The Discrimination of Vowels and Consonants by Lara Lalonde, Jacynthe Bigras, Jessica Flanagan, Véronick Boucher, Janie Paris & Lyzanne Cuddihy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Acquisition of Language II Lecture 5 Sounds of Words.
Advertisements

09/01/10 Kuhl et al. (1992) Presentation Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992) Linguistic experience alters.
Plasticity, exemplars, and the perceptual equivalence of ‘defective’ and non-defective /r/ realisations Rachael-Anne Knight & Mark J. Jones.
Speech Productions of French- English Bilingual Speakers in Western Canada Nicole Netelenbos Fangfang Li.
18 and 24-month-olds use syntactic knowledge of functional categories for determining meaning and reference Yarden Kedar Marianella Casasola Barbara Lust.
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Acquisition of Language II Lecture 3 Sounds.
The Sound Patterns of Language: Phonology
Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination Jessica Maye, Janet F. Werker, LouAnn Gerken A brief article from Cognition.
Ling 240: Language and Mind Acquisition of Phonology.
Speech perception 2 Perceptual organization of speech.
Development of Speech Perception. Issues in the development of speech perception Are the mechanisms peculiar to speech perception evident in young infants?
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Acquisition of Language II Lecture 4 Sounds.
Figure 1 Mean Visual Recovery (and SD) to a novel object for trials where the object was used correctly vs. incorrectly in a moving and static display.
Sentence Durations and Accentedness Judgments ABSTRACT Talkers in a second language can frequently be identified as speaking with a foreign accent. It.
PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY
PaPI 2005 (Barcelona, June) The perception of stress patterns by Spanish and Catalan infants Ferran Pons (University of British Columbia) Laura Bosch.
Languages’ rhythm and language acquisition Franck Ramus Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Paris Jacques Mehler, Marina Nespor,
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Acquisition of Language II
Language Acquisition Species-specific, species-universal accomplishment Central issue for cognitive science Important distinction between language comprehension.
Chapter three Phonology
Adrienne Moore section COGS1
Phonetics, day 2 Oct 3, 2008 Phonetics 1.Experimental a. production b. perception 2. Surveys/Interviews.
The Perception of Speech
L2 Vocabulary Acquisition in Children: Effects of Learning Method and Cognate Status I-Pei Tsai NA1C0004.
NOVA Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders Chapter 14 Acquisition of the English Voicing Contrast by Native Spanish-Speaking.
Phonology, phonotactics, and suprasegmentals
A Lecture about… Phonetic Acquisition Veronica Weiner May, 2006.
Preschool-Age Sound- Shape Correspondences to the Bouba-Kiki Effect Karlee Jones, B.S. Ed. & Matthew Carter, Ph.D. Valdosta State University.
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Psychology of Language Learning
Sebastián-Gallés, N. & Bosch, L. (2009) Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account.
Background Infants and toddlers have detailed representations for their known vocabulary items Consonants (e.g., Swingley & Aslin, 2000; Fennel & Werker,
Speech Perception 4/6/00 Acoustic-Perceptual Invariance in Speech Perceptual Constancy or Perceptual Invariance: –Perpetual constancy is necessary, however,
Nasal endings of Taiwan Mandarin: Production, perception, and linguistic change Student : Shu-Ping Huang ID No. : NA3C0004 Professor : Dr. Chung Chienjer.
1 Comparing Computational Algorithms for Modeling Phoneme Learning Ilana Heintz, Fangfang Li, and Jeff Holliday The Ohio State University MCWOP 2008, University.
Infant Speech Perception & Language Processing. Languages of the World Similar and Different on many features Similarities –Arbitrary mapping of sound.
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Psychology of Language Learning Lecture 5 Sounds III.
Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels. Thiery Nazzi (2004) By: Dominique, Jennifer,
Acoustic Cues to Laryngeal Contrasts in Hindi Susan Jackson and Stephen Winters University of Calgary Acoustics Week in Canada October 14,
Growing up Bilingual: One System or Two? Language differentiation and speech perception in infancy.
1. Background Evidence of phonetic perception during the first year of life: from language-universal listeners to native listeners: Consonants and vowels:
Intelligibility of voiced and voiceless consonants produced by Lebanese Arabic speakers with respect to vowel length Romy Ghanem.
Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: a perceptual illusion? Emmanual Dupoux, et al (1999) By Carl O’Toole.
SEPARATION OF CO-OCCURRING SYLLABLES: SEQUENTIAL AND SIMULTANEOUS GROUPING or CAN SCHEMATA OVERRULE PRIMITIVE GROUPING CUES IN SPEECH PERCEPTION? William.
3308 First Language acquisition Acquisition of sounds Perception Sook Whan Cho Fall, 2012.
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Psychology of Language Learning Lecture 6 Sounds of Words I.
Cognition 7e, Margaret MatlinChapter 13 The Development of Language Language in Infants rate of acquisition – approx 7 words/day, birth-6 vocabulary size.
Electrophysiological Processing of Single Words in Toddlers and School-Age Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Sharon Coffey-Corina 1, Denise Padden.
Bilingualism in Young Children: Methods of Acquisition Janese Botelho.
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Psychology of Language Learning Lecture 3 Sounds II.
Acoustic Continua and Phonetic Categories Frequency - Tones.
1 Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception Sandra Anacleto uOttawa.
CSD 2230 INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN COMMUNICATION DISORDERS Normal Sound Perception, Speech Perception, and Auditory Characteristics at the Boundaries of the.
Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception LING 7912 Professor Nina Kazanina.
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Psychology of Language Learning Lecture 2 Sounds I.
Source of change –Combination of feedback and explain- experimenter’s-reasoning led to greater learning than feedback alone Path of change –Children relied.
Infant Perception. William James, 1890 “The baby, assailed by eyes, ears, nose, skin and entrails all at once, feels it all as one great blooming, buzzing.
What infants bring to language acquisition Limitations of Motherese & First steps in Word Learning.
A Psycholinguistic Perspective on Child Phonology Sharon Peperkamp Emmanuel Dupoux Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, EHESS-CNRS,
Basic Cognitive Processes - 2
Abstract Prior research has demonstrated that young infants are able to perceive the affordance, or the potential for action, provided by the physical.
Bosch & Sebastián-Gallés Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life.
The Role of Multisensory Information in Infant Attention to Faces of Speakers Versus the Rhythm of Speech Lorraine E. Bahrick, Mariana Vaillant-Molina,
Speech Perception in Infants Peter D. Eimas, Einar R. Siqueland, Peter Jusczyk, and James Vigorito 1971.
GGGE6313 PSYCHOLINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE TEACHING Research article summary presentation GROUP 5 CULTURE AS A BINDER FOR BILINGUAL ACQUISITION Group members:
17th International Conference on Infant Studies Baltimore, Maryland, March 2010 Language Discrimination by Infants: Discriminating Within the Native.
Sentence Durations and Accentedness Judgments
an Introduction to English
Susan Geffen, Suzanne Curtin and Susan Graham
Susan Geffen, Suzanne Curtin and Susan Graham
Jessica McKee Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
Presentation transcript:

The Discrimination of Vowels and Consonants by Lara Lalonde, Jacynthe Bigras, Jessica Flanagan, Véronick Boucher, Janie Paris & Lyzanne Cuddihy

Based on 2 articles The Discrimination of Foreign Speech Contrasts by Infants and Adults – By Sandra E. Trehub, 1976 Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life – By Laura Bosch and Núria Sebastián-Gallés, 2003

Previous Research Very young infants are better able to perceive phonetic distinction than adults. By the end of the first year of life, infants’ responsiveness to many non-native contrast will be significantly reduced. (Aslin, Pisoni, & Jusczyk 1993 and Jusczyck 1997) Only a few studies have described developmental changes in vowel perception. – Language specific effects seem to be present earlier for vowels than consonants, at around 6 to 8 months of age.

Previous Research (cont): Polka and Werker (1994) found that 4 month old infants can discriminate a pair of foreign vowel in a /dVt/ context. At 6 to 8 months of age, this pattern was already modified and by 10 to 12 months of age, infants were no longer able to discriminate foreign vowels.

Trehub’s Article Introduction: This study looks at how infants between 5-17 weeks of age could discriminate foreign language contrasts. Trehub conducted 2 experiments to evaluate this phenomenon in infants. – She observed the nasal vowel distinction [pa] vs [pã] and the distinctive feature of stridency [  a] vs [  a].

Subjects: Residents of Montreal, Canada English as a home language. 40, full-term, healthy infants – 20 in experiment 1 (~ 10.5 weeks old) – 20 in experiment 2 (~ 9.5 weeks old)

Stimuli: Experiment 1 used stimuli [pa] vs [pã] from the French and Polish languages. – ~500 ms in duration Experiment 2 used stimuli [  a] vs [  a] used by Czech speakers. (feature of stridency) – ~500 ms in duration

Apparatus Nonnutritive sucking was attached to a pressure transducer which transcribed the results on a polygraph.

Procedure: [pa] or [  a] was presented to both experimental and control groups in the habituation phase. decrement criterion: decreased sucking rate at least 33 1/3 % below the infant's highest rate, maintained for 2 consecutive minutes. when the decrement criterion was reached, the contrast stimulus was substituted for the experimental group only: [pã] or [  a].

Results Consisted of criterion sucks per minute No significant differences in the predecrement period (before switch) for both the experimental and control group. Significant differences in postdecrement period (after switch).

Discussion Infants are able to discriminate between pairs of foreign language contrasts that they have never heard before. Even if the nasal vowel [ã] and the strident consonant [  ]  are said to be among the latest productive acquisitions for speakers of relevant languages, infants aged between weeks old can discriminate them.