1. Academy business Monthly newsletter Highlights of the work group plans for recommendations 2. Obtaining Funding from the Center for Research in Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fig. A We build understanding Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada.
Advertisements

TATIONpRÆSEN AARHUS UNIVERSITET 1 AARHUS UNIVERSITET Aarhus University - The new administration.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Orientation October 15, 2003 Atlanta. T he Intermediary Network is a group of leading education and workforce development organizations working together.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Leonie Gordon TEACHING PORTFOLIO- DOCUMENTING YOUR EXPERTISE IN TEACHING.
INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT Niaz Latif Department of Industrial Technology.
Presentation of EQ11 Advisory Group May The Approach Faculty reflections Faculty visit and discussions Discussion papers Our challenge was to.
Governance Hot Topics National Office Dialogue 1.
DEPARTMENTAL COUNCIL MEETING #2 SECOND SEMESTER (TERM 062) Day & Date: Sunday, 18 March, 2007 Time and Place: 10:00 A.M., Bldg
October 7, 2004Grace Hopper Celebration Stephenson, Menzel, Van Busum The JETT Program: Building a Learning Partnership Between High School & University.
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
... for our health Peggy O’Halloran, MPH University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine Setting up the Wisconsin Primary Care Clinician Survey Group.
Current CAS Issues and Directions Joanne Spalla MAF Fall Meeting September 21, 2007.
University of Michigan Medical School Academy for Educational Excellence and Scholarship Monthly Seminar 1.Academy updates 2.Discussion: The Science of.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Designing an Academy of Medical Educators at the University of Michigan Medical School Joseph C. Kolars, M.D. Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global.
FCM International Partnership Beaumont – Koh Thom Business Information Exchange.
University of Michigan Medical School Academy for Educational Excellence and Scholarship Monthly Seminar – September 23, Academy Update and plans.
Office of the Faculty Secretary www:webs.uidaho.edu/facultycouncil Faculty Senate Website 8/10/09 1.
Anish Bhardwaj, MD, MBA, FAHA, FCCM, FAAN, FANA John Sealy Chairman and Professor Department of Neurology Assistant Dean for Faculty Affairs University.
TYPE 2 TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH 2009 GRANT PROGRAMS UW Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) Community-Academic Partnership Core (CAP)
THE HR APPRENTICERICHMOND THE HR APPRENTICE RICHMOND Marvelous Membership Mavericks.
Strengthening Our Collective Impact: Developing A Strategic Plan for CMHA National Conference Workshop Materials Kelowna, British Columbia September, 2011.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Overview: FY12 Strategic Communications Plan Meredith Fisher Director, Administration and Communication.
AN OVERVIEW Healthy & Ready to Learn by Age 5 What is ECP? The Early Childhood Partners initiative is CT’s name for MCHB’s “State Early Childhood Comprehensive.
University of Michigan Medical School Academy for Educational Excellence and Scholarship Monthly Seminar – June 23, Academy updates, year in review:
URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE PARTNERSHIPS, PARENTS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT October 27, 2011 Presented By Ramona Reyes, Vice President, Columbus.
Before you begin. For additional assistance, contact your club’s Information Technology Chairperson or Electronic Learning at:
The College of Education We develop educational leaders who create tomorrow’s opportunities.
TEAM-Math Teacher Leader Meeting October 28, 2004.
University of Michigan Medical School Academy for Educational Excellence and Scholarship Monthly Seminar – November 17, Academy Update Membership;
BRANDEIS PLURALISM ALLIANCE Grant Application Online Workshop.
Presentation to NFE working group 30 August 2013.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
+ Meeting of Assistant Professors June 29, Faculty and Academic Affairs Leadership Steven Abramson, M.D., Vice Dean for Education, Faculty and.
Investment Management Process (IMP) ACF-1 John DiNofrio Gary Graybill Alex Storoz March 31, 2003.
SIM- Data Infrastructure Subcommittee March 5, 2014.
The College of Education We develop educational leaders who create tomorrow’s opportunities.
Faculty Survey Highlights University Council Presentation Lynn McCloskey Edward S. Macias April 7, 2008.
How to Plan a Successful Academic Year with Your Chapter: Keeping the End in Mind JODI BROOKINS-FISHER, PHD, MCHES ESG PRESIDENT HOLLY TURNER MOSES, PHD,
S 1 Annual Meeting 2013 Management and reporting (WP6) Chiara Bearzotti NACLIM project manager.
Faculty Governance Jane Dillehay Faculty Chair Jan Hafer AAUP Chair 12 August 2011.
University of Michigan Medical School Academy for Educational Excellence and Scholarship Monthly Seminar – October 20, Academy Business (15 minutes)
College of Education Incentivizing Research CADREI Annual Fall Meeting September 28, 2015 College of Education.
Eight Schools Information Security Policies: The Process at Hotchkiss.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
Strategic Planning Linked to Long Range Planning Presentation to Faculty and Staff February 13-14, 2008
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
Connecting with Your Members: Member Recruitment and Retention 2016 Chapter Leadership Training NMA...THE Leadership Development Organization.
Strategic Reallocation RFP Process for Student Success
Kansas Rural Health Options Project March 6, 2006.
The Promotion and Tenure Process at Alabama State University.
Academic Year UNC Asheville
Center For Faculty Excellence: Leadership and Faculty Development
June 5, 2017 General Track Meeting.
TN: TEACH AACTE Grant TN TEACH: The TN EPP Assistive and Collaborative Help Network.
Solutions to promote science and technology activity of young lecturers in the context of internationalization Dr. Nguyen Van Tam
Supplemental Learning- AIR
Department of Medicine Michael Farkouh, Vice-Chair Research michael
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Q3 Academic Year (January – March 2018)
Provost’s Merit Pay Initiative
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
Supporting Faculty Research
Presentation transcript:

1. Academy business Monthly newsletter Highlights of the work group plans for recommendations 2. Obtaining Funding from the Center for Research in Learning and Teaching: Dr. Mary Blazek, Department of Psychiatry 3. Turning educational programming into peer-reviewd scholarship: Team based learning: Drs. Jocelyn Schiller, Terry Murphy Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases Academy of Educators, Agenda April 22, 2014 Danto Auditorium

Work groups will meet during last 30 to 45 minutes of our May and June, 2014 monthly meetings. Work Group Questions -- To be answered by the fall, were generated at the March monthly meeting --were refined and focused by the steering committee in? How would faculty access/apply for – dependent on level of engagement? How would we measure return on investment? For modeling purposes, assume we have $50-100K to invest in our members over the academic year.

Membership Work Group 1.What is a simple mechanism for valuing and tracking engagement of members? (i.e. what ‘counts’ regarding the work of the academy? What is the unit of measure for engagement with regard to working on what counts? How to track?) 2.What should be our policy on recruiting new members? (i.e., when should we have our next membership drive? How many times a year? When do we start considering faculty outside the medical school/learners?) 3.What should be the criteria by which funds are made available to members? (i.e. what kind of faculty development activities should the Academy be investing in? How would faculty access/apply for – dependent on level of engagement? How would we measure return on investment? For modeling purposes, assume we have $50-100K to invest in our members over the academic year.

Membership Work Group 1.What is a simple mechanism for valuing and tracking engagement of members? (i.e. what ‘counts’ regarding the work of the academy? What is the unit of measure for engagement with regard to working on what counts? How to track?) 2.What should be our policy on recruiting new members? (i.e., when should we have our next membership drive? How many times a year? When do we start considering faculty outside the medical school/learners?) 3.What should be the criteria by which funds are made available to members? (i.e. what kind of faculty development activities should the Academy be investing in? How would faculty access/apply for – dependent on level of engagement? How would we measure return on investment? For modeling purposes, assume we have $50-100K to invest in our members over the academic year.

Membership Work Group 1.What is a simple mechanism for valuing and tracking engagement of members? (i.e. what ‘counts’ regarding the work of the academy? What is the unit of measure for engagement with regard to working on what counts? How to track?) 2.What should be our policy on recruiting new members? (i.e., when should we have our next membership drive? How many times a year? When do we start considering faculty outside the medical school/learners?) 3.What should be the criteria by which funds are made available to members? (i.e. what kind of faculty development activities should the Academy be investing in? How would faculty access/apply for – dependent on level of engagement? How would we measure return on investment? For modeling purposes, assume we have $50-100K to invest in our members over the academic year.

Membership Work Group 1.What is a simple mechanism for valuing and tracking engagement of members? (i.e. what ‘counts’ regarding the work of the academy? What is the unit of measure for engagement with regard to working on what counts? How to track?) 2.What should be our policy on recruiting new members? (i.e., when should we have our next membership drive? How many times a year? When do we start considering faculty outside the medical school/learners?) 3.What should be the criteria by which funds are made available to members? (i.e. what kind of faculty development activities should the Academy be investing in? How would faculty access/apply for – dependent on level of engagement? How would we measure return on investment? For modeling purposes, assume we have $50-100K to invest in our members over the academic year.

Peer Review/Mentoring Work Group 1.What is a prototype peer review instrument that could be piloted this Fall? 2.What is a process map for piloting the instrument, recruiting participants, and developing an approach to evaluation of the pilot?

Valuing Education Work Group 1.What can we learn from the approaches Departments are taking to notifying their faculty about the distribution of education dollars? (This presumes the data will be provided by the Deans office to the workgroup for review and analysis). 2.How can exemplars be presented to the Academy for deeper understanding and, hopefully, the adoption of best practices in other Departments? (e.g., detailed presentation of 2-4 Departmental approaches, at least one of which is Basic Science).

Valuing Education Work Group 1.What can we learn from the approaches Departments are taking to notifying their faculty about the distribution of education dollars? (This presumes the data will be provided by the Deans office to the workgroup for review and analysis). 2.How can exemplars be presented to the Academy for deeper understanding and, hopefully, the adoption of best practices in other Departments? (e.g., detailed presentation of 2-4 Departmental approaches, at least one of which is Basic Science).

Valuing Education Work Group 1.What can we learn from the approaches Departments are taking to notifying their faculty about the distribution of education dollars? (This presumes the data will be provided by the Deans office to the workgroup for review and analysis). 2.How can exemplars be presented to the Academy for deeper understanding and, hopefully, the adoption of best practices in other Departments? (e.g., detailed presentation of 2-4 Departmental approaches, at least one of which is Basic Science).

Monthly Meetings/Faculty Development 1.What would a 10-month seminar program look like for the upcoming year (starting in September) with regard to specific topics Key topics? Research idea presentations from members Informational presentations from units that may be helpful (CRLT, med ed) Great debates (Pro/Con – development of a ‘educator track’) etc. Note: It was acknowledged that a strong, valuable portion of the seminar gatherings is the networking and we must be careful not to overly program to the point that this isn’t as spontaneous as it could be. 2.How can the effectiveness/value proposition of the seminars be measured?

Monthly Meetings/Faculty Development 1.What would a 10-month seminar program look like for the upcoming year (starting in September) with regard to specific topics Key topics? Research idea presentations from members Informational presentations from units that may be helpful (CRLT, med ed) Great debates (Pro/Con – development of a ‘educator track’) etc. Note: It was acknowledged that a strong, valuable portion of the seminar gatherings is the networking and we must be careful not to overly program to the point that this isn’t as spontaneous as it could be. 2.How can the effectiveness/value proposition of the seminars be measured?

Scholarship 1.What should be the ingredients/mock-up of an Academy Web site with tools that can enable faculty to pursue scholarship in medical education? This would include a repository of the scholarship that is taking place and a ‘dating site’ for those hoping to find partners on ideas or projects. 2.How can we propose a suite of enablers to promote scholarship? What would be the strategic planning process map for the development of a Medical Education Core? 3.How can we advise the membership group regarding the role of a small grants program to promote scholarship among faculty

Scholarship 1.What should be the ingredients/mock-up of an Academy Web site with tools that can enable faculty to pursue scholarship in medical education? This would include a repository of the scholarship that is taking place and a ‘dating site’ for those hoping to find partners on ideas or projects. 2.How can we propose a suite of enablers to promote scholarship? What would be the strategic planning process map for the development of a Medical Education Core? 3.How can we advise the membership group regarding the role of a small grants program to promote scholarship among faculty

Scholarship 1.What should be the ingredients/mock-up of an Academy Web site with tools that can enable faculty to pursue scholarship in medical education? This would include a repository of the scholarship that is taking place and a ‘dating site’ for those hoping to find partners on ideas or projects. 2.How can we propose a suite of enablers to promote scholarship? What would be the strategic planning process map for the development of a Medical Education Core? 3.How can we advise the membership group regarding the role of a small grants program to promote scholarship among faculty

Scholarship 1.What should be the ingredients/mock-up of an Academy Web site with tools that can enable faculty to pursue scholarship in medical education? This would include a repository of the scholarship that is taking place and a ‘dating site’ for those hoping to find partners on ideas or projects. 2.How can we propose a suite of enablers to promote scholarship? What would be the strategic planning process map for the development of a Medical Education Core? 3.How can we advise the membership group regarding the role of a small grants program to promote scholarship among faculty