Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips U.S. Geological Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Clean Estuary Partnership and the RMP Comparing two stakeholder programs producing science in support of policy James M. Kelly, Chair Bay Area Clean.
Advertisements

Contaminant Fate WG 5 Year Plan RMP CFWG Meeting January 15, 2008.
Developing Water Quality Solutions for SF Bay
Regulatory State of the Bay Status and Trends Tom Mumley San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Fish Effects Five-year Plan Chinook Salmon. Outline Management and Regulatory Context Management and Regulatory Context RMP objectives RMP objectives.
PCBs Total Maximum Daily Loads San Francisco Bay Fred Hetzel SFB-RWQCB May 13, 2003.
Planning for Our Future:
Overview of the Chesapeake Bay Prioritized Organic Toxics of Concern List Rich Eskin Greg Allen Chesapeake Bay Program Toxics Subcommittee.
Endocrine Disruptors: What are they, and why should we care? httpwww.usgs.govthemesFS
What are Ecosystem Services? Goods and life supporting services provided by natural ecosystem. Goods timber fisheries pharmaceuticals Services pollination.
Cleaning Wisconsin’s Waters: From Command and Control to Collaborative Decision Michael Kraft Public and Environmental Affairs UW-Green Bay Prepared for.
 Great Lakes Areas of Concern  U.S. urban areas (pink shading)
+ Water Quality & Human Health: From Arsenic Exposure to Biological Response Understanding how contaminants move through the environment UNC Superfund.
Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips (USGS) and Greg Allen (EPA)
Columbia River Toxics Reduction Working Group 2012 Regional Roundtable: Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention Resource Center.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
PBT Initiative and PCBs Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force Holly Davies, Ph.D. April 24 th, 2013.
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Marine Pollution Pollution – Any harmful substance or energy put into the oceans by humans Harmful to living organisms –Standard.
Goals  Determine which chemicals present (or potentially present) in the Lake Champlain basin would cause detrimental effects  Determine the pathways.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Persistent Organic Pollutants in Marine Ecosystems.
Air Pollutants and the Chesapeake Bay
Environmental Legislation and Agencies Review. Sets a time table for phasing out ozone- depleting substances.
Sources of Pollutants Point Source Nonpoint Source
A Brief Review by: Akbar Tahir Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries University of Hasanuddin Marine coastal pollution: causes, effects and management.
The situation in Norway concerning sediments/dredging Tore Lundestad, Port of Borg, Norway.
Mark Richards Virginia Department of Environmental Quality What’s in Your Water? A Discussion of Threats to Virginia’s Water Quality William & Mary School.
Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) Pollution of the Hudson River Marka Latif 10/18/13 Life Science Class.
A Small Dose of Pollutant – 12/04/10 An Introduction To The Health Effects of Persistent Chemical Pollutants A Small Dose of Pollutant.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Background and Litigation Jon A. Mueller, Vice President For Litigation Chesapeake Bay Foundation William and Mary,
Lake Huron Initiative: A Work in Process Presented by: Jim Bredin - Michigan Office of the Great Lakes.
By :Katie Yang (Sophomore, Guilderland HS Mentored by Krista Glanville, RPI EcoEd Secondary School Research Program.
Oregon Toxics Reduction & Green Chemistry PPRC Roundtable – October 24, 2012 Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
Current Great Lakes Toxic Prevention Programs Maumee Bay, OH February 22, 2005.
Environmental Protection in the United States Christopher Green U.S. Embassy July 13, 2006.
Name that Legislatio n! Review. Sets a time table for phasing out ozone- depleting substances.
` Area VI: Pollution VIB2: Hazardous Chemicals in the Environment.
«WATER QUALITY & EU POLICY» KATHERINE-JOANNE HARALAMBOUS NTUA Professor «WATER QUALITY & EU POLICY» KATHERINE-JOANNE HARALAMBOUS NTUA Professor NATIONAL.
Emerging Contaminants in the Great Lakes Christina Pfouts.
I. I.Water Pollution – Sources and Effects B. B.Sources 2. 2.Other factors Factors besides chemical pollutants can degrade water quality a. a.Removal of.
Fishing Advisories and Fish Contaminants EEES 4730 Amanda Wendzicki.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Proposed Lake Michigan Rivers Network NMN proposed 17sites. Lake Michigan group added 3 additional sites that already conduct flow and quality monitoring.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
Consumer Concerns: Food & Water Safety Chapter 17.
North American Sound Management of Chemicals Initiative Commission for Environmental Cooperation Ned Brooks, Chemicals Program Manager Commission for Environmental.
The State of the Sound Scott Redman Puget Sound Action Team February 5, 2003 Marine Water and Nearshore Successes & Challenges.
Management of threats to fish and wildlife from PBTs Scott Redman, Puget Sound Action Team Puget Sound Plankton - The Ultimate Seafood Experience, Jan.
Regulatory Chemical Risk Assessment From Superfund to Contaminants of Emerging Concern Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Patrick Gwinn November.
Water Quality in San Francisco Bay J.A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council slide 1 Follow Up Actions to ESPX Collaboration – “center of knowledge” type repository for information and research.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Potential Activities, Costs, and Priorities for Watershed Monitoring Scott Phillips Joel Blomquist Katie Foreman Eff/Opt Conf Call July 24, 2009.
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
Combining prediction and monitoring for reduction of toxics: the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study Glenn Warren, Russell Kreis, and Paul Horvatin U.S. EPA,
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Chapter 14 Water Pollution. The Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Bay – largest estuary in the US Pollutants: – Excess nitrogen and phosphorus From 3 major sources:
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
By: Krishna Patel & Saras Wong (Group #7).  What is Electronic Waste & why is it a major environmental concern?  The objective of this review  Introduce.
Chesapeake Bay. Is the largest estuary in the United States The Bay’s watershed is 64,000 square miles (60% forested) and covers parts of 6 states These.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
ENV 103 Final presentation
U.S. Clean Water Act: Water Quality Standards Overview
Niagara River Area of Concern
Benefits and Risks of Pesticides
Health & Consumers Directorate General
Scott Phillips (USGS) and Greg Allen (EPA)
UNC Superfund Research Program
Semi-Permeable Membrane Devices (SPMD)
Presentation transcript:

Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips U.S. Geological Survey

What contaminants are in the Chesapeake watershed? –Extent –Severity What are the threats? –People –Fish and wildlife What is being done? –CBP –Management strategies Outline

Nation’s Largest Estuary What it provides… –Biodiversity –18 M people –$1 Trillion value Degraded ecosystem Restoration effort –CBP –Bay Agreements –Toxic contaminants

What is in the water? CBP Report: Extent and Severity Pesticides Petroleum products Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Metals Polychlorinated biphenyls Dioxins and Furans Pharmaceuticals Household and Personal Care Products Flame Retardants Biogenic hormones

Extent Widespread: –PCBs, PAHs, Mercury –Some herbicides Localized: –Petroleum products –Insecticides –Metals –Dioxins/furans, Uncertain: Pharmaceuticals, care products, flame retardants, some pesticides, hormones

Severity Widespread: PCBs and mercury Localized: Petroleum products, PAHs, Insecticides, metals Dioxins/furans, Uncertain: Pharmaceuticals, care products, flame retardants, biogenic hormones, herbicides

Effects: People, Fish, Wildlife Fish consumption Degraded fish health –Reduced reproduction –Feminization –Tumors –Mortality Wildlife: Reproductive impairment in water birds –Eggshell thinning (DDE) –Embryo lethality (pesticides) –Hatching success (PCBs)

What is being done? Chesapeake 2000 –Nutrients and sediment –Toxics Lower priority New concerns Executive Order New Agreement –10 goals –Contaminants –Management strategies

Contaminant Goal Free of contaminant effects Outcomes –Policy and Prevention –Research Fish safe to eat Fish and wildlife Widespread contaminants Science based

Management strategies Widespread Localized Uncertain PCBs Mercury Dioxin, Petroleum, Insecticides, Metals PAHs Pesticides Herbicides Pharmaceuticals Hshld/Personal Care Flame Retardants Biogenic Hormones -Reduction -Air regulations Existing regulations and local approaches Monitoring and research strategy

Managing PCBs CBP management approaches Coordination with regulatory programs Contaminated sediment remediation Voluntary removal of PCB fluids Reductions from nutrient/sediment TMDL Laws and regulations TSCA CWA RCRA CERCLA CAA

CBP coordination –Complete strategies –Adaptive management –Regulation and voluntary Special interest groups –Lobbying and litigation Implementing actions –Costs –Slow improvements Monitoring and research –Support decision making Next Steps and Challenges