ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
Advertisements

Jan. EPA Final GHG Reporting Guidance (actually Dec ) Mar. 31stAnnual GHG Reporting AprilProposed HAPs or Mercury MACT July 1st Annual Toxic Release.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule for the 1997 PM2.5 Standards Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
DEP’s Air Regulatory Update
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter Overview
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Villa Florence Hotel San Francisco, CA April 9-11, 2003.
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Development of 24-Hour 2006 PM 2.5 Designations Guidance NTAA National Tribal Air Quality Forum Barbara Driscoll EPA, OAQPS April 17, 2007.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
EPA’s Revisions to Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (PM NAAQS) Air Quality Committee Meeting January 9, 2013 Sushma Masemore,
1 SJVAPCD DRAFT SCHEDULES May 2, Hr OZONE ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN PM10 ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Imperial County PM 10 SIP: Update Imperial County APCD SIP Workgroup Meeting September 24, 2008.
State Implementation Plans: The Road Ahead
Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear Skies Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
PSD/Nonattainment Review You can do this! Marc Sturdivant Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015.
Joelle Burleson Planning Section, Rules Development Branch Division of Air Quality Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules per Regulatory Reform.
Joelle Burleson Planning Section, Rules Development Branch Division of Air Quality Status of Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules per Regulatory.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
A&WMA Southern Section Annual Meeting Biloxi, MS September 12, 2012 Carla Brown, P.E. MS Dept. of Environmental Quality
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
1 Designations & Classifications for the 8-hour Ozone NAAQS U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
EPA Planning and implementation Update Western Regional Air Partnership November 11, 2009.
OAQPS Update WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particle Pollution Mike Papp U.S. EPA
PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation Interactive Session NACAA Annual Meeting May 8, 2013 St. Louis, MO 1.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
Implementation of National Ambient Air Quality Standards Bill Harnett NACAA Fall Meeting September 22, 2009.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Miscellaneous Stuff William Harnett WESTAR Spring Meeting April 3, 2007.
1 Update on New Source Review (NSR) Activities and Priorities for Information Transfer and Program Integration Division April 7, 2004.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Natural Events Policy Questions PM 2.5 Natural Events – States/Regions Need Written Statement Clarifying Position That It Is Allowed Under Current Law.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Ozone and SO2 NAAQS Implementation Updates
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Draft Modeling Protocol for PM2.5
Bill Harnett WESTAR Spring Meeting April 8, 2009
PM NAAQS - Panel and Roundtable
NACAA Permitting Workshop, Chicago June 14, 2011
WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
PSD Issues in PM2.5 Transition Proposal
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Implementing 8-Hour Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze Standards
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
PM 2.5 Designation Process and Timeline
Presentation transcript:

ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006

What issues are discussed in the ANPR? Proposed options for transitioning from 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS to any new 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS Timelines for implementation of any new 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS Timelines for implementation of any new PM NAAQS Transition from the PM 10 standards to any new PM NAAQS What emission inventory requirements should apply to PM 2.5 and PM NAAQS Next steps

Transition from 1997 to 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS Option 1: –Proposed change to annual PM 2.5 standard is minimal Not significant enough to require new designations –Propose to not revoke the annual PM 2.5 standard –Propose to revoke the hr PM 2.5 standard one year after designations under any new 24-hr PM 2.5 standard –SIPs for annual PM 2.5 standard would stay in place until areas redesignated attainment

Transition from 1997 to 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS Option 2: –Revoke annual and 24-hr PM 2.5 standard 1 year after designations under any new PM 2.5 standards –Develop and implement “anti-backsliding” rule Which planning control requirements remain? NSR program Conformity programs

Timeline Comparison for PM standards including proposed 2006 PM 2.5 standards Milestone1997 PM 2.5 Primary NAAQS CAIR2006 PM 2.5 Primary NAAQS Effective date of Standard July 1997March 2005December 2006 Monitoring Data Used for State Recommendations State Recommendations to EPA Feb. 2004December 2007 Final Designations Signature Dec. 2004December 2009 Effective Date of Designations April 2005April 2010 SIPs DueApril 2008Sept. 2006April 2013 Attainment DateApril 2010 (based on data) Jan (Phase I NOx) Jan (Phase I SOx) Jan (Phase 2 - NOx and SOx) April 2015 (based on data) Attainment Date with Extension Up to April 2015April 2020

Timeline for New PM Standard* Milestone2006 PM NAAQS Effective date of StandardDecember 2006 Monitoring Data Used for State Recommendations State Recommendations to EPAJuly 2012 Final Designations SignatureMay 2013 Effective Date of DesignationsJuly 2013 SIPs DueJuly 2016 Attainment DateUp to July 2018 (based on data) Attainment Date with ExtensionUp to July 2023 *Schedule based on monitor deployment in 2009

Transition from the PM 10 standards to any new PM NAAQS – Proposed in PM NAAQS Proposal for revoking PM 10 Standards upon promulgation of 2006 PM NAAQS: –Revoke annual PM 10 standard everywhere –Revoke 24-hr PM 10 standard everywhere except Where violating monitor and urbanized area with population greater than 100K Taking comment on retaining 24-hr PM 10 standard in non-urbanized areas with ambient mix of PM from traffic, industrial and construction sources and one violating monitor

Transition from the PM 10 standards to any new PM NAAQS – Proposed in ANPR Revoking 24-hr PM 10 standard one year after designations under PM standards Anti-backsliding rule would be needed: –Control Measures – to be retained based on PM 10 classification – moderate or serious –Maintenance for areas that come into attainment w/ PM 10 prior to revocation? –Transportation conformity – to be addressed in separate rulemaking –General conformity – to be addressed in separate rulemaking –New Source Review – following slides

Transition from the PM 10 standards to any new PM NAAQS: NSR Issues Does PM 10 continue to be a regulated NSR pollutant for PSD where 24-hr PM 10 is revoked? –Option 1: PM 10 continues to be regulated NSR pollutant since retained in some areas; PSD continues to apply – but only BACT since non-criteria pollutant –Option 2: interpret definition to be area-specific, so PM 10 no longer regulated NSR pollutant and none of the PSD requirements would apply Does the CAA require continued obligation for some form of PM increment? –Option 1: Conclude § 166(f) and § 163 requirements no longer applicable and develop new increments for PM 2.5 and PM establishing new baseline and trigger dates –Option 2: Substitute PM 10 increments with two new increments PM 2.5 and PM – retain existing baseline and dates

Transition from the PM 10 standards to any new PM NAAQS: NSR Issues cont’d How should permitting authorities implement the PM 2.5 program upon revocation of PM 10 ? –Option 1: Continue to use PM 10 as surrogate – but compare PM 10 emissions concentrations with the PM 2.5 NAAQS - conservative –Option 2: Continue to apply existing surrogate policy for implementing the PM 2.5 program – compare PM 10 emissions with former PM 10 NAAQS How to implement PSD program for PM upon the effective date of promulgation for PM ? –Option 1: Use PM 10 as a surrogate – compare PM 10 emissions concentrations with the PM NAAQS - conservative –Option 2: Compare PM 10 analysis to former PM 10 NAAQS and use compliance with this as surrogate for compliance with new PM NAAQS for a temporary period –Option 3: Use compliance with BACT for PM as a surrogate for the PM compliance demonstration

PM NAAQS : NSR Issue How should ambient PM dominated by rural windblown dust and soils, and generated by agricultural and mining sources be treated in the NSR program for the proposed PM standard? –Definition of proposed PM standard suggests that NSR applicability test would exclude these sources from consideration. How do we implement the NSR program if a NAAQS with these characteristics is promulgated?

Applicable emission inventory requirements for PM 2.5 and PM NAAQS EPA’s emission inventory program is specified in the Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule, the Air Emissions Reporting Requirements, and guidance –Are the data elements specified in the CERR and AERR sufficient to develop adequate SIPS for PM2.5 and PM ? –Fugitive emissions are significant contributors to PM Should EPA require/develop more precise methods for estimating these emissions –Should EPA require any additional emission inventory data elements or temporal allocation techniques to estimate more accurately daily emissions and their variability? –Other inventory issues which need to be defined?

Next Steps ANPR published in FR on Feb 9 (71 FR 6718) w/ 60 day comment period ending April 10, 2006 Evaluate comments and develop proposal sometime after NAAQS are finalized in September 2006