C. Huc/CNES, D. Boucon/CNES-SILOGIC, D.M. Sawyer/NASA/GSFC, J.G. Garrett/NASA-Raytheon Producer-Archive Interface Methodology Abstract Standard PAIMAS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The way to open resources Laurent Romary CNRS. Two aspects of scientific communication Research papers –All types (Conferences, journals, grey literature.
Advertisements

Long-Term Preservation. Technical Approaches to Long-Term Preservation the challenge is to interpret formats a similar development: sound carriers From.
Heppenheim Producer-Archive Interface Specification Status of standardisation project Main characteristics, major changes, items pending.
Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) And Submission Agreements NOAA DSA TIM Donald Sawyer/NASA/GSFC 26-October 2005 NOAA DSA.
Fedora Users’ Conference Rutgers University May 14, 2005 Researching Fedora's Ability to Serve as a Preservation System for Electronic University Records.
19/05/2011 CSTS File transfer service discussions CSTS-File Transfer service discussions (2) CNES position.
Space Life Sciences Data Archive Producer-Archive Interface Community Standard Proposal Presentation to CCSDS Panel 2 Archival Standards Committee, March.
Dr Gordon Russell, Napier University Unit Data Dictionary 1 Data Dictionary Unit 5.3.
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
ISO & OAI-PMH By Neal Harmeyer, Amy Hatfield, and Brandon Beatty PURDUE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH REPOSITORY.
‘The Transparent Repository’ Kevin Bradley (NLA) & Chris Blackall (ANU)
Merrilee Proffitt e(X)literature / Digital Cultures Project April 2003 News from the Digital Library The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard; the.
CS 501: Software Engineering
CCSDS XML Telemetric and Command Exchange (XTCE)
1 ®  Overview Benefits of a Good Construction Schedule Baseline Schedule Development Schedule Updating and Maintenance Managing Project Changes USACE.
Supplement 02CASE Tools1 Supplement 02 - Case Tools And Franchise Colleges By MANSHA NAWAZ.
The Software Product Life Cycle. Views of the Software Product Life Cycle  Management  Software engineering  Engineering design  Architectural design.
An Overview of Selected ISO Standards Applicable to Digital Archives Science Archives in the 21st Century 25 April 2007 Donald Sawyer - NASA/GSFC/NSSDC.
CASE Tools And Their Effect On Software Quality Peter Geddis – pxg07u.
FP OntoGrid: Paving the way for Knowledgeable Grid Services and Systems WP8: Use case 1: Quality Analysis for Satellite Missions.
M-1 ISO “Reference Model For an Open Archival Information System (OAIS)” ISO “Reference Model For an Open Archival Information System (OAIS)” Tutorial.
International Council on Archives Section on University and Research Institution Archives Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Preserving Electronic.
By: Md Rezaul Huda Reza 5Ps for SE Process Project Product People Problem.
C. Huc/CNES, D. Boucon/CNES-SILOGIC Specification for the Formal Definition and Transfer Phase of a Producer-Archive Interface.
Don Sawyer NASA/National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC) Lou Reich
Rome Producer-Archive Interface Specification Plan of Objects to be Transferred Prototype for the design and Transfer follow-up.
CCSDS Meeting ’Producer-Archive Interface, 31/03/ 2003 CNES 1 CCSDS - MOIMS Area Data Archive Ingest WG CNES Report Athens meeting - April 2004 Claude.
NASA Life Sciences Presented to the MOIMS DAI CCSDS International Meeting, Nov 2-6, 2004 By Alan Wood Jacque Havelka A.E.Wood & Associates, Wyle Labs/Lockheed.
Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) ESIP Summer Meeting John Garrett – ADNET Systems at NASA/GSFC ESIP Summer Meeting.
Author(s): David A. Wallace and Margaret Hedstrom, 2009 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative.
Current Applications of the OAIS Model David Giaretta.
Archival Information Packages for NASA HDF-EOS Data R. Duerr, Kent Yang, Azhar Sikander.
11 - December- 2001FLICC/CENDI1 OAIS: What is it and Where is it Going? Don Sawyer/NASA/GSFC Lou Reich/NASA/CSC 11-December-2001 FLICC/CENDI.
Coming to TERM: Designing the Texas Repository Model Sue Soy Stan Gunn Marlan Green Dr. Patricia Galloway University of Texas at Austin Graduate.
WGISS /09/2015 DATA PRESERVATION – CNES APPROACH B. Chausserie-Laprée.
CCSDS Meeting CNES Report, 05/12/2004 CNES 1 CCSDS - MOIMS Area Information Packaging and Registry WG CNES Report on activity November April 2005.
CCSDS Meeting CNES Report, 2/11/2004 CNES 1 CCSDS - MOIMS Area Data Archive ingestion WG Information Packaging and Registry WG CNES Report on activity.
September 2003ERPANET - Marburg 2003View # 1 Data preservation Using CCSDS and ISO Standards Denis MINGUILLON
1 CCSDS Information Architecture Working Group Daniel J. Crichton, Chair NASA/JPL 14 September 2005.
PREMIS Implementation Fair, San Francisco, CA October 7, Stanford Digital Repository PREMIS & Geospatial Resources Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Knowledge.
C. Huc/CNES, D. Boucon/CNES-SILOGIC, L. Saillard/SILOGIC Producer-Archive Interface Specification Mock-up for POT creation.
Wyn Cudlip BNSC/QinetiQ Presentation to WGISS25 China, February 2008 CCSDS Liaison Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems.
CCSDS MOIMS Springs Meeting 2006 – Rome - June 2006 XFDU & SAFE - ESA return from experience ESA return from experience & f Stéphane Mbaye
Common Terminology Services 2 CTS 2 Submission Team Status Update HL7 Vocabulary Working Group May 17, 2011.
OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.
C. Huc/CNES, D. Boucon/CNES-SILOGIC Producer-Archive Interface Specification.
Domain Classes – Part 1.  Analyze Requirements as per Use Case Model  Domain Model (Conceptual Class Diagram)  Interaction (Sequence) Diagrams  System.
Defining Submission Agreements and Policies DigCCurr Professional Institute May 16-21, 2010 & January 5-6, 2011 Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA Carolyn.
M-1 ISO “Reference Model For an Open Archival Information System (OAIS)” ISO “Reference Model For an Open Archival Information System (OAIS)” Presentation.
CCSDS Meeting data Archive Ingest - June 2006 CNES 1 CCSDS - MOIMS Area Data Archive Ingest WG CNES Report Rome meeting – June 2006 Claude Huc.
Winter 2011SEG Chapter 11 Chapter 1 (Part 1) Review from previous courses Subject 1: The Software Development Process.
The OAIS Reference Model Michael Day, Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University of Bath Reference Models meeting,
CCSDS Meeting data Archive Ingest - January 2007 CNES 1 CCSDS - MOIMS Area Data Archive Ingest WG CNES Report Colorado Springs meeting – January 2007 Claude.
June 21, 2011EDMC Workshop in Silver Spring, MDDan Kowal Submission Agreements: The role they play in supporting the relationship between the Data Producer/Provider.
Florida Digital Archive PREMIS and DAITSS. Florida Digital Archive.
Data Archive Ingest WG Report to MOIMS Plenary May 14, 2004.
Software Development Process CS 360 Lecture 3. Software Process The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software.
The OAIS model SEEDS meeting May 5 th, 2015, Lausanne Bojana Tasic.
Colorado Springs Producer-Archive Interface Specification Status of standardisation project Main characteristics, major changes, items pending.
OAIS (archive) Producer Management Consumer. Representation Information Data Object Information Object Interpreted using its Yields.
OAIS (archive) OAIS (archive) Producer Management Consumer.
CNES: CCSDS - MOIMS Area Data Archive ingestion WG Information Packaging and Registry WG CNES Report on activity May-October 2004 Toulouse meeting.
OAIS Producer (archive) Consumer Management
NASA Life Sciences Presented to the MOIMS DAI CCSDS International Meeting, Nov 2-6, 2004 By Alan Wood Jacque Havelka A.E.Wood & Associates, Wyle Labs/Lockheed.
Heppenheim Prototype for the MOT design and for the Transfer follow-up
Active Data Management in Space 20m DG
Don Sawyer NASA/National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC) Lou Reich
Project Management Process Groups
Open Archival Information System
Robin Dale RLG OAIS Functionality Robin Dale RLG
Presentation transcript:

C. Huc/CNES, D. Boucon/CNES-SILOGIC, D.M. Sawyer/NASA/GSFC, J.G. Garrett/NASA-Raytheon Producer-Archive Interface Methodology Abstract Standard PAIMAS

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology2 Contents  Why a new standard? Space data archiving Needs for standardization What standardization will bring Abstract standard status  Proposed methodology Context - description The 4 phases  Specialization  Aid Tool for the use of the Methodology  Towards an implementation standard  Conclusions

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology3 Why a new standard? Space data archiving: archive types Telemetry Operation control Payload control Mission exploitation Mission archives Mission control system Scientific multi-mission data centers: long-term archives

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology4  Data Producers: the operating systems of each mission the mission processing and archiving centres the scientific teams in the laboratories  Archive specialized independent organizations (CDS) specialized services within the agencies (NSSDC) services common to several organizations (CDPP) a P roducer-Archive Project is a set of activities and the means used by the Information Producer as well as the Archive to ingest a given set of information into the Archive. Why a new standard? Space data archiving: key roles and players

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology5  The relations between archives and data Producers are rarely simple and easy: nonconformity of received data unclear and imprecise definition of the data to be delivered, failure to meet delivery schedule, late detection of errors in archived data, non-management of modifications ==> Can be detrimental to archived information quality and the cost of the operation.  Ever increasing diversity of the producers  Data complexity  Each project develops its own methodology on the basis of a process that is roughly the same from one project to another ==> Work duplicated, no generality, excessively high costs, etc. Why a new standard? Needs for standardization: problems

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology6 PAIMAS Generic abstract standard Community abstract standard PAIMAS Implementation standard Approved by the CCSDS Development in progress Why a new standard? Needs for standardization: multiple standards

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology7  Ease some typical problems (as noted earlier)  Make it easier to follow schedules and commitments  Help with human resources turnover  Anticipate new problems  Address the legal aspects early  Increase data quality of archive holdings  Have weight and credibility for adoption  And finally, save time (and money) Why a new standard? What standardization will bring

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology8  Today: CCSDS standard (blue book) and standardization with ISO in progress  Various communities have helped produce this document : space agencies (CNES, NASA, ESA, …) archivists (NARA, …) and librarians (BNF -French National Library, RLG- Research Library Group). Why a new standard? Abstract standard status

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology9 Contents  Why a new standard? Space data archiving Needs for standardization What standardization will bring Abstract standard status  Proposed methodology Context - description The 4 phases  Specialization  Aid Tool for the use of the Methodology  Towards an implementation standard  Conclusion

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology10 Methodology Context: OAIS environment

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology11 AIP : Archival Information Package, SIP : Submission Information Package, DIP : Dissemination Information package Methodology Context: PAIMAS focus

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology12 AIP : Archival Information Package, SIP : Submission Information Package, DIP : Dissemination Information package Ingest Methodology Context: PAIMAS focus

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology13  The archive project is broken down into 4 main phases: Preliminary Phase, Formal Definition Phase, Transfer Phase, Validation Phase.  Each phase has extensive action tables.  Specification for a community. Methodology Description

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology14 Data ready to archive Methodology The phases: relationships Preliminary Agreement Dictionary Formal model Submission Agreement Transferred object files Validation agreement Phase objective Preliminary Phase Formal Definition Phase Transfer Phase Validation Phase Anomalies Validate the transferred objects Identification and preliminary agreement Define the information to be archived resources estimation Negotiate the Submission Develop agreement (data to be delivered, complementary elements, schedule) Actual transfer of the data Actual transfer of the objects

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology15 Preliminary Phase Preliminary Agreement Methodology Preliminary phase: context Archive Producer

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology16 Methodology Preliminary phase: sub-phases Action table Description

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology17 Formal Definition Phase Preliminary Agreement Dictionary Data Model Submission Agreement Methodology Formal Definition Phase: context

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology18 Methodology Formal Definition Phase: sub-phases and action table

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology19 Transfer Phase Actual transfer of the objects: carry out the transfer test manage the transfer Data Model of object files to deliver Schedule Transferred object files Methodology Transfer Phase

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology20 Validation Phase Validate the transferred objects: carry out the validation test manage the validation Transferred object files Data ready to archive Anomalies Methodology Validation Phase Producer Validation acknowledgement

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology21 Contents  Why a new standard? Space data archiving Needs for standardization What standardization will bring Abstract standard status  Proposed methodology Context - description The 4 phases  Specialization  Aid Tool for the use of the Methodology  Towards an implementation standard  Conclusion

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology22  Adapt the generic standard to a particular community (which can range from an international organization to a simple archive service)  Steps involved to define a community standard terminology, data dictionary and information model, standards, common tools.  Analyze each action of the generic standard (add actions if necessary) Specialization

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology23  Example (CDPP -Plasma Physics Data Center- Archive) F-4: Define the formats, coding rules, and standards to be applied for the objects to be delivered Generic Action (Methodology) Specific Action (CDPP) Apply the ‘specification of products for delivery to the CDPP’ including Use the Data Description Language EAST Specification defined by the CCSDS for the syntactic data description Use the CCSDS DEDSL- Data Entity Dictionary Structure Language- —XML/DTD Syntax for the semantic data description Use the CCSDS time code format for the date and time coding Etc. Specialization: Example

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology24 Contents  Why a new standard? Space data archiving Needs for standardization What standardization will bring Abstract standard status  Proposed methodology Context - description The 4 phases  Specialization  Aid Tool for the use of the Methodology  Towards an implementation standard  Conclusion

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology25 A methodology application and archive project aid tool would be a real advantage for both the Producer and the Archive. First mockups produced Aid Tool

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology26 Aid Tool

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology27 Contents  Why a new standard? Space data archiving Needs for standardization What standardization will bring Abstract standard status  Proposed methodology Context - description The 4 phases  Specialization  Aid Tool for the use of the Methodology  Towards an implementation standard  Conclusion

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology28 PAIMAS Generic abstract standard Implementation standard Methodology application aid Languages Tools Community standard Archive project Towards an implementation standard Context

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology29 generic data model –transfer data model (generic objects) –transfer data dictionary (generic descriptors) –community dictionary diagram of data to transfer for the archive project transfer sequencing and chronology transfer session Implementation standard Languages Tools XML XML Schema UML XMLScheme DEDSL DTD XMLScheme XFDU Towards an implementation standard Approach

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology30 Towards an implementation standard Relationships CLUS-CIS-CODIF-Jm CLUS-CIS-CODIF-EAST CODIF CIS HIA CLUS-CIS-HIA-EAST CLUS-CIS-HIA-Jn CLUSTER

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology31  Delivery plan all the elements to be delivered easy to understand from the Producer side expression of constraints Towards an implementation standard Schema

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology32 Conclusion  PAIMAS identifies: the phases in the process of transferring information, the objective of the phases, the actions that must be carried out, the expected results.  PAIMAS is a basis: for the identification of standards and implementation guides, for identification and development of a set of software tools.

SpaceOps, Montreal, Producer-Archive Methodology33