Study of the effect of AVAS on road traffic noise

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
59 th GRB (28-30 January 2014) JASIC Japan proposal for Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle 1 Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle: GVM ≤ 2.5 ton PMR (power to mass ratio)
Advertisements

CHAPTER 14 CITY DRIVING 2-Main Factors That Make City Driving Difficult: 1. There are more hazards 2. Deal with them more frequently.
Portorož, Slovenia Statistical Properties of Road Traffic Noise Emission Measurements Marco ConterMarco Conter arsenal researcharsenal research ResearcherResearcher.
QRTV for UN Regulation GRB 61 Transmitted by IWG QRTV for UN Regulation Informal document GRB (61st GRB, January 2015, agenda item 11)
Introduction to VISSIM
1 Measure against Quietness Problem of HV, etc. October 12, 2010 MLIT Japan.
HPC Impacts Automotive Aerodynamics Computational Fluid Dynamics HPC demands Kevin Golsch Aerodynamics – Energy Center 1 October 2010.
Pengukuran Noise Ahmad Suudi, S.T., M.T.. 2 Noise Measurement Significant variability in noises from transportation sources L p : noise level at a particular.
Interchanges, Arterials, And Networks Last Week. Interchanges Freeway – Multilane highway Ramps and weaves are the same Problem comes in when you have.
ENGR 215 ~ Dynamics Sections Power Power is the flow of energy per unit time Units –Light Bulb: 100W 1 W = 1 Nm/s –Car Engine: 250 Hp 1 Hp =
1 Motor Vehicle Emission Control in Japan Better Air Quality Workshop 2002 ( 16th Dec 2002 ) Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of the Environment.
CE 453 Lecture 7 Noise Analysis See: and
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Study on new regulation concerning Driver’s field of vision Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport 81th GRSG, October 9-12, 2001, Geneva.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Performance Evaluation of Vehicular DTN Routing under Realistic Mobility Models Pei’en LUO.
The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,
Instrumented Vehicle BAQ Instrumented In-Use-Vehicles, a Versatile Tool to Measure Emissions BAQ 2004 Agra, India Dec 2004 Instrumented In-Use-Vehicles,
France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB
1 Surveys for Standardization of AVAS in Japan Results of questionnaires investigating in which situations quietness of HV/EV works against people JASIC.
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
International Harmonizationof Noise Test Procedures and Target Limits
Damage Mitigation Braking System
19-21 September 2011 JASIC Kei-truck of N1 Informal document GRB (54th GRB, September 2011, agenda item 3(b))
INFLUENCE OF DRIVER'S ATTITUDES ON INTENTION TO SPEED IN THE URBAN AREA MSc Boško Matović MSc Spasoje Mićić PhD Todor Bačkalić.
Acceleration- Change in Velocity
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values ~Rationality of Thresholds for N2 and M3~ JASIC 1 Informal document GRB (57 th GRB, 5-7 February 2013, agenda.
XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Study on cycle modification ~ Reflect validation test 1 result ~ 10 th DHC sub-group meeting under GRPE/WLTP.
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
Influence of road surface on tyre rolling sound emission Report from the NordTyre project, part 2: Passenger car tyres. Truls Berge, SINTEF ICT, Norway.
1 Defining Sounder Criteria Presented by Henry Morgan Edited from paper prepared and presented by Prof. Geoff Leventhall to ISO Apr 2011 Acoustical Consultant.
Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.
1 A Study on Approach Warning Systems for hybrid vehicle in motor mode JASIC, JAPAN Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009, agenda.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values JASIC 1 Informal document GRB Rev.1 (55th GRB, 7-9 February 2012, agenda item 3(b))
Quiet road surfaces Eurocities - working group noise Chair: Henk Wolfert Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1.
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
1 Proposals of WLTC versions for low powered vehicles Heinz Steven WLTP.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
Acceleration Acceleration – the rate at which velocity changes  Can be an: Increase in speed Decrease in speed Change in direction.
1 Optimumization of Sound Level for Approaching Vehicle Audible System JASIC, JAPAN.
1 Situation and new challenges on pass-by noise for road transport vehicles ECE R 51: noise for passenger cars, light commercial and heavy vehicles ( M&
ROAD PROFILING-ROUGHNESS Presentation by Niranjan Santhirasegaram
Additional ASEP data GRB IG ASEP sept 2007 By the Netherlands.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Measurement and Simulation of Instantaneous Emissions of a Heavy Truck Diesel.
Abstract A highway traffic noise prediction model has been developed for environmental assessment in South Korea. The model is based on an outdoor sound.
Vehicle Noise Standards System of China
Aerodynamics of High Speed Rail Tunnels
The Implement of ECE R51 03series in China
Transmitted by the expert from Japan
Noise Emission of Motor Vehicles
Reversing Alarm of M- and N-Vehicles
Speed simulator / Traceability and Uncertainty Walter Fasel
Driving conditions and conclusions of China on ASEP test method
Effects of Countdown Traffic Signal On Driving
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd
Integration of dilemma zone protection with speed harmonization
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Japanese Fuel Efficiency Standard for Heavy Duty Vehicles
JASIC National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory
HDV CO2 Regulation in REPUBLIC OF KOREA
UN QRTV GTR Informal Working Group 6th session – Baltimore, USA, May 2018 Regulation (EU) No 540/2014: commonalities and differences with UN R
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Highway Engineering CE 431
Traffic Light Simulation
QRTV for UN Regulation GRB 61.
Road Traffic Noise An Industry Opinion Noise in EUROPE – 24 April 2017
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
Presentation transcript:

Study of the effect of AVAS on road traffic noise QRTV-07-07 Study of the effect of AVAS on road traffic noise JASIC

Contents Calculation flow of road traffic noise Effect of the increase of EV Influence of the installation of AVAS Calculation flow of road traffic noise Effect of the increase of EV Influence of the installation of AVAS

Calculation flow of JARI model [1], [2], [3] Estimation of traffic flow Running condition of each vehicle Power unit noise Tire/road noise Sound Power level of each vehicle Sound propagation Calculation of LAeq

Traffic flow simulation Running condition (speed, acceleration, engine speed, position) of each vehicle is estimated.

Calculation flow of JARI model [1], [2], [3] Estimation of traffic flow Running condition of each vehicle Power unit noise Tire/road noise Sound Power level of each vehicle Sound propagation Calculation of LAeq

Sound power level model of ICE vehicle Noise sources Models Power unit noise S : Engine speed [rpm], L : Engine load [%] Tire/road noise V : Vehicle speed [km/h]

Calculation flow of JARI model [1], [2], [3] Estimation of traffic flow Running condition of each vehicle Power unit noise Tire/road noise Sound Power level of each vehicle Sound propagation Calculation of LAeq 7

Time history of road traffic noise Measured A-weighted sound pressure level [dB] Calculated 50 70 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 Time [sec]

Comparison of measured and calculated LAeq < Road surface>

Calculation flow of JARI model [1], [2], [3] Aural simulation of road traffic noise [4] Sound pressure waveform of each vehicle Sound propagation Synthesized waveform of road traffic noise Running condition of each vehicle Estimation of traffic flow Tire/road noise Power unit noise Synthesis of sound waveforms Estimation of traffic flow Running condition of each vehicle Power unit noise Tire/road noise Sound Power level of each vehicle Sound propagation Calculation of LAeq 10 10

Waveforms from noise sources of ICE vehicle Sound pressure waveforms Power unit noise 3 -3 Sound pressure (Pa) Time 0.05sec Tire/road noise 3 -3 Sound pressure (Pa) Time 0.1sec

Visual and aural simulation [4]

Contents Calculation flow of road traffic noise Effect of the increase of EV Influence of the installation of AVAS

Radiated same as ICE vehicle Noise radiation of EV Noise sources Noise sources Models Noise radiations Power unit noise Not radiated Tire/road noise Radiated same as ICE vehicle

Prediction area(1): Urban area Prediction point far from intersection Prediction point near intersection with traffic light Traffic conditions Traffic volume: 1,434 vehicles/hour Ratio of vehicle categories: Passenger car 85.9 % Light truck 5.1 % Medium truck 5.7 % Heavy truck 0.6 % Motorcycle 2.7 % Speed limit: 50 km/h

Prediction results in urban area: Effect of the increase of EV [5] Ratio of EV (in passenger car) [%] Near intersection Far from intersection LAeq [dB] Decrease 70.3 70.4 20 70.1 0.2 0.0 40 70.0 0.3 70.2 When EVs increase to 40 %, it is predicted that road traffic noise LAeq in urban area decreases 0.2 dB to 0.3 dB.

Prediction area(2): Residential area Prediction point far from intersection Prediction point near intersection Traffic conditions Traffic volume: 60 vehicles/hour Ratio of vehicle categories: Passenger car 100 % Light truck 0 % Medium truck Heavy truck Motorcycle Speed limit: 30 km/h

Prediction results in residential area: Effect of the increase of EV [5] Ratio of EV (in passenger car) [%] Near intersection Far from intersection LAeq [dB] Decrease 55.2 54.2 20 1.0 53.6 0.6 40 53.3 1.9 52.9 1.3 When EVs increase to 40 %, it is predicted that road traffic noise LAeq in residential area decreases 1.3 dB to 1.9 dB.

Contents Calculation flow of road traffic noise Effect of the increase of EV Influence of the installation of AVAS

Sound radiation from EV with AVAS Sound sources Sound radiations Type: Continuous sound Level: 50 dB(A) at 2 m forward of vehicle, 1.2 m in height (Constant level, equals to idling of ICE vehicle) Speed range in which sound is generated: 0 < Speed < 20 km/h Power unit AVAS Tire/road noise Same as ICE vehicle

Prediction results: Influence of the installation of AVAS [5] Ratio of EV (in passenger car) [%] Residential area Near intersection Far from intersection LAeq [dB] Decrease [dB] Without AVAS With AVAS 55.2 54.2 20 1.0 53.6 0.6 40 53.3 1.9 52.9 1.3 Even if AVAS is installed in EV, it doesn't influence road traffic noise.

Conclusion When EVs increase to 40 %, it is predicted that road traffic noise LAeq in urban area decreases 0.2 dB to 0.3 dB, and LAeq in residential area decreases 1.3 dB to 1.9 dB. The effect of AVAS installed in EV was examined, where the sound was generated at the same level as idling of ICE vehicle in the speed range in 20 km/h or less. As a result, it has been found that the sound from AVAS doesn't influence road traffic noise.

Reference [1] Y.Oshino and H.Tachibana, "Prediction of road traffic noise taking account of transient vehicle running condition", Proceeding of Inter-noise 93 (1993) [2] Y.Oshino, K.Tsukui and H.Tachibana, "Road traffic noise prediction taking account of transient vehicle running condition", Proceeding of Inter-noise 96 (1996) [3] T.Suzuki, K.Tsukui, Y.Oshino and H.Tachibana, "Road traffic noise prediction model around signalized intersections", Proceeding of Inter-noise 2003 (2003) [4] M.Tanaka, T.Suzuki, Y.Oshino and H.Tachibana, "Aural simulation of road traffic noise", Proceeding of Inter-noise 2008 (2008) [5] National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, “車両接近通報装置の特性評価と基準化に関する調査 (in Japanese)", 2007

Thank you