HQ02 Magnetic Measurements Prelim. Results Overview 28Jun2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Advertisements

EMA Technology Overview. ElectroMagnetic Actuator – EMA4K Peak Force = 19kN Peak Vel = 4m/sec Typical Damper Pk Performance: 4m/sec Freq response.
Summary of the last lecture
1 Zachary Wolf 1 Undulator Tuning Status June 9, 2009 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen,
BBA Related Issues Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Undulator.
1 / 27 L.Angrisani University of Naples Federico II, ITALY 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva,
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rotating Coils - Giordana Severino – Rotating Coils PACMAN meeting Printed Circuit Coils – Future developments.
1 / 17 Author CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland Title.
R&D of fundamental technologies of accelerator magnets using coated conductors N. Amemiya, Z. Zhang, T. Sano, Y. Sogabe, T. Nakamura (Kyoto Univ.) T. Ogitsu.
11 December 2011 Holger Witte Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group A Dipole with Grain Oriented Steel.
Overview of main results from first HQ02a test For HQ meeting 7/30/13.
Field Quality Working Group-14/12/04 - Stephane Sanfilippo AT-MTM-AS Field Quality measurements at cold. Standard program v.s extended tests. Presented.
Bias Magnet for the Booster’s 2-nd Harmonic Cavity An attempt to evaluate the scope of work based of the existing RF design of the cavity 9/10/2015I. T.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
Displacement vs Time, Velocity vs Time, and Acceleration vs Time Graphs.
Geneva, 12/06/ Results of Magnetic Measurements on MQXC 02 L. Fiscarelli on behalf of TE/MSC/MM section
HQ02 Magnetic Measurements Prelim. Results Overview 28Jun2013.
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
L. Fiscarelli, S. Izquierdo Bermudez, O. Dunkel, S. Russenschuck, G. Willering, J. Feuvrier 22 nd September 2015.
#1 Energy matching It is observed that the orbit of an injected proton beam is horizontally displaced towards the outside of the ring, by about  x~1 mm.
1 J.DiMarco 16Nov2010 LQS01b Magnetic Measurements Results ( preliminary ) J. DiMarco 16Nov2010.
HL-LHC Annual Meeting, November 2013HQ Planning – G. Sabbi 1 HQ Status and Plans G. Sabbi High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting Daresbury, UK, November 11-14,
LARP DOE Review, 7/9/2012Magnet Systems Introduction – G. Sabbi 1 Magnet Systems Overview and HQ Program GianLuca Sabbi 2012 DOE Review of LARP SLAC, July.
HQ01e3 test summary December 2012 M. Marchevsky, LBNL.
Field Model for the Multipoles Factory FQWG, 17/3/2004 S.Amet, L.Deniau, M.Haverkamp, L.Larsson, T.Pieloni, S.Sanfilippo, M. Schneider, R. Wolf, G.Ambrosio.
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
LCLS-II Physics Meeting, May 08, 2013 LCLS-II Undulator Tolerances Heinz-Dieter Nuhn LCLS-II Undulator Physics Manager May 8, 2013.
Test Program and Results Guram Chlachidze for FNAL-CERN Collaboration September 26-27, 2012 Outline Test program Quench Performance Quench Protection Magnetic.
4 th Order Resonance at the PS R. WASEF, S. Gilardoni, S. Machida Acknowledgements: A. Huschauer, G. Sterbini SC meeting, 05/03/15.
L. Fiscarelli, O. Dunkel, S. Russenschuck, S. Izquierdo Bermudez, G. Willering, J. Feuvrier 21 st July 2015.
Superconducting Magnet Development for Ex-Situ NMR FY04 Plan G. Sabbi, 3/31/03.
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge th April 2013.
Magnetic Field Stability Measurements Joe DiMarco 23Oct07.
How precisely can we control our magnets? Experience and impact on the expected control of machine parameters (tune and chromaticity) Thanks to: M.Lamont,
L. Fiscarelli O. Dunkel, J. Feuvrier, S. Izquierdo Bermudez, G. Willering International Review of the HL-LHC 11 T Dipole for DS collimation December 2014.
7 th March 2008 Magnet Modelling N. Sammut On behalf of the FIDEL Working Group.
Analysis of magnetic measurements 11-T single-aperture demonstrator built and tested at FNAL B. Auchmann, M. Karppinen, D. Tsirigkas for the 11-T collaboration.
Warm-Cold Changes in the Sextupole Harmonic in the Quadrupole Magnets for the BEPC-II Luminosity Upgrade Animesh Jain Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton,
“ Decay & snapback in main LHC dipoles vs injection current”, LUMI-05, Arcidosso, 1 September 2005, Page 1/4 During ramps, boundary-induced.
Tune: Decay at Injection and Snapback Michaela Schaumann In cooperation with: Mariusz Juchno, Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci, Jorg Wennigner.
AC Loss Measurements on the HQ2 Magnet Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to H. Bajas, G. Chlachidze, V. Marinozzi, M. Tartaglia, X. Wang HQ Meeting
MQXF protection: work in progress and plans Vittorio Marinozzi 9/23/ QLASA calibration with HQ02 data.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
TQC03e Test Status  Magnetic measurements at 300 K  Z-scan at ±10 A  Magnetic measurements at 4.6 K (I max up to 6.5 kA)  Quench training and ramp.
SC Undulators protection and commissioning W. Venturini Delsolaro Acknowledgements: R. Denz, R. Maccaferri.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Many people contributed to this work, most of all the Long Quadrupole Task Leaders:
LQS01a Test Results LARP Collaboration Meeting 14 Fermilab - April 26-28, 2010 Guram Chlachidze.
HL-LHC Meeting, November 2013Field Quality Update – G. Sabbi 1 Field Quality Updates HQ/QXF and D2 GianLuca Sabbi Acknowledgement: Joe DiMarco, E. Todesco,
17 th April 2007 Nicholas J. Sammut Decay Prediction and Minimisation During LHC Operation University of Malta Field Quality Working Group with several.
Magnetic measurements on MBHSP104
Figure 22-1 The Force Between Two Bar Magnets
Model magnet test results at FNAL
Naoyuki Amemiya Kyoto University
Tune and Chromaticity: Decay and Snapback
HQ01e-3 magnetic measurements
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York , USA
Cycle-to-cycle reproducibility and magnet modeling.
REVIEW OF ESTIMATES OF RANDOM COMPONENTS IN THE INNER TRIPLET
Detection thresholds in LARP Magnets
Flux jumps in HQ Hugo BAJAS
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
FNAL Superconducting Quadrupole Test
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Undulator Tuning Status
HQ01 field quality study update
On reproducibility From several inputs of N. Sammut, S. Sanfilippo, W. Venturini Presented by L. Bottura LHCCWG
Presentation transcript:

HQ02 Magnetic Measurements Prelim. Results Overview 28Jun2013

Summary of Magnetic Measurements Performed on HQ02 A – 200mm and 100mm long PCB probe ( simultaneous acquisition of both circuits ) B – dual 100mm long PCB probe ( simultaneous acquisition of both circuits ) C – 100mm long Tangential probe

Z-scans 1.9K 964A 14605A scans repeat well 8500A 14605A Saturation effect Zscans on upramp and downramp show stable persistent current magnetization vs. z

Changes in b3/a3 vs Z-position are ~5 units in the straight section - indicating some variations in coil geometry b6 change is ~2 units

From standard deviation of harmonics among 4 non-overlap positions in magnet straight section can estimate amplitude of coil block variations from HQ02 cross-section error simulation. 48  m coil position variation is larger than TQ or HQ01 which were closer to ~30  m Calculation of expected harmonics s.d. using random coil displacement RMS = d

Apply same technique among the three assemblies HQ01d, HQ01e, and HQ02 Coil position variation is ~ 62  m TQ series had ensemble variation of ~140  m Courtesy XRW

Accelerator profile reproducibility test Accelt6 has slower current acceleration i.e. 2A/s^2 instead of 6.5A/s^2

Accelerator profile reproducibility test This cycle was preceded by a quench, so harmonics during pre-cycle are different Reproducibility in all harmonics is very good

Accelerator profile injection porch b6 decay and snap-back About 0.5 units b6 change over 20 min. Fast decay when arrive on porch Resuming ramp from porch plotted vs TIME ramp from porch plotted vs CUR Drift during porch is comparable to dynamic component while ramping ‘Snap-back’ is therefore very small

300A min. cur. Start new file at 14kA to keep size manageable 600A 900A

Ramp up from 50A 300A 600A 900A Accelerator Cycle Reset Current Test

HQ01 – b3 HQ02 – b6 HQ02 – b3 HQ01 – b6 Loops at 20, 40A/s ramp rates HQ02 b6 has small ramp rate dependent effects. HQ02 b3 has some effects, but still much smaller than HQ01

Loops at 40A/s ramp rates at 2K and 4K temperatures Temperature effect on harmonics is very small – except for magnitude of ‘flux jump’ events

HQ01e HQ02 Magnitude of flux jump events seems smaller in HQ02 than in HQ01e3 (owing perhaps to more uniform set of coils); but work in progress… b6 Comparison of ‘flux jump’ events between HQ magnets