Consequences of Aluminum or Ferrous Sulfate Amended Poultry Litter on Concentrations of Aluminum in Plant and Soil Sosten Lungu, Haile Tewolde and Dennis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Study Water Surface – Dirt Minerals Organic materials (any once living thing now decomposed Fertilizer Chemicals Anything spilled Ground – aquifers.
Advertisements

Influence of Roadside Establishment Practices on Sediment and Nutrient Loss Kyle R. Briscoe G. Munshaw, J.J. Varco, B.R. Stewart Plant and Soil Sciences.
Soils.
Manure Spreading and Its Effects on Soil Compaction and Corn Yield in Southern Wisconsin Gregg Sanford 1,Joshua Posner 1,Janet Hedtcke 1,Ron Schuler 2,
REDUCTION OF WATER SOLUBLE PHOSPHORUS IN POULTRY LITTER USING INDUSTRIAL CO-PRODUCTS Dr. Gary Felton, Kristen Hughes, University of Maryland, Biological.
Interaction of Phosphorus and Dissolved Organic Carbon in Runoff and Drainage Water Ronnie Schnell 1, Donald Vietor 1, Clyde L. Munster 2, Tony Provin.
Manure Issues & The Texas Fertilizer Law R. D. Hoestenbach, Jr. ASFFPCO June 22-25, 2003 Fort Worth, Texas.
Short Term Effectiveness of Poultry Litter as a Fertilizer for Newly Established Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Allan Pringle and Kenneth Farrish Division.
Soil and Water Quality with Miscanthus on a Louisiana Coastal Plain Hillside L. Gaston and W. Felicien LSU AgCenter School of Plant, Environmental and.
Waste Handling for Poultry Production Lori Marsh, Associate Professor, Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech.
Comparative DNA Analysis of Soils Treated with Pesticides and Poultry Litter This research determines the DNA profiles of soil samples collected from agricultural.
Mineralization of high-N organic fertilizers L. Sonon, D. Kissel, U. Saha, and SPW Lab Staff Agricultural and Environmental Services Labs. University of.
P-saturated Ochre: Performance as a Fertiliser and Environmental Acceptability K.E. Dobbie, K.V. Heal and K.A. Smith School of GeoSciences, University.
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is estimated to be 33% throughout the world, and can be lower in single, pre-plant applications compared with split nitrogen.
Agriscience Unit 18: Plant Growth Soil or growing media pH Proper soil or growing media pH will have the most impact on the availability of nutrients.
HP-HG exhibits higher P concentrations in all fractions NaHCO 3 pool exhibits slightly different trends, with LP-HG having significantly higher P concentrations.
SOIL CHEMISTRY SOIL pH A measure of the degree to which the soil is Acidic or Basic; also known as... Soil Reaction.
Hailin Zhang Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Soil Physical and Chemical Quality and Management in Organic Production.
Soil Acidity and pH Causes, remediation, and measurement.
Soil Reactions Acidity and Alkalinity Topic # 2056 Matt Jakubik.
Soil pH vs. Nutrients  By: Becky McGuire.
An Introduction to Acid Mine Drainage by George Mitchell and Tim Craddock.
3. Soil pH.
Canopy Cultural Practices to Reduce Thatch in Ultradwarf Bermudagrass Putting Greens S.L. Freshour, J.M. Kauffman, J.C. Sorochan, and J.T. Brosnan Dept.
Soil Composition 1/13/12. What determines characteristics of soil? Physical (such as water) Parent material (chemical make-up) Life (biological activity)
Wheat losses attributed to PM can reach 40% by affecting grain fill, root growth, and reducing test weights 1,2,3. At expected yield losses greater than.
Introduction Agriculture is a large contributor of non-point source pollution to surface water. Field surface application of manure as a soil amendment.
Revision Exercises Soil. Name the three different types of parent rock? Give examples of each type of rock How is each rock type formed? What is meant.
Chapter 7 Weathering and Soil
Agriscience, Unit 18 worksheet
Residuals and Manure Management for Environmental and Agronomic Benefits Olawale O. Oladeji Soil and Water Science Department University of Florida.
The Effects of Topdressing Organic Nitrogen on Hard Red Winter Wheat - Year 2 Name: Erica Cummings Date: March 15, 2012 Title: Crops and Soils Technician.
Soil Nutrient Accumulation in an Orchardgrass Hayfield following Poultry Litter Application R.A. Gilfillen 1 *, B.B. Sleugh 2, W.T. Willian 1, and M.L.
Effects of various soil amendments on soil test P values David Brauer, Glen Aiken, Dan Pote ARS/USDA, Booneville AR S.J. Livingston, L.D. Norton ARS/USDA,
Adjusting N:P ratios in liquid dairy manure through nitrification and chemical phosphorus removal to match crop fertilizer requirements Background Nutrient.
An important product of Weathering.
The carbon cycle Trace the pathways through which carbon is released and absorbed in the diagram below:
Soil Nitrogen Unit: Soil Science.
Drainage Management for Water Quality and Crop Production Benefits Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL.
College Station July 2006 College Station October 2006 Evaluation of Soil from Selected Sites for Suppressiveness against the Reniform Nematode A.F. Robinson.
NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.
Savoy,*H.J. 1, Leib, B. 1, and Joines, D. 2 1 Associate Professors, University of Tennessee, Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, Extension 2. Manager,
Inhibition of Phymatotrichopsis omnivora (Cotton Root Rot) Germination and Growth in Soil following Application of Various Oilseed Meals Ping Hu 1, Autumn.
INFLUENCE OF AERATION IMPLEMENTS, AMENDMENT AND SOIL TAXA ON PHOSPHORUS LOSSES IN GRASSLANDS D.H. Franklin, D.M. Butler and M.L. Cabrera.
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
EVALUATION OF LAMBDA STAR IN THE CONTROL OF APHIDS ON KALE. BY JOSPHINE W. NJOGU REG NO.A138/10309/2007.
I.A. Zasada 1, J.E. Weiland 1 and LisiGlobal 2 1 USDA-ARS Horticultural Crops Research Unit, 3420 NW Orchard Avenue, Corvallis, OR 97330, 2 Richland, WA.
Soil nutrient dynamics and rye cover crop efficacy to remediate nutrient accumulation in broiler litter amended soils Annesly Netthisinghe, Becky Gilfillen,
 Salinity: Salinity is the concentration of dissolved salts in the water and is an important element of a  habitat. Aquatic animals are adapted to living.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Alum Effects on Phosphorus Runoff Loss from Turfgrass Amended with Biosolids R.W. Schnell, D.M. Vietor, C.L. Munster, T.L. Provin, and R.H. White, Texas.
Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Photo :Tom van Cakenberghe/IWMI Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Water for a food-secure world W. Mekuria, A. Noble, C.T.
Results & Discussion Phosphorus Mobility from Organic and Inorganic Soil Amendments: Rainfall Simulation Studies T.J. Rew, D.A. Graetz, M.S. Josan*, V.D.
Effect of Gypsum Alone, or Combined with Compost and Cover Crops, on Sweet Corn Quality and Yield Marcia Jn-Baptiste and Darryl Warncke Department of Crop.
Influence of Nitrogen Sources and Soil pH on Soil Microbial Communities in a Long-term Crop Rotation System Reji Mathew, Yucheng Feng, and Charles Mitchell.
The Effects of Slash Pile Burning Britt Johnson, Dale Jo Department of Natural Resources and Environm ABSTRACT When slash piles are used as a prescribed.
Microbial Community Analysis in Monosodium-methanearsonate Treated Rice Soils Anil Somenahally 1, Terry Gentry 1, Richard Loeppert 1 and Wengui Yan 2 1.
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand, 73140
Soil Change after Three Decades of Conventional Till, No-Till, and Forest Succession in the Piedmont of Georgia, USA S. Devine1, D. Markewitz1, P. Hendrix2,3,
Results Objective Assess the effects of metal interactions on trace metal uptake by plant Evaluate the effects of plant uptake process on the distribution.
Fungal and Bacterial Dynamics in the Lettuce Rhizosphere Responding to Successive Additions of Cd and Zn. A. M. I. D. Amarakoon * and R. M. C. P. Rajapaksha.
Evaluation of N-stabilizers in Enhancing NUE of Animal Manures
EFFECT OF ABATTOIR WASTES ON THE PHYSICO- CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF TWO SOIL TYPES IN ENUGU STATE NIGERIA EDEH, I.G. AND IGWE, C.A. UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA,
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Effects of organic materials on soil properties, growth and yield of honeydew melon (Cucumis melo L. inodorus) Nguyen Van Tam, Ph.D Thai Nguyen University.
C.C. Mitchell*, D.P. Delaney (Auburn Univ.) & K.S. Balkcom (USDA-ARS)
Validating the effects of Plant Catalyst in Fertilizer Reduction on Yield and Quality of Burley Tobacco and Maize in Malawi.
Presentation transcript:

Consequences of Aluminum or Ferrous Sulfate Amended Poultry Litter on Concentrations of Aluminum in Plant and Soil Sosten Lungu, Haile Tewolde and Dennis E. Rowe USDA-ARS, Waste Management and Forage Unit, Mississippi State, MS Abstract Amending poultry litter with aluminum sulfate (alum) reduces phosphorous (P) runoff and ammonia volatilization but its effects on soil pH are not completely researched. Greenhouse pot experiments with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and soybean (Glycine max. L. Merr) as test crops were conducted with a sandy loam (Fine-loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Typic Paleudults) soil, that was adjusted to pH’s of 4.5, 5.0, 5.5 and 6.5 using fine Ca(OH)2. The objective was to determine if poultry litter amended with aluminum sulfate (alum) or ferrous sulfate at 0, 10% and 20% by weight affected soil pH, soil exchangeable aluminum and plant aluminum concentration when applied to meet N requirement of the crop. Application of non-amended litter and litter amended with 10% alum increased soil pH on all treatments. Application of litter amended with alum or ferrous sulfate at 20% reduced soil pH and increased soil exchangeable Al extracted with 0.01M CaCl 2. The increase in soil exchangeable Al and reduction in soil pH were greater for soils with pH of 4.5 and 5.0 than for soils with higher pH. Amendments significantly increased shoot Al concentration for plants grown in soil with pH of 4.5 and 5.0. The application of alum or ferrous sulfate at higher rates to soils with pH less than 5.5 has detrimental effects on the soil and plant and is of environmental concern. Introduction Long-term amendments of agricultural land with poultry manure based on N requirement of the crop have resulted in P retention in soils. The sole environmental effect of P is its role in the eutrophication of surface waters (Sims and Wolf, 1994). On site poultry litter management using chemicals amendments have been evaluated to reduce P release from soil and ammonia volatilization (Moore and Miller, 1994). Aluminum sulfate (alum) has been shown to be economically viable for reducing P and ammonia volatilization. Concerns have been raised that long term application of poultry litter amended with alum may lead to more available aluminum in soils than present levels. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of alum amended litter on soil pH, soil extractable aluminum and aluminum uptake by plants.  Soil pH significantly increased with application of poultry litter alone.  There was a modest increase in soil pH with application of poultry litter amended with alum or ferrous sulfate at 10% by weight but was significantly lower than poultry litter alone.  There is a reduction in soil pH when fertilized with alum or ferrous sulfate treated litter at 20% by weight.  Soil extractable Al significantly increased in soils fertilized with poultry litter treated with alum or ferrous sulfate at 20% rate with initial soil pH of 4.5 and 5.0.  The lowest amounts of extractable Al was with poultry litter alone although it was not statistically different from litter amended with alum or ferrous at 10% rate.  Plant aluminum uptake was also significantly higher in soils fertilized with litter at 20% of alum or ferrous at pH below 5.0.  Litter amended with alum or ferrous sulfate at 20% had significantly lower dry weights at pH of 4.5 and 5.  These results indicate that higher amendments chemical amendments rates with poultry litter may not be desired to the plant and soil particularly at soil pH of below 5.0.  There was an increase in total aluminum with alum amended litter and this may be of concern in the longer term. c c c a a Fig.4. Effect of soil pH and repeated application of poultry litter amended with alum sulfate at 0, 10, and 20% weight rate on plant tissue Al concentration. Fig.5. Effect of soil pH and repeated application of poultry litter amended with iron sulfate at 0, 10, and 20% weight rate on plant tissue Al concentration. Fig.1. Relationship between extractable aluminum and soil pH in soils consecutively fertilized with poultry litter treated with alum at 0, 10 and 20% by weight. Fig.2. Relationship between extractable aluminum and soil pH in soils consecutively fertilized with poultry litter treated with iron sulfate at 0, 10 and 20% by weight. Fig.3. Effect of poultry litter treated with alum or iron sulfate at 0, 10 and 20% weight rates on soil pH. Same letters are not significantly different (p<0.05) in each cropping cycle Results Materials and Methods The research was conducted in a greenhouse at the Crop Science Research Laboratory of the USDA-ARS at Mississippi State, MS in a Ruston soil collected from Mississippi Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES), Newton, Mississippi. The soil was collected from the upper 0.20 m soil profile of a site that was cropped with Coastal bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). The soil was a fine sandy loam (Fine- loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Typic Paleudults) and consist of well-drained medium acid to very strong acid soils. The site where the soil was collected has no known history of poultry litter application. The treatments included initial soil pH of 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, and 6.5 in a full factorial combination with five poultry litter treatments in a randomized complete block design replicated 7 times. The five litter treatments were (1) Poultry litter alone; (2) Poultry litter + 10% (w/w) alum; (3) Poultry litter + 20% (w/w) alum; (4) Poultry litter + 10% (w/w) Iron Sulfate, and (5) Poultry litter + 20% (w/w) Iron Sulfate. b a c b b c a a a b b b b b b b c c c c c c