1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Strategies for addressing challenges around Termination of Parental Rights. Presenters: Bill Stanton, Consultant, ICF Consulting Mary Coogan, Esq. Advocates.
Advertisements

Child Protective Services Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance May 30, 2007.
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
Introduction to Child Welfare Law in Washington
Practice Guidelines for Attorneys Representing Parents in Abuse, Neglect and Termination of Parental Rights Cases Cindi Wood, JD John Chambers, JD February.
 Federal Dollars for Assurances Which Protect Children Who are in Foster Care.
Juvenile Law in 30 Minutes or Less Otherwise known as “Tom’s Chance to Vent to the Court” Tom C. Rawlings Judge, Juvenile Courts, Middle Circuit Sandersville,
FUTURE OPTION LEFT OPEN Presented by: Honorable Bryan K. Murray Magistrate and Juvenile Judge - 6 th Judicial District.
Proactive Interventions: Incorporating a Children’s Rights Approach
On Behalf of the Parent’s – The ICWA - Transferring Proceedings to Tribal Court and Petitioning to Invalidate ICWA Proceedings.
Introducing the Law, the Child Protection System and the Courts Guardian Ad Litem Program.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS. 2 Court System  District Court  Trial Court  Some “specialty” courts including  Family Court  Drug Court  Juvenile Court 
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Poverty Law 2 Permanency Planning Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki 2013 Copyright.
Third-Party Custody Presenters: Emily K. Cooper and Tracy L. Reid Cooper & Reid, LLC.
CJI Reducing Trauma in Children by Ensuring Involvement of Fathers Nancy K. Jones, Hennepin County Attorney’s Office Kevin McTigue, Hennepin County Human.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
Adoption & Safe Families Act
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Contents n Definitions n Goals n Target Populations n Categories n Activities.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Achieving Timely.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
Quality Representation for Parents in Child Welfare Cases: A Path to Better Outcomes for Families Presented by Dona Playton Assistant Lecturer at Law UW.
LAWYERS ETHICS Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl. APPLICABLE PROFESSIONAL RULES  Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct 
Jill Malat Office of Civil Legal Aid Children’s Representation Program
Module 7: The Court Process Slide of 37 Module 7: The Court Process Slide of 37 Module 7: The Court Process The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
ICWA: Purposes, Procedures & Practice Implications Prepared by: Jerry R. Foxhoven, Executive Director, Drake Legal Clinic Director, Middleton Center for.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Juvenile Courts Chapter Nineteen.
Timothy J. Eirich, Esq. Grob & Eirich, LLC Lakewood, CO
What does the Safe Haven Law provide? The law protects a parent who leaves their baby at a “Safe Haven” location. The parent will not face criminal prosecution.
Relevant provisions of the Act  S 62 provides  “ A care order may be made an interim order or a final order, except as provided by this Part.  The.
ADOPTIONS CM 124_ADP_PPT_October 2012 PPT 1. Objectives Professional standards & values Adoption program’s legal base. Florida adoption guidelines. Legal.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
Foster Care Eligibility Determination Training System Century College MFWCAA Conference Title IV-E Workshop October 9, 2008 Deborah Trotter NW Region Paula.
The Multiethnic Placement Act of 1994 (MEPA) As Amended by the Interethnic Adoption Provisions of 1996 (IEAP)
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
Florida Guardian ad Litem Program Termination of Parental Rights Regional Training 2007.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
1August 2012 Duty of Care. Duty of Care; Technically speaking; You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee.
A.J. (Tony) Brandenburg August 21, 2015 TCAP Tribal Court Conference Protecting Indian Children (760)
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
Child In Need of Care (CINC) Code Guardians ad litem Nuts and Bolts October 2015.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki Copyright 2013.
Permanency.
Helping Youth in Indiana. Indiana Department of Child Services Child Protection Services “protects Indiana's children from further abuse or neglect and.
Overview of Child Protection Law in Minnesota and the Juvenile Court Process Children’s Law Center of Minnesota 450 Syndicate St. N, Suite 315, St. Paul,
The Indian Child Welfare Act (and the Minnesota Indian family preservation act) U.S.C. § 1901 et. seq. Minn. Stat. § et. seq.
Being in Care. Joint priorities remain to… Improve outcomes for children, young people and families in Birmingham. In particular: Protect children from.
Attorney Paul Stenzel Stenzel Law Office, LLC 24 th Annual Coming Together of the Peoples Conference Madison, WI March 19, 2010.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
ADOPTIONS.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS?
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
What does prevention services act mean for Iowa juvenile court judges?
Constitutional Safe Guards
Basics of the Indian Child Welfare Act
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS?
Presentation transcript:

1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl

2 The CHIPS Petition Filed by the county attorney on behalf of the county agency Filed by “any reasonable person”

3 Emergency Protective Care Hearing - Rule 30 Held within 72 Hours of child being taken into emergency protective care Evidence - may include reliable hearsay and opinion

4 Court must determine Does petition establish prima facie showing that juvenile protection matter exists and child is subject of that matter Does petition make a prima facie showing of endangerment

5 If finding of endangerment court shall Continue protective care Or release child with conditions

6 Reasonable Efforts Minn. Stat. § Agency responsibility exercise of due diligence use culturally appropriate and available services to meet the needs of the child and the child's family

7 Reasonable Efforts (cont.) Prevent placement Reunite the child with the child's family at the earliest possible time Finalize permanency

8 Reasonable Efforts – Agency - Prevent Placement Minn. Stat. § (d) "Reasonable efforts to prevent placement" means: “(1) the agency has made reasonable efforts to prevent the placement of the child in foster care by working with the family to develop and implement a safety plan; or”

9 Reasonable Efforts – Agency - Prevent Placement (cont.) “(2) given the particular circumstances of the child and family at the time of the child's removal, there are no services or efforts available which could allow the child to safely remain in the home.”

10 Reasonable Efforts – Court’s Duties Minn. Stat. § (f) Court must ensure agency makes reasonable efforts to Prevent placement Eliminate need for removal Reunite child with child’s family at earliest possible time

11 Court shall consider whether services were Relevant to child’s safety and protection Adequate to meet the needs of the child and family Culturally appropriate Available and accessible Consistent and timely Realistic under the circumstances

12 Reasonable Efforts Consistent with the best interests, safety, and protection of the child Child’s health and safety must be of paramount concern

13 Reasonable Efforts Are Not Required in Some Circumstances Egregious harm Parental rights to another child have been terminated involuntarily Child is an abandoned infant Parents custodial rights to another child have been involuntarily transferred to a relative Provision of services... is futile and therefore unreasonable under the circumstances.

14 Indian Child Welfare Act Requires active efforts

15 Juvenile Court CHIPS Matters LOTS OF HEARINGS Admit/Deny Pretrial Trial Disposition Disposition review Permanent placement determination