Habitat Conditions and Targets How did we get here?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Riparian Thinning: Logic Paths for Silvicultural Prescriptions
Advertisements

Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Rapid River Schools FOREST ECOLOGY “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land.” “A Sand County Almanac” Aldo Leopold
SIMulating Patterns and Processes at Landscape scaLEs HISTORIC RANGE of VARIABILITY.
Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class 1 Revised Draft for Longleaf Partnership Council Discussion Clay Ware April 7, 2014.
Predicting Sapling Recruitment Following Partial Cutting in the Acadian Forest: Using Long-Term Data to Assess the Performance of FVS-NE David Ray 1, Chad.
1 Writing Landscape Unit Objectives 2 Planning for Old Growth Retention Data Preparation Delineate OGMAs Develop WTR Targets Write LU Objectives Establish.
Lecture 7 Forestry 3218 Forest Mensuration II Lecture 7 Forest Inventories Avery and Burkhart Chapter 9.
Stand Level Biodiversity Extensive Evaluation Checklist January 27 th presentation Field observations By Bryce Bancroft RPBio.
Key Recommendations and Products From a Series of Dry-Forest Workshops in Oregon and Washington Redmond, OR October 14, 2009.
Landscape Ecology Large-scale Spatial Patterns and Ecological Processes.
Cruising Approaches  Area Based Methods  Tree Based Methods.
1 OLD GROWTH RETENTION. 2 Planning for Old Growth Retention Goals –Spatially locate and map OGMAs based on – maximizing biological effectiveness within.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
1 Principles and Practices of Sugar Bush Management.
Presented by: Peter McAuliffe, Sr. Forestry Specialist, Regulatory Affairs and Stewardship Branch Lori Miller, GIS Analyst, Regulatory Affairs and Stewardship.
Fuel treatment effects on forest carbon and wildfire Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center,
Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Ch 20 Community Ecology: Species Abundance + Diversity.
Sugar Bush Management: Module 2 - Management Planning 1 Principles and Practices of Sugar Bush Management Module 2 – Management Planning.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Wisconsin’s Continuous Forest Inventory State Forest Working Group Meeting Plymouth, WI May 10, 2006 Teague PrichardChip Scott WDNR State Lands SpecialistUSDA.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
1 The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study Biol. 595 Sept. 16, 2009.
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
STAND STRUCTURE CLASSIFICATION A Cumulative Distribution Approach to Stand Structure Classification Craig Farnden and Ian S. Moss Western Mensurationists’
Stefan Zeglen, Forest Pathologist, West Coast Region Jim Brown, Senior Analyst, Forest Analysis and Inventory Branch CSC Winter Workshop, Nanaimo, BCFebruary.
Guidance on Measurement Elaboration and Examples.
Managing Tree Species Diversity for Forest Resilience and Adaptability Andy MacKinnon - Research Ecologist -Coast Area Provincial Ecologists Nanaimo BC.
Natural Disturbance and Environmental Assessments in the Oil Sands Region Linda Halsey April 2012.
UNIT 8: Fisheries assessments. 2 Fisheries data Why do we need fisheries data? FAO (2005): “Information is critical to EAF. It underpins the formulation.
Effects of Regeneration Abundance on Predicted Development of Interior Douglas-fir Stands By Cornel Lencar Graduate Student, Faculty of Forestry University.
__________. Introduction Importance – Wildlife Habitat – Nutrient Cycling – Long-Term Carbon Storage – Key Indicator for Biodiversity Minimum Stocking.
SUMMER HABITAT USE BY SPRUCE GROUSE (Felcipennis canadensis) IN LOGGED AND UNDISTURBED AREAS IN THE PORTNEUF WILDLIFE RESERVE, QUÉBEC, CANADA Pierre Blanchette.
Using existing landscape monitoring programmes for monitoring and reporting on the Habitats directive PEER Nature2000 workshop, April 2007 Hans Gardfjell,
 Tier 1: Monitoring that will be done regardless of funding received:  Forest Service Preference is to focus on vegetation, e.g. Stand Structure including.
Biological Planning Process for Partners in Flight How to Translate Population Targets into Habitat Objectives at Eco-Regional Scales West Gulf Coastal.
Identifying Species Targets at the Landscape/ Seascape Scale.
Disturbance and Reserve Design Neville Handel Fall 2005.
A New Way to Look at Aspen Competition in the Cariboo when Assessing Free Growing 1.
1 ABCFP Policy Review Seminar 2009 Forest and Range Practices ABCFP Policy Review Seminar 2009: Forest and Range Practices.
Breakout III Summary Biodiversity and Habitats Marc Imhoff and Ross Nelson - Co-Chairs (Kathleen Bergen and Scott Goetz - Co-Chairs of Breakout I)
SIMulating Patterns and Processes at Landscape scaLEs HISTORIC RANGE of VARIABILITY.
Establishing Plots to Monitor Growth and Treatment Response Some do’s and don’ts A discussion.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Tropical rainforest. Climate Tropical rainforests are always humid and warm Get about 200 to 450 cm of rain a year Located on a belt around the earth.
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Fall 2008 IB Workshop Series sponsored by IB academic advisors Study Abroad for IB Majors Thursday, October 30 4:00-5:00PM.
Single Season Study Design. 2 Points for consideration Don’t forget; why, what and how. A well designed study will:  highlight gaps in current knowledge.
FORESTRY LAND USE Overview and Update Buckingham County Land Use Work Session September 18, 2017 Dean Cumbia Forest Resource Management Branch.
Guiding Principles of Data
Sand Dunes State Forest
Statistics Introduction.
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About TPO and Biomass
Wildlife Biology and Management
Strategies for Managing your Land for Wild Turkeys
Other Cruise Methods.
Wildlife Terms and Concepts
Formulate the Research Problem
Managing Coarse Woody Debris and Wildlife Debris Piles
Viability Assessment Tool
Stand level Biodiversity
C5 Population Ecology National geographic celebrates 7 billionth person on October 31, 2011 Need 1.5 Earths to support current growing population 19th.
Additional Data Collection in 2017
Measuring Data Quality and Compilation of Metadata
National Forest Inventory for Great Britain
Characteristics of Populations
Bob McGaughey Pacific Northwest Research Station
Characteristics of Populations
Angela Gee, US Forest Service July 22, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Habitat Conditions and Targets How did we get here?

Overview  What is a condition?  What is a target?  Fisher data used  Characterizing conditions  Target estimation  Example  Operational application  Summarize process

Conditions and Targets Provide forestry personnel with an idea of: What good fisher habitat looks like How much of it is needed by fishers Used to provide guidance to help make operational decisions in fisher habitat

Habitat Relationships Across BC  Forest composition varies considerably across regions  Species composition  Tree growth and decay  Understory diversity and cover  Desired Habitat Conditions and Targets vary too

What do fishers need? 1.Collect information on fishers  Capture, radiotag and monitor fishers to: 1.Identify the structures used by fishers for rearing offspring and resting. 2.Identify the stands used by fishers for rearing, resting, foraging, and movement. 3.Determine the size and composition of the home range of each tagged fisher.

What do fishers need? 1.Collect information on fishers 2.Measure habitats used by fishers a)Characterize the MINIMUM STRUCTURAL ATTRIBUTES of rearing and resting sites b)Characterize HIGH-QUALITY STAND ATTRIBUTES of stands used by fishers [VRI] At as leading species Q_DIAM_125=24.4 cm PROJ_AGE_1=128 PROJ_HT_1=27.1

How much do fishers need? 1.Collect information on fishers 2.Measure habitats used by fishers 3.Estimate targets a)Estimate the MINIMUM DENSITY of “high-quality stands” needed for each behaviour within each home range b)Estimate the TOTAL NUMBER OF STRUCTURES that need to occur within the home range. 18.9% of home range in “high- quality” den stands

Say What? Minimum Structural Attributes?? High-Quality Stand Attributes?? Minimum Stand Density?? Total Number of Structures??

MINIMUM STRUCTURAL ATTRIBUTES

Why 75%?

Bigger actually is better

HIGH-QUALITY STAND ATTRIBUTES

MINIMUM STAND DENSITY

TOTAL NUMBER OF STRUCTURES

Desired Habitat Conditions This process allows us to: 1.Identify the minimum characteristics of trees used by fishers for rearing and resting. 2.Identify high- and low-quality stands for each activity. 3.Identify the minimum density of “high-quality” stands that support fishers. 4.Estimate the total number of structures¹ that fishers need within home ranges. ¹ that meet minimum criteria of (1) Summary

A Few Important Notes Not all trees that meet the minimum criteria are suitable  Things we can measure vs. things fishers need TOTAL NUMBER OF STRUCTURES is based on the things we can measure  Refining the minimum criteria to better reflect what fishers need would refine the target. 1

A Few Important Notes Males don’t really matter!  Female fishers are the real habitat specialists Have to find enough structures and habitats to support themselves in a smaller area than males  Males simply go wherever the girls are…and pick up food along the way Conditions and targets that we present are derived from data on female fishers 2

How would they get used? Conditions and Targets

Applying Targets HUH?? 5,250 aspen trees >40 cm dbh and 2,620 balsam poplar trees >54 cm dbh in a 30 km² area?

Targets for each harvest unit depend upon features of: 1.LANDSCAPE: Density of high-quality stands [above or below minimum requirement] 2.STAND: relative quality of the stands [high- or low-quality for each activity] 3.SUB-STAND: Timber cruise or site-plan ground data [density of minimum structural attributes or other features] What are the Targets?

Targets - Landscape Assessment MINIMUM STAND DENSITY Information needed: 1.Identify stands with “High- Quality Stand Attributes” Q UERY VRI 2.Determine where the density of high-quality stands is greater than the “Minimum Stand Density” S PATIAL ANALYSIS Allows licencee to determine if proposed block is in an area with sufficient density of stands. HIGH-QUALITY STAND ATTRIBUTES

Targets - Stand Assessment HIGH-QUALITY STAND ATTRIBUTESMINIMUM STRUCTURAL ATTRIBUTES Information needed: 1.Determine if unit is in a “High- quality stand” VRI QUERY 2.Determine if this stand is rare in the surrounding landscape L ANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT 3.Estimate density of structures that meet minimum structural attributes C RUISE OR S ITE P LAN DATA

Decisions, decisions… Landscape Above Minimum Stand Density Below Minimum Stand Density Meet High-quality Stand Attributes Stand Sub-Stand Not Meet High-quality Stand Attributes Trees with Minimum Structural Attributes Abundant Trees with Minimum Structural Attributes Rare

Assessments and Targets The results of the landscape and stand assessment helps guide targets for the unit  Rearing  Resting  Foraging  Movement Likely considerable overlap  Meet multiple targets with single prescription