Technical Working Group Status Updates Federal ESPC Quality Assurance Steering Committee January 25th, 2004 Washington,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prepared for Water Quality Partnership March 17, 2011 SMS Rule Revisions SMS Rule Revisions Things are never as good as they seem, things are never as.
Advertisements

ASSESS TARGET DELIVER MEASURE Understanding Building Energy Audits Joe Hofstetter P.E., CEM, LEED AP Karpinski Engineering.
Global Business Blueprint Summary Presenters: Laurie Dempsey, CBP Lois McCluskey, eCP January 28, 2004.
1 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energyeere.energy.gov DOE Small Business Webinar: Getting Involved with ESPCs May 6, 2013 Chip Goyette ESPC ENABLE.
Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Tier 3 Approaches, Complex Models or Direct Measurements, in Greenhouse Gas Inventories Report of the.
REVIEW SESSION ONE When does the Fiscal Year begin each year? What are the five parts of a budget? There are four funds. Name them and provide a brief.
Republic of Korea - Reduction of Financing Barriers for Energy Savings Performance Contracts Conference of the Parties 9 Milan, Italy 1 December 2003 Conference.
1 ®  Overview Benefits of a Good Construction Schedule Baseline Schedule Development Schedule Updating and Maintenance Managing Project Changes USACE.
Using Uncertainty Modeling to Optimize M&V in ESPC Projects Discussion Document 10/31/02.
Benchmarking Energy Use in Commercial Buildings Satish Kumar, Ph.D. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Public Sector Energy Management Workshop Mumbai,
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 2: Assess Performance & Opportunities Toolkit 2A: KEEPS.
Analysis of Real-World Data Static Stability Factor and the Risk of Rollover April 11, 2001.
Energy Efficiency in the Clean Power Plan Opportunities for Virginia Mary Shoemaker Research Assistant Spring 2015 VAEEC Meeting May 11, 2015.
M&V Planning Working Group Update M&V Summit, New Orleans 5/5/03 Satish Kumar and Venkat Kumar.
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
Metering - FEMP’s Perspective Presentation to the Interagency Energy Management Task Force by Ab Ream, FEMP O&M Program Lead October 16,
Options to Expand Access to Home and Community-Based Services: HB 594 Analysis January 28, 2008.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Michael Blasnik M Blasnik & Associates Greg Dalhoff Dalhoff Associates, LLC David Carroll APPRISE.
Overview of the Regional Technical Forum Guidelines January 22, 2013.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona A Review of the Current DOE IDIQ Track 5: Project Financing Session 3: ESPC Large and Small: The Basics of ESPC.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Using Private Financing to Maximize Energy and Cost Savings Track 5: Project Financing Session 7: Economics.
Analyzing Financial Performance Reports
DoN ESPC PROGRAM M&V Briefing Russell Dominy, CEM.
Femp.energy.gov 1 US DOE Perspective on Deep Energy Retrofits Cyrus Nasseri US Department of Energy Annex 61 Technical Day April 13, 2015.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Budgeting Statistical Projects Section A 1.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Data Center Energy Management Strategies Edwards AFB Data Center Consolidation ESPB Building Performance Data.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Solution Showcase GSA’s NDER Program: Doubling the Energy Savings from Financed Projects Kevin Vaughn Schneider.
M&V Part 2: Risk Assessment & Responsibility Allocation.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
Reviewing the Audit Results. Defining a Quality Base Year is Key to Maximizing Project Value n Base year is the mutually agreed upon pre-retrofit annual.
Rocky Mountain Power Collection Agency Fees Docket No T08
M&V Part 1: D.O. Review. 1-2 Your Instructor Mark Stetz, P.E. Ø Worked with FEMP since Ø Serves as FEMP’s M&V Specialist. Ø Contributed to FEMP.
Advanced Metering Implementation in ESPCs Drivers 1) Legislation Mandate – No $ 2)M&V Requirements in ESPCs 3)Utilities Cost allocation (e.g. tenants)
Refrigerator Decommissioning: Measure Status Update Regional Technical Forum October 16, 2013.
Introduction to The Climate Registry Gary Gero Washington Department of Ecology November 5, 2007.
Mid-Course Adjustment Overview. Flood Map Modernization The Question “The committee understands that the 5-year, $1,000,000,000 program will not update.
Bill Savings Public Workshop Costs and Bill Saving in the Low Income Energy Efficiency Programs for 2003 to 2005 April 21, :00 AM to Noon 77 Beale.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Federal Geographic Data Committee, Coordination Group Meeting Washington, DC 7 June 2005 Study Results Geospatial Interoperability Standards: A Return-on-Investment.
Electric / Gas / Water MAESTRO Evaluation Showcase July 26-27, 2006 Project Manager: Pierre Landry, SCE Lead Consultants: Mike Rufo, Itron; Keith Rothenburg,
Annual Reporting Working Group Update Lia Webster, Nexant New Orleans M&V Summit May 2003.
Slide 1 PRE-DECISIONAL - WORKING PAPERS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRE-DECISIONAL - WORKING PAPERS OSD(AT&L) Template Should Cost Targets & Progress Defense.
Guidelines Revisions Defining What RTF Means by “Savings” December 17,
1 Oconomowoc Area School District Energy Update 6-Month Status Report December 2005 – May 2006.
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
Energy Assistance Program FFY2016 EAP Annual Training Crisis.
Monmouth County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update.
Project Chartering & Approval Process
Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings in Brazil – Guidelines for Implementation Anand Subbiah, Nexant Inc. April 30, 2002, Kubitschek Plaza Hotel, Brasilia,
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
Demand Forecast Deviations Working Group Presented to: Stakeholder Advisory Committee Presented by: Pat Doran January 24, 2007.
1  Power plant costs are key factors in energy market policy decisions Key assumptions in the EIA NEMS model Input factors to all energy economic models.
Northwest Resource Adequacy Implementation – Update ---- DRAFT ---- NW Adequacy Forum Technical Committee May 31, 2006.
REBUILD AMERICA. Why look at the bills? l Bills are the bottom line –they prove the savings!
1 Status of CY 04 MCO Rates Medicaid Advisory Committee September 25, 2003.
Overview of the Final Report and Findings from the Review of Sampling Methods in Extrapolated New Base-Year Generation Studies May 11-12, 2004.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
NAMA potential of Vietnam Vuong Xuan Hoa Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology and Environment Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Climate Change.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of BGE’s DSM Programs Marshall Keneipp, PE Summit Blue Consulting, LLC Prepared for: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Stakeholders.
Overview Federal Project Financing Vehicles by David McAndrew Federal Energy Management Program.
Writing and updating strategic and annual plans Richard Maggs Astana September 2014.
Mortgage Holding & Switching Market Research Findings Section 1 - Face to Face Survey Section 2 - Online Survey 1 Research Conducted by.
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
EE590 Transmission Planning Projects and Cost Allocation Ming NI Economic Studies, Midwest ISO.
Energy Savings Performance Contracts & Energy Service Companies
Presentation by: Kathleen M. King, Director, Health Care
Illustrative EE/DSM/DR Planning Process
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
LIHEAP Performance Management in the District of Columbia
Presentation transcript:

Technical Working Group Status Updates Federal ESPC Quality Assurance Steering Committee January 25th, 2004 Washington, DC

Energy Savings Discrepancy Resolution Update Acknowledgements Jim Heller, NFESC Dan Magro, NFESC

Revised Scope Two approaches to be pursued in parallel –Macro or Agency-level approach (analysis to be done by LBNL) –Micro or site-specific approach (analysis to be done by ORNL)

Macro Analysis – Basic Concept

Navy Sites Dataset

Basis of Macro Approach Red line is unadjusted baseline & black line is linear fit of actual data Analysis is based on actual utility data reported by 26 Navy sites Limited dataset - analysis will benefit by including data from more sites either from Navy and/or from other agencies Analysis is using source energy to account for fuel switching projects Percentages are used to allow combining data for comparisons

Macro Approach – Key Findings Load creep and utility unit costs significantly increase baseline –Both are increasing year to year –ESPC performance parallel to unadjusted baseline Load creep happening at both ESPC sites and at sites where no significant EE activity has taken place –Accounts for 25% of the energy cost increase –Need for upward adjustment of the baseline when calculating savings from ESPC projects Most Navy sites have experienced higher utility costs (approx. 10% per year), which can’t be explained by poor ESPC performance These two factors largely responsible for discrepancy between the guaranteed energy savings in ESPCs and actual utility bills

Estimated Adjustments to Baseline Year OneYear Two Energy Use 104%105% Energy Cost 111%121%

Next Steps Expand the macro analysis by including more sites Evaluate impact of other variables such as square footage increase, climate, ESCO payments for O&M savings, activity level (tempo) Prepare a report detailing the macro analysis and key findings and submit it to the Federal ESPC Steering Committee Publish a FEMP Focus article explaining the reasons for discrepancy between guaranteed savings from ESPCs and visible savings in the utility bills ORNL to conduct site-specific analysis at five ESPC sites Target date for completion: Summer 2005