1 Funding Oregon’s Groundwater Protection Program A fee proposal for UICs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE EXPANDING ROLE of RECYCLED WATER The Need, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness Make Recycled Water an Increasingly Valued Resource Harry Ehrlich, SDA Principal.
Advertisements

Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
United States Environmental Protection Agency Idaho Traveling Inspector Program Region 10 State-EPA Symposium on Environmental Innovation and Results Denver.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Nancy Kraushaar, P.E., City Engineer/PW Director December 12, 2011.
District of Columbia Stormwater Fees October 27, 2008 Apartment and Office Building Association of Metropolitan Washington Brendan Shane DDOE Office of.
Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
1 Air Management Programs Legislative Audit Bureau May 2004.
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Texas Underground Injection Control Program 2015
1 CITY OF LOS ANGELES BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LEA/CIWMB ANNUAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 1-3, 2006 MONTEREY, CA Diane Gilbert Jones.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
1 Food and Dairy Safety Program Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Legislative Audit Bureau July 2008.
1 Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Rules.
Collaboration Nation: Piloting EPA’s Small Local Governments Compliance Assistance Policy Ken Harmon, Attorney Office of Compliance U.S. Environmental.
EPA Small Business Ombudsman (OSDBU) Opening Doors for America’s Small Businesses Program Overview of the 1.
STRONGER State Review Process Presentation to the EPA May 2005 Lori Wrotenbery.
Crafting Stormwater Programs Oregon Coastal Planners Fall Network Meeting October 9, 2008 Florence Event Center Alissa Maxwell, PE.
Failing Septic Systems: Problems and Solutions Protect Our Waters 2003 Legislative Session Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Environmental.
Permits to Take Water: What you need to know.
Colorado’s Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring and Protecting Groundwater During Oil and Gas Development Natural Resources Law Center Intermountain.
Consideration of Michigan Pursuing an NRC Agreement A Discussion with Stakeholders March 2, 2007.
Oregon’s Statewide Land Use Planning Program A Framework for Community Decisions Richard Whitman – Director Oregon Department of Land Conservation and.
1 Small Community Environmental Compliance Assistance Project May 8, 2007 Arizona’s.
How 1041 Regulations are Impacting Geothermal Development A discussion of how counties are applying 1041 regulations to geothermal development and the.
Developing Green Stormwater Design Solutions For UIC Compliance Presented by: Adam Zucker PE, CWRE 819 SE Morrison Street ● Suite 310 ● Portland, Oregon.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Tap Water * EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) * Department of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) * The local utility (city/municipal district) Bottled Water.
Title V: The Big Picture
Agency Coordination: Fraser River Estuary Management Program [FREMP] Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference 3 April 2003 Vancouver,
Since 1997, directly assisted over 30 local agencies through an EMS training program.
Source Water Collaborative Online Partnership Tool 1 Collaboration Toolkit: Protecting Drinking Water Sources through Agricultural Conservation Practices.
WATER QUALITY TOPICS ENFORCEMENT – ARE FINES BECOMING A WAY OF LIFE AT THE DEQ By:Donald D. Maisch Supervising Attorney, Water Quality Division Office.
Future Directions* *As I See It Mark Robertson Federal Facilities Program Manager EPA Region 4 (Southeast) June 14, 2007.
Centre Region Council of Governments. 150 Square Miles 83,000 Population *Includes Students.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FY Budget Worksession July 11, 2011.
STAKEHOLDER CALL/MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE INPUT ON ZEV INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD March 7,
Environmental Fees January 2007 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP IDEM Commissioner.
Consideration of Michigan Pursuing an NRC Agreement A Discussion with Licensees and Stakeholders August 8, 2007.
SOLID WASTE REGIONALIZATION MONTANA’S JOURNEY Waste & Underground Tanks Management Bureau Solid Waste Section.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Proposed Municipal Fee Amendments. Proposed Changes Allow the $0.15/month/ERU increase by the fiscal growth factor (FGF) Add a surcharge to domestic wastewater.
1 Update on Efforts to Reduce Emissions and Risks at High Risk Railyards February 25, 2010 BNSF San Bernardino California Environmental Protection Agency.
Voluntary Standards and Government: Working Together A Positive Collaboration Benefits Both the Public and Private Sectors Presentation by Mary C. McKiel,
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
Safe Water Drinking Act (SWDA) Originally passed: 1974 Amended: 1986 and 1996 National Act.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
UTILITY PARTNERSHIP CITY OF STOCKTON & OMI / THAMES WATER SERVICE CONTRACT.
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District DRAFT Water Resource Management Plan Review
TCEQ Helps Compliance and Assistance Programs
Drinking Water Source Protection Action Kit
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Watershed Section Funding
Florida and Reclaimed Water
Presented by Michael Johnson Director of Public Health
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Finance Options: Funding Water Infrastructure Projects George Bryan South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control State Revolving Fund.
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Source Water Collaboration Toolkit
WATER RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE Programs & FUNDING IN KANSAS
DOING MORE WITH LESS Shellie Chard-McClary
Overview of Source Protection
Staff Advisory Team Meeting #5 October 18, 2018
Texas Underground Injection Control Program 2019
Presentation transcript:

1 Funding Oregon’s Groundwater Protection Program A fee proposal for UICs

2 An Important Issue Protection of Oregon’s drinking water Almost half of Oregonians (1.4 million people) are dependent on groundwater for daily water 77 percent at least partially dependent on groundwater Underground Injection Control devices (UICs) are a potential threat to drinking water Oregon needs to fund and retain its own administration of UIC regulations

3 What’s a UIC? A device that transfers liquid below ground Historically they include… Dry Wells, Cesspools, Drill Holes, Floor Drains Used for stormwater and wastewater They are used routinely in development

4 What are the Issues? Inadequate funding source High level of growth and development Causing an increased program workload Insufficient local resources and technical assistance

5 Issues continued… State program relinquishment to EPA: Loss of state protection of Oregon’s groundwater Loss of local knowledge and understanding of UIC issues Loss of understanding of regional geology Loss of support to development community No development of program guidance for agencies and developers

6 What are the options? Return program to EPA EPA likely will rely on an enforcement approach Developers and municipalities at risk Both State and Federal rules remain in place Little/no technical assistance to development community Less protection for Oregon groundwater

7 Options continued… Request general fund allocation Still possible Develop fee proposal Proposed action

8 Benefits of UIC Fees For All State protection of Oregon’s groundwater Drinking water source For the Development Community Improved technical assistance & guidance Shorter development review time Reduced risk Greater certainty

9 Benefits continued… For Municipalities & Districts Improved DEQ rules Improved technical assistance & guidance Permits issuance Shorter development review time Greater certainty Reduced risk Ability to promote ‘green’ stormwater technologies Ability to consider innovative technologies for treated wastewater effluent

10 Goals of UIC Fee Table Simple Fair Easy to administer

11 Fee Table Proposal Classifications Simple, Moderate, Complex Fee types Registration Annual compliance fee if annual actions required Fee Categories Rule authorized (new fee) Permits (existing fee)

12 Proposed New Fees Simple $100 per UIC No annual compliance fee Moderate (small parking lots, <1000 TPD, etc.) $125 per UIC No annual compliance fee Complex (large parking lots, >1000 TPD geothermal, etc.) $300 per UIC for large parking lots $10,000 per UIC for large energy-producing geothermal Annual compliance fee of $100 - $200 per UIC per year

13 DEQ Staffing Structure 6.75 FTEs 1 policy FTE at headquarters (NRS4) existing 0.8 FTE from federal funds 1 senior hydrogeologist FTE (NRS4) 3 regional hydrogeologists FTE (NRS3) Portland, Eugene, Bend 1 FTE administrative support (AS1) 0.5 FTE enforcement staff (ELS) 0.25 Management oversight $620,000 per year

14 Groundwater Protection Coalition Objective Adoption of the proposed Fee Structure by Legislature Participation Redmond, Bend, Portland, Gresham, Multnomah County, Eugene, Milwaukie, Trimet, Clackamas County Participated in fee structure development

15 GPC Next Steps Coordinated representation in Salem Legislative outreach UIC Day Testimony from stakeholders Stakeholder Outreach and Support Development community, environmental community, HBA, LOC, AOC, ODOT, Big Box Retailers Letters of Support

16 Summary Proposal adequately funds state UIC program administration State protection of Oregon’s groundwater Improved level of service to development and municipal communities Asking for your letter of support