Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
Advertisements

Transportation Planning Board September 15, 2004 Transportation Planning Board September 15, 2004 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Richard.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
Public transit in Indiana – the path forward November 2012.
THE PRESIDENT’S FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET REQUEST Federal Transit Administration.
Security of Public Transport in the United States Chief Michael Taborn Metro Transit Police Department January 28, 2011 Metro Transit Police Department.
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS SYSTEM PLAN 2040
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
BART Briefing for Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force April 30, 2013.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Planning & Implementing Transportation Alternatives for Energy Efficiency and the Future Is Now Foundation October 4, 2011 Debbie Griner, Environmental.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Montgomery County Maryland I-270 Integrated Corridor Management Project Tom Jacobs, University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology.
Transit Alliance 4 Founded in Coalition of 39 groups 4 Local governments 4 Business organizations 4 Community groups.
1 Presented by Tom Harrington WMATA Office of Long-Range Planning TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Future Metrorail Capacity Needs.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Transportation leadership you can trust. prepared for National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board presented by Arlee Reno, Cambridge Systematics.
Structure of Presentation Federal Requirement Methodology WMATA Expenditures and Core Capacity Constraint Draft Revenues and Expenditures for 2015 – 2040.
1 Governance Council Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR December 18, 2003.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Wake County Transit Plan Choose how you move! December 7, 2011 Capital Area Friends of Transit 1.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
Prepared for Transportation Planning Board presented by Arlee Reno Cambridge Systematics, Inc. in cooperation with K.T. Analytics November 16, 2005 Status.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study TPB Citizens Advisory Committee Public Forum in Oxon.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
1 MetropolitanCouncil Transit CapitalImprovement ProgramOctober 22, 2008.
Metropolitan Transportation Authority July Financial Plan 2016 – 2019 Presentation to the Board July 22, 2015.
1 FTA Research Programs Ronald Hynes Acting Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation April 17, 2007.
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 1 Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board September 21, 2005 Dedicated.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
1 Transit Capacity Constraint Presented to: TPB Technical Committee April 1, 2005 Lora Byala Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Business.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Metropolitan Transportation Authority November Financial Plan 2016 – 2019 Presentation to the Board November 18, 2015.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Development of a System-Wide Asset Management Program Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Jeffrey D. Knueppel, PE Chief Engineer and Assistant.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Ronald F. Kirby Director, COG Department of Transportation.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Monica Bansal Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB CAC November 13, 2008 Progress on “CLRP Aspirations” & “What Would it Take?”
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
Transit Capital Project Revenue Advisory Board June 16, 2016 Virginia Department of Rail & Public Transportation Transit Resource Allocation Plan Capital.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
2018 – 2023 Strategic Budget Plan
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
Review of 2018–2023 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and
Capital Metro Long-Range Financial Forecast ( )
Public transit in Indiana – the path forward November 2012
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
Transit Systems Planning
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Project Overview
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS
Presentation transcript:

Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority December 17, 2008

Metro and the Region  How do we maintain our world- class system and meet the growing transit needs of the region in the future?  Purpose is to present a comprehensive review of Metro’s capital improvement needs over the next 10 years – Basis for next WMATA capital funding strategy – WMATA Inputs to the FY11-16 TIP and CLRP Financial Plan – Transit capacity constraint in CLRP 1

Metro’s Contribution to the Region  Congestion Relief –Metro removes cars from congested corridors –Metrorail carries 32% of rush hour trips to core  Mobility Choice –Washington region has 2 nd highest share of commuting trips on transit –Transit users on average save $820 in fuel per year  Environmental Impacts –Taking transit to work can eliminate 4,800 pounds of greenhouse gas CO 2 per year; with roughly 600 thousand riders using Metro daily, this totals 1.5 million tons per year.  Economic Generator –Transit supports development investment – over $25 billion in development has been built near Metrorail 2

Why Develop a Capital Needs Inventory? Support development of regional funding strategy −Metro Matters Funding Agreement ends July 2010 −SAFETEA-LU expires in September 2009 −Optimal schedule for multi-year rail and bus vehicle procurements Foundation for a strategic capital planning process −Baseline of capital needs −Link capital investment decisions to agency goals 3

Capital Needs Overview  Conducted capital needs inventory –10-years (FY 2011 to FY 2020) –Full inventory of needs (not limited by funding availability) –Outreach with each department –Based on life-cycle replacements, current conditions, and future demand  What’s not included in the capital needs inventory: –System expansion projects (entrances, stations, new rail lines) –Transit projects to be funded or implemented entirely by the jurisdictions –Debt repayment costs 4

Capital Needs Overview (-cont) The FY 2011 – FY 2020 capital needs are driven by several key factors:  Many system components were built when system opened, have reached end of lifecycle, must be replaced  For the first time, Metro is faced with the replacement of a series of railcars  Information Technology and MetroAccess capital costs are being fully addressed  Construction and material costs are rapidly increasing  Includes deferred needs 5

PerformanceCustomerDemand Provide the Best Ride in the Nation Capital Needs Inventory 6

Capital Improvement Needs: FY 2011 – FY 2020 Capital Needs in 2008 dollars: $9.2 billion Metro’s total capital needs for FY FY 2020 are $11.3 billion, or $1.1 billion per year. Future needs are roughly double the current capital spending levels. 7

Performance – What’s Needed Bus mid-life rehab & replacements Railcar rehab & replacement Rail system rehab Rehab rail maintenance facilities Replace obsolete bus garages IT – Software, security and data centers 8

Customer Experience – What’s Needed  Station safety -Lighting upgrades -“Bumpy tile” platform edging at all stations -Signage improvements  Improve real-time and web-based information  Fare payment system improvements  Station and platform canopies -Complete entrance canopy program -Extend exterior station platform canopies 9

Ridership Growth Trends Metrorail ridership is expected to grow from about 750,000 trips daily in 2008 to about 910,000 in Metrobus ridership is expected to grow from about 460,000 trips daily in 2008 to about 510,000 in

Demand – What’s Needed  Metrorail capacity enhancements -Core station improvements such as more elevators and escalators -100% 8-car trains during rush period, including power upgrades and storage  Metrobus enhancements -Priority corridor improvements -Over 300 additional buses -Build 2 new bus garages  More MetroAccess vehicles 11

◄If we do not expand the fleet after Metro Matters ◄If we expand the fleet for 100% 8-car train service Rail System Capacity 12

System Capacity Challenges  Deployment of 8-car trains will likely handle system capacity needs thru 2025  Highest priority stations for capacity improvement are largely in the Core  System extensions require expansion of core capacity 13

Metro’s Next Steps for Funding  Prioritize Metro’s capital needs  In 2009 – Work with regional partners to finalize a new capital funding arrangement, effective July 1, 2010  Work with federal and jurisdiction partners to secure dedicated funding  Position Metro to receive federal economic stimulus funds 14

About Metro / Planning & Development For more information… 15