Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I Directors Conference Sept 2007 Carol Diedrichsen Gwen Pollock Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum for English.
Advertisements

SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
AGU FM 2006 Teacher Research Experiences Gail Scowcroft and Chris Knowlton Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island What We Have Learned.
Louisiana Math & Science Teacher Institute (LaMSTI) Overview of External Evaluation and Development of Self-Report Measures of Instructional Leadership.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Content Analysis of Common Core State Standards: Initial Findings Webex: September 20, 2010.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Michigan MSPs June 2007 Wendy Tackett, PhD, iEval
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships: FY 2005 Summary.
Table of Contents Professional Development School Pilot Study.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
NASA LIFT OFF Overview Inquiry LIFT OFF Team ALAMEDA County Office of Education LOS ANGELES County Office of Education SANTA CLARA County Office.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
Classroom Walkthrough for Continuous Improvement: Strengthening Teaching and Learning Teacher Orientation 2010–
Exploring Relationships between Professional Development, Teacher Practice, and State Content Standards By John L. Smithson, Ph.D. Director, Measures of.
Professional Development is aligned to your district’s initiatives and tailored to your districts current needs. Our modules are designed to  Deepen.
Professional Development in Challenged Environments Project: Making Mathematics Matter (PM³) A Model for Effective PD Conversations Among Colleagues March.
Professional Development for High-Poverty Schools Joseph F. Johnson, Jr., Ph.D. MSP Conference January 10, 2007 Phoenix, AZ.
Professional Growth Systems And Nevada Academic Content Standards Strengthening teacher capacity through powerful feedback March 20, 2015.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
Supporting Your Child Through the Transition to Common Core Mathematics What Parents Need to Know.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What is Lenoir STEM? A program funded by MSP grant with additional financial support from industry.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Science Learning through Engineering Design SLED Brenda M. Capobianco Department of Curriculum & Instruction November 16, 2010 This project is supported.
Survey of Enacted Curriculum An Essential Tool for School Improvement CCSSO SEC State Collaborative Meeting San Diego, CA February 2008 Constance J Dorr,
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP. Objective 1: Design coherent instruction and learning activities collaboratively that are highly relevant to students and pedagogical.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Education Leaders Conference: Using Data to Improve Instruction
Partnership for Practice
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP

Goal 1: Increase the quality and quantity of teachers' content knowledge in science to improve ability to create and lead inquiry-based lessons fostering reasoning and problem solving in 4-8 students. Goal 2: Increase teachers' knowledge of the state and national science standards to enable them to align their curricula and instruction in order to increase student achievement. Goal 3: Increase teachers' involvement as leaders in their profession. Goal 4: Increase the use of inquiry-based teaching strategies by project participants. Goal 5: Increase the appropriate use of technology as a teaching and learning tool. Goal 6: Increase teachers' use of high quality, authentic assessment strategies and their abilities to make targeted, real-world connections between and within science and mathematics. Goal 7: Enhance teachers' abilities to reflect on their performance and how they impact student learning. Goal 8: Increase collaboration between and among teachers, and between teachers and university faculty. Goal 9: Improve student performance on science MAP (Missouri Assessment Program) examinations. Missouri PRISM Project Goals

Goal 1: Increase the quality and quantity of teachers' content knowledge in science to improve ability to create and lead inquiry-based lessons fostering reasoning and problem solving in 4-8 students. Goal 2: Increase teachers' knowledge of the state and national science standards to enable them to align their curricula and instruction in order to increase student achievement. Goal 3: Increase teachers' involvement as leaders in their profession. Goal 4: Increase the use of inquiry-based teaching strategies by project participants. Goal 5: Increase the appropriate use of technology as a teaching and learning tool. Goal 6: Increase teachers' use of high quality, authentic assessment strategies and their abilities to make targeted, real-world connections between and within science and mathematics. Goal 7: Enhance teachers' abilities to reflect on their performance and how they impact student learning. Goal 8: Increase collaboration between and among teachers, and between teachers and university faculty. Goal 9: Improve student performance on science MAP (Missouri Assessment Program) examinations. Missouri PRISM Project Goals

Graduate course-work throughout the year Teacher collaboration with colleague not in program PD & Admin. of Formative Assessments Teacher Content Knowledge Assessments Develop criteria and protocols for observing inquiry-based lessons Administrator Training & Observations Teachers given PDA’s for planning/ organizing assignments Training in simulations and probe-ware Missouri PRISM Project Highlights

Assessments (Teacher & Students) Classroom Observations & Walk-thru Evaluations Video-taped classroom instruction Student-work Teacher-work Coach/Mentor field notes Teacher (SEC) Surveys Missouri PRISM Project Data

English Language Arts & Reading The SEC Data-set SUMMARY MEASURES ContentPracticeClimateProf. Dev./// Science Instructional Content Instr. Activities Tchr. Char./Opinions/Beliefs Professional Development Mathematics Social Studies (coming soon)

Comparison Groups MO-PRISM Group Teachers participating in the MO-PRISM project for 2 (n=51) or 3 (n=47) years Other MSP Groups Teachers participating in other state MSP projects for 2 (n=606) or 3 (n=174) years Non-MSP Groups Teachers participating in school/district-based school improvement initiatives for 2 (n = 73) or 3 (n=6) years.

Participation in Formal Course-work & Institutes

SEC Indicators of Quality Professional Development

SEC Reports of Instructional Practice

Two Strategies for Improving Alignment

MO-PRISM Student (Classroom) Assessments

Measuring the Learned Curriculum

SEC Longitudinal Data Patterns

The ‘Lag’ Effect

SEC Longitudinal Data Patterns The ‘Negative Growth’ Effect

SEC Longitudinal Data Patterns The ‘Sustainability’ Effect