Bridge Design Implementation Jeff Olsen, PE – MT DOT AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
Advertisements

Primer Class Jim Ferguson (TUG Vice Chair, Nebraska Dept of Roads) October 12, 2004.
Licensing Because DARWin-ME will not be available for licensing until April 2011, the annual license fees will be prorated for the period April through.
Solutions for Prestressed Reinforced Concrete Structures
Implementation of Darwin – ME Chris Wagner, PE July 26-29, 2010 Kansas City, MO.
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
VOBUG Conference August 3 rd, 2010 Nashville, Tennessee Robert LeFevre, P.E. Adam Price, P.E. Tennessee Department of Transportation Structures Division.
Idaho Load Rating Program
Brenden K. Schaefer, P.E. Principal Bridge Engineer Wyoming Department of Transportation 2011 Virtis / Opis User Group Meeting August 2, 2011 Helena, MT.
Rating of Local Bridges for SHVs Using Virtis Software Virtis/Opis User Group Meeting August 3-4, 2010 Moises C. Dimaculangan, P.E. Minnesota Department.
© 2012 Autodesk Structural Workflows for Autodesk ® Plant Design Suite Projects Abraham Koenig Technical Specialists Manager AEC/ENI Central Europe Alexandre.
VDOT LRFD Software Andy Zickler VDOT Structure and Bridge Division Central Office September 8, 2006.
Micheal J. Watters, P.E. Principal Bridge Engineer Wyoming Department of Transportation Virtis / Opis Users Group Meeting August 3, 2010.
AASHTOWare Bridge Update
AASHTOWare  - Transportation Software Solutions Contents Participants Follow-up Purpose Introduction Results Trnsport 2004 Customer Satisfaction Survey.
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
PennDOT Research Program Got Research? Repair Methods for Prestressed Girder Bridges.
Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis Bridgeware User Group 2011 Conference Helena, Montana 1.
© 2009 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Steve Willoughby, Bentley Systems Bridge Product Specialist LEAP Bridge: Product Update and Direction.
Virtis-Opis Update Virtis-Opis User Group Training Meeting Helena – August 2011.
PGSuper2AASHTOWare Bridge Data Translator
AASHTOWare Program Benefits Standing Committee on Highways October 18, 2013 Tom Cole, Idaho DOT AASHTO Special Committee on Joint Development.
Todd Thompson, PE – SD DOT AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force, Chair Presented to the RADBUG Traverse City, MI August 12, 2014.
Server-Side vs. Client-Side Scripting Languages
Steel and Reinforced Concrete
ODOT Policy for Deck/Slab Closure Pours Sean Meddles, P.E. Assistant Administrator ODOT Office of Structural Engineering.
EXAMPLE 9.3 – Part III PCI Bridge Design Manual
Bridge Design-Rating 2014 Administrative Overview RADBUG Meeting Traverse City, MI Judy B. Skeen, P.E.
RM Product Update October 2009 Alexander Mabrich, PE, Msc Senior Engineering Consultant.
TUG, AASHTO, TTF Primer Class Tim Lindberg (TTF Member from South Carolina) November 6, 2005.
2013 Design Rating User Group Presentation Virginia Beach, Virginia August 8, 2013.
Bentley Leap Bridge Components Overview
Jason G. Caudill Assistant Professor of Business Administration Carson-Newman College.
LRFR vs. LFR Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 2, 2011
1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO Standard Spec Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.
Using Templates to Increase Efficiency
AASHTO SCOHTS SUB COMMITTEE ON SAFETY MANAGEMENT STATUS UPDATE APRIL 29, 2009 Chicago, Illinois.
End HomeWelcome! The Software Development Process.
1 AASHTOWare Bridge Technical Update AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/Design User Group Training Meeting Traverse City – August 2014.
AASHTOWare BRIDGEWare Satisfaction Survey Results FY 2010 Wendy L. Gagnier, P.E. BRIDGEWare Project Manager.
Virtis-Opis Beta Testing Todd S. Thompson, PE South Dakota DOT Office of Bridge Design August 3, 2011.
AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating TAG Overview RADBUG Traverse City, Michigan August 2014.
BRIDGE DESIGN & RATING REPORTS TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP (RTAG) Amjad Waheed, PE 2014 RADBUG Presentation Traverse City, Michigan August 13, 2014.
Presented by J. Mauricio Ruiz, P.E. Yadhira A. Resendez HIPERPAV Wisconsin Customization 15 November 2005 Madison, Wisconsin.
C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
A Load Rating of a 3 Span Continuous Deck-to- Through Truss Bridge in Br|R AASHTOWare BrDR 2013 User Group Meeting A Load Rating of a 3 Span Continuous.
1 Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2010 Nashville, Tennessee.
Bridge Girder Alternatives for Extremely Aggressive Environments Project Manager: Will Potter, P.E. - FDOT Research Team: Jeff R. Brown, PhD, Assoc. Professor.
© 2014 Autodesk What’s New in Autodesk ® Advance Steel 2015 Presenter Name Presenter Title.
User Interface Improvements AASHTOWare Bridge Design/Rating User Group Training Meeting Virginia Beach – August 2013.
1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO LRFD/LRFR Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.
BrDR Technical Support Center How-To Herman Lee, P.E RADBUG Conference August 12, 2014.
1 AASHTOWare Bridge Design Tool AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/Design User Group Training Meeting Virginia Beach – August 2013.
Making the System Operational Implementation & Deployment
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Bridge Structural Considerations BASIC STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS.
Offsite manufactured Bridges
TPC Desktop 2015 Updated Interface
Hua Liu, Zeqian Li (Student) Lin Yin (Visiting Faculty Advisor)
TPC Desktop 2015 Updated Interface
Bridge modelling with CSI software.
ABCD What’s New In Bridges
Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 6, 2013
GST Implementation in Miracle
Insert Presentation Title Here Insert Presentation Summary Here
GST Implementation in Miracle
JavaScript 101 Lesson 8: Loops.
Bridge Design-Rating AASHTO Overview
AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force
AASHTOWare Bridge Design & Rating (BrDR) 3D FEM Analysis Capabilities
Presentation transcript:

Bridge Design Implementation Jeff Olsen, PE – MT DOT AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force

Previously used “In-House” programs Constantly updating to current AASHTO code Outdate language What are our software needs? Prestressed Beams Reinforced Concrete Slabs Steel I-Girders Looked at multiple programs PS-Beam, Conspan Merlin Dash, MDX AASHTOWare Bridge Montana’s Design Implementation

AASHTO LRFD Acceptable Method of Structural Analysis

One program is able to model majority of our new bridge types AASHTO Spec-Checker and Spec Check Summary Designer can select the spec version – updated yearly Can build multiple alternates 3D Analysis and Steel Curved Girder Ability to provide load rating with the same model Bridge model is passed on to Bridge Management Section State owned software We have a voice in the development Can add state specific features thru service units New upcoming design tools Advantages of AASHTOWare Bridge Design

Design Policy

Helpers Prestress Design Templates and Tutorial

Helpers Report Location Summary

Customizing Bridge Explorer

OPIS as a Design Tool Enhancement # 1233

OPIS as a Design Tool Task Force Created a Design Tool – Technical Advisory Group Prestress Design Tool Currently Under Development – released as soon as ready Steel Design Tool Design Phase – 2015 Implementation – 2016 Steel Girder – Splice Analysis (New York Enhancement) – 2015 Future Design Tools Timber Design and Rating Application – BRDRSUP-228 ???? (Insert your design tool idea here)

Design Tool TAG Jeff Olsen – Montana, Chair Dean Teal – Kansas, Co-Chair Berhanu Woldemichael – Alabama Mahmood (Mac) Hasan – Colorado Nicholas Barnett – Illinois Elizabeth Befikadu – AI Engineers Arielle Ehrlich – Minnesota Bethany Kappes – Montana Brenda Crudele – New York Jeff Ruby – Kansas

States that License BrDR

Questions…… Thank You