1 Exploring time and space in the annotation of museum catalogues: The Sloane virtual exhibition experience Stephen Stead Vienna November 2014 University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resource description and access for the digital world Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde Scotland.
Advertisements

UKOLN is supported by: Using the RSLP schema Ann Chapman Collection Description Focus A centre of expertise in digital information management
1 ICS –FORTH, Oct.30-Nov.4,2006, Cyprus Documenting Events in Metadata Martin Doerr, Athina Kritsotaki Center for Cultural Informatics Institute of Computer.
F25 Performance Plan F1 Work F15 Complex Work F14 Individual Work F2 Expression F22 Self Contained Expression R1 is logical successor of (has successor)
ICS-FORTH May 23, An Ontological Approach to Digital Preservation Metadata Martin Doerr Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas Institute.
8/3/20071 E65 Creation F30 Work Conception F1 Work F21 Complex Work Work F46 Individual Work R21 initiated (was initiated by) F2 Expression F20 Self Contained.
1 CIDOC CRM + FRBR ER = FRBR OO … an equation for a harmonised view of museum information and bibliographic information Martin Doerr First CASPAR Seminar.
TEI, CIDOC-CRM and a Possible Interface between the Two Øyvind Eide & Christian-Emil Ore* Unit for Digital Documentation, University of Oslo, Norway (*ICOM.
ICS-FORTH Which Period Is It? A Methodology To Create Thesauri Of Historical Periods Martin Doerr, Athina Kritsotaki, Stephen Stead.
P12 occurred in the presence of (was present at) P11 had participant P16 used specific object P25 moved P31 has modified P92 brought into existence P33.
ACQUISITION INFORMATION P52 has current owner (is current owner of) P51 has former or current owner (is former or current owner of) E55 TypeE1 CRM EntityE62.
COMP 6703 eScience Project Semantic Web for Museums Student : Lei Junran Client/Technical Supervisor : Tom Worthington Academic Supervisor : Peter Strazdins.
8/28/97Information Organization and Retrieval Files and Databases University of California, Berkeley School of Information Management and Systems SIMS.
An example of "CIDOC-CRM-aware" modelling: the HADOC model
Carlos Lamsfus. ISWDS 2005 Galway, November 7th 2005 CENTRO DE TECNOLOGÍAS DE INTERACCIÓN VISUAL Y COMUNICACIONES VISUAL INTERACTION AND COMMUNICATIONS.
ICS-FORTH October 14, The CIDOC CRM, factor for the integration and presentation of cultural information Martin Doerr Foundation for Research and.
Harmonising without Harm: towards an object-oriented formulation of FRBR aligned on the CIDOC CRM ontology Maja Žumer (University of Ljubljana) & Patrick.
1 Modelling Intellectual Processes: The object-orient FRBR Model Martin Doerr Center for Cultural Informatics Institute of Computer Science Foundation.
Using an ontology-driven system to integrate museum information and library information Paper presented on the occasion of the Symposium on Digital Semantic.
Il ruolo delle “core ontologies” nel ciclo di vita del prodotto culturale digitale Il caso “CIDOC-CRM” Oleg Missikoff - Prima giornata di studi sul SW.
‘The Universal Catalogue’ a cultural sector viewpoint David Dawson Senior Policy Adviser (Digital Futures) Museums, Libraries and archives Council.
Metadata, the CARARE Aggregation service and 3D ICONS Kate Fernie, MDR Partners, UK.
P12 occurred in the presence of (was present at) P11 had participant P16 used specific object P25 moved P31 has modified P92 brought into existence P33.
Conceptual models: museums & libraries towards an object-oriented formulation of FRBR aligned on the CIDOC CRM ontology The title of the present ELAG.
A CIDOC CRM – compatible metadata model for digital preservation
Toleva, Petya Regional Archaeological Museum Plovdiv Priorities of the Archaeological Museum in Plovdiv - promotion and preservation of the local Cultural.
The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model A core-ontology for information integration Karl H. Lampe, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK) Bonn/Germany.
Out and About with the CIDOC CRM: The Lessons and Results of the CRM Dissemination and Training programme Stephen Stead, Paveprime Ltd.
ICS-FORTH Thesauri of Historical Periods A Proposal for Standardization Martin Doerr, Athina Kritsotaki Heraklion, Crete, June
From FRBR to FRBR OO through CIDOC CRM… A Common Ontology for Cultural Heritage Information Patrick Le Bœuf, National Library of France International Symposium.
Digital Humanities Dr. Øyvind Eide TEI and neighbouring standards: CIDOC-CRM Øyvind Eide Universität Passau (with thanks to Christian-Emil.
Knowledge Technologies for Description of the Semantics of the Bulgarian Iconographical Artefacts Lilia Pavlova-Draganova Laboratory of Telemаtics – BAS,
Helsinki, November FRBR: the bright new future? Part 1 Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana Slovenia.
RDA: history and background Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT ACOC Seminar, Sydney, 24 October 2008.
CIDOC CRM:SIG presentation© CIDOC 2015 CRM inf : the Argumentation Model Stephen Stead Paveprime Ltd and Southampton University Oxford, UK, February 2015.
F25 Performance Plan F1 Work F15 Complex Work F14 Individual Work F2 Expression F22 Self Contained Expression R1 is logical successor of (has successor)
A CRM-based Ontology for Narratives 1 Carlo Meghini, Valentina Bartalesi.
Co-funded by the European Union under FP7-ICT Co-ordinated by aparsen.eu #APARSEN Provenance Interoperability and Reasoning Yannis Tzitzikas Assistant.
RSC Strategy Gordon Dunsire, Chair, RDA Steering Committee
Geometric and Semantic Matching for Cultural Heritage Artefacts
Dr. Barry Norton, Development Manager, ResearchSpace*
Harmonized models for the Digital World: CIDOC CRM and extensions
RDA work plan: current and future activities
Harmonized EDM-CRM-FRBRoo
Modelling Intellectual Processes: The object-orient FRBR Model
Harmonized EDM-CRM-FRBRoo-CRMdig
From FRBR to FRBROO through CIDOC CRM…
Harmonized EDM-CRM-FRBRoo
Harmonized EDM-CRM-FRBRoo
Annual report and current focus CIDOC CRM SIG
FRBRoo and performing arts
Building an Argumentation Platform for 3D Reconstruction
IFLA FRBR-Library Reference Model and RDA
Chair, IFLA Namespaces Technical Group; Chair-Elect, JSC/RDA
CRMinf: Argumentation and Scholarly Reading
Move S15 Observable Entity to CRM?
RDA, linked data, and update on development
Harmonized EDM-CRM-FRBRoo
Interesting Features of the CIDOC CRM
CRMinf: the Argumentation Model
Move S15 Observable Entity to CRM?
Supporting Facts by arguments
The new RDA: resource description in libraries and beyond
IFLA LRM adopted! Top congress news!
Modus ponens.
Evolution Change Over Time.
Future directions for RDA
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
The CIDOC CRM Recent Developments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

1 Exploring time and space in the annotation of museum catalogues: The Sloane virtual exhibition experience Stephen Stead Vienna November 2014 University of Southampton & Paveprime Ltd Jonathan Whitson-Cloud, Dominic Oldman British Museum

2 Agenda  Historical Background  The CIDOC CRM  Review of Place in Catalogue Entry  Review of Time in Catalogue Entry  Spatial Temporal Relationships between Catalogue Entries  CRMinf  CRMinf recording Sloan assertions

3 Historical Background  Sir Hans Sloane ( )  Trip to Jamaica in the 1680s  Started a collection of ‘natural and artificial rarities’  On death left collection to the Nation  Act of Parliament created British Museum  Parts later dispersed to British Library and Natural History Museum  79,475 catalogue entries  Reconstructing Sloane project

CIDOC CRM Background Ontology: 89 classes &137 properties Explains hundreds of data formats International standard ISO 21127:2006 Ongoing maintenance ISO update and v6.0 in 2014 Extended by FRBRoo v2.0 in 2014

The CRM Family  CRM: Conceptual Reference Model  FRBRoo: Bibliographic References  PRESSoo: Periodicals  CRMinf: Argumentation Model  CRMsci: Scientific Observation Model  CRMdig: Digital Provenance Model  CRMgeo: Spatiotemporal Refinement

6 The CIDOC CRM Top-level Classes participate in E39 Actor E55 Type E28 Conceptual Object E18 Physical Thing E2 Temporal Entity E41 Appellation affect or use refer to / refine refer to / identify location at within E53 Place E52 Time-Span

7 Place in Catalogue Entry (after CAA14 paper)  Place of Manufacture  Region of Use  Place of Collection  Region of Associated Culture  Origin of Manufacturer

8 Time in Catalogue Entry (after CAA14 paper)  Date of Manufacture  Date of Culture of Manufacture  Date of Usage  Date of Collection  Date of Accession  Date of Record Compilation

9 Spatial Temporal Relationships between Catalogue Entries  Relative Record Compilation (see CAA2014 paper)  Spatial Relations Between Catalogue Entry Versions

Spatial Relations Between Catalogue Entry Versions (S1) 10 E31 Document Original Misc 4 E31 Document Misc 4 X E25 Man-Made Feature Marks of Original Misc 4 E24 Physical Man-Made Thing ESL P128 is carried by E53 Place Place of Original Misc 4 text P128 is carried by P59 has section P53 has former or current location E25 Man-Made Feature Marks of Misc 4 X P128 is carried by E53 Place Place of Misc 4 X symbol P53 has former or current location P122 borders with E53 Place Place of Misc 4 L226 text E53 Place Place of Misc 4 25 text P122 P59 has section

11 Evolution of Catalogue Entry  A] 4.-> X-> L226-> 25  B] 4.-> L226->X-> 25  C] 4.-> L226-> 25-> X  Others?

12 Evolution of Catalogue Entries (A) E65 Creation Creation of X and Version 2 Misc 4 E65 Creation Creation of Misc 4 P94i was created by P106i forms part of & P148i is component of P106i & P148i E31 Document Original Misc 4 E31 Document Misc 4 X E31 Document Version 2 Misc 4 P94i was created by P94i P16 E65 Creation Creation of L226 and Version 3 Misc 4 P106i & P148i E31 Document Misc 4 L226 E31 Document Version 3 Misc 4 P94i was created by P94i P16 used specific object E31 Document Version 4 Misc 4 E31 Document Misc 4 25 E65 Creation Creation of 25 and Version 4 Misc 4 P106i & P148i P16 P94i

CRMinf classes: Temporal Entities 13 I2 Belief E2 Temporal Entity S15 Observable Entity E13 Attribute Assignment I1 Argumentation S4 Observation S5 I5 Inference Making I7 Belief Adoption CRM CRMsci CRMinf

CRMinf classes: Others 14 E73 Information Object E28 Conceptual Object I3 Inference Logic I4 Proposition Set I6 Belief Value E28 Symbolic Object E28 Propositional Object E59 Primitive Value CRM CRMinf

CRMinf Argumentation 15 I3 Inference Logic I4 Proposition Set I6 Belief Value I2 Belief I1 Argumentation I5 Inference Making I7 Belief Adoption J1 used as premise (was premise for) P17 was motivated by J6 adopted (adopted by) P17 was motivated by J5 holds to be (is held by) J4 that (is subject of) J3 applies (was applied by) P16 used specific object J2 concluded that (was concluded by) P116 starts E39 Actor P14 carried out by (performed) CRM CRMinf

Modelling my Beliefs in Evolutions A, B and C 16 J1 used as premise J5 holds to be J4 that J2 concluded that P14 carried out by I5 Inference Making Evolution Decision I2 Belief SdS Belief in Evolution A of Misc 4 E39 Actor Person SdS I4 Proposition Set Evolution A I6 Belief Value True J5 holds to be J4 that J2 concluded that I2 Belief SdS Belief in Evolution B of Misc 4 I4 Proposition Set Evolution B I6 Belief Value False J5 holds to be J4 that J2 concluded that I2 Belief SdS Belief in Evolution C of Misc 4 I4 Proposition Set Evolution C I6 Belief Value False J3 applies I2 Belief BM Belief in Spatial Relations of Misc 4 J5 holds to be J4 that I4 Proposition Set S1 I6 Belief Value True I3 Inference Logic Catalogue Text Rules

Trusting a Belief 17 J6 adopted J5 holds to be J4 that J2 concluded that P14 carried out by I7 Belief Adoption Adopting SdS belief I2 Belief CHNT Belief in Evolution A of Misc 4 E39 Actor Group CHNT19 I4 Proposition Set Evolution A I6 Belief Value True I2 Belief SdS Belief in Evolution A of Misc 4 J5 holds to be J4 that I4 Proposition Set Evolution A I6 Belief Value True

Modelling Belief in a forgery 18 J1 used as premise J5 holds to be J4 that J2 concluded that P14 carried out by I5 Inference Making Forgery Decision I2 Belief EvD Belief in Forgery of Misc 4 E39 Actor Person EvD I4 Proposition Set Forgery I6 Belief Value True J3 applies I2 Belief Belief in Spatial Relations of Misc 4 J5 holds to be J4 that I4 Proposition Set S1 I6 Belief Value True I3 Inference Logic Forgery Rules

19 Conclusion  The Sloan catalogues are a fantastic resource  The parent of UK cataloguing practice  Temporal and Spatial Semantics  Rich, varied and often eccentric  CRMinf allows the modelling of inference chains  Jean-Claude Gardin would be pleased