NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal on Ancillary Service Deliverability Requirements QMWG January 6, 2012.
Advertisements

Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Market Based Solutions for Demand Response Providers Today and the Future Alice Jackson Occidental Energy Ventures Corp.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Requirement Documents November 7, 2006 Sai Moorty MMS Project.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG) April 2015 Update to COPS.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
August 17, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting Updated Analysis of Non-Spin Deployments and RUC John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 4, 2009.
March 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott April 7, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee March 4, 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
NPRR 097 DSR and Small Capacity / Low Operating Level Issues for Compliance Monitoring.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6.1 EDS 3 Release 6 LFC Workshop October 10, 2007.
ROS Meeting – 12/06/071Texas Nodal Program - TPTF Update Texas Nodal Transition Plan Task Force ROS Meeting Stacy Bridges, ERCOT Thursday, 12/06/2007.
1 ERCOT Nodal Protocols Telemetry Requirements. 2 Protocol References Telemetry TAC will establish TASK force and approve a telemetry criteria.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 TPTF Update for TAC March 8, 2007 Trip Doggett.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC November 4 th, 2010.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
October Project Release (NPRRs 710, 706, 698 and 595) ERCOT Operations & Market Operations WebEx Training October XX, 2015.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) TITLE: Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin March.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
PRR525 SCE Method Comparison ERCOT Compliance December 3, 2004.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April 2007 (which is in March)
© CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. THE OFFERING DESCRIBED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS SOLD AND CONTRACTED BY CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC., A SUBSIDIARY.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
NPRRs NPRR649 Lost Opportunity Payments for HDL Manual Overrides. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes two options for a lost opportunity.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
ERCOT DYNAMICS WORKING GROUP Report to ROS August 16, 2007 Vance Beauregard, American Electric Power.
December 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Integrated ERCOT Readiness and Transition (IRT) TPTF – December 4 th, 2006 ERCOT Qualification.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 June, 2009 Report to WMS 17 June, 2009 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Analysis for the Determination of X, Y, and Z for Compliance Monitoring NATF.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
June 26 and July 31, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott August 5, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Text reason for Deviation from Defined High Sustained Limit/Low Sustained Limit John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Jan 22, TAC Report to the ERCOT Board January 22, 2003.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors July 15, 2008.
February 25, 2016 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott March 1, 2016 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
NPRRs 705NPRR Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process. In the Resource Interconnection Handbook,
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
TPTF Update Trip Doggett TAC March 9, TPTF Update Meetings February 6 & 7, February 20 Attendance approximately 40 Completed review of ERCOT’s clarification.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
Approval of Important Station Voltages for State Estimator Reporting Review of SE and Telemetry Standards Alex Sills Advanced Network Applications 10/13/11.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 7, 2009.
February 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott March 3, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
1 Commercial Operations Working Group Update to TAC April 7, 2005.
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
August 25, 2016 TAC Update to COPS
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Presentation transcript:

NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II

Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements Section 4 –Loads and simultaneous CLR and UFR Section 6 –SCED – yes or no? –Pseudo-Resource –AS Capacity Monitor Section 6 (continued) –Load Frequency Control (LFC) –Limit Calculations – HASL, LASL… –CLR RRS Deployment and Recall –Scheduled Power Consumption Section 8 –Regulation Service Energy Deployment Criteria –Performance Settlement

Section 3: Management Activities for the ERCOT System COP –Edited Section to distinguish between the data provided for a Controllable Load Resource versus and non-CLR –Edited Section to create a clear status for Controllable Load Resources providing Responsive Reserve Service Controllable Load Resource Participation Limits –In the initial NPRR edit to the Nodal Protocols, Section 3.16 (2) was revised to provide ERCOT the ability to determine annually the methodology for determining the minimum quantity requirement for each Ancillary Service needed for reliability and the percentages of Resources allowed to provide those Ancillary Services, including CLRs.

Section 3: Management Activities for the ERCOT System (continued) Telemetry Requirements –Section Telemetry Criteria (1)The appropriate TAC subcommittee shall establish a task force that is open to Market Participants, comprised of technical experts to develop a set of Telemetry Criteria consistent with the minimum requirements of the Protocols. TAC shall approve a set of Telemetry Criteria and the appropriate TAC subcommittee shall update the Telemetry Criteria annually each October or more often on a periodic basis as deemed necessary. (2)The Telemetry Criteria must define the performance and observability requirements of voltage and power flow measurements, including requirements for redundancy of telemetry measurement data, necessary to support the State Estimator in meeting the approved performance standard, and to support TAC-approved accuracy standards for the calculation of LMPs.

Section 4: Day-Ahead Operations Loads and Simultaneous CLR and UFR –Revised Section to add a clarification that disallows the offering of Ancillary Services as both a Controllable Load Resource and a Load Resource on high-set under-frequency relay simultaneously behind a common breaker.

Section 6: Adjustment Period and Real- Time Operations SCED – yes or no? –Include CLRs in the second generation Nodal design. Pseudo-Resource –If the pseudo-resource bid is struck, SCED increases the Base Points of Generation Resources providing Responsive Reserve (100MW Max). Without inclusion of CLR’s in SCED, an alternate deployment method would need to be created to participate in the pseudo-Resource calculation.

Section 6: Adjustment Period and Real- Time Operations (continued) Section Ancillary Service Capacity Monitor –Changed Section (1) to clearly provide the Responsive Reserve Service Capacity quantities by Load Resource type (non-CLR v. CLR) –Necessary values from CLRs would be the HASL and LASL which are already calculated by the Resource Limit Calculator and fed into the AS Capacity Monitor

Section 6: Adjustment Period and Real- Time Operations (continued) Load Frequency Control (LFC) –Revised Section in first pass of revisions. Didn’t see any additional areas that required further revision. Limit Calculations – (HASL, LASL) –In running the calculations through various simulations it appears they work sufficiently for Controllable Load Resources.

Section 6: Adjustment Period and Real- Time Operations (continued) Controllable Load Resource RRS Deployment and Recall –Deployment is addressed sufficiently with LFC –Section Restoration of Market Operations is vague on how to recall deployed Resources. Will this be elaborated upon in the Operating Guides or in requirements?

Section 6: Adjustment Period and Real- Time Operations (continued) Scheduled Power Consumption –The concept of Scheduled Power Consumption was discussed 6/26 TPTF meeting. We’ve added this reporting requirement to the Operational Data Requirements in Section and as a defined term in Section 2.

Section 8: Performance Monitoring and Compliance Performance Settlement –Section 8 modified to account for non- compliance.

Section 8: Performance Monitoring and Compliance (continued) Regulation Service Energy Deployment Criteria –At the TPTF meeting on 6/26 Section (2) – (4) was highlighted concerning the evaluation of QSE’s participation factors. –By using the data provided by the Scheduled Power Consumption, a Controllable Load Base Point may be derived to be included in this section for QSE evaluations.