RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSULATING PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD FROM RUC CAPACITY SHORT CHARGE Mark W. Smith J. Kay Trostle August 2008 DSWG.
Advertisements

PRR 692 APPEAL PRESENTED BY: Constellation NewEnergy DATE: November 2, 2006.
2004 Congestion Costs. 2 Transmission Congestion Occurs when analysis shows a given outage of a transmission element (contingency) will result in the.
Critique of Proposal to Designate SAPS-Shrew as CRE Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) June 4, 2009.
CRR Shortfall – Revenue Equalization Part 2 (Continuation from 2/21/08 TPTF discussion) Bill Barnes TPTF 3/5/2008.
Concerns with RUC Capacity Short Charge and Energy Trades.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
ERCOT Load Forecast Uncertainty V2 August 2, 2006.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 7, 2006.
ERCOT WHOLESALE MARKET OPERATIONS MODULE 2. 2 Essential Concepts Ancillary Services Congestion Management Topics.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
1 WMS Report To TAC September In Brief Four Working Group Reports Four Working Group Reports One Task Force Report One Task Force Report Three.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
PRS - RPRS Task Force Status Summary - August 14, PRS RPRS Task Force Status Summary Prepared for WMS and PRS August 2006.
June 17, Strategic Framework Business Definition and Strategic Issues Board of Director’s Meeting June 17, 2003 ERCOT Strategic Planning Task Force.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Demand Side Working Group Chairman Slides June 27, 2008 Mary Anne Brelinsky Vice President 1.
Presentation to House Regulated Industries Committee Chairman Phil King Trip Doggett Chief Operating Officer The Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
Discussion of Reliability Must-Run (RMR) Protocol Provisions ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 6, 2002.
1 ERCOT Wholesale Settlement Module 3. 2 BENA iq = -1 * (Σ (RI iz + LI iz + URC iz + MISD iz + MISR iz ) z + TCRPAY Bei + Σ CSC Bei ) * LRS iq Can you.
CRR Shortfall – Revenue Equalization Part 3 (Continuation from 3/5/08 TPTF discussion) Bill Barnes/Sharon Wang TPTF 3/21/2008.
1 WMS Report TO TAC January In Brief Two Working Group Reports Two Working Group Reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports One PRR.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Unit-Specific Bid Limits based on Modified Generic Cost.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 4, 2007.
RPRS TF and QSE Managers Report to PRS 1)Procurement (QSE Managers) 2)Cost Allocation (RPRS Task Force) –PRR 674 –PRR 676 –PRR 678.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
1 RPRS Market the issue of capacity inadequacy solved by the Local Congestion procurements ERCOT Feb 19, 2004.
2003 State of the Market Report ERCOT Wholesale Electricity Markets.
Nodal Short Pay and Uplift Process CWG Meeting May 28, 2008.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Report to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee December 5, 2002.
Operating Reserves and Extended Locational Marginal Pricing 1.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April In Brief Two Working Group reports Two Working Group reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports BENA presentation.
PRS RPRS Task Force Report from July 27 th Meeting Special PRS Meeting August 2, 2006.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
ERCOT Wholesale Market Basics Module 3 Settlement.
COPS – ERCOT PROJECTS UPDATE WHOLESALE MARKET DEVELOPMENT Paula Feuerbacher October 20, 2004.
RPRS Settlement Examples Market Support Services March 30, 2005 March 14, 2006 Presented by ERCOT Art Deller Bill Kettlewell.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board November 14, 2006.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors October 21, 2008.
Joint PLWG/CMWG Assignment Update to ROS September 15, 2011.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
OOMC and Local RPRS Settlement Alignment January 2007 WMS Meeting Ino Gonzalez ERCOT Settlements.
2004 CSCs & Zones. Goals for 2004 Increase ERCOT market efficiency Reduce out-of-merit energy and capacity deployments Reduce uplift of local congestion.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Jul 23, 2003Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO1 Market Pricing Issues Update John MacKenzie.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
1 ECONOMIC TRANSMISSION PLANNING Wholesale Market Subcommittee March 22, 2006 CMWG Proposal #1.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
Report to TAC June In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG MCWG MCWG QMWG QMWG VCWG VCWG Other Reports Other Reports NOGRR.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
RPRS March 23, 2006 Presented by ERCOT Art Deller Bill Kettlewell
CRR Deration and NPRR821 WMS 09/06/2017.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Settlement Update Austin Rosel ERCOT October 11, 2017.
Settlements Analysis due to SFT Deration Issue
Review of Abnormal MCPEs
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Presentation transcript:

RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006

RPRS Purpose To bring sufficient capacity on line to meet the needs of:  ERCOT system wide insufficiency  Zonal Congestion (currently not functional)  Local Congestion (basically OOMC)

RPRS Payment When the service was crafted it was the intent that costs related to the service were allocated:  System wide insufficiency: QSEs short on an ERCOT wide basis  Zonal Congestion: QSEs impacting the CSCs  Local Congestion: all QSEs on a LRS basis  See Protocols

RPRS Problem The settlement formulas do not allocate the ERCOT system wide insufficiency costs as intended  Formula breaks down insufficiency on a zonal basis (“z” subscript in the formulas) Maximum Zonal Shortfall Maximum RPRS Price Maximum Zonal Mismatch RPRS Underschedule Charge

Result A QSE with adequate resource ERCOT wide can be charged significantly for load variances in different zones

For Example A QSE schedules 500MWs in the North Zone and 500MWs in the South Zone DAY AHEAD LOAD SCHEDULE IntervalQty (MW)ZoneQty (MW)Zone HE16500N S REAL TIME AML IntervalQty (MW)ZoneQty (MW)Zone HE16400N600S RPRS Cost = $100/MW Actual ERCOT wide shortfall = 1000 – 1000 = 0 Undershedule RPRS Charge  West, NE & Houston Zones = $100*(max[0,0]) = $0  North Zone = $100*(max[0,-100]) = $0  South Zone = $100*(max[0, 100]) = $10,000

Is this a Big Concern? Probably  For April 2006: $1,851,331 paid to generators providing RPRS $19,778,786 collected from QSEs  May 17: HE17 cleared at $1,555.54/MW (Revised down) Zonal issue may be significant contributor to overcharges Minor imbalances on May 17 lead to major charges

Fixes are in Progress PRRs 666 (yeah I know) and 667 would revise allocation mechanism and remove this issue Both will be discussed at PRS this month In the mean time...

Proposed Resolution "ERCOT is advised that the intent of the Protocols is for RPRS that has been procured for ERCOT System wide insufficiency be appropriately charged to QSEs that have insufficient capacity to meet their load on an ERCOT system wide basis and not by individual zone. RPRS that has been procured for Zonal Congestion is to be applied to QSEs whose schedules impact the CSC(s) for which the service was procured.“ Note: second sentence not essential since Zonal RPRS is not currently being procured. This language would clarify disagreement between Protocols language and settlement formulas. Does this also need to be a Board Resolution?

Protocol Language Specific Procurement Process Requirements for Replacement Reserve Service in the Adjustment Period ERCOT shall procure Replacement Reserve Service (RPRS) in the AP as follows: (1)ERCOT will evaluate Zonal Congestion, Local Congestion, and capacity insufficiency using ERCOT’s Operational Model, balanced QSE schedules, Resource Plans, and ERCOT forecast of next day Load. (2)ERCOT will define the level of Resources available to meet next-day reliability needs of the ERCOT System based on QSE schedule submissions, Resource Plans and ERCOT Load forecast. ERCOT will determine incremental Resource capacity available from Generation Resources that are Off-line, or Generation Resources that are expected to be Off-line in the requested hours or Loads acting as a Resource shown as available in the Resource Plans. (3)RPRS procurement produces an optimum solution for the whole Operating Day. The RPRS procurement resolves Local Congestion problems first and then resolves capacity inadequacy and Zonal Congestion problems simultaneously. The solution of the RPRS is a result of ERCOT performing analysis of the current physical system operations for each hour to recognize potential transmission constraints that would require Resources not currently planned to be available. The purpose and use of the RPRS procurement is to provide capacity from which energy would be available to solve the following system security violations:  (a)ERCOT System capacity insufficiency using any RPRS bid;  (b)Zonal Congestion using the RPRS bids by Congestion Zone in bid price Merit Order and the current physical system operations in the ERCOT System; and  (c)Local Congestion using Resource Category Generic Cost and the current physical system operations in the ERCOT System. (4)ERCOT will solve security violations using a transmission security-constrained mathematical optimization application. The application will solve as if each bid can be proportioned into individual MW bids. The objective of the optimization is to minimize the total cost, based on Resource Category Generic Cost, capacity price, operation price, and Resource Shift Factors, as described in Section , ERCOT Receipt of Replacement Reserve Service Bids, as well as lead time, minimum up time, and minimum down time captured through the registration process, for the whole Operating Day while satisfying all the security constraints for each hour.

Protocols Continued (5)The costs associated with resolving system security violations will be identified separately into the following categories: capacity inadequacy, Zonal Congestion, and Local Congestion. (6)The Market Clearing Prices on the capacity insufficiency, CSC constraint, and Operational Constraint will represent the marginal cost for the solution of each constraint and will be produced as an output of the mathematical optimization application. The output of the application will be as follows:  (a)The marginal cost (Shadow Price of the power balance constraint) to solve system insufficiency defines MCPC for insufficiency.  (b)The marginal cost (Shadow Price of the CSC constraint) to solve a CSC constraint defines the Congestion price of the CSC constraint.  (c)The bidder of RPRS shall be paid the higher of RPRS bid price (as defined in Section , Zonal or System Wide Replacement Reserve Service Capacity Payment to QSE) and MCPC of the Congestion Zone unless the bid has been selected to solve Local Congestion. Resources taken to solve Local Congestion shall be paid in accordance with the Local Congestion Replacement Reserve formula in Section , Local Congestion Replacement Reserve Payment to QSE. (7)QSEs whose schedules have impacts on CSCs according to the Commercial Model (using zonal Shift Factors at the time of RPRS procurement for each Zone) shall be charged Congestion costs associated with the impact. (8)The costs of resolving Local Congestion are based on the amount of capacity required to solve Local Congestion. This cost will be tracked by specific constraint to aid the determination of the potential addition to the constraint as a CSC. (9)If all of the cost of RPRS is not allocated by one of the above methods, then the allocation will be uplifted to all QSEs based on the Load Ratio Share for the relevant period. If ERCOT collects more RPRS costs in this manner than are necessary, the excess funds collected by ERCOT will be credited to all QSEs based on the Load Ratio Share for the relevant period.

Conclusion In it’s omission ERCOT Wide Insufficiency is left to the provision of (9): General Uplift This was not the intent of the drafters either The intent of the Protocols was direct assignment where feasible Thus ERCOT wide insufficiency should be applied to QSEs short ERCOT wide not zonally