OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February 21-22 nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity study and Sun correction impact J. Gourrion and the SMOS-BEC team SMOS-BEC, ICM/CSIC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BIAS TRENDS IN THE 1-SLOPE (REPROCESSING) AND CALIBRATED L1 BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES Joe Tenerelli SMOS Payload Calibration Meeting September 2012.
Advertisements

SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Commissioning Plan, 07/05/2009 Level 2 Ocean Salinity Processor Commissioning Plan 7 May 2009 ARGANS ACRI-ST ICM-CSIC.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity – Reprocessing Level 2 Ocean Salinity Reprocessing 17 September 2008.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity L20S Tool Box Architecture & Release 27 June 2014 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL.
UPDATE ON BIAS TRENDS, DIRECT SUN CORRECTION, AND ROUGHNESS CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli May 10, 2011.
AN INITIAL LOOK AT THE IMPACT OF THE NEW ANTENNA LOSS MODEL Joe Tenerelli SMOS QUALITY WORKING GROUP #4 7-9 March 2011.
UPDATE ON SMOS LONG-TERM BIASES OVER THE OCEAN AND ROUGH SURFACE SCATTERING OF CELESTIAL SKY NOISE Joe Tenerelli SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting Arles, France,
REVIEW OF OBSERVED BIAS TRENDS OVER THE OCEAN AND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF PROCESSOR EVOLUTION Joe & Nicolas IFREMER/CLS ESL Quality Working Group #5 May 30-31,
PART 2: A QUICK COMPARISON OF V504 AND V620 GLOBAL MAPS Joe Tenerelli SMOS Calibration Meeting 18 26/05/2014.
F. Wentz, T. Meissner, J. Scott and K. Hilburn Remote Sensing Systems 2014 Aquarius / SAC-D Science Team Meeting November ,
OSE meeting GODAE, Toulouse 4-5 June 2009 Interest of assimilating future Sea Surface Salinity measurements.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity L1 -> L2OS tools 12 February 2014 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity Using TEC estimated from Stokes 3 24 October 2012 ACRI-st, LOCEAN & ARGANS SMOS+polarimetry.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 TEC estimation Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN)
GLOBAL BIASES IN THE DWELL-LINE MEAN STOKES PARAMETERS FROM SMOS FOR NOVEMBER 2010 Joe Tenerelli 25 February 2011.
The Aquarius Salinity Retrieval Algorithm Frank J. Wentz and Thomas Meissner, Remote Sensing Systems Gary S. Lagerloef, Earth and Space Research David.
MIRAS performance based on OS data SMOS MIRAS IOP 6 th Review, ESAC – 17 June 2013 Prepared by: J. Font, SMOS Co-Lead Investigator, Ocean Salinity – ICM-CSIC.
ElectroScience Lab Studies of Radio Frequency Interference in SMOS Observations IGARSS 2011 Joel T. Johnson and Mustafa Aksoy Department of Electrical.
DA/SAT Training Course, March 2006 Variational Quality Control Erik Andersson Room: 302 Extension: 2627
BA 555 Practical Business Analysis
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Error Validation and Early Orbit Corrections Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center April 2005 Climate Observation Program Blended SST Analysis Changes and Implications for the Buoy Network 1.Plans.
L2OS RFI status Nicolas Lamquin, Jean-Luc Vergely Jacqueline Boutin Paul Spurgeon ICM, Barcelona, 16/17 May 2013.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity status 4 February 2013 ARGANS.
Ifremer Planning of Cal/Val Activities during In orbit commisioning Phase N. Reul, J. Tenerelli, S. Brachet, F. Paul & F. Gaillard, ESL & GLOSCAL teams.
SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Workshop, 18-19/11/2008, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Mediterranean flights C.
Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
SMOS Science Workshop, Arles, th Sept, 2011 IMPROVING SMOS SALINITY RETRIEVAL: SYSTEMATIC ERROR DIAGNOSTIC J. Gourrion, R. Sabia, M. Portabella,
SMOS QWG-5, 30 May- 1 June 2011, ESRIN Ocean Salinity 1 1.Commissioning reprocessing analysis 2.New processor version: improvements and problems detected/solved.
LECTURER PROF.Dr. DEMIR BAYKA AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING LABORATORY I.
Calibration and Validation Studies for Aquarius Salinity Retrieval PI: Shannon Brown Co-Is: Shailen Desai and Anthony Scodary Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
UPDATE ON THE SUN GLINT Joe Tenerelli Ocean Data Lab SMOS Level 2 OS Progress Meeting 26 SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Barcelona, Spain April 2015.
A REVIEW OF BIAS PATTERNS IN THE MIRAS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES OVER THE OCEAN Joe Tenerelli SMOS Quality Working Group # Feb 2013 ESRIN.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity PM # May 2011 ARGANS & L2OS CLS.
A. Montuori 1, M. Portabella 2, S. Guimbard 2, C. Gabarrò 2, M. Migliaccio 1 1 Dipartimento per le Tecnologie (DiT), University of Naples Parthenope, Italy.
SMOS QWG-11, ESRIN 4-5 July 2013 L2OS v600 status and evolution 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity Status 9 February 2015 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL 1.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity L2OS planning 2 July 2014 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL 1.
1 / 13 Current activities at ICM-SMOS-BEC J. Gourrion, C. Gabarró, R. Sabia, M. Talone, V. González, S. Montero, S. Guimbard, F. Pérez, J. Martínez, M.
SPCM-9, Esac, May 3 rd, 2012 MODEL-INDEPENDENT ESTIMATION OF SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES J. Gourrion, S. Guimbard, R. Sabia,
Level 2 Algorithm. Definition of Product Levels LevelDescription Level 1 1A Reconstructed unprocessed instrument data 1B Geolocated, calibrated sensor.
EXTENDING THE LAND SEA CONTAMINATION CHARACTERIZATION TO THE EXTENDED ALIAS- FREE FIELD OF VIEW Joe Tenerelli (CLS) and Nicolas Reul (IFREMER) SMOS Quality.
SMOS-BEC – Barcelona (Spain) Revealing Geophysically-Consistent Spatial Structures in SMOS Surface Salinity Derived Maps Marcos Portabella, Estrella Olmedo,
SMOS QWG-6, ESRIN October 2011 OTT generation strategy and associated issues 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Characterization of scattered celestial signals in SMOS observations over the Ocean J. Gourrion 1, J.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity v63x product design evolution 22 April 2015 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL 1.
USING SMOS POLARIMETRIC BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES TO CORRECT FOR ROUGH SURFACE EMISSION BEFORE SALINITY INVERSION.
SMOS-BEC – Barcelona (Spain) LO calibration frequency impact Part II C. Gabarró, J. Martínez, V. González, A. Turiel & BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre.
Cal/Val Discussion. Summary No large errors in rain, freshening observed by Aquarius can be significant and real (up to about 3 hours on average after.
SMOS-BEC – Barcelona (Spain) Assessment of impact of new ECMWF cycle 38r2 BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, Barcelona.
QWG-10 ESRIN 4-6 February 2013 Quality control study for SMOS data / Flags analysis C. Gabarró, J. Martínez, E. Olmedo M. Portabella, J. Font and BEC team.
Simulator Wish-List Gary Lagerloef Aquarius Principal Investigator Cal/Val/Algorithm Workshop March GSFC.
SMOS Quality Working Group Meeting #2 Frascati (Rome), September 13 th -14 th,2010 SMOS-BEC Team.
2 - 5 December, Hurricane Conference Tropical Prediction Center, Miami, FL 2009 Hurricane Conference Authors : Paul Chang, NOAA/NESDIS Jim Carswell,
SMOS QWG-9, ESRIN October 2012 L2OS: Product performance summary v550 highlights 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
Mission Operations Review February 8-10, 2010 Cordoba, ARGENTINA SECTION 16.x Aquarius Science Commissioning and Acceptance Draft 2 Prepared by: Gary Lagerloef,
T. Meissner and F. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems 2014 Aquarius / SAC-D Science Team Meeting November , 2014 Seattle. Washington,
Assimilating Satellite Sea-Surface Salinity in NOAA Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Dave Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC Avichal Mehra, NWS/NCEP/EMC Sudhir Nadiga, IMSG.
Ocean and Land Surface Characterization in the GPM Radar-Radiometer Combined Algorithm S. Joseph Munchak 1,2 *, William S. Olson 1,3, Mircea Grecu 1,4,
21-23/04/2015PM27 J-L Vergely, J. Boutin, N. Kolodziejczyk, N. Martin, S. Marchand SMOS RFI/Outlier filtering.
A step toward operational use of AMSR-E horizontal polarized radiance in JMA global data assimilation system Masahiro Kazumori Numerical Prediction Division.
QWG-10 – 4-6 February 2013 – ESRIN (Italy) SMOS Level3 and Level 4 Research Products Provided by the Barcelona Expert Center Jordi Font and BEC team SMOS.
Impact of sea surface roughness on SMOS measurements A new empirical model S. Guimbard & SMOS-BEC Team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta.
UPDATE ON GALACTIC NOISE CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli SMOS Quality Working Group #9 ESA ESRIN 24 October 2012.
Dependence of SMOS/MIRAS brightness temperatures on wind speed: sea surface effect and latitudinal biases Xiaobin Yin, Jacqueline Boutin LOCEAN.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya CORRECTION OF SPATIAL ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES L. Wu, I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
Tests on V500 Sun On versus Sun Off 1)Tbmeas. –Tbmodel in the FOV X. Yin, J. Boutin Inputs from R. Balague, P. Spurgeon, A. Chuprin, M. Martin-Neira and.
Dec 12, 2008F. Iturbide-Sanchez Review of MiRS Rainfall Rate Performances F. Iturbide-Sanchez, K. Garrett, S.-A. Boukabara, and W. Chen.
Yandell – Econ 216 Chap 15-1 Chapter 15 Multiple Regression Model Building.
Hartmut Bösch and Sarah Dance
Presentation transcript:

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity study and Sun correction impact J. Gourrion and the SMOS-BEC team SMOS-BEC, ICM/CSIC

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity  DPGS OTT  Impact on OTT quality of different factors: 1.Galactic signals 2.Number of snapshots used 3.Apparent drift (or temporal integration window width)  Experiments designed to remove inter-dependence  OTT quality criterion: stability, level of dependence on the subset of data

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity  Force independence of factor 2 (constant number of snapshots N) and 3 (use a 12-days period)  Galactic potential contamination detection: threshold on the incident field (3.5 to 8 K)  For each threshold value, N snapshots are randomly selected, and an OTT computed  Using the lowest threshold value as reference, we compute the OTT rms increase due to increasing galactic contamination Impact of galactic contamination

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011  Force independence of factor 1 (strict galactic filter) and 3 (use a 12-days period)  For three different periods, the reference situation is given by the overall number of available snapshots after filtering.  the number of snapshots is progressively reduced, snapshots are randomly selected and corresponding OTTs are computed  OTT rms increase is computed as a function of snapshot number reduction factor and averaged over the 3 datasets (consistency checked) OTT sensitivity Impact of number of snapshots

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity Impact of number of snapshots

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity Impact of number of snapshots

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011  Force independence of factor 1 (strict galactic filter) and 2 (constant number of snapshots N)  The temporal window width is increased from 6 days to 48 days  In each case, N snapshots are randomly selected, and an OTT computed  Using the shortest temporal window as reference, we compute the OTT rms increase due to increasing data inconsistency OTT sensitivity Impact of apparent drift

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011  As expected, the number of snapshots used to compute the OTT should be kept as high as possible, the upper limit being set by other constraints  Galaxy presence in the snapshots used to compute the OTT may induce large errors in the characterization of systematic instrument/reconstruction biases (up to 0.4 K rms at X- and Y-pol)  Apparent instrumental drift can induce significant errors. If not canceled, numbers provided should help defining the OTT recomputation period. OTT sensitivity Summary

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 Direct sun correction impact Using DPGS file : SM_OPER_MIR_SC_F1B_ T131914_ T141314_340_001_0

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 Direct sun correction impact Using DPGS file : SM_OPER_MIR_SC_F1B_ T131914_ T141314_340_001_0

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 Direct sun correction impact Using DPGS file : SM_OPER_MIR_SC_F1B_ T131914_ T141314_340_001_0 * K shift * no impact on latitudinal variations

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 Direct sun correction impact Using DPGS file : SM_OPER_MIR_SC_F1B_ T031502_ T040900_340_001_0

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 Direct sun correction impact Using DPGS file : SM_OPER_MIR_SC_F1B_ T031502_ T040900_340_001_0

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 Direct sun correction impact Using DPGS file : SM_OPER_MIR_SC_F1B_ T031502_ T040900_340_001_0 1K impact on latitudinal variations

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 Data processing  31 days week of Full-pol data from Augus  Level 1 Operational Processor version  Land contamination detected at Level 1B: much wider FOV than at L1C  Only pure Ocean scenes are kept (less than 0.25% of land pixels)  RFI detection in the Alias-Free FOV: threshold on the allowed maximum departure from model (20 K)  Reconstruction bias pattern estimated from the 6-days dataset subsampled to homogenize the geophysical conditions histograms (wind speed and SST) over the FOV.

OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 Summary  Variability of the distribution of observed geophysical conditions inside the FOV, when computing the OTT, may introduce inconsistencies in the modified brightness temperatures  Adequate snapshot selection procedure enables to reduce consequent biases in the retrieved salinities. The procedure requires much more data than one half-orbit.  The residual SSS anomalies are highly reduced when using a roughness-improved forward model (IQR divided by 2, Y-pol)  In terms of salinity, X-pol is much noisier than Y-pol.  To further reduce the SSS errors:  work on the roughness description and more generally on the forward model  improve the inversion method from the present linear approach