A trust and Contract Management framework enabling secure collaborative business processing in on-demand created, self- managed, scalable, and highly dynamic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
©2006 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other members of the SIMDAT consortium A SIMDAT Perspective on Grid Standards and Specifications.
Advertisements

1 2 nd Shanghai, 19/02/06 Architecture for Next Generation Grids Kostas Tserpes, NTUA Shanghai, 20th of February 2006.
The Next Generation Grid Kostas Tserpes, NTUA Beijing, 22 of June 2005.
© Fraunhofer Institute SCAI and other members of the SIMDAT consortium Data Grids for Process and Product Development using Numerical Simulation and Knowledge.
DG INFSO- Grid Research & Infrastructures: W. Boch, M. Campolargo 1 Delivery of Industrial-strength Grid Middleware: establishing an effective European.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP VALORISATION & SUSTAINIBILITY PLAN Budapest, June 2007.
End-to-End Efficiency (E 3 ) Integrated Project of the EC 7 th Framework Programme E 3 WP5 Objectives E 3 WP5 Structure and Research Challenges
Eugen Volk High Performance Computing Center – HLRS University Stuttgart AgroGrid Composition and Monitoring of dynamic Supply Chains.
Overview of OASIS SOA Reference Architecture Foundation (SOA-RAF)
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
Connecting People With Information DoD Net-Centric Services Strategy Frank Petroski October 31, 2006.
The HITCH project: Cooperation between EuroRec and IHE Pascal Coorevits EuroRec 2010 Annual Conference June 18 th 2010.
1 © NOKIA Nokia-W3C-Opening.PPT/ / Ari Jaaksi Nokia and W3C Ari Jaaksi Art Barstow.
Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN) BoF
© 2006, Tod O’ Dot Productions Introducing EUI-Net: European University-Industry Network to Develop and Promote the Entrepreneurship of Students in Technology.
TeleManagement Forum The voice of the OSS/BSS industry.
Developing Enterprise Architecture
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
Software Engineering Muhammad Fahad Khan
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 18 Slide 1 Software Reuse.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
Adaptive Services Grid FP6 – IST Develop a prototype of an open development platform for adaptive services registration,
Project Presentation.
Integrated Growth Pillar 1 of the SEE 2020 Strategy SEEIC Meeting Sarajevo, 19 June 2013.
EGI-Engage EGI-Engage Engaging the EGI Community towards an Open Science Commons Project Overview 9/14/2015 EGI-Engage: a project.
Project Presentation.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Man-Sze Li IC Focus Enterprise Interoperability Research Roadmap SME aspects.
Copyright © 2004 by The Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-I). All Rights Reserved 1 Interoperability: Ensuring the Success of Web Services.
IST 2006 – 22/11/2006 Aljosa Pasic Atos Origin Security, Dependability and Trust in Service Infrastructures.
Advanced Next gEneration Mobile Open NEtwork Tridentcom th International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Jarek Nabrzyski, Ariel Oleksiak Comparison of Grid Middleware in European Grid Projects Jarek Nabrzyski, Ariel Oleksiak Poznań Supercomputing and Networking.
ESTELA Summer Workshop, 26 June 2013 The EU-SOLARIS project.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
NETWORKED EUROPEAN SOFTWARE & SERVICES INITIATIVE Future research challenges in dependability - an industrial perspective from NESSI Aljosa Pasic Atos.
This document produced by Members of the Helix Nebula Partners and Consortium is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Permissions.
W HAT IS I NTEROPERABILITY ? ( AND HOW DO WE MEASURE IT ?) INSPIRE Conference 2011 Edinburgh, UK.
Bob Jones Technical Director CERN - August 2003 EGEE is proposed as a project to be funded by the European Union under contract IST
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
Information Society and Media Directorate-General Unit Grid Technologies NCP Info Day Call5 - Brussels, 02 June – Advanced Grid Technologies,
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
Virtual Collaborative Social Living Community for Elderly Kick Off Event WP 7 – Dissemination, Exploitation Strategy and Standardization Inova+ Co-Living.
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
University of Paderborn - GermanyPresenter: Johannes Magenheim Developing the AGORA Road Map – 9 th WCCE July 27 th – 31 st, 2009 Bento Gonçalves, Brazil.
GRID ANATOMY Advanced Computing Concepts – Dr. Emmanuel Pilli.
NCP Info DAY, Brussels, 23 June 2010 NCP Information Day: ICT WP Call 7 - Objective 1.3 Internet-connected Objects Alain Jaume, Deputy Head of Unit.
Realising the Community Vision of Concurrent Enterprising ICE 2003 Moderator Roberto Santoro, ESoCE NET Roberto Santoro, ESoCE NETwww.esoce.net.
Technology-enhanced Learning: EU research and its role in current and future ICT based learning environments Pat Manson Head of Unit Technology Enhanced.
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
19-20 October 2010 IT Directors’ Group meeting 1 Item 6 of the agenda ISA programme Pascal JACQUES Unit B2 - Methodology/Research Local Informatics Security.
Implementation recommendations 1st COPRAS review Presentation at 2nd COPRAS annual review, 15 March 2006, CEN/CENELEC meeting centre, Brussels Bart Brusse.
WP5 – Flagship Deployment Period 1 Review Phil Evans – Logica/CGI 1.
1 FORM Consortium FORM Partners: Atos (F - admin. Coord.), Broadcom(IRL), DELTA(DK), Ericsson(DK), GMD-Fokus(D), KPN Research(NL), Tele Danmark(DK), TCD(IRL),
1 Industry Advisory Council’s Enterprise Architecture Shared Interest Group (IAC EA SIG) Collaborative Approach to Addressing Common Government- Industry.
Slide 1 PDT Europe 2014, October 2014, Paris 1 AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe Through Life Cycle Interoperability as developed.
IoT R&I on IoT integration and platforms INTERNET OF THINGS
Department of Computer Science Introduction to Information Security Chapter 8 ISO/IEC Semester 1.
WP6 – Inter-operability with e-Infrastructures Sergio Andreozzi - WP6 Task Leader Strategy and Policy Manager, EGI.eu Helix Nebula - 1st Year Review 1.
© The InfoCitizen Consortium Project Presentation Agent based negotiation for inter- and intra-enterprise coordination employing a European Information.
Name - Date Technology-enhanced Learning: tomorrow’s school and beyond Pat Manson Head of Unit Technology Enhanced Learning Directorate General.
Jim McEachern Senior Technology Consultant ATIS July 8, 2015.
Bob Jones EGEE Technical Director
TeleManagement Forum The voice of the OSS/BSS industry.
Integrated Management System and Certification
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
Presentation transcript:

A trust and Contract Management framework enabling secure collaborative business processing in on-demand created, self- managed, scalable, and highly dynamic Virtual Organisations Project funded under the action line Networked Business and Government TrustCoM Standardisation COPRAS FP6 IST call 1 kick-off – 14 October 2004 Joris Claessens European Microsoft Innovation Center TrustCoM standardisation manager

Consortium

Virtual Collaboration (Process Enactment) Team Motivation – Virtual Organisations - End-User - Application Service / Business Function - Component / Resource - Main contractor - Subcontractor Org. Policy domains Contract 1 Partner DPartner E VO2 Contract 2 Partner B Partner APartner C

Project Objectives To provide a trust & contract management framework enabling the definition and secure enactment of collaborative business processes within secure, scalable, highly dynamic, integrated and targeted Virtual Organisations, which are formed on-demand, are self-managed and evolve dynamically, sharing computation, data, information and knowledge across enterprise boundaries, in order to –tackle collaborative projects that their participants could not undertake individually or –collectively offer services to customers that could not be provided by the individual enterprises. R&D type R&D focus R&D relevance Technology focus Business need

Main challenges through VO lifecycle Trust & Security discovery & justified identification of credible, trusted partners establishment of trust between perspective VO members maintenance of trust, autonomic security management, adaptive deployment of security policies termination of trust relationships & maintenance of trust knowledge Contract elicitation of contractual requirements formulation, negotiation Instantiation and endorsement of collaboration agreements between VO partners contract enforcement, performance monitoring, arbitration & contract amendment nullification of contracts, posterior analysis Collaborative Process definition of VO objectives, elicitation of process goals and requirements process definition (overlaying trust information), engagement of collaborators, optimisation of resource utilisation adaptive enactment of collaborative processes, trust- based decision making, secure service orchestration, dynamic service invocation, accounting resource disengagement, posterior analysis Identification Formation Operation Dissolution

Expected results A framework (architecture, services descriptions, interaction protocols) enabling the secure enactment of collaborative business processes in dynamic Virtual Organisations, based on –A set of well defined concepts, and realised through –Open standards profiles for the secure enactment of collaborative business processes in dynamic Virtual Organisations Extend existing / emerging standards where possible Introduce new standards when necessary Open source reference implementation –Use of “next generation” Web Services & Grid Services technology Domain specific test-beds exhibiting the commercial viability of the TrustCoM framework in the areas of –Collaborative engineering –Provision of ad-hoc aggregate services

Standardisation objectives TrustCoM is committed to the adoption of open standards, and intends to build upon and extend interoperability specifications where possible –ensure that TrustCoM framework leverages relevant standards and interoperability guidelines –ensure that TrustCoM results contribute to the future developments of standards for trust, contract, and security management for collaborative business processing Why standardisation matters: –way to promote and achieve interoperability between technologies across different vendors –interoperability is a key requirement in today’s multi-vendor market (need balance between agreed functionality, competitive advantage, and need for interoperability) –standardisation is an important part of successful exploitation

Standardisation areas Trust, PMI and PKI Contracts & SLAs Policies & Security Collab. business processes Web and Grid Services Model driven security Semantic technologies

Standardisation contributions What are we going to contribute to this already vast landscape of numerous relevant specifications? –profiles, to integrate existing and new specifications within and across areas; –new contributions in specific areas, where appropriate; –adaptations of existing standards, only when really needed; –dissemination of TrustCoM results within standardisation initiatives Consider various (pre-)standardisation bodies/initiatives –W3C, OASIS, “IBM/Microsoft”, WS-I, Liberty Alliance, GGF, OMG, IETF, ISO, Ecma International, UN/CEFACT, Internet2, domain-specific initiatives Liaise with other EU projects and initiatives to maximise impact and to avoid duplication of effort –COPRAS and ATHENA forum for standardisation and interoperability –selected EU FP6 projects in related areas (e.g., business, Grid) Disseminate and discuss potential standardisation contributions within individual project partner organisations

Interoperability profiles TrustCoM is an integrated project: –addressing trust, security, and contract management, for collaborative business processing, as a whole –focusing on the relationships and interactions between, and integration of, these issues, rather than investigating each of these issues separately and independently Main impact is therefore expected with respect to interoperability profiles: –in addition to standardisation contributions within individual areas –creation of profiles integrating existing standards across different areas. Profiles: –integrate and refine individual specifications –define specific semantics for generic specifications –exploit complementary and composability characteristics. Need for profiles has been recognized in the standardisation community (e.g., WS-I)

Standardisation Roadmap TrustCoM Standardisation Roadmap –supports and documents the project’s standardisation activities –will be regularly updated throughout the lifetime of the project –first version (D6) is made available at the end of the project’s initial scoping and requirements phase, and establishes a first baseline for our further standardisation activities Initial version of the Standardisation Roadmap covers: –consolidation of standardisation areas relevant to the project –assessment of state of standardisation in each of these areas –preliminary identification of potential standardisation contributions in each of these areas –mapping to the relevant standardisation bodies and initiatives –outline of further standardisation activities –overview of standardisation activities of individual partners Identification and assessment in close interaction with State of the Art WP and (ongoing) Framework specifications WP

Thank you Questions?