Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus October 19 2011 Aluminum Block Analyses.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads Friction Tests Collar Shear Tests NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03 Michael Kalish.
Advertisements

Second Peer Review for New MGI Valves for NSTX-U (Update on Valve Testing) R. Raman, et al. October 29,
Summary of Twisted Racetrack / Clamp Analysis K. D. Freudenberg.
N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
NSTX outer TF leg analysis (with diamonds not uniformly distributed) *Full 360º model *Al blocks connected to springs to simulate umbrella structure (stiffness.
October 21, 2003LST Mechanical Design Review - SLACN. Yu BaBar IFR Upgrades An FEA Study of the Effects of Adding Brass Plates in the IFR.
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 4/10/03.
Analysis of Basic Load Cases Axial Stress
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
SQXF Shell & Yoke Assembly Procedure
What is good for small mechanisms is very good for very big ones. Above is the major reciprocating parts of a rally engine. At top right is the force applied.
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
NSTX CSU Preliminary Assessment of PFCs Art Brooks December 8,
KDEMO Structural Analysis P. Titus June ! KDEMO coil axisymmetric analysis pfcb 21 1, 1.52,0.70,.9,1.3,8,10 !CS1 2, 1.52,2.10,.9,1.3,8,10 !CS2.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus February 24, 2010 PF3 Dome Bracket 1/8 inch Weld Stress PF4,5 Stress with 6 Support.
NSTXU-CALC Vessel Port Rework for NB and Thomson Scattering
NSTXU-CALC TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd TUTORIAL-1 : STRESS & STRAIN 1 PROBLEM-1 The hanger assembly is used to support a distributed loading of w=16kN/m.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 17, 2007 T. Brown.
In-Vessel Coil System Conceptual Design Review – September, Vertical Stability Coil Structural Analyses P. Titus, July
Shear Stress in Beams ( )
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Stress Analysis FDR Fred Dahlgren 17 May 2004.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus January 27, 2010 Umbrella Leg Sliding Blocks TF OOP Support to the Vessel Seismic (Static.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus/EA Branch November 17, 2010 Lid/Cover/Flex Aluminum Block Bolting Stress And Stresses.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Cooldown and Modular Coil EM Loads Part 2 – Results of Clamp Assembly, Wing Bags, Poloidal.
Results of Linear Stress Analyses for Modular Coils and Coil structure For 2T High Beta Currents at 0 Seconds and Initial Coil Shrinkage of in/in.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus April 14, 2010 PF4/5 Terminal Stress Existing PF4/5 Support Weld Algorythm Moment Influence.
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus/EA Branch February Global Model Update Status P4 Quench Vessel/Bellows Analysis.
Update: TF Outer Ring and Clevis Design TF Outer Ring – Implemented recommendations from P. Rogoff. Modified Bolted Joint. Modified weldment to reduce.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
BoltJoin ppt P. Rogoff 3/24/2011. NSTX Supported by P. R. 3/9/2011 Update Ring Bolted Joint Design and Recommend the Joint Geometry using bolts.
NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus March Insulation Short Beam Tests – Failure Modes Ripple Loads on PF PF4/5.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
Andrew Biehl.  The objective of this project is to develop a method for determining the nut factor of a bolted joint using the finite element method.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
Twisted Racetrack Revisited Model Changes: Side A has 10 turns Clamps have been modified to as built geometry. Property Changes (linear results.
Analysis of TF Load Paths and Vacuum Vessel Loading H. M. Fan Jan. 22, 2009.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus March F.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus Feb 3, 2010 Dome Rib Tab Weld Stress Removing TF OOP Support to the Vessel.
NSTX TF outer leg analysis Because the stress on umbrella structure is too high, there are some ideas to reduce it, like adding a case to enhance the stiffness.
1 Long QXF Mirror Fabrication (MQXFPM1) Rodger Bossert HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 18-20, 2016 SLAC R. Bossert - HiLumi Collaboration Meeting.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting
PRESSURE VESSEL. 1.Determine the bursting steam pressure of a steel shell with diameter of 10 inches and made of ¼ in thick steel plate. The joint efficiency.
Dr. Baljeet Singh Department of Mathematics
Status of the PANDA Magnet mechanics (yoke & cryostat)
MEC201 Mechanics of Solids
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
SQXF Mirror QXFSM1 Strain Gauges
Ch. 2: Fundamental of Structure
Stress Analysis on SunSiphon Rack Design
Cartesian Vectors In right-handed Cartesian coordinated system, the right thumb points in the positive z direction when the right hand figures are curled.
Cartesian Vectors In right-handed Cartesian coordinated system, the right thumb points in the positive z direction when the right hand figures are curled.
Cartesian Vectors In right-handed Cartesian coordinated system, the right thumb points in the positive z direction when the right hand figures are curled.
Symbols for the Type of Welds.
Cartesian Vectors In right-handed Cartesian coordinated system, the right thumb points in the positive z direction when the right hand figures are curled.
4. Rigid body Equilibrium
Shipping Support Post Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus October Aluminum Block Analyses

x z x y coordinate system 200 (Cartesian) Top view Load in Aluminum block (in coordinate system 200) FX = N FY = N FZ = N MX = N-m MY = N-m MZ = N-m FradialFverticalFtheta Han's Early Loads kN10-44 kN kN Titus (This Calc), Scenario kN-25.5 kN184.8* Sri's 2009 Calc256.3 kN21.3 TFInPlane= TFInPlane=TFInPlane*.2248 TFInPlaney= TFInPlaney=tfinplaney*.2248 momy= !N-M momy=momy*.2248*39.37 TFOOPForce= *.2248 * this is 168*1.1 intended to apply the 10% headroom in PF current The 6 3/4 bolts should be preloaded to a minimum of 92 ft-lbs or 7375 lbs each to avoid cyclic loading. This produces a frictional restraint of 6*7373*.3 = lbs or N frictional restraint. Not enough to support the 184.8kN FX = N FY = N FZ = N MX = 0 N-m MY = 0 N-m MZ = N-m Han EQ 16 Ball End Struts, Welded Clevis Titus Calc, EQ 79 Spring Struts, Bolted Clevis Hand Calc **** SUMMATION OF TOTAL FORCES AND MOMENTS IN COORDINATE SYSTEM 5 NOTE: THE SUM IS DONE IN COORDINATE SYSTEM 5 FX = FY = FZ = MX = MY = MZ = SUMMATION POINT= Titus Calc, EQ79 Ball End Struts, Welded Clevis Vector Sum of FX and FZ 204,600N 193,377N243,340N Mz at Alum Block N-m 9598 N-m N-m My at Alum Block N-m 32135N-m0

1.09m *** SUMMATION OF TOTAL FORCES AND MOMENTS IN COORDINATE SYSTEM 5 NOTE: THE SUM IS DONE IN COORDINATE SYSTEM 5 FX = FY = FZ = MX = MY = MZ = SUMMATION POINT= EQ79

~1T Average Field Across Leg=.5T 130*3kA ~.5m 130kA*.5m*.5T = N Load Inventory from Inside the Umbrella Structure

Bursting force from the inner TF components is the source of the radial finger loads. These are included in the loads from [1], [2]

Aluminum Block Tresca EQ #79 With PlasmaNo Plasma

Split Desired for Installation Can we get rid of this notch? Analyzed to date All the Block Clamp Bolts Pass Thru “Wing” CDR/PDR

Mat 1 Mat 5 Mat 40 Mat 5 Mat 2 Mat 10 Mat 11 Mat 14 Mat 15

Gaps Under the Bolt Heads –Used for Preload Gaps Between “Wing” and Umbrella Shell Gaps Between Block Flange and Umbrella Shell Gaps Between Block and Umbrella Shell Opening Gaps Between Block and Umbrella Shell Opening Gaps Between Block Flange and Umbrella Shell Gaps Under the Bolt Heads –Used for Preload Gap Elements Used in the Model

304 Bar Stock Yield and 1.5 Sm is 33.6ksi

25ksi Bolt Preload Run ablk12 Weld Allowable 14 ksi No PT 20 ksi with PT FEA simulates 3/8 Groove backed with a 3/8 Fillet

25ksi Bolt Preload Preload Only Full Loading

Local Model EQ79 Global Model [2] EQ79 (25670 psi) Stress in Pascal Stress in psi Bending allowable is 34.6 ksi.

1.87 mm Vertical Displacement with respect to the block 1.48 mm Vertical Displacement with respect to the block 0.5 mm Theta Displacement with respect to the block The differential motion in the theta Direction with respect to the block is = Global rotation needs to be subtracted –see below In the global model the umbrella structure rotates / = rad and the global displacement difference just from the global rotation is 1.57/1.0624* =.00187m and the difference is = m or.6mm. The comparison is then =.9mm vs.5 mm for the local model.