abrasion ablation  σ f [cm 2 ] for projectile fragmentation + fission  luminosity [atoms cm -2 s -1 ]  70% transmission SIS – FRS  ε trans transmission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Advertisements

LoI Relativistic Coulomb M1 excitation of neutron-rich 85 Br N. Pietralla G. Rainovski J. Gerl D. Jenkins.
Expected counting rates. FRS experimental setup Total load is limited by SC1 and MUSIC1.
The fission of a heavy fissile nucleus ( A, Z ) is the splitting of this nucleus into 2 fragments, called primary fragments A’ 1 and A’ 2. They are excited.
NE Introduction to Nuclear Science Spring 2012
Fragmentation of very neutron-rich projectiles around 132 Sn GSI experiment S294 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires.
10-1 CHEM 312 Lecture 10: Part 1 Radiation Reactions: Dosimetry and Hot Atom Chemistry Readings: §Reading: Modern Nuclear Chemistry, Chap. 17; Nuclear.
Estimation of production rates and secondary beam intensities Martin Veselský, Janka Strišovská, Jozef Klimo Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences,
GAMMA-PARTICLE ARRAY FOR DIRECT REACTION STUDIES SIMULATIONS.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano Study of exotic nuclei.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Relativistic Coulomb excitation of nuclei near 100 Sn C.Fahlander, J. Eckman, M. Mineva, D. Rudolph, Dept. Phys., Lund University, Sweden M.G., A.Banu,
Simulation of a Ring Imaging Cerenkov detector to identify relativistic heavy ions. M.Fernández-Ordóñez, J.Benlliure, E.Casarejos, J.Pereira Universidad.
Configuration of RISING for Measurements of Spin-alignment and g-factors by TDPAD.
Rare ISotope INvestigation at GSI Status of the relativistic beam campaign Introduction Fast beam physics program Experimental methods Status and perspectives.
Particle Interactions
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions According to: bombarding.
Spectroscopy and lifetime measurements at ReA12 Hiro IWASAKI (NSCL/MSU) 7/12/2014Recoil Separator for ReA12 workshop1.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Workshop on Physics on Nuclei at Extremes, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy.
Xy position from LYCCA Slowed down beams - new perspective for GOSIA scattering experiments at relativistic energies.
NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
N. Saito The RISING stopped beam physics meeting Technical status of RISING at GSI N. Saito - GSI for the RISING collaboration Introduction Detector performance.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Interactions of Neutrons
CJ Barton Department of Physics INTAG Meeting – GSI – May 2007 Large Acceptance Bragg Detector at ISOLDE.
From CATE to LYCCA Mike Taylor Particle Identification After the Secondary Target.
Nuclear structure around 100 Sn Darek Seweryniak, ANL.
Nuclear Structure studies using fast radioactive beams J. Gerl SNP2008 July Ohio University, Athens Ohio USA –The RISING experiment –Relativistic.
Wolfram KORTEN 1 Euroschool Leuven – September 2009 Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams Motivation and introduction Theoretical aspects of Coulomb.
Pygmy Dipole Resonance in 64Fe
B-1 Fragmentation – 0 Introduction Generalities Isotopic distributions Neck emission Participant-spectator model Fragment separators LISE of GANIL FRS.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
Calorimeters Chapter 21 Chapter 2 Interactions of Charged Particles - With Focus on Electrons and Positrons -
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electron pick-up. ~1/E What about fission fragments????? Bragg curve stochastic energy.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Methods of excitation: nuclear reactions
Rare Isotope Spectroscopic INvestigation at GSI. abrasion ablation  σ f [cm 2 ] for projectile fragmentation + fission  luminosity [atoms cm -2 s -1.
NS08 MSU, June 3rd – 6th 2008 Elisa Rapisarda Università degli studi di Catania E.Rapisarda 18 2.
FAIR (Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research) (Darmstadt, Germany) low-energy cave MeV/u fragmentation/fission ~1GeV/u fragment separator 350m.
Neutron Capture Cross Sections from 1 MeV to 2 MeV by Activation Measurements Korea Institutes of Geoscience and Mineral Resource G.D.Kim, T.K.Yang, Y.S.Kim,
The INFN Italy EXOTIC group Milano, Napoli, Padova, NIPNE Romania, Crakow Poland. Presented by C.Signorini Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Padova (Italy):
1 Cost Room Availability Passive Shielding Detector spheres for accelerators Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Implantation rates at the focal plane of Super-FRS Some Simulations for AIDA Detectors.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1.
Interactions with Rest Gas – Typical Case Interactions with Rest Gas – ELENA Quantitative analysis for ELENA Evaluations at 100 keV Ejection Energy Evaluations.
Adam Maj IFJ PAN Krakow Search for Pigmy Dipole Resonance in 68 Ni RISING experiment in GSI EWON Meeting Prague, May, 2007.
ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТ R3B РЕАКЦИИ С РЕЛЯТИВИСТКИМИ РАДИОАКТИВНЫМИ ПУЧКАМИ НА УСКОРИТЕЛЬНОМ КОМПЛЕКСЕ FAIR (GSI, DARMSTADT, GERMANY) Е.М. МАЕВ.
Radiation Protection and Safety 3/12/ Interactions with Electrons   Energy-loss Mechanisms Electrons and positrons have similar stopping powers.
Michael Bendel intrinsic phoswich conzept – CALOR 2014 – Gießen 1 Michael Bendel Physik-Department E12 Technische Universität München a new technique for.
June 3rd, 2013 | Norbert Pietralla | TU-Darmstadt | Konferenz | 1 On the Road to FAIR: First Operation of AGATA in PreSPEC at GSI Norbert Pietralla, TU-Darmstadt,
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Efficiency versus energy resolution
PHL424: Semi-classical reaction theory
Primary Beam Intensity
Russian Research Center “ Kurchatov Institute”
Rare Isotope Spectroscopic INvestigation at GSI
PHL424: Semi-classical reaction theory
Simulations of the AGATA Response to Relativistic Heavy Ions Beams
Physics cases for tracking
Efficiency versus energy resolution
Rare Isotope Spectroscopic INvestigation at GSI
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Wednesday,March 7, 2012 Dr. Brandt
108Sn studied with intermediate-energy Coulomb excitation
Rare Isotope Spectroscopic INvestigation at GSI
Presentation transcript:

abrasion ablation  σ f [cm 2 ] for projectile fragmentation + fission  luminosity [atoms cm -2 s -1 ]  70% transmission SIS – FRS  ε trans transmission through the fragment separator FRS  event rate[s -1 ] = luminosity[cm -2 s -1 ] * σ[cm 2 ] * 0.7 * ε trans Count Rate Estimate

20% speed of light deflecting magnets focussing magnets acceleration Max. 90% speed of light experiment UNILAC IonNumber of injections Intensity [spill -1 ] at FRS Ion source Date 58 Ni16*10 9 MEVVA Ag13*10 9 MEVVA Xe15*10 9 MUCIS Xe45*10 9 MEVVA Pb301.3*10 9 PIG U12.0*10 9 PIG % speed of light eff. puls width for injection: 47μs 36.2% efficiency intensity[s -1 ]=0.5*intensity[spill -1 ] period of one revolution 4.7 μs 10 turns will be accepted for injection Primary Beam Intensity acceleration: 0.5 s extraction: 1.0 s magnet resetting: 0.5 s

The optimum thickness of the production target is limited by the loss of fragments due to secondary reactions Primary reaction rate: Example: 238 U (10 9 s -1 ) on 208 Pb (x=1g/cm 2 ) → 132 Sn (σ f =15.4mb) reaction rate: 44571[s -1 ] Primary + secondary reaction rate: Example: Example: 124 Xe (10 9 s -1 ) on 9 Be (x=1g/cm 2 ) → 104 Sn (σ f =5.6μb) reaction rate: 375[s -1 ] Primary target thickness

Nuclear reaction rate Reaction rate (thin target): Reaction rate (thick target): Example: Reaction rate: 57941[s -1 ] transmission (SIS/FRS)=70%, transmission (FRS) 1.9%

Optimization of the target thickness Primary reaction rate: Example: Primary + secondary reaction rate:

Reaction Parameters for Heavy-Ion Collisions The relevant formulae are calculated if A 1, Z 1 and A 2, Z 2 are the mass (in amu) and charge number of the projectile and target nucleus, respectively. Nuclear radius for homogeneous (sharp) mass distribution: Nuclear radius for diffuse (Fermi) mass distribution: Nuclear interaction radius: Nuclear reaction cross section at relativistic energies:

RIBs produced by fragmentation or fission

IonReactionσ[b]ε FRS [%]Rate[s -1 ] 36 Si 48 Ca+ 9 Be6.6· Ca 82 Se+ 9 Be4.5· Cr 58 Ni+ 9 Be1.6· Ni 86 Kr+ 9 Be5.3· Ge 86 Kr+ 9 Be0.8· Sn 124 Xe+ 9 Be5.6· Te 136 Xe+ 9 Be 3.7 · W 208 Pb+ 9 Be 8.8 · Kr 238 U+ 208 Pb 2.6 · Sn 238 U+ 208 Pb 1.5 · Beam intensity: 10 9 [s -1 ] Target thickness: 1[g/cm 2 ] Secondary Beam Rate at S4

transmission SIS-FRS: 70% primary Xe-beam intensity: 2.5·10 9 [s -1 ] Be-target thickness: 4g/cm 2 transmission through FRS: 60% primary U-beam intensity: 10 9 [s -1 ] Pb-target thickness: 1g/cm 2 transmission through FRS: 2% Secondary Beam Intensities at S4

Scattering experiments at 100 AMeV 86 Kr, 480MeV/u 56 Cr, 100MeV/u 56 Cr Z A/Q relativistic Coulomb excitation RIB from FRS secondary target DSSSD CsI time-of-flight (x,y,ΔE) diamond/plastic Lund-York-Cologne CAlorimeter (LYCCA)

Reaction types at relativistic energies secondary beam intensity: 10 3 [s -1 ] target Au thickness: 0.4[g/cm 2 ] Coulex cross section: 0.50[b] AGATA γ-efficiency: 17.5% reaction rate: 380[h] secondary beam intensity: 10 3 [s -1 ] target Be thickness: 0.7[g/cm 2 ] fragmentation cross section: 0.03[b] AGATA γ-efficiency: 17.5% reaction rate: 880[h]

target thickness (mg/cm 2 ) angular width (mrad) Coulomb excitation: projectile mass number A 1 grazing angle (mrad) Scattering Experiments at 100 MeV/u

target: Au,Be

electric field lines (v/c=0.99) slowing down of a moving point-charge Bremsstrahlung

 Radiative electron capture (REC) capture of target electrons into bound states of the projectile:  Primary Bremsstrahlung (PB) capture of target electrons into continuum states of the projectile:  Secondary Bremsstrahlung (SB) Stopping of high energy electrons in the target: Atomic Background Radiation

 Radiative electron capture (REC) capture of target electrons into bound states of the projectile:  Primary Bremsstrahlung (PB) capture of target electrons into continuum states of the projectile:  Secondary Bremsstrahlung (SB) Stopping of high energy electrons in the target: Atomic Background Radiation

 Radiative electron capture (REC) capture of target electrons into bound states of the projectile:  Primary Bremsstrahlung (PB) capture of target electrons into continuum states of the projectile:  Secondary Bremsstrahlung (SB) Stopping of high energy electrons in the target:  large cross sections  angular distribution - forwar boosted with projectile energy Atomic Background Radiation

HECTOR BaF Xe beam (150 MeV/u) → Au target (0.2 g/cm 2 ) time spectrum (ns) At the very beginning… prompt (target) Kr beam (100 MeV/u) → Au target time spectrum (ns) prompt (target) Atomic Background Radiation

HECTOR BaF 2 Early gamma radiation 5ns, coming from the beam line, caused by the light particles, ranging to very high energies (0-20 MeV) 8-12ns after 15ns after Additional Background Radiation

HECTOR BaF 2 prompt CATE time spectrum Coulomb excitation: A/Q - 37 Ca, CATE - Ca prompt time spectrum Fragmentation: A/Q - 37 Ca, CATE -K (mainly 36 K) 37 Ca beam at 196MeV/u Additional Background Radiation

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = What happens to the spectral shape, when one applies Doppler corrections? „662 keV”

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.100

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.200

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.300

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.320

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.330

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.340

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.345

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.350

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.355

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.360

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.370

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.380

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.390

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.400

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.410

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.420

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.430

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.440

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = 0.450

132 Xe (662 keV) v/c = This is NOT bremstrahlung! This is compressed nearly constant background.