Bigger Bang for the Buck Panel Discussion: Improving the ROI on Transit Investments with TDM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
Advertisements

General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
ANYBODY CAN RIDE! Examples of successful rural transit programs and practices elsewhere in the United States.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
TDM to Support Transit Town of Markham Experience ACT Canada --TDM Summit Toronto November 16, 2009.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
How can we relieve congestion in the I-95 corridor? I-95 Congestion Relief Study.
How Politics Even Affect Good Pricing Projects Eric N. Schreffler, ESTC TRB Int’l Symposium on Road Pricing Key Biscayne, Florida November 21, 2003.
1 icfi.com | Regional Sketch Modeling of VMT Reduction Strategies with the TEAM Approach Frank Gallivan ICF International October 22, 2014.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
University of Massachusetts Boston Catherine Paquette, Deputy Project Manager.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Alternative Transportation: Carpooling at Niagara College
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
Immigration to support Canada’s economic needs Presentation to the Leaders Summit on Immigrant Employment, Vancouver September 18, 2012.
RideshareOnline.com New tools to help save money, time and the environment while helping people live more independently! Prepared for: 2010 Public Transportation.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Calgary Regional Partnership Workshop BC Transit Governance and Funding Experience Bill Lambert, Manager, Transportation Solutions, April 16, 2013.
1 Providing Commute Choices to Employees Krute Singa.
CLARK COUNTY CTR PROGRAM CLARK COUNTYWORKSITES Camas, Vancouver, Washougal, Unincorporated Clark County  60 CTR Affected Worksites  43 in.
1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Freeway Revolts: Why not the Twin Cities? Thomas More Nick Dobda Xiaozheng He.
Commuter Connections FY 2006 Work Program National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board May 18, 2005.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Incorporating Pricing Strategies US Department of Transportation Incorporating.
GoBerkeley 1 goBerkeley: Integrating TDM and Parking Management into Downtown Berkeley Monday, October 28 th, 2013 Steer Davies Gleave 970 – 355 Burrard.
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
Reacting to Trends Rising gas prices! Decreasing public funding for transportation. TDM becoming more needed in new development. Modified tax benefit.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
TransLink’s role in supporting Cycling in Greater Vancouver ProWalk/ProBike 2004 Gavin Davidson, Program Manager, Bicycle Planning Greater Vancouver Transportation.
CITY OF TACOMA CTR PILOT CTR Board WSDOT Headquarters May 30, 2014.
Automated Vehicles: The technology that will change our mobility experience Ryan Lanyon Program Manager, Transportation Services City Toronto ACT Canada.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
10/22/021 Recent Innovations in Transportation Demand Management Peter Valk Transportation Management Services 12 th Annual UCLA Symposium on the Transportation/Land.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
A LITTLE BIT OF INFORMATION GOES A LONG WAY... Using individualized marketing to change travel behaviour A WinSmart Initiative.
Www-civil.monash.edu.au/its Institute of Transport Studies National Urban Transport Modelling Workshop, 5 March 2008 Travel Demand Management Geoff Rose.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Transportation Management, Intelligent Transportation Systems, and Other Adaptations to Maturity in the Highway Sector David Levinson.
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
Transportation 101 February 18, CommuteInfo Introducing… a better way to work.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
10 by 10 Initiatives. 10% by 2010 Achieve a 10% increase in the use of “alternative transportation modes” by the year Stepped approach: Convert.
OneCommute People Vanpool Management Contacts Program Management Accounts Surveys Meetings/Events Transit Passes Program Plan Actuals Mode Counts Vehicle.
Transportation Fee MSFAC Meeting 12/06/ Transportation Summary Typical Service Day during Semester: Tech Trolley – 6,200 riders & 240 trips Red.
Sustainability Programs
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Our Suite of Services.
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
Technology In Action Session: An On-Demand Sunday Transit Application
SATC 2017 SOUTHERN AFRICAN SOLUTIONS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORT CHALLENGES
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Bigger Bang for the Buck Panel Discussion: Improving the ROI on Transit Investments with TDM

What can TDM do? Attract New Rides Manage Peak Demand Respond Quickly to Changing Demands Provide Temporary Travel Measures Ensure Business Continuity

What can TDM do? Source: Cansult – TSI, May 2005 Impact of Transit Improvements on GHG Emissions (March 2005)

Attract New Riders Motivate individuals to choose transit –Financial incentives and loyalty Toronto – 12 months of free passes at new condos Mississauga – matching discount with employers Vancouver – universal transit pass at UBC, SFU –18 months: weekday trips up 54% and 84% –18 months: SOV trips down by 22% and 10% Canada – tax credit for transit riders Volume incentive programs

Attract New Riders Increase capacity at little cost –Modal integration GTHA: BikeLinx for bicycle racks on buses Active transportation links –Carpool parking at rapid transit

Attract New Riders Individualized marketing –Identify those most likely to take transit –Targeted marketing at trip ends –Portland, Oregon Transit marketing to households near new LRT line Transit trips increased by 44% with IM; 24% without –GTHA Big Move IM to every household near rapid transit approximately every three years

Manage Peak Demand

Alternative work arrangements –Ottawa (1974) “…Serious overtaxing of the bus transit system, particularly during brief periods in the morning and evening.” (Safavian and McLean, 1975) 33,000 federal employees on flexible time 50% of city’s workforce Manage Peak Demand CarTransit BeforeAfterChangeBeforeAfterChange AM50%47%-3%50%53%+3% PM57%55%-2%43%45%+2%

Manage Peak Demand Compressed Work Weeks –4/10 or 9/80 Telework Peak Period Pricing –Ottawa (discontinued) Fare premium during peak times Incentives –Seat guarantee and improved reliability

Respond Quickly Address capacity shortages until new infrastructure is in service Provide options in new areas before transit is introduced or extended Telework and carpooling can provide workforce continuity in a matter of days

Provide Temporary Measures Ease Disruptions (Construction, Events) –Incentives to prevent switch to SOV Temporary HOV Lanes Focused measures e.g. corridor Reprioritize modes for safety and efficiency –Route change Maximize use of alternates with capacity –Trip elimination programs

Provide Temporary Measures Denver –T-REX = 19 miles of new LRT and 17 miles of new highway TransOptions –Subsidies to employers and commuters –Marketing of options –Eligibility restricted to T-REX corridor –25% of commuters altered their travel time (50,000) –21% of commuters altered their routes –Flexible work schedules were #1 desire for work commuters during construction

Ensure Business Continuity Engage Private Involvement –Economic continuity –Private investment in transportation Continuity in transit operations –Service continuity –Emergency planning and operations E.g. office and support staff

Benefits Reduced Expenditures –TDM a fraction of the cost of new supply –Improved efficiency on sunken investments –Options where transit is not yet cost-effective Better Returns –More riders on Day 1 of new service –Reduced impact of disruptions –Ability to target the issue or population

Benefits Equity –Level the playing field across modes Environment –Strengthens transit’s position as ‘green’ Partnership –Can forge long-lasting partnerships Transit and TDM Supporters and stakeholders