Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
R OAD M AP TO M EANINGFUL U SE. What is Meaningful Use in the Hospital?
ARRA Meaningful Use Update Mount Auburn Hospital Information Systems Update March 2011.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee March 14, 2013.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated.
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Presenter James S. Dunnick, SESEDN LLC. Credentials: MD. FACC. CHCQM. CPC. Contact Information:
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Data Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting March 18, 2015.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee February 10, 2015.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
PR’s Journey Towards Electronic Health Records Adoption & Meaningful Use PRESENTATION TO PR HIT SUMMIT Antonio Fernandez Regional Extension Center for.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
Meaningful Use Indiana Association for Health Care Quality, May 2013.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Meaningful Use Stage 1 & 2 Helping Colorado Providers Achieve Meaningful Use Tracy Rue Senior Consultant, Colorado Regional Extension Center.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
Meaningful Use Presentation for Fall Faculty Meeting October 24, 2014.
America’s Voice for Community Health Care The National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC) represents Community and Migrant Health Centers,
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee January 14, 2014.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use and Implementation Lecture a This material (Comp11_Unit8a) was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Our first care is your health care Arizona Health Care Cost Containment.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 NPRM Overview Robert Anthony March 7, 2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee December 4, 2013.
HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Standards Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Component 3-Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Unit 15-Overview/ Introduction to the EHR This material was developed by The University.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Maine Health Information Technology (HIT)Status Report for MaineCare and Office of the State Coordinator for HIT Project Team: Andy Coburn Cathy McGuire.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee August 7, 2013.
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 15 Overview / Introduction to the EHR.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Standards Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting November 4, 2014 Data Analytics Update 1.
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager.
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
 By phone: 1) Dial ) Enter conference ID: # Join the audio conference:  Via internet: 1) Click the phone icon 2) Click “Connect”
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee July 9, 2013.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
Praxis EMR Training Seminar
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Presentation transcript:

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012

Active Registrations – January

Medicare Incentive Payments – Jan 2912 MU 3 Medicare Incentive Payments – January 2012 Meaningful Use (MU) For final CMS reports, please visit:

Medicare Incentive Payments 4 Medicare Incentive Payments – January 2012 Meaningful Use For final CMS reports, please visit:

Medicaid Incentive Payments 5 Medicaid Incentive Payments – January 2012 (Both MU and AIU) For final CMS reports, please visit:

EHR Incentive Programs 6 EHR Incentive Programs – January 2012 Totals

Draft Estimates Only 7 Medicare & Medicaid Payments for February 2012 DRAFT ESTIMATES ONLY

EHR Incentive Programs 8 EHR Incentive Programs – Number of Providers Paid by Month, February 2012

EHR Incentive Programs 9 EHR Incentive Programs – Total Incentive Payments by Month, February 2012

Medicaid National Status Map 10 Implementation Report (1/12) States launched as of February 2012: 42 # of States that disbursed incentives: 33 Note: ME, MA, DE, VT and NY have also disbursed incentives as of 12/31

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Attestation Data 11

Data Caveats Only 8 Medicaid EPs attesting to meaningful use, and that data was not included in our analysis. No Medicaid-only hospitals. Acute care/critical access hospitals could be receiving a meaningful use incentive payment from both Medicare and Medicaid. 12

Highlights On average all thresholds were greatly exceeded, but every threshold had some providers on the borderline Drug formulary, immunization registries and patient list are the most popular menu objectives for EPs Advance Directives, Drug Formulary, and Clinical Lab Test Results for hospitals Transition of care summary and patient reminders were the least popular menu objectives for EPs Transition of Care and Syndromic Surveillance for hospitals Little difference between EP and hospitals Little difference among specialties in performance, but differences in exclusions and deferrals 13

Providers Included This data-only analysis shows our earliest adopters who have attested, but does not inform us on barriers to attestation. At the time of the analysis 58,063 EPs had attested 57,765 Successfully 298 Unsuccessfully (146 EPs have resubmitted successfully) 1,061 Hospital had attested All successfully 14

EP Quality, Safety, Efficiency, and Reduce Health Disparities 15 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral Recording objectives* 90%+8%*N/A CPOE 84%19%N/A Electronic prescribing 79%23%N/A Incorporate lab results 91%4%38% Drug-formulary checks N/A14%16% Patient lists N/A 25% Send reminders to patients 62%0.5%78% *Refers to problem, med, allergy lists, vital signs, demographics and smoking status. Exclusion is for vital signs and smoking status.

EP Engage Patients and Their Families 16 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral E – Copy of Health Information 96%69%N/A Office visit summaries 78%2%N/A Patient Education Resources 49%N/A50% Timely electronic access 73%2%65%

EP Improve Care Coordination 17 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral Medication reconciliation 89%3%56% Summary of care at transitions 89%3%84%

EP Improve Population and Public Health 18 ObjectivePerformance*ExclusionDeferral Immunizations38%41%21% Syndromic Surveillance6%26%68% *Performance is percentage of attesting providers who conducted test

EH Quality, Safety, Efficiency, and Reduce Health Disparities 19 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral Recording objectives* +93%0.5%0% CPOE 85%N/A Advance directives 95%0.1%12% Incorporate lab results 95%N/A17% Drug-formulary checks N/A 13% Patient lists N/A 37% *Refers to problem, med, allergy lists, vital signs, demographics and smoking status. Exclusion is for vital signs and smoking status.

EH Engage Patients and Their Families 20 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral E – copy of health information 95%67%N/A E – copy of discharge Instructions 95%61%N/A Patient education resources 71%N/A62%

EH Improve Care Coordination 21 ObjectivePerformanceDeferral Medication reconciliation84%74% Summary of care at transitions82%93%

EH Improve Population and Public Health ObjectivePerformance*ExclusionDeferral Immunizations48%15%36% Reportable Lab Results17%6%77% Syndromic Surveillance18%4%79% 22 *Performance is percentage of attesting providers who conducted test

EP Specialty Breakdown ObjectiveTraditional Office VisitLittle/No Patient Contact Performance Vital Signs90%80% Incorporating Lab Results91%99% Patient Reminders61%69% Timely Electronic Access75%89% Education50%38% Transitions of Care88%97% Exclusions Exclusions for No e-Rx17%96% Vital Signs9%66% No Lab Orders4%35% 23

EP Specialty Breakdown (Cont.) ObjectiveTraditional Office VisitLittle/No Patient Contact Deferral Incorporating Lab Results77%30% Timely Electronic Access38%50% Education51%12% Summary at Transitions of Care 15%37% 24

EP Performance by State ObjectiveNational Top Three High Performing States CPOE85%MN – 96%OH – 91%WI – 91% E-Prescribing78%HI – 95%MA – 87% Demographics91%NH – 98%WI – 97%MN – 95% Smoking Status90%MN – 96%NH – 95%VT – 95% Incorporate Lab Results91%OR – 98%MN – 98%MA – 97% Patient Reminders61%RI – 87%CT – 75%LA – 74% Timely Electronic Access75%IA – 85%OR – 87%MN – 93% Education50%AK – 76%HI – 74%MO – 73% Objectives not noted did not have significant positive variation by State Some objectives had more than 3 States with a significant positive variation 25

EH Performance by State ObjectiveNational Top Three High Performing States CPOE85%VA– 95% Education71%IL – 83%HI – 74%MO – 73% Objectives not noted did not have significant positive variation by State 26

Concluding Points Preliminary monthly data is provided to the HITPC for consideration Official data should be sourced and cited from the CMS website, updated monthly ( DataAndReports.asp) DataAndReports.asp February payment numbers are estimates only. Check our website for final figures. 27 For final CMS reports, please visit: