River Channels in GIS Venkatesh Merwade, Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas at Austin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydro Networks in GIS Network model Flow on Networks Hydrologic networks Linear referencing on networks Some slides in this presentation were prepared.
Advertisements

Hydrologic Measurement Precipitation Evaporation Streamflow Channel Properties Topography GIS datasets Reading: Applied Hydrology Chapter 6.
G EOSPATIAL D ATA L AYERS FOR A RC H YDRO R IVER Arc Hydro River Meeting Clark Siler Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Center for Modeling & Simulation.  A Map is the most effective shorthand to show locations of objects with attributes, which can be physical or cultural.
Terrain for the Lower Colorado River Flood Damage Evaluation Project Erin Atkinson, Halff Associates, Inc. Rick Diaz, Lower Colorado River Authority Symposium.
Kinematic Routing Model and its Parameters Definition.
Hydrologic Measurement
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
Introduction This project deals with conversion of Vector based Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) data into Raster based PMP data using different interpolation.
Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Stage – Discharge Rating Numerical relationship between water elevation (stage) and discharge at a location in a flowing system. Expressed as an equation,
GIS Modeling Venkatesh Merwade, University of Texas at Austin Interdisciplinary aquatic modeling workshop, July 21, 2005.
Geographic Information Systems : Data Types, Sources and the ArcView Program.
HEC-RAS.
1 CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Session #1 (some material from Dr. David Maidment, University of Texas) January 18, 2006 Learning Objectives:
Modeling River Ice and River Ice Jams with HEC-RAS
Texas A&M University, Department of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of GIS in Civil Engineering Professor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Student: Brad.
GIS in Water Resources: Lecture 1
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science College of Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS ESRI user conference May 2004 Gil Strassberg and David Maidment, University.
“We Bring Engineering to Life” 3-D Stream Restoration Design, Monitoring and Beyond David Bidelspach, PE - Stantec Consulting Greg Jennings, PE – NCSU.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
STUDY OF THE ROUGHNESS CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANT SPECIES IN CALIFORNIA RIVERS By U.C.Davis J.Amorocho Hydraulics Laboratory.
Lower Saluda River Instream Flow Study TWC Study Team Workshop December 11, 2007.
1 Flood Hazard Analysis Session 1 Dr. Heiko Apel Risk Analysis Flood Hazard Assessment.
Hydrologic Modeling David R. Maidment, Oscar Robayo, Venkatesh Merwade, Carlos Patino, Nate Johnson, Sergio Martinez, Tim Whiteaker, Dan Obenour Center.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
Understanding Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Joey Kleiner.
Wendy Welch ADAPTING THE ARC HYDRO DATA MODEL AND TOOLS TO A HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK KITSAP PENINSULA, KITSAP, MASON AND PIERCE COUNTIES, WASHINGTON.
NWS FLDWAV ANALYSIS TOOL
Why should the Corps of Engineers be interested in Arc Hydro? –Watershed planning –Reservoir operations –Flood damage reduction –Ecosystem restoration.
Elevation (m) Figure 1: The left panel shows the entire modeled reach which extends from RM 63.4 to RM 65.9, with arrows indicate locations of the rapids.
CRWR-FloodMap ArcView Digital Elevation Model HEC-HMS Flood discharge HEC-RAS Water surface profiles ArcView Flood plain maps CRWR-PreProAvRAS Digital.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
Fluvial Geomorphic Analyses of the Llano River and Sandy Creek Basins, Central Texas, using GIS and Arc Hydro Tools Franklin T. Heitmuller CE 394K November.
March 2003HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Other Features of HEC-RAS- part 2 Cross Section Interpolation Multiple Plans Supporting Pictures.
Measuring velocity profiles above different substrates on the Glinščica stream Maja Koprivšek 1, Mitja Brilly 1, Mihael Jožef Toman 2 1 University of Ljubljana,
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers Reference: HEC-RAS Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, Chapters 1 and 2 Reading: HEC-RAS Manual pp. 2-1 to 2-12 Applied.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
INTRODUCTION TO GIS  Used to describe computer facilities which are used to handle data referenced to the spatial domain.  Has the ability to inter-
Steve Kopp Esri ArcGIS 10 and Beyond Arc Hydro River Workshop, Austin, Texas, December 1, 2010.
River channels Venkatesh Merwade, University of Texas at Austin.
Basic Hydraulics: Channels Analysis and design – I
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS AWRA Specialty Conference Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and.
Floodplain Mapping using TINs Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) Representation of stream channels using TINs Floodplain delineation using HEC-HMS,
Building Hydrologic Information Systems David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Modeling.
Surface-Groundwater interactions on the Eastern Snake River, ID.
Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources Arc Hydro –Networks and the Framework –Drainage systems –Channels –Time Series –Modeling David R. Maidment, University.
A 3D description of river channels using 2D NHD reaches Venkatesh M. Merwade and David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources, University of.
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
What is the Bradshaw model?
“Low Flow” “Water is taken out of the stream for a variety of uses, such as irrigated agriculture, municipal and industrial. Low flow means that amount.
INTRODUCTION TO GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics
Arc Hydro for EPA Basins
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
River Channels CE 397 Flood Forecasting David R. Maidment
Distributed Flow Routing
Improvements from Senate Bill 2: Instream Flow requirements
TERMINOLOGY Macrohabitat – water quality and hydrology
Creation of Bathymetric Surfaces Using High-Density Point Surveys
GIS and SMS in Numerical Modeling of Open Channel Flow
Streams Hydrodynamics
Streams Hydrodynamics
GIS in Water Resources: Lecture 1
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Presentation transcript:

River Channels in GIS Venkatesh Merwade, Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas at Austin

Overview Fish Habitat Modeling using GIS Standardized 3D representation of river channels River Channel Morphology Model RCMM and Hydraulic Modeling

Instream flow studies How do we quantify the impact of changing the naturalized flow of a river on species habitat? How do we set the minimum reservoir releases that would satisfy the instream flow requirement?

Objective Objective Instream Flow To model species habitat as a function of flow conditions and help decision making Instream Flow Flow necessary to maintain habitat in natural channel.

Methodology Species habitat are dependent on channel hydrodynamics – hydrodynamic modeling Criteria to classify species depending on the conditions in the river channel – biological studies Combine hydrodynamics and biological studies to make decisions – ArcGIS

Fish Habitat Modeling Criterion GIS RMA2 Biological Sampling Instream Flow Decision Making Hydrodynamic Model Habitat Descriptions GIS RMA2 Biological Sampling Depth & velocity Species groups Criterion

Data Requirement Hydrodynamic Modeling Biological Studies Bathymetry Data (to define the channel bed) Substrate Materials (to find the roughness) Boundary Conditions (for hydrodynamic model) Calibration Data (to check the model) Biological Studies Fish Sampling (for classification of different species) Velocity and depth at sampling points

Study Area (Guadalupe river near Seguin, TX) 1/2 meter Digital Ortho Photography

Depth Sounder (Echo Sounder) The electronic depth sounder operates in a similar way to radar It sends out an electronic pulse which echoes back from the bed. The echo is timed electronically and transposed into a reading of the depth of water.

Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Provides full profiles of water current speed and direction in the ocean, rivers, and lakes. Also used for discharge, scour and river bed topography.

Global Positioning System (GPS) Tells you where you are on the earth!

Final Setup GPS Antenna Computer and power setup Depth Sounder

Final Data View

2D Hydrodynamic Model SMS (Surface Water Modeling System) Input Data (Environmental Modeling Systems, Inc.) RMA2 (US Army Corps of Engineers) SMS (Surface Water Modeling System) RMA2 Interface Input Data Bathymetry Data Substrate Materials Boundary Conditions Calibration Data

Finite element mesh and bathymetric data SMS mesh Finite element mesh and bathymetric data

SMS Results

Biological Studies (TAMU) Meso Habitat and Micro Habitat Use Vadas & Orth (1998) criterion for Meso Habitats Electrofishing or seining to collect fish samples for Micro Habitat analysis Sample at several flow rates and seasons Measure Velocity and depth at seining points Statistical analysis to get a table for Micro Habitats classification.

Mesohabitat Criteria: V, D, V/D, FR (Vadas & Orth, 1998) Depth [feet] Run Fast Riffle Slow Riffle Deep Pool Medium Pool Shallow Pool Mesohabitat Criteria: V, D, V/D, FR (Vadas & Orth, 1998)

Micro Habitat Table Species 50% MinD 50% MaxD 50% MinV 50% MaxV Group 1 1.5 2.7 2.9 Group 2 0.9 1.7 2.3 Group 3 0.5 1.2 0.6 2 Group 4 1.6 Group 5 1.8 4.6 0.3 Group 6 4.3 6.5 Group 7 3.3 0.1 Group 8 1.1 10 0.01 Group 9 2.0 0.4 Group 10 0.8

Hydraulic and Biological Data Attribute Table Bathymetry Points Habitat Descriptions

Habitat Modeling using ArcGIS

Results

Overview Fish Habitat Modeling using GIS Standardized 3D representation of river channels River Channel Morphology Model RCMM and Hydraulic Modeling

Channel bathymetry in Hydraulic Modeling Source: RMA2 reference manual, 2002

Channel Representation in Arc Hydro River channels are represented as a set of cross-sections and profile-lines in Arc Hydro

GIS database for river channels Thalweg Cross-sections ProfileLines 3D Network Measurement points Surface Develop generic ways to create all the channel features from measurement points.

Data analysis Start with points Create surface from points Centerline/Thalweg Cross-sections ProfileLines Start with points Create surface from points Extract all the necessary information How can we do this…….

Development of Geospatial Structure for River Channels Thought Process: Regular FishNet in ArcGIS provides a network of 3D lines, which are not flow oriented If the data are plotted in a flow-oriented system, the regular FishNet becomes flow-oriented. Flow-oriented coordinate system is useful for getting cross-sections and profile-lines. Regular FishNet

Geospatial Structure for River Channels - Methodology Plot the data in a flow-oriented coordinate system (s,n,z). Interpolate the data to create a surface. Create a FishNet from the interpolated surface. Transform the FishNet to (x,y,z).

Measure in ArcGIS A PolylineMZ can store m and z at each vertex along with x and y coordinates. 112.3213 64.0056

(s,n,z) coordinate system P Q Centerlin e Bankline s (s = 0, n = 0) P(n1, s1) Q(n2, s2) n2 s1 s2 s-coordinate is the flow length along the river channel n-coordinate is the perpendicular distance from the centerline n-coordinate is negative to the LHS and positive to the RHS of the centerline

Defining a Thalweg Input Output Step 2 Steps 3, 4 Steps 5,6,7 Step 8 User defines an arbitrary centerline over the measurement points Thalweg tool creates a surface using the measurement points Densify the initial centerline to get more points Normals are drawn at each vertex of the centerline to locate deepest points All the deepest points replace the vertices of the old centerline Final result is a 3D polyline defining the thalweg Old vertices New vertices

(x,y,z) (s,n,z) x y o - n + s (x,y,z) (s,n,z)

Spatial interpolation Bathymetry Points IDW EIDW Splines Tension Regularized Kriging Ordinary Anisotropic Interpolated Raster

Spatial Interpolation Results Spatial Interpolation Method RMSE (m) Rank Inverse Distance Weighting 0.53 5 Elliptical Inverse Distance Weighting 0.32 2 Regularized Spline 0.59 6 Tension Spline 0.45 4 Ordinary Kriging 0.44 3 Anisotropic Kriging 0.31 1 Anisotropic kriging gave the least RMSE

FishNet in (s,n,z) is flow-oriented! FishNet (x,y,z) to (s,n,z) s n x y FishNet in (s,n,z) is flow-oriented!

FishNet comparison Hydraulic FishNet Regular FishNet

Profile Lines and Cross Sections in 3D Bird’s eye view!

Instream flow studies in Texas Priority segments are 100s of miles long Study area is only few miles long Results from small studies are extrapolated Are the results valid?? Can we cross-check??

Overview Fish Habitat Modeling using GIS Standardized 3D representation of river channels River Channel Morphology Model RCMM and Hydraulic Modeling

Goal Based on the knowledge gained from a detailed dataset collected for a reach of river, develop a model for describing the 3D river channel form at regional scale.

Conceptual Model Meandering shape Thalweg location Cross-section form B C Cross-section form

Deterministic Component Channel Bathymetry = + Channel Bathymetry Deterministic Component Stochastic Component Channel bathymetry is complex This research is focused on the deterministic component only

River Channel Morphology Model 4 1 2 3 Get the shape (blue line or DOQ) Using the shape, locate the thalweg Using thalweg location, create cross-sections Network of cross-sections and profile lines

Site1 and Site2 on Brazos River @ 30 miles @ 5 miles The data for Site 1 and Site 2 are available as (x,y,z) points.

Step 1: Normalizing the data nL nR - + Zd P(ni, zi) w = nL + nR For any point P(ni,zi), the normalized coordinates are: nnew = (ni – nL)/w znew = (Z – zi)/d For nL = -15, nR = 35, d = 5, Z=10 P (10, 7.5) becomes Pnew(0.5, 0.5)

Original cross-section Modified cross-section Normalized Data Original cross-section Modified cross-section Depth and width going from zero to unity makes life easier without changing the shape of the original cross-section

Shape characterization through radius of curvature If radius of curvature is small, the thalweg is close to the bank and as it increases the thalweg moves towards the center of the channel. If the channel meanders to left, the center of curvature is to the right hand side of the centerline and vice versa. When the center of curvature is to the right, the radius of curvature is considered positive and vice versa

Step 2: locate thalweg using shape Y = 0.076*log(x) + 1.21 Y = 0.087*log(x) – 0.32 0.5 1.0

Thalweg and cross-section Cross-section should have an analytical form to relate it to the thalweg location Many probability density functions (pdf) have shapes similar to the cross-section Beta pdf is found feasible its domain is from zero to one it has only two parameters (a,b)

Step 3: cross-sections as beta pdfs beta c/s = (beta1 + beta2) * k a1=5, b1=2, a2=3, b2=3, factor = 0.5 a1=2, b1=2, a2=3, b2=7, factor = 0.6 Create beta cross-sections for different thalweg locations

Cross-sections as Beta pdf Single pdf Combination of two pdfs a1=5, b1=2, a2=3, b2=3, factor = 0.5 Simple, only two parameters, 0 < x < 1 A single pdf has a flat tail, which is undesirable. The condition of unit area under the pdf makes it difficult to maintain z*< 1. A combination of two beta pdfs offers flexibility to fit any form of cross-sectional shape.

Hydraulic Geometry Relationships Hydraulic geometry relationships for Brazos River at Richmond. Hydraulic geometry relationships are developed at USGS gaging stations. W, d, and v obtained at the gaging stations are then interpolated to get the corresponding values at other locations. An ideal scenario would be to have gaging stations both upstream and downstream from the point of interest.

USGS Measurements http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/measurements

The final framework Start with a blue line (s), locate the thalweg (t) using the relationship, t = f(s). Using t, describe cross-sections (c) using the relationship, c(a,b) = f(t). The resulting cross-sections have a unit width and unit depth. Rescale the normalized cross-sections using width and depth (hydraulic geometry)

Results

Lower Brazos in Texas

3D Channel Representation Cross-sections Profile-lines 3D Mesh of cross-sections and profile-lines Set of Volume objects

Overview Fish Habitat Modeling using GIS Standardized 3D representation of river channels River Channel Morphology Model RCMM and Hydraulic Modeling

RCMM and Hydraulic Modeling 3D Channel Model Blue line to 3D channel using the shape and hydraulic geometry Interaction with external hydraulic models (HEC-RAS) via XML Blue Line 3D Channel XML HEC-RAS GIS / Hydraulic Model Data Exchange

Hydraulic Model Attributes Relationships – ReachHasCrossSection HydroID of Reach is ReachID of CrossSections

FTable Linking of 3D channel and hydraulic model can be used to run hydraulic simulations and create FTable in GIS FTable contains useful information on water surface elevations, velocity, volume, residence times Cross-section identifier Hydraulic attributes Reach identifier

Questions