Response to WRAP Air Managers Committee Memo “Request for Cost Estimates” April 6, 2009 WESTAR Council.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Advertisements

Attribution of Haze Workgroup & Technical Support System Report Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting July
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
WRAP Strategic Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT February 20, 2008.
Developing a Workplan for Implementing the Strategic Plan for the WRAP Board October 1, 2008.
WRAP Activities Overview August 31, 2009 Fire Emissions Tracking System Project Meeting.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum –Section 308 Strategies for Fire Coordinating efforts of states changing or developing smoke management strategies for regional.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Ozone and Nitrogen Concerns in NM WRAP Ozone and NOx in the West November 11, 2009.
Regional Issues Facing Colorado and Other Western States WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Denver, Colorado March 30, 2010 Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado.
IS THERE LIFE AFTER 2007?. WHERE DO TRIBES WANT TO GO WITH THE WRAP?
The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy and Network Design Westar Spring 2007 Business Meeting April 4, 2007 Bruce Louks, Idaho Department of Environmental.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
October 29, 2012 Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association WESTAR Council Meeting.
Stationary Sources Joint Forum Update Eric Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Lee Alter and Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association.
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
SIP Improvement: Current initiatives Anna Marie Wood Director Air Quality Policy Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA WESTAR.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
Resources and needs for technical support in a Workplan WESTAR-WRAP Working Group June 14, 2007 Tom Moore, WRAP Technical Coordinator.
Conceptual Description – Next Generation of Regional Modeling & Analysis Center Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling Studies July 30,
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality WRAP Technical Analysis.
WRAP Work Activities: September 30, 2008.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
2005 WRAP Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
WESTAR Staff Reports 2015 Fall Business Meeting Scottsdale, Arizona.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Introduction to the the RMC Source Apportionment Modeling Effort Gail Tonnesen,
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
May 23, 2013 Don Arkell WESTAR Staff WESTAR Council Meeting Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association.
WESTAR Regional Haze 2018 SIP Planning Karin Landsberg Alaska DEC, Air Quality November 2013.
Attribution of Haze Project Inter-RPO Modeling Discussion Group May 25-26, 2004 Denver, CO.
Status of WRAP Work Plan Tom Moore, WRAP September 19, 2002 WESTAR Fall Technical Conference.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
WRAP Activities Overview §308 Technical Work Outline June 3, 2003.
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
April 17, 2012 Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association WESTAR Council Meeting.
Air Managers and State Caucus support  State Caucus – IWG feedback on Questions  Tribal Caucus Liaison WRAP Workgroups-Ad Hoc  Attribution of Haze 
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
WESTAR Staff Reports Technical Coordinator Regional Haze Planning Training.
WESTAR Staff Reports  Technical Coordinator Report  Regional Haze Planning Report  Training Program Report.
Visibility Coordinator Regional Haze
WESTAR Planning Committee
WRAP Charter Revisions, Board of Directors and Funding
Arizona Regional Haze State Implementation Plan
WRAP Workplan WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations and Action Items
Upcoming projects* to support Regional Haze SIP/TIP planning
Western Regional Air Partnership 2003 Technical Workplan Elements
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
WRAP Regional Haze Grant Status, Technical Project Priorities, & Proposed Technical Analysis Forum Tom Moore WRAP Technical Coordinator Attribution.
WESTAR Planning Committee Report
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Attribution of Haze Workgroup Organizational Meeting
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
Workshop on Monitoring & Data for Regional Analysis
WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations
Attribution of Haze Project Report
Fire Emissions Joint Forum February 9, 2005
WESTAR Staff Reports Technical Coordinator Report
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Presentation transcript:

Response to WRAP Air Managers Committee Memo “Request for Cost Estimates” April 6, 2009 WESTAR Council

Purpose of AMC memo (November 25, 2008) 1)Understand the funding needed to maintain the most critical ongoing systems for implementation of regional haze requirements; 2)Understand what additional funding would be needed to conduct periodic monitoring, emissions, modeling and other analyses required by the regional haze rule; and 3)Estimate costs to carry out additional regional technical analyses or assessments, assuming that full funding is provided for items 1) and 2).

Color-coding for funding categories in AMC Memo Base 1 Funding for Operation and Maintenance of Critical Systems Base 2 Funding for Regional Haze – Periodic Assessments Additional Funding for Other Regional Technical Analyses  Assumes Base 1 + Base 2 funding

Scope of “Other Regional Technical Analyses” Multi-state or regional-scale analyses Ozone, e.g., inventory development and refinement for ozone precursors, monitoring data analysis and gap assessment, air quality modeling, etc. Mercury (Hg), e.g., Hg emissions inventory development and refinement, monitoring data analysis and gap assessment, necessary fate and transport analyses, etc. Ammonia/Nitrogen (deposition) modeling and analysis, e.g., emissions inventory development and refinement, monitoring data analysis and gap assessment, necessary fate and transport information, etc.

Schedule and Process December ’08 - January ‘09 From AMC memo, Technical Oversight Committee reviewed: – Workplan document format and level of detail –List of proposed projects by Forum and WorkGroup January - February ‘09: Multiple calls of each Forum and WorkGroup to review drafts of proposed projects and costs –Sent to hundreds across all Forum and WorkGroup distribution lists –Reviewed by dozens of participants in each Forum and WorkGroup call

Schedule and Process, continued March 11-12: TOC-hosted Workplan Review meeting  30+ participants March 31 st - Final Draft Workplan released April 6-8: Review at WESTAR Meeting April 20 th - Review on Air Managers Committee call (100 PM Mountain time) WRAP Board call

Results Workplan covers technical work needed for –Maintenance/needed development of technical systems –Regional haze implementation for required 2012 SIP check-in analyses, sets stage for 2018 SIPs –Leverages regional haze work for other air quality technical analyses and planning for Ozone and PM NAAQS, Nitrogen and Mercury deposition –Supports and enables regional and national air quality projects with extramural funding

Examples of Results for States to Use #1 Low-cost/maximum utility for RHR implementation –EDMS operations, trends from RHR 2002 base year + EDMS-based portal for air quality planners - cross- referencing state, tribal, local, and national control effectiveness to historic and projected future emissions $115,000/year –Oil & Gas emissions tracking tools + control analyses $85,000 in 2010, $25,000 in 2011 –Implementation WG: “Area of Influence” analysis + controls/costs for “sources beyond BART” $75,000 in 2010, $125,000 in 2011 –Fire emissions tracking + emissions averted by smoke management $125,000 in 2010, $150,000 in 2011

Examples of Results for States to Use #2 Medium-cost & high utility for both RHR implementation & Additional Technical Analyses –VIEWS operations for RHR, add Ozone, PM, Nitrogen, Mercury data, & trends from RHR baseline + “what if emissions or air quality changes upwind” tools $300,000 in 2010, $225,000 in 2011 –Coordinated monitoring plan, methods, & data $175,000/year –New base & revised projection years’ emission inventories for 2012/13 planning milestones $450,000 in 2010, $400,000 in 2011 –Improve mobile sources emissions estimates for O&G basins $175,000

Examples of Results for States to Use #3 High-cost & regionally complete, optimized utility, & application for RHR implementation & Additional Technical Analyses –Next generation of Regional Modeling Center – emissions, meteorology, air quality, & source apportionment results for RHR, Ozone, PM, Nitrogen & Mercury delivered via tools on the VIEWS/TSS (for 2012/13 planning milestones) $1.35 million/year –Staff, travel & meetings, overhead, et cetera $655,000/year

Cost Estimates Base I Annual Funding – On-going System Maintenance and Operation $335,000 Base II Annual Funding, Regional Haze – Periodic Assessments $3,090,000$2,900,000 Regional Haze Subtotal $3,425,000$3,235,000 Additional Regional Technical Assessments, assuming full funding is provided for Base 1 & Base 2) a.Ozone Annual Funding $1,065,000$965,000 a.Mercury Annual Funding 50,000 a.NOx/Nitrate/Nitrogen Annual FundingIncl. in Ozone Additional Regional Technical Assessments subtotal $1,115,000$1,015,000 Regional Haze + Additional Technical Assessments total $4,540,000$4,250,000

Thanks for your attention -