 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans.  Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lincoln-Douglas Debates: Video (2:13)
Advertisements

CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.
April 28, 2011 If you did not turn in your guided reading yesterday, turn it in today! WE HAVE A QUIZ TOMORROW-STUDY GUIDES ARE DUE BEFORE WE TAKE THE.
Dred Scott v Sanford. Who was Dred Scott? A slave born around the 1800’s Married fellow slave: Harriet Robinson 2 children: Eliza and Lizzie Died: Sept.
Dred Scott And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor.
The Dred Scott Decision
By Trevor Burns atures/bio/B11.html.
II. Basis of Citizenship
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
Dred Scott Decision, March 1857 Dred Scott was a slave who moved from a Missouri a slave state to free states Illinois and Wisconsin In 1846 Scott sues.
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages
Dred Scott Decision :The Worst Decision the Supreme Court Ever Made Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) Dred Scott.
The Supreme Court. Separation of Powers Purpose of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court of the United States was created in accordance with provision.
Historical Discussions Congress Passes the Kansas-Nebraska Act The Republican Party is Founded The Supreme Court Hands Down The Dred Scott Decision The.
II. Basis of Citizenship. A. National Citizenship Founders let states decide who was a citizen Naturalization – Legal process by which a person is granted.
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
By Alexander M. Barker. Born as a slave in the late 1700s Owned by the Blow family Parents are unknown Lived in Southampton County, VA Moved to Alabama;
V. Sanford Dred Scott A presentation presented by Paola Garcia.
Chapter 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery.
YOU MUST WRITE EVERYTHING DOWN, UNLESS I TELL YOU OTHERWISE.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Emerson DeLoach Elicia Bilyeu Isidro Hernandez Noah Hickman Supreme Court Cases.
Dred Scott. Background Scott was the slave of an Army surgeon who took him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and modern day Minnesota. Scott was the.
Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:
Dred Scott v Sandford Facts of the Case: Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of.
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Deaton US History.   What Rights do you have as a citizen? Citizen Rights.
APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH
Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
By Greg Munetz. He was born a slave in 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia He was industrious and intelligent, he served as a farmhand, a stevedore,
Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)
Tyler Kennedy Nick Logan.  Born a slave to the Blow family  Sold to Army Surgeon named Dr. John Anderson  Owner died then got a new owner  Lived in.
Dred Scott V. Sanford 1858 Julien Mercier and Kendal Kulp.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Back to the 1850’s… Law in the 1850’s. Rights of African Americans Still the Fugitive Slave Act Whether free or slave you could NOT be citizen Still segregation.
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Slavery and Secession. The Birth of the Republican Party.
Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) 1854 Law that allowed for popular sovereignty in the Kansas and Nebraska Territories Devised by the “Little Giant” Stephen Douglas.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.
21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page
On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.
Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott
Dred Scott Decision 1857.
Dred Scott.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott By :mina 5B.
Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84
Images from the Life of Dred Scott
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
The Dreadful Decision Dred Scott.
Famous Abolitionists.
FOA 2/29/16 1. What did the Kansas-Nebraska Act actually do?
PART 3.
Dred Scot Decision.
Dred Scot Decision.
Dred Scott Decision Scott was not a citizen, could not sue
The Dred Scott Decision
Events that Helped Spark the Civil War By: Mrs. Andreatta
Dred Scot Decision.
And The case for freedom
8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
The Freed Man Shall Not Be Free
Presentation transcript:

 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans

 Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to slave state of Missouri, Dred had appealed to supreme court hoping he will be granted his freedom.

 When Emerson died in 1843,Scott sued Emerson’s widow for his freedom in the Missouri supreme court,claiming that his residence in the free soil of Illinois made him a free man.

Peter blow John emerson

 When Dred first went to trial to sue for his freedom in 1847.ten years later after appeals after appeals the court reversal,his case was finally brought before the united states supreme court.

 The court also ruled that the federal government didn’t have the power to prohibit slavery it’s territories.

 In 1850 there was an retrial,the St Louis circuit court ruled that Scott and his family was free.

 In 1854 the Missouri supreme court stepped in again,revering the decision of the lower court.  Scott and his lawyer then brought his case to a federal court,the united states circuit court in Missouri.

 In case went to the supreme court on a writ of certiorari. the high court refused to hear the case in order to overturn the lower court decision.

 No we don’t agree with the court decision because we believe everyone should be treated equally no matter black or white, we believe that the court didn’t give Scott and his family an fair trial.

 Today in society black’s are treated better than they use to be treated, black people today are no slave we have freedom.

Dred Scott wife Harriet His two daughters Lizzie and Eliza.

United states v.s cruikshank

 ml ml    