CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 20 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 11, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Qualcomm Incorporated, v. Broadcom Corporation.  U.S. Federal Court Rules of Civil Procedure – amended rules December 1, 2006 to include electronically.
Advertisements

© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
L.A. 310 – DISCOVERY PART II. Depositions C.C.P section 2025 Defined: Oral testimony taken (usually prior to trial) which is: –Under oath –Before a certified.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 11 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 20, 2002.
Pleadings -- Documents exchanged to initiate lawsuit Complaint Answer Summons Discovery –Depositions from Witnesses: –Production of Documents –Written.
Motion to Compel A party is entitled to secure discovery from another party without court intervention.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Pleading Pre-trial Discovery Resolution without Trial Trial & Post-trial Appeal.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 15 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 29, 2003.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 14 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 9, 2001.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 9 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 20, 2001.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
1 Agenda for 8th Class Admin –Handouts –Name plates –No class next Friday, 9/26 Experts (continued) Sanctions –Phillips Introduction to Summary Judgment.
1 Agenda for 6th Class Admin –Slide handouts –Name plates out –Lunch Friday, 12:30 outside Rm 433 (Faculty Lounge –Make up class This Wednesday, 9/17,
1 Agenda for 7th Class Admin –Slides –Name plates out Work Product Experts Introduction to Sanctions.
Stages of an Arbitration Arbitration Week in Palestine Session #4 December 9,
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 24 DISCOVERY V.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9Slide 1 Advantages of a Deposition You can ask specific follow-up questions based on the answers you get You can ask specific.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 27 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 24, 2005.
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2002 Class 8 September 13, 2002 Professor Fischer.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY III.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 10 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 25, 2001.
Mon., Nov. 19. Supplemental Jurisdiction U.S. Const. Article III. Section. 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising.
PA110 Civil Litigation I Unit 6 Seminar.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DEPOSITIONS.
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 13 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2001.
Legal Document Preparation Class 12Slide 1 Functions of the Discovery Process Narrow the issues –After investigation, you can more easily determine which.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 16 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 2, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 15 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 11, 2001.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 15 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 26, 2005.
Interrogatories & Depositions Civil Litigation I - Unit 6.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 20 DISCOVERY I Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 7, 2005.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS.
1 Agenda for 9th Class Admin –Handouts –Name plates Experts (continued) Sanctions –Phillips –A Civil Action Introduction to Summary Judgment.
© Mark E. Damon - All Rights Reserved $1 Million $500,000 $250,000 $125,000 $64,000 $32,000 $16,000 $8,000 $4,000.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 16, 2001.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 23 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 18, 2002.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION F CLASS 13 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 21, 2005.
1 Agenda for 8th Class Admin –Slide handouts –Name plates out Discovery –Review of Scope –Work Product –Experts –Intro to Sanctions.
E-Discovery And why it matters to a SSA. What is E-Discovery? E-Discovery is the process during litigation of discovering information relevant to litigation.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 18 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 8, 2003.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 22 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 16, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2002 Class 21 October 15, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 22 DISCOVERY III.
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION F CLASS 13 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 26, 2003.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY II October 11, 2005.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 27 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 27, 2003.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 10 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 18, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 CLASS 3 (8/29/03) STAGES AND ESSENTIAL CONCEPTS OF A CIVIL ACTION Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION F CLASS 22/23 DISCOVERY IV.
Forms of Pretrial Discovery in the Auto Property Damage Case Mark Demian and Jeffrey Dubin Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLP.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial
The F.R.C.P. Part II Alan R. Beckman, J.D..
Tues., Nov. 11.
Unit B Customized by Professor Ludlum Nov. 30, 2016.
Agenda for 8th Class Admin Slide handouts Name plates out Discovery
Agenda for 7th Class Admin Slide handouts Name plates out Friday lunch
Agenda for 9th Class Admin Handouts Name plates Sanctions Phillips
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Agenda for 9th Class Admin Handouts Name plates
Civil Pretrial Practice
What is involved in a civil lawsuit?
Presentation transcript:

CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 20 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 11, 2002

WRAP-UP OF LAST CLASS Last class, we started to focus on techniques of discovery. We learned about the initial initial disclosures required under FRCP 26(a) and we began to discuss depositions.

WHAT WILL WE DO TODAY? Learn about the discovery techniques of depositions (FRCP 27-31), interrogatories (FRCP 33), document requests (FRCP 34), physical/mental examinations (FRCP 35), and requests for admissions (FRCP 36) We will discuss discovery sanctions on next Tuesday

SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS How do counsel schedule the time and place of depositions? Are there any limits on the place of depositions for parties or non-parties? Is there a time limit for depositions (see 30(d)(2)?

DEPOSITIONS OF PARTIES How do you initiate the deposition of a party? See Fig of Glannon at p. 371 What if you want the party to bring documents? See 30(b)(5) What must be in the notice of deposition? Must a notice normally be filed with court? What happens if a party does not comply with a notice of deposition? Can a party object to a valid notice? See FRCP 26(c)

DEPOSITIONS OF NON- PARTIES How do you initiate the deposition of a non-party? See FRCP 30(a)(1), 45, Fig Glannon p. 372 What happens if a non-party does not show up for the deposition? How can a non-party object? FRCP 26(c) What should counsel do if she wants a non-party to produce documents or other tangible evidence for a deposition? See 45

CONDUCT OF THE DEPOSITION What statements must be made at the beginning/end of a deposition? (See 30(b)(4)) How does the questioning work at a deposition? See 30(c); CB 1084

OBJECTING TO QUESTIONS/REFUSING TO ANSWER AT DEPOSITIONS Can a deponent object to questions and if so, on what basis (See FRCP 30(c)), 32(d)(3)) Must a deponent answer a question at a deposition even if she has an objection to it? See FRCP 30(d)(1) What if the deponent’s objection is based privilege? What if the deposing counsel is harassing the witness? See 30(d)(4)

REVIEWING THE DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT Can a deponent review the transcript of her deposition and if so, in what circumstances? See FRCP 30(e)

UNUSUAL TYPES OF DEPOSITIONS Telephone/videoconference depositions - see 30 (b)(7) Depositions on written questions - see 31 – just know what one is, not specific rules for its noticing and conduct Video depositions - see 30(b)(2)

USE OF DEPOSITIONS AT TRIAL FRCP 32 Any or all of a deposition may be used as trial as if witness present and testifying (an exception against rule against hearsay evidence) But rules of evidence still apply to admission of the depositions contents A deposition is like a box containing evidence – the box can be used at trial but the contents are subject to admissibility rules

INTERROGATORIES What is an interrogatory? See Fig in Glannon p. 377 Which FRCP governs interrogatories? How many interrogatories may be served on another party?

INTERROGATORIES AND NON-PARTIES Can an interrogatory be served on a non- party? Can an interrogatory be served on a corporation?

RESPONDING TO INTERROGATORIES How should a party respond to an interrogatory? See 33(b)(1) and 33(d), See Fig in Glannon p. 380 Can a party object to an interrogatory? If so, how? Can a party object on basis that interrogatory asks for legal conclusion? What are the time limits for responding to interrogatories?

SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS Who must sign interrogatory answers? Who must sign interrogatory objections?

ADVANTAGES/DISADVANT AGES OF INTERROGATORIES What are the advantages of interrogatories? What are the disadvantage of interrogatories?

HYPO Having sustained injuries from a household appliance, Betty sues the manufacturer, SuperVac. The required discovery conference and ensuing disclosures occur. Betty then serves 55 interrogatories on SuperVac and 20 interrogatories on Rechts Department Store, which sold her the product. Both SuperVac and Store refuse to answer. Assume the questions are relevant and not privileged. Must Store answer? Must Manufacturer answer? By what, if any, procedural step might Betty induce them to answer?

EXAMINING DOCUMENTS, THINGS, PROPERTY & PEOPLE: FRCP 34/35 Requests for production/inspection of documents and things: FRCP 34 Physical and mental examinations: FRCP 35

DOCUMENT REQUESTS: FRCP 34 How do you request production/inspection of documents, things or property from a party? FRCP 34(a) and (b) Note “possession, custody or control” requirement for documents; “possession or control” for land : FRCP 34(a) How do you request a non-party to produce documents & things? FRCP 34(c)

RESPONDING TO DOCUMENT REQUESTS How long does the recipient of the request have to respond? (See 30(b)) Can the recipient object? If so, In what circumstances?

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS If the recipient of a document request does not object, can she produce the documents in a jumbled mass? If not, how must they be arranged? What is the governing FRCP?