Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
CAC NOVEMBER 13, 2014 Common Core State Standards and Universal Design for Learning.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Digital Library Overview State Preparation for Digital Library Preview Jan Martin & Matt Gill Testing Roadshow- 9/15/14 to 9/19/14.
Transitioning to the Common Core Common Core Academy - Summer 2011.
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
CORE California Office to Reform Education Fall Performance Assessment Pilot October-December 2012.
Why move to Common Core?  Preparation: The standards are college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they.
Oregon Common Core State Standards Foundation of the Oregon Diploma.
KRISTEN BURTON ERIN FAASUAMALIE Future of Alternate Achievement Standards and Assessment in Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Common Core Standards Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District.
ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #8 Assessment.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Changing Landscape Writing Professional Development SMARTER Balance Assessment Consortium Common Core State Writing Standards.
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
Buckeye Elementary School District’s Curriculum Mapping Initiative
Principal Network Series Lisa Andrew, Ed.D Martha Martinez District and School Support Services.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Instructional Focus Meeting, September 22  Goals for today:  Overview of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) ▪ What are they? ▪ Where did they come.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Oregon Common Core State Standards Foundation of the Oregon Diploma.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
South Dakota Department of Education Spring 2011.
EHS and EMS Presentation 11/12/10 With thanks to Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor, James B. Hunt, Jr. Institute.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Curriculum Updates and Draft Instructional Framework I.Welcoming and Thank you… II.Implementation timeline and where we are… III.Review of the Curriculum,
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
May 13, 2011 Getting to Know the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
21 st Century Education A conversation regarding the changes in academic standards, assessment, funding, and accountability.
KLC October 7, Mathematical Practices ELA cognitively complex skills 1.Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Smarter Balanced Field Test March 3, 2014 Sequim School District.
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards August 2012IDEA Partnership1.
Smarter Balanced Interim and Formative Assessment PTE Summer Conference June 17, 2014 Nancy Thomas Price, Comprehensive Assessment Coordinator.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Using SVMI & SDCOE Resources to Support Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
Preparing All Students for College and Career Readiness CCSS and Smarter Balanced Assessments 101.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Transition to the Common Core LVUSD. The Challenge The Common Core curriculum itself will not look radically different from the lessons teachers.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning October 2011.
Transition to Common Core State Standards Oh Yes! New Standards Elizabeth A Herron-Ruff The Center for Charter Schools Danna Ferris Kent ISD September.
Examining the Collaborative Process in Implementing the Common Core State Standards.
Current StateYear 1: Year 2: Year 3: Desired State Curriculum How well is your curriculum articulated within and across grade.
Move Education Forward Name of School District | Date | Presenter’s Name | Presenter’s Title.
SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT PARA LOS NIÑOS APRIL 30, 2013 Transitioning to the Common Core.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Common Core State Standards
Building on our tradition of excellence – planning for the future.
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
Network Team Institute July 8-12, 2013
Scoring Open-Ended Items
Presentation transcript:

Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!

Five Year Transition Plan Develop Transition Plan: The goal of the transition and the collaborative professional development is to ensure quality learning for every student, every day, in every classroom. This plan has built in time for teachers to learn and process the new instructional focus through a collaborative and coaching model. Technology tools will be integrated throughout the five year transition plan. The collaborative unit/lessons will be added to Curriculum Crafter in order to create a repository of instructional materials for all educators throughout the county. Summer 2010 (Kent County Five Year Plan) – Brought in approximately 120 educators to complete the 10 Step Unwrapping Process (Lead and Learn) using the newly adopted Common Core Standards for ELA and Math. Grade/Course level teams completed this process for many of the units of instruction outlined by the CCSS. After the summer work, draft units of instruction were been released in Curriculum Crafter and now can be used for dialogue and exploration at the local level. The School Year (Starting the Wheel in Motion) – Created a common understanding of the purpose for Common Core State Standards – Created a county-wide Common Core Coaching Network (CCCN) to help with the transition and professional development taking place at the county and district levels. – Held five face-to-face meetings with activities that were replicated back in the buildings throughout each district in order to ensure that the information was shared with everyone on staff. We had approximately 375 educators involved in these sessions. – Focused on the change of the HOW of instruction – professional development centered on how UDL, PBL, Web 2.0 (MOODLE, Skype, Google Apps) and 21 st century skills can be embedded into classroom instruction. – Provided teacher collaborative time to discuss, critique, plan, and develop instructional unit(s) to be used in classrooms. – Teams gathered information, provided feedback, and sought out additional instructional ideas to be shared throughout the county on how to successfully implement the Common Core State Standards. – All educators engaged in professional learning conversations and activities to explore the Common Core State Standards.

Five Year Transition Plan Summer 2011 (Keeping the Wheel in Motion) – Brought in approximately 150 educators to continue the work of the 10 Step Unwrapping Process (Lead and Learn) for additional units of instruction outlined by the CCSS. Online pre-learning modules were completed by all participants prior to the face to face training. A few of the draft units were revised and have been re-released for draft piloting, dialogue, and exploration at the local level. See previous summer and CCCN training information for more specifics. The School Year (Keeping the Wheel in Motion) – Continue with the CCSS professional development to reach out and train additional staff in every district. Teams will support the “Model for Learning” i.e. gradual release model for planning and implementing common K-12 units of instruction. – Focus is on changing the HOW of instruction (UDL, PBL, Web 2.0, Balanced Assessment Systems, 21 st Century Skills, etc.) in the following domains: – K-12 ELA, Science, & Social Studies: Informational Text, Informational Writing, Argumentative Writing – Mathematics: Whole Number Operations K-2, Fraction 3-5, Ratios and Proportions 6-8, Modeling 9-12 – Provide teachers with collaborative time to discuss, critique, plan, and develop instructional unit(s) to be used in classrooms. – Introduction of new materials to assist with formative and interim assessment from the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium – Pilot the implementation of the new units of instruction K-12 – Gather information, provide feedback, seek out additional instructional ideas to be shared throughout the county on how to successfully implement the Common Core State Standards into every classroom. Summer (Continuing the Wheel in Motion) – Bring in educators to continue the work of the 10 Step Unwrapping Process (Lead and Learn) for units of instruction outlined by the CCSS. Online pre-learning modules will be completed by all participants prior to the face to face training. Draft instructional units and updated assessment samples will be revised and will be placed in Curriculum Crafter for use in classrooms across the county. The units can be used to enhance the PLC dialogue and exploration at the local level during the school years.

Five Year Transition Plan The School Year (Full Implementation Pilot) – Continue with the CCSS professional development to reach out and train additional staff in every district. Teams will support the “Model for Learning” gradual release model for planning and implementing common K-12 units of instruction. – Focus is on changing the HOW of instruction (UDL, PBL, Web 2.0, Performance Assessments, 21 st Century Skills, etc.) in the following domains: – K-12 ELA, Science, & Social Studies: Informational Text, Informational Writing, Argumentative Writing – Mathematics: Whole Number Operations K-2, Fraction 3-5, Ratios and Proportions 6-8, Modeling 9-12 – Provide teacher collaborative time to discuss, critique, plan, and develop instructional unit(s) to be used in classrooms. – Introduction of new materials to assist with formative and interim assessment from the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium will be shared, utilized as practice assessments to gauge student comfort with the new format of assessments. – Implementation of the new units of instruction K-12 (See Stages of Implementation) – Gather information, provide feedback, seek out additional instructional ideas to be shared throughout the county on how to successfully implement the Common Core State Standards. – Introduce and share resources, materials, and assessment samples from the SBAC Digital Clearing House (see slide 14 for more details) (Full Implementation at Every School in Every Classroom) – Facilitate training for new teachers and administrators on how to use the SBAC Digital Clearing House resources (see slide 14 for more details)

Understanding the Common Core State Standards and What It Means to Classroom Instruction and Student Learning Kent County Five Year Plan See County-Wide Five Year Collaborative Plan

Starting the Wheel in Motion… Awareness of Common Core Understand the “Why” and New “How” Focus Unwrap the CCSS Engage and Explore in CCSS Dialogue at County and District Level around Instruction Participate in Professional Development (UDL, PBL, Web 2.0, 21 st Century Skills, Balanced Assessment Educational Technology Integration – Explore, Engage and Implement Summer PD and Curriculum Development Work Planning and Communication for next steps in the process Common Core Transition Plan Starting the Wheel in Motion – Year 1 & 2

Implementation in Motion… Common Message about CCSS Implementation Implementation of Course Content and discussion about gaps in teaching the transition Implementation of Units of Instruction/PLC Dialogue Benchmarking Student Progressing – Using Data to Drive Instruction Additional Unit Development Work and Professional Development for new staff Common Core Implementation Plan Starting the Wheel in Motion – Year 3-5 Participate in Professional Development: Creating a Balanced Assessment System and Exploring SBAC Sample Assessments Demonstrate the change in “How” and integration of technology into classroom instruction. PLC Dialogue around CCSS Implementation

Our Model for Learning – Understanding the Common Core State Standards Our Model for Learning – Year 2-5

Stages of Implementation Plan: Sequence of Instruction of CCSS Units Develop: Process for implementing new instructional units. Critique: Share thinking and gather ideas and deeper understandings from colleagues and district/ISD administrators. Administer: Utilize new units, take notes throughout instruction, offer ideas and suggestions, enhance units with new ideas to be shared. Revise: Provide ideas for revisions and enhancements to Units of Instruction. Continuous Improvement Model Stages of Implementation – Year 2-5

Clear Expectations Begin Implementation of CCSS Units of Instruction Learn and Implement instructional Strategies (PBL, UDL and Tech Tools) Engage in PLC around CCSS Units Job embedded Professional Development Successful Pilot and Gather Feedback Communication and Exploration Implementation and Professional Development Reflection and Planning Implementation with Success Implementation with Success– Year 2-5 Balanced Assessment System

Implementation and Professional Development Rubric Yet to be created MDE’s recommended school year for full implementation? for district conversation time around gaps in teaching the transition District Level Implementation Planning Timeline Yet to be created Important Points to Keep In Mind: K & Grade 8 should implement CCSS because they will be the first students taking the Smarter Balanced Assessment in Kindergarten students that begin Common Core will not have any gaps in their learning.

MEAP Testing Scoring YearAssessment CriteriaScoring Same MEAP Questions as in the pastNew Cut Scores – ALL MEAP Questions part of score and MEAP questions plus field testing of CCSS correlation questions as part of the assessment Content assessment questions may be previous MEAP questions but from a different grade levels. Cut Score will maintain or may increase based on previous year scores – Some MEAP questions are part of the score CCSS field questions will be added but will not count for AYP purposes (like extended core) SMARTER Balanced Assessment Begins Summative Assessments includes: Computer adapted content assessment and reading, writing and math performance assessments every year in grades 3-8 & 11 Cut scores and accommodations will be consistent across all states in the consortium

Together we will build a solid learning structure to meet the needs of ALL students and prepare them to effectively compete in the global economy. Purpose: Kent County Five Year Plan