Overview of Phase 1 and 2a Safety and Efficacy Data of Maraviroc (UK-427,857) Mary McHale, Sam Abel, Deborah Russell, James Gallagher, Elna van der Ryst.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
Advertisements

Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS , prodrug of BMS (attachment inhibitor) - AI Study.
Efficacy and Safety of Deferasirox (Exjade®) during 1 Year of Treatment in Transfusion-Dependent Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results from.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Dual Inhibition of Two Sources of Cholesterol: Absorption and Production in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
Kwo PY. NEJM 2014;371: CORAL-I  Design OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV Open label Phase II years Chronic HCV infection, genotype 1 Liver transplantation.
ATOMIC  Design  Objective –SVR 24 by ITT-analysis, detection of a 30% or 25% difference between two treatment groups, 2-sided significance level of 5%,
Clinical Aspects of Treatment with Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Antiretroviral- Experienced Patients Infected With CCR5-Tropic HIV-1: 48-Week Results of MOTIVATE 1 J Lalezari 1, J.
IAC 2006 Abs# THLB0214 Potent Antiretroviral Effect of MK-0518, a Novel HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor, as part of Combination ART in Treatment -Naïve HIV-1.
1 Resistance and Tropism - Maraviroc Lisa K. Naeger, Ph.D. Division of Antiviral Products Food and Drug Administration April 24, 2007 FDA Antiviral Advisory.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Daclatasvir-Asunaprevir-Beclabuvir in Genotype 1 Cirrhotics UNITY-2 Study Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Nelson DR,
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
ALLY-2  Design  Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, in treatment-naïve genotype 1 treated for 12 weeks DCV + SOF 400 mg QD DCV + SOF.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
AI Study  Design SOF 1W then DCV + SOF 23W DVC + SOF Randomisation* 1 : 1 : 1 Open-label AI Study: DCV + SOF + RBV for genotypes 1, 2 and.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Brett-Smith, ATAC, 2/24/02 Stavudine Extended Release (Zerit ® XR; d4T XR) Stavudine Prolonged Release Capsules ATAC Meeting 2/24/02.
Reesink H, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/28/09.
PO 2726; IAS; Vicriviroc (formerly SCH ): Antiviral Activity of a Potent New CCR5 Receptor Antagonist D. Schuermann, C. Pechardscheck, R. Rouzier,
Placebo + PR W48 Placebo + PR Yes Hezode C. Gut 2015;64: COMMAND-1 COMMAND-1 Study: daclatasvir + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 or 4 DCV60 + PEG-IFN.
© Copyright 2015 Galapagos NV Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a novel CFTR potentiator GLPG1837 in healthy volunteers F.P. Vanhoutte 1, M-H.
W24 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment naïve Early fibrosis to compensated cirrhosis No HBV or HIV co-infection N = 10 SOF + weight-based.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg bid  Objective.
Agenda  Update on Darunavir: Perry Mohammed  Update on Etravirine: Rekha Sinha  Update on TMC278: Peter Williams  Update on TMC207: Karel De Beule.
Angelo L Gaffo Kenneth G Saag Core Evidence 2009:4 25–36
Overview of Drug Interactions Between Brecanavir (BCV) and Other HIV Protease Inhibitors (PIs) M Shelton, S Ford, M Anderson, S Murray, J Ng-Cashin XVI.
No randomization N = 59 W12W24 Arm B : compensated cirrhosis N = 31 N = 29 Arm C : compensated cirrhosis Arm A : No cirrhosis AGATE-II Study: OBV/PTV/r.
SMV + DCV + SOF Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 or 4 Treatment-naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN ± RBV Portal hypertension or liver decompensation.
ALLY-3  Design  Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI DCV 60 mg qd + SOF 400 mg qd Not randomised Open-label ALLY-3 Study: DCV + SOF for.
Asselah T. AASLD 2015, Abs. 714 Randomisation 1:1 Open-label years HCV genotype 4 HCV RNA ≥ 1,000 IU/ml Naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN + RBV (Part.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Sulkowski M. Lancet 2015;385: C-WORTHY  Design Randomisation* Open-label > 18 years HCV genotype 1, treatment naïve HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml No cirrhosis.
Comparison of EFV vs MVC  MERIT Study.  Design N = 361 N = 360  Objective –Non inferiority of MVC vs EFV: % HIV RNA < 400 c/mL and < 50 c/mL (co-primary.
No randomisation Open-label years HCV genotype 1 Naïve or null-response to PEG-IFN + RBV HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/ml No cirrhosis No HBV or HIV co-infection.
Placebo + PR W24 DCV + PR Placebo + PR Yes Dore GJ. Gastroenterology 2015;148: COMMAND GT2/3 COMMAND GT2/3 Study: daclatasvir + PEG-IFN + RBV for.
C-EDGE TN Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir in genotype 1, 4 or 6 Zeuzem S. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163:1-13 GZR/EBR 100/50 mg qd N = 316 N = 105  Design W12W24.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Poordad F. NEJM 2014;368: D Phase IIa  Design  Treatment regimens – Paritaprevir/rironavir (PTV/r) : PTV 250 or 150 mg qd/ritonavir 100 mg qd (2.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Dual Inhibition of Two Sources of Cholesterol: Absorption and Production Results of a Clinical Trial.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Elbasvir-Grazoprevir in Treatment-Naïve HCV Genotype 1, 4 or 6 C-EDGE Treatment Naïve (TN) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve.
© 2016 Direct One Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Recent Research Expands Our Understanding of Perampanel Christian M. Cabrera Kang, MD Emory.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Short-term monotherapy with UK-453,061, a novel NNRTI, reduces viral load in HIV-infected patients G Fätkenheuer 1 ; S Staszewski 2 ; A Plettenburg 3 ;
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
eGFR (MDRD) > 50 mL/min
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis** No HBV or HIV co-infection
AL study: AL ODV + SMV in naïve patients, phase II
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Injection Drug Use
Evaluation of tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and anti-retroviral activity of MK-8591 in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected adult subjects MK-8591 (EFdA)
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
47th ICAAC Chicago, USA, September 17–20, 2007
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Phase 2b Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
47th ICAAC Chicago, USA, September 17–20, 2007
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Phase 1 and 2a Safety and Efficacy Data of Maraviroc (UK-427,857) Mary McHale, Sam Abel, Deborah Russell, James Gallagher, Elna van der Ryst Pfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich Laboratories, Kent, UK

2 Maraviroc (MVC)  Maraviroc (UK-427,857, MVC) is a CCR5 antagonist with potent anti-HIV activity in vitro  An extensive Phase 1/2a program has been carried out  Here we present a summary of the data from the five double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose studies with MVC alone, and one drug– drug interaction study with oral contraceptives (expected not to affect exposure to MVC in plasma)  Studies included a total of 259 healthy volunteers and HIV+ positive patients who received MVC at QD and BID doses ranging from 3 mg BID to 1200 mg QD or placebo  Some volunteers received more than one dose of MVC/placebo and are therefore included in more than one dose group in tables and figures. Total dosing events for MVC = 220 (154 healthy volunteers, 66 HIV+) Total dosing events for placebo = 111 (95 healthy volunteers, 16 HIV+)

3 Study Details Study (All double-blind, placebo-controlled) Unit dose range* (mg) Duration (days) Dose-escalating multiple-dose study (with wash out periods) 1 3–60010 Oral contraceptive interaction study –day safety study 3 100–30028 High dose-escalating multiple-dose study300–12007 & 7 Monotherapy study in asymptomatic HIV+ subjects 4 25–30010 Monotherapy study in asymptomatic HIV+ subjects (investigating possible food effect) 4 150– Abel S et al. 10 th CROI 2003; Paper Russell D et al. 43 rd ICAAC 2003; Paper *Unit dose refers to actual dose taken at any time point and not total daily dose, several studies included BID doses 3. Abel S et al. 43 rd ICAAC 2003; Paper Fätkenheuer G et al. 15 th IAC 2004; Abstract TuPeB4489.

4 Demographic Data Dose Placebo  150 mg 300 mg600–1200 mg N GenderMale Female Age18– – RaceWhite Black3411 Asian2100 Other2210

5 Most Frequent Adverse Events – Treatment Related Dose Adverse EventPlacebo  150 mg 300 mg600–1200 mg N (%) Headache17 (15)19 (17)12 (24)18 (30) Dizziness7 (6)8 (7)5 (10)27 (44) Nausea6 (5)1 (1)6 (12)16 (26) Asthenia8 (7)5 (5)3 (6)16 (26) Flatulence6 (5)3 (3)7 (14)8 (13) Rhinitis1 (1)2 (2)2 (4)14 (23) Postural hypotension1 (1)0 (0) 14 (23) Abnormal vision2 (2)1 (1)1 (2)12 (20) Conjunctivitis0 (0) 14 (23) Somnolence3 (3)0 (0) 12 (20) Abdominal pain3 (3)1 (1)2 (4)7 (11)

6 Postural Hypotension Incidence of postural hypotension (%)  Postural hypotension was the dose-limiting AE in phase 1  Occurred at rates in excess of placebo only at doses of  600 mg 3/35 5/17 6/9 2/1110/360/570/160/50

7 SAEs and Discontinuations  No SAEs reported  11 discontinuations on MVC 9 in 154 healthy volunteers in four Phase 1 studies (3 related) 2 in 66 HIV+ patients in two Phase 2a studies (not related) –“no longer willing to participate” (25 mg QD) –“headache” (100 mg QD fasted)  8 discontinuations on placebo 8 in 95 healthy volunteers in four Phase 1 studies (2 related) 0 in 16 HIV+ patients in two Phase 2a studies

8 Discontinuations DoseNReason for discontinuationTreatment related* Severity* 3 mg1Transaminases elevated (1)YesSevere 25 mg2Varicella infection (1) No longer willing to participate (1) No - Moderate mg3Tooth abscess (1) Headache (1) No longer willing to participate (1) No - Moderate mg2Protocol violation (1) Infectious mononucleosis (1) - No - Moderate 600 mg3Postural hypotension (2) No longer willing to participate (1) Yes - Severe - Placebo8Postural hypotension(1) Protocol violation (3) Sore throat (1) Laboratory abnormality (1) Headache (1) Itchy rash of thorax (1) Yes - No Yes Severe - Moderate Mild *Investigator assessment

9 Laboratory Abnormalities  Changes in s-creatinine Elevations in creatinine (<2ULN) in one study at 1200 mg QD and placebo Not seen in other studies where similar exposures to MVC were achieved  Liver-enzyme abnormalities Sporadic transaminase elevations with no dose relationship No associated bilirubin elevations

10 Laboratory Abnormalities ALT changes in patients with normal ALT at baseline, n  ULN >ULN to  2 ULN >2ULN to  3ULN >3ULN to  5ULN >5ULNTotal Placebo <100 mg mg mg mg mg mg mg ULN = Upper Limit of Normal

11 Max Increase in QTcF From Baseline (msec)  No evidence of dose-related changes in QTcF at doses of  1200 mg QD Increase in QTcF from baseline (msec), n (%) N<30  30–<60  60 Placebo7466 (89)8 (11)0 (0) <100 mg3632 (89)3 (8)1 (3) 100 mg5755 (97)2 (4)0 (0) 150 mg1612 (75)4 (25)0 (0) 300 mg5047 (94)3 (6)0 (0) 600 mg3532 (91)3 (9)0 (0) 900 mg1716 (94)0 (0)1 (6) 1200 mg99 (100)0 (0) QTcF, Fridericia’s correction

12 MVC Safety Profile Summary  At doses of  300 mg BID, AE profile was similar to placebo  Postural hypotension was the dose-limiting AE – only seen at rates higher than placebo for doses of  600 mg  Clinically relevant elevations in transaminases occurred sporadically, with no dose relationship and no associated elevation in bilirubin  No evidence of clinically relevant prolongation of QTcF

13 MVC Efficacy Results: Mean Reduction in Viral Load over Time Change from baseline (log 10 HIV-1 copies/mL) Last day of dosing Placebo 1015 Placebo mg QD 50 mg BID 100 mg QD 100 mg BID 150 mg BID Fast 150 mg BID Fed 300 mg QD 300 mg BID Maraviroc dose n Time (day) Baseline – 2.0 – 1.5 – 1.0 – Fätkenheuer G et al. 15 th IAC 2004; Abstract TuPeB4489

14 MVC Reduces Viral Load in All Patients Receiving Therapeutic Doses Mean decrease in HIV RNA log 10 copies/mL (range) HIV RNA decrease >1.0 log 10 copies/mL (no. patients) Median time to nadir (days) DosenDay 11NadirDay 11Nadir 25 mg QD (-1.08, 0.02)-0.59 (-1.10, 0.02) mg BID (-1.37, 0.40)-0.86 (-1.37, -0.14) mg QD (-1.70, -0.43)-1.25 (-1.70, -0.61) mg BID (-1.84, -1.04)-1.68 (-2.10, -1.37) mg BID (-1.71, -0.90)-1.77 (-2.16, -1.43) mg BID fed (-1.79, -0.51)-1.74 (-2.09, -1.13) mg QD (-1.62, -0.95)-1.60 (-2.08, -1.14) mg BID (-2.42, -0.78)-1.84 (-2.42, -1.49)7811

15 Emergence of CXCR4-Tropic Virus (1)  61/63 patients (97%) with CCR5-tropic virus at baseline remained CCR5-tropic after 10 days of MVC monotherapy  2 patients showed emergence of CXCR4-using variants during treatment with MVC 100 mg QD for 10 days  R5 variants remained the predominant virus species post-treatment Lewis M et al. 44th ICAAC 2004; Poster H-584b

16 Emergence of CXCR4-Tropic Virus (2)  Patient 1 HIV RNA decline: –0.71 log 10 copies/mL Transient emergence of dual-/mixed-tropic virus at day 11 Reverted to CCR5-tropic at day 40.  Patient 2 HIV RNA decline: –1.26 log 10 copies/mL Dual-/mixed-tropic virus detected from day 11 onwards R5 variants constituted ~80% of the circulating virus after one year’s follow-up.  Phylogenetic analysis suggested that R5/X4 variants which emerged post-treatment in each patient most likely expanded from a pre-treatment R5/X4 virus reservoir, rather than co-receptor switching of an R5 clone Lewis M et al. 44th ICAAC 2004; Poster H-584b

17 Conclusions  MVC was safe and well tolerated in doses up to and including 300 mg BID in this population  Doses of  100 mg BID resulted in viral load reductions of >1 log 10 copies/mL Dosing with food had no significant effect on viral load reduction Dosing of 150 mg BID and 300 mg QD resulted in similar viral load reductions  Currently in Phase 2b/3 development in both naive and treatment-experienced patients using doses equivalent to 300 mg QD and 300 mg BID

18 Acknowledgements  The maraviroc development team  All the investigators and study-site staff  The patients and volunteers for their participation in these studies