Methods, Practice and Teaching of Survey Research Don Haider-Markel University of Kansas May-June 2005
The Basics: Why Conduct a Survey? Research Questions Research Design Methods and Data Collection
Sampling and Sample Design Types of Samples and Probability Theory Random Samples Reflecting a population Expense Non-Random Samples Stratified Sample Examples Quota Samples and Others
Implementing a Sample Design Issues of Cost Issues of response rates Biased sample; reliability Reducing non-response rates Traditionally telephone was best (>50%) Increasingly mail response is the same as telephone; sometimes better (25-35%) Deciding on a data collection method Cost, response rate, population characteristics
Designing the Survey Instrument Defining Objectives What do you really want to know Several Questions Related to the issue; triangulate Example: Attitudes about the U.S. and the West
Designing the Survey Instrument Question construction Reliability: Wording Validity: Are we measuring what we think we are measuring? Concept versus Measurement
Use of Terms and Question Wording 2005 May 2-5 (sorted by "should")Homosexuals Gays and Lesbians Difference, in Pct. Pts. % Salesperson Doctors The armed forces As a member of the president's cabinet High school teachers Elementary school teachers Clergy4953+4
Designing the Survey Instrument Format and Layout Order Effects Appearance on Surveys that the Respondent is Able to view Example of scenarios
Instrument Length Ideal is 10 to 15 minutes on telephone or mail survey Often not possible At about 30 minutes significant drop-off Translates into less than 75 non-complex questions
Non-Complex Question
Going Into the Field Ethical Issues and Consent Human Subjects Approval Funding issues Who is paying and notifying respondents Training interviewers Consistency Professional
Using Survey Data Returning to the Research Questions Recall what you wanted to learn
Using Survey Data Research Questions Research Design Methods and Data Collection
Using Survey Data Uncovering New Questions Data patterns are likely to reveal new issues
Using Survey Data Bivariate versus Multivariate Analysis Bivariate allows simple way to show relationships Multivariate allows us to control for alternative explanations
Bivariate Republicans, independents, and Democrats have different ideas on the origins of homosexuality -- Democrats are more likely to believe it is something a person is born with; Republicans believe it is due to upbringing and environment. In your view, is homosexuality: something a person is born with, (or is homosexuality) due to factors such as upbringing and environment? ±3 pct. pt. margin of error May 2-5, 2005 Sample size = 1,005 National adults
Multivariate Table 1. The Determinants of Causal Attributions about the Origins of Homosexuality — Genetics as Cause. Independent VariablesEstimatez Education.33**5.30 (.06) Age.19**4.18 (.04) Female.58**4.04 (.14) Gay Friend.78**5.10 (.15) Religiosity -.25** (.04) Republican -.55** (.16) Liberal.36* 2.01 (.18) Constant ** (.31) Pseduo R-square.13 Chi Square N 1041 Notes: Coefficients are Logistic regression coefficients; standard errors are in parentheses. ** p <.01, * p <.05. The data are from an October 2003 survey conducted by the Pew Center Research Center.
Explaining Margin of Error and Sampling Issues Need to provide clear methodology Exact Question Wording
Final Thoughts Just one research tool No better or worse than others Use depends on research questions Should always try to combine methods and analysis