Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 21, 2011.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Assessment and Accountability at the State Level NAEP NRT (Iowa Tests) Core CRTs DWA UAA UBSCT NCLB U-PASS Alphabet Soup.
Current legislation requires the phase-out of high school TAKS and replaces it with 12 EOC assessments in  English I, English II, English III  Algebra.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Graduation and Next Generation Assessment Update Coventry High School January 29, 2015.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
Assessment Dashboard March 2013 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.
June 12,   Legislation  New assessment laws are being analyzed  Additional bills not yet law  Today  Addressing assessments for
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 6/21/10.
Multnomah County Student Achievement Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
NAEP 2012 Pre-Administration Workshop Bobbie Bable
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
NAEP and International Assessments August 28, 2013 DAC Annual Meeting.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
2009 MCAS Analysis & Adequate Yearly Progress Report Mendon – Upton Regional School District.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
NAEP 2014 Pre-Administration Workshop Bobbie Bable
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements and Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 3/15/2011.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Jackson County School District 2012 Preliminary Test Results Mississippi Curriculum Test, 2 nd Edition (Grades 3 – 8, Language Arts and Mathematics) Subject.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Winston Salem/Forsyth County Schools Testing Information Atkins Academic and Technology High School Parent Meeting February 16, 2012 Monta’ Ervin, Curriculum.
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard” Test Data 2011.
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
State Testing Program Update Sharon Nobis CHHS Assistant Principal Grapevine-Colleyville ISD November 7, 2011.
GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT “HARTFORD MAGAZINE RECOGNIZED GMHS AS THE SIXTH RANKING HIGH SCHOOL IN HARTFORD COUNTY.” 2011 High School Testing.
1 School Report Cards 2002–2003 An Overview. 2 School Report Card: Overall Trends Elementary school achievement is up in English and math over Middle.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard” Test Data 2008.
Provincial Assessment Results
Measuring College and Career Readiness
The Ethical Community Charter School
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Meredith cargilL director of curriculum, instruction, and technology
NAEP and International Assessments
AYP and Report Card.
Split-Block Class Schedule at Yorktown High School
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Presentation transcript:

Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing Assessment Subject Area Testing Program

Mississippi Curriculum Test Administered each May to students in grades 2 – 8 Students are tested in the areas of reading, language arts, and mathematics. Mean scale score is the average score of all students tested. % of students scoring proficient and advanced looks only at students in the upper quartiles. Basis for state (Achievement and Growth) and most of federal (AYP) accountability models. As mandated by NCLB, by 2014 ALL students MUST score either proficient or advanced.

JCSD Results Based on the results of the 2006 state testing, the JCSD was one of only nine school districts in the state of Mississippi who had ALL schools rated as Level 5 and who met AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) in ALL subgroups in EVERY school.

Second Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores 26.0 scale point increase in Reading scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – scale point increase in Math

Third Grade - A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores 15.2 scale point increase in Reading scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – scale point increase in Math

Fourth Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores 11.9 scale point increase in Reading scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – scale point increase in Math

Fifth Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores 10.2 scale point increase in Reading scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – scale point increase in Math

Sixth Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores 7.8 scale point increase in Reading scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – scale point increase in Math 2001 – 2006

Seventh Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores 8.2 scale point increase in Reading scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – scale point increase in Math

Eighth Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores 1.6 scale point increase in Reading scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – scale point increase in Math

Second Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced – Six Year Trend

Third Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced – Six Year Trend

Fourth Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced – Six Year Trend

Fifth Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced – Six Year Trend

Sixth Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced – Six Year Trend

Seventh Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced – Six Year Trend

Eighth Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced – Six Year Trend

Cohort Groups (Analyzing the same students from year to year….. or comparing apples to apples!) Longitudinal Data 2003 – nd – 5 th Grade

Cohort Groups Cont. 3 rd Grade – 6th Grade

Cohort Group 4th Grade – 7 th Grade

Cohort Group 5 th Grade – 8 th Grade

Writing Assessment Administered each March to students in grades 4 and 7. Students receive a score of 1 – 4 based on writing proficiency shown on a writing prompt.

Subject Area Tests Subject Area Tests are administered in the following areas: * Algebra I * English II (multiple choice and 1 writing prompt - informative * Biology * United States History

More on SATP Students must pass all subject area tests in order to obtain a high school diploma. Students not passing any assessment will be given three opportunities to be retested. The 2001 administration of the SATP did not count towards graduation; therefore, a percentage of pass/fail was not included for that year.

Algebra 1 Data Comparison Mean Scores ~ Pass Rate MS and JCSD

English II Data Comparison Mean Scores ~ Pass Rate MS and JCSD

Biology Data Comparison Mean Scores ~ Pass Rate MS and JCSD

U.S. History Data Comparison Mean Scores ~ Pass Rate MS and JCSD

English II Writing Assessment Informative Mean Score Pass Rate

Mississippi Science Test Administered to students in grades 5 and 8 These tests are aligned with the Mississippi Science Framework 2001 and contains all multiple choice items with varying degrees of difficulty. The tests are summative. That is the assessment covers grades 3 – 5 of the grade 5 test and grades 6 – 8 on the grade 8 test. A field test was administered in The first operational administration will take place in March Standard setting will take place in June Results will be reported in late summer Beginning in 2008 all results will be distributed no later than June 15.

NAEP The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is a congressionally mandated project overseen by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) to continuously monitor the knowledge, skills, and performance of the nation’s children and youth.

“ Nation’s Report Card” As the “Nation’s Report Card,” NAEP has measured and reported on a regular basis what America’s fourth, eighth, and twelfth graders know and can do since 1969.

NAEP Data NAEP provides objective data about students’ performance at national, regional, and, as of 1990, state levels in reading, writing, mathematics, science, U.S. history, civics, geography, the arts, and other subjects.

NAEP Assessments Who takes NAEP assessments? Federal law requires all states that receive Title I funds participate in NAEP reading and mathematics assessments at 4 th and 8 th grades. Schools that represent the demographics of the state are selected to participate; students within the schools are selected randomly.

NAEP Schedule January 22 to March 2, 2007 NAEP assessments will be administered. Reading and Math (Grades 4 and 8) Writing (Grade 8 and Grade 12) ECUE, ECMS and SMHS (8 th Grade only) will participate in NAEP testing this spring.

NAEP Scores 2007 NAEP Mathematics and Reading results should be available in the fall of It is important to remember that no student scores or school scores or district scores are generated – only state scores for grades 4 and 8 and only national scores for grade 12.

Where do we go from here? Continue developing/refining curriculum pacing guides and common assessments to insure ALL students are held to the very highest standards. District assessments are currently given every 4 ½ weeks. Analyze data in a very deliberate manner to insure that students having difficulty with any skill are identified and remediated in a timely manner. Continue implementation of new computer based learning programs aimed at improving scores of targeted subgroups. (i.e. NovaNet, FastForward, Compass Learning, etc.)

Steps to insure an increase in student achievement cont. All schools have identified each and every student who scored minimal or basic on the 2006 MCT. These students are receiving additional help through a wide range of services (i.e before and after school tutorial services) Schools have also identified students scoring in the lower 25% of the proficient range. These students are also given extra support to insure that they do show a decrease on the MCT. Students in need of assistance were identified not only as individuals, but also as members of their NCLB subgroup. This will aid in insuring that ALL subgroups meet Adequate Yearly Progress.

Conclusion The goal of the JSCD is to have 100% of students scoring either proficient and advanced BEFORE We will achieve this goal by showing sustained growth over time with all student groups.