Coaching Teachers to Use Assessment to Inform Instruction The Florida Center for Reading Research 850.644.9352.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
Ongoing Progress Monitoring and Determining Instructional Level JRF! Leadership Academy July 2006 Randee Winterbottom, Tricia Curran, Stacey Fisher.
Read to Achieve North Carolina: Excellent Public Schools Act.
1 Module 2 Using DIBELS Next Data: Identifying and Validating Need for Support.
B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Lee County’s Just Read, Florida! District Plan K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Plan Dianne Johnson, Ali Conant C. Keith Woodfin, John Scheller.
Using Data to Inform Instruction Second Year Teacher Induction March 25, 2010.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Providing Leadership in Reading First Schools: Essential Elements Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida Center for Reading Research Miami Reading First Principals,
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Literacy Collaborative Achievement for Every Student.
Pearson Copyright Tier Reading Model 3/26/08.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Selecting Research Based Instructional Programs Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research Georgia March, 2004.
Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research January 22, 2004 Teaching Every Child to Read: A Responsibility.
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Making a Difference for Struggling Readers Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Using the PMRN and ECI and EI Indices to Make Effective Decisions Elizabeth Crawford, MS, CCC-SLP Director of Interventions The Florida Center for Reading.
MTSS Multi-Tiered System of Support School Intervention Plan St. Patrick School Ed 515 Mary Staley.
PROCESS TO PROGRESS Reading First at MCS. 8 Critical Reading First Elements 1. Systematic and explicit instruction using an approved Scientifically Based.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Supporting Leadership of Effective Reading Programs Stephen M. Nettles, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Florida Center for Reading Research: Mission & Projects Dr. Marcia L. Grek Council of Language Arts Supervisors, May 2003.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading Coaches Conference Orlando, Florida August, 2004.
Using the PMRN, ECI and EI Indices, and Other Information to Make Effective Decisions Elizabeth Crawford, MS, CCC-SLP Director of Interventions The Florida.
Data-based Decisions: A year in review Sharon Walpole University of Delaware.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Offered by The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading First Assessment “Catch Them Before They Fall”
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
1 Putting it All Together: Building an Effective 90 Minute Reading Block 22.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
IMPLEMENTING RTI Critical Features: Practices & System Components.
Assistant Principal’s Meeting Miami-Dade County Public Schools
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Data-Based Leadership
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction
Supplemental and Intervention Reading Programs
Ensuring Success for Every Reader
Presentation transcript:

Coaching Teachers to Use Assessment to Inform Instruction The Florida Center for Reading Research

From Florida’s Reading First Grant: …Coaches can assist principals in developing grade level instructional teams at each school to monitor individual and classroom level progress in reading and to make data based decisions about instruction… Coaches will need in depth knowledge about Data Analysis Individual Problem Solving Classroom Organization Responsibilities of the Coach

Reading Coaches will understand how to use data from the following sources to assist teachers in making instructional decisions –Class Status Reports generated by the PMRN –Individual Student Reports generated by the PMRN become familiar with various classroom organization models that provide teachers opportunities to use assessment to inform instruction Objectives

5 Five skills on which early reading instruction should focus 3 Three types of assessment to guide instruction Screening Progress monitoring Diagnosis ii High quality initial instruction is critical iii Immediate intensive interventions for children lagging behind in the growth of critical reading skills ii + iii = NCLB

An important part of the Coaches responsibilities is to help teachers use assessment data to navigate, organize, and plan for ii and iii. Coaches Responsibilities

Uninterrupted 90 minute block of reading instruction (this is a minimum) Implement high quality initial instruction Implement differentiated instruction Implement immediate intensive intervention Teacher Responsibilities

Initial Instruction (ii) The goal of ii is to implement consistent high quality instruction in K-3 classrooms. The instructional tool used for ii is a core reading program that is aligned with Reading First guidelines.

Your core reading program has these characteristics: –explicit & interactive instruction –systematic instruction that is well designed & strategic –ample opportunities for student practice –aligned student materials (content of student materials is consistent with what is taught) Initial Instruction (ii)

Immediate Intensive Intervention (iii) iii should be implemented with children as soon as we notice they are falling behind in the development of critical reading skills. iii involves children in receiving instruction in reading that is more intensive than what they have been receiving. This can be accomplished by: reducing the student/teacher ratio providing more instructional time Both include providing more supports (instructional opportunity, time, resources, materials and/or personnel)

Resources to Implement iii 1.Intervention program that accompanies the core reading program 2. Research based program that –targets specific skills, –is implemented explicitly and systematically, –is coordinated and consistent with the work that is being done during initial instruction.

Every Reading First school has proposed a plan outlining the 90 minute block of reading instruction. Whole group instruction and small group instruction will be part of the 90 minute block. As much of the reading instruction as possible needs to take place within the regular classroom. Additional support may be provided through: –Resource Teachers –ESOL Teachers –ESE Teachers –Trained Paraprofessionals Reading First Classroom Organization

Reading First Classroom Organization: Learning Centers Teacher-Led Center -Small group instruction Student Centers - Academically engaged - Accountability - Group, Pair, Cooperative, Individual

Keep high risk group sizes small (5-7 as a maximum). For students not making adequate progress in a group of 5-7, it is critical to reduce the group size. Monitor high risk student progress more frequently in order to make instructional changes, small group changes, and to accelerate learning. It is important to work with each small group differently based on instructional need. Consider attitudes, behaviors, and work ethics when forming and modifying groups. Flexible Groups

Model for Student Success Continuous Assessment Data-Based Instructiona l Planning Instruction

GRADEDIBELS MEASUREREADING COMPONENT ASSESSED Kindergarten Letter Naming, Initial Sounds, Phoneme Segmentation, Nonsense Words Phonemic Awareness Phonics First Letter Naming, Phoneme Segmentation, Nonsense Words Oral Reading Phonemic Awareness Phonics Reading Fluency SecondNonsense Words Oral Reading Phonics Reading Fluency ThirdOral ReadingReading Fluency

A web based data management system that provides: -a convenient place for entering and organizing the results of student assessments, -a secure, centralized, easily accessible location for the storage of student information, -a tool for timely and helpful reports so that educators can effectively analyze data, plan instruction, and communicate student progress. What is the PMRN? (Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network)

The Class Status Reports from the Progress Monitoring & Reporting Network (PMRN) will help answer three important questions: 1. Who needs extra support? 2. How should groups be formed? 3. Which skills need to be emphasized? How will PMRN Help Guide Instruction?

1. 1.On your colorful handout, complete the activity on page 2 individually or with a partner (20 minutes) Share your results with another person or pair (5 minutes). 3.Turn your attention toward the front of the room.

Who Needs Extra Support? High Risk:7 Moderate Risk:3 Low Risk:9

How will small groups be formed? Group 1: Students 1, 4, 5, 7, 8 Group 2: Students 2, 3, 6, 9, 10 Group 3: Students 11-19

Which skills need to be emphasized? Group 1: PA & Phonics Group 2: PA & Phonics Group 3: Phonics & Fluency

Uninterrupted 90 minute block No other personnel to assist during Learning Center time SF with Links to Reading First for ii Classroom Organization for this Kindergarten Class

40 minutes will be devoted to whole class ii using SF 50 minutes will be devoted to small group instruction: Classroom Organization for this Kindergarten Class: Teacher Led-Center MTWTHF G125 G G

Small group instruction for 50 minutes: –Group 1: Implement SF ERI -25 min. daily –Group 2: Implement SF Links to RF (phonemic awareness and phonics activities will provide students extra practice with the content that was taught during ii) min. daily –Group 3: Use the decodable books from SF to practice the decoding process and fluency—10-15 min. daily Classroom Organization for this Kindergarten Class: Teacher-Led Center

Composition of Student Centers: –Individual –Small Group –Pairs –Cooperative Groups Activities at student Centers: –Individualized practice at computers –Paired Reading –Word Work –Listening Center (building fluency w/ tapes) Student Centers

Page 3 of colorful handout At Assessment 4, there were six students in need of intensive intervention and four students in need of extra support. Now, let’s take a closer look at the NWF progress of this second grade class….

See page 4 of your colorful handout.

See page 5 of your colorful handout.

1. 1.With a partner analyze the Class Reports and answer the questions on page 6 & 7 of your colorful handout.

1. 1.What do you notice about the trend for this class across all 4 assessments? The median for this third grade class was above the target on Assessments 1, 2, and 3 for ORF. Assessment 4 shows that the class median was slightly below the target. The range of scores is very large at Assessment 1. There seems to be an improvement after Assessment 1, but then the trend flattens out. The class is not progressing at the rate expected.

2.Pie Charts: What do we know about students who are at high risk of not achieving the year-end goal? When should have intervention been implemented? Assessment 1: 13%, Assessment 2: 7%, Assessment 3: 12%, Assessment 4: 21%. Intervention should have been implemented immediately. At each assessment point, the Reading Coach can help the teacher identify these students by looking at the Class Progress Tracking Tool (bar graph). Once these students are identified, strategies to improve Oral Reading Fluency can be suggested and implemented.

1. 1.When should have more intensive instruction been implemented for: Student 3? After Assessment 3 Student 8?After Assessment 1 Student 16?After Assessment 1

2. 2.Which students made up the red piece of the pie charts on the previous page? Students 3, 8, and 13 Student 16 was enrolled in this class for Assessments 1-3, but not Assessment 4.

3. What do you notice about Student 3? The student has not progressed in reading fluency, but the target has increased. So, by Assessment 4, he was at high risk.

4. After Assessment 3, which students should the teacher have targeted for extra instruction in oral reading fluency? Students 3, 4, 8, 10, 14, and 16

Use Class Status Reports to answer 3 important instructional questions: –Who needs extra support? –How should groups be formed? –Which skills should be emphasized? Use Class PMT and Class Progress Tracking Reports together to see progress at the class level as well as progress of individual students and how each student is doing relative to the whole class. Summary

Please use blue question/comment cards found on your table. We will provide answers to your questions as soon as possible. Questions?

Reading Coaches will understand how to use data from the following sources to assist teachers in making instructional decisions –Class Status Reports generated by the PMRN –Individual Student Reports generated by the PMRN become familiar with various classroom organization models that provide teachers opportunities to use assessment to inform instruction Objectives Day 2

See page 8 of your colorful handout. Now, we will take a closer look at an individual student. Student 6 is a second grader who is in need of intensive intervention. If we click on the red box labeled “intensive”, we will see the graphs on page 9.

See page 9 of your colorful handout.

Work with a partner to analyze the reports and answer the questions on pages 10 and 11 of your colorful handout. Page 11 Page 10

1. 1.After Assessment 2, what instructional strategies could you suggest to the teacher? Explicitly teach the decoding process using words made up of letter sounds the student knows. Check to make sure the student can do this independently. Make sure the student is receiving multiple opportunities to practice reading words made up of letter sounds already learned. Are new, useful letter sounds being taught? Is the student practicing reading connected text at his instructional level and receiving feedback from the teacher? Check the size of the flexible group. Does it need to be reduced to provide this student extra instructional time? Page 10

1. 1.After Assessment 2, what instructional strategies could you suggest to the teacher? Is the student practicing oral reading fluency with text at his independent level? Is the student receiving feedback from the teacher while reading orally? Is the student engaging in repeated readings? Check the size of the flexible group. Does it need to be reduced to provide this student extra instructional time? Partnering this student with a Low Risk peer in the class might be beneficial. The pair could engage in Partner Reading utilizing books provided by the teacher (the teacher would insure that the books were at the High Risk Student’s Independent or Instructional Level). Page 11

Use Student PMT Reports to: –Monitor progress –Determine which students need more intensive instruction –Offer instructional strategies to the teacher –Determine types of professional development from which specific teachers could benefit Summary

Summary of Recommended Uses of Student Data By Teachers – –To identify students in need of more assistance – –To determine if students are improving with extra assistance – –To form flexible reading groups – –To conduct parent conferences – –To write and monitor Academic Improvement Plans (AIPs)

Use DIBELS Progress Monitoring to determine the following: –Identify who needs extra support –Determine how to group students –Identify what specific skills need to be emphasized –Track effectiveness of instruction—make changes to group size or instructional focus depending on student progress Remember

Please use blue question/comment cards found on your table. We will provide answers to your questions as soon as possible. Questions?

For additional information regarding Reading Curriculum & Instruction, please contact: Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. Director of Curriculum & Instructional Projects Florida Center for Reading Research 227 North Bronough Street, Suite 7250 Tallahassee, FL (850) (V) (850) (F)