Trademark Opposition & Cancellation Process U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) US Oppositions and Cancellations 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Office Action Practice
Advertisements

INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association COST COMPARISON OF INTER PARTES PROCEEDINGS IN THE USPTO AND INFRINGEMENT ACTION IN.
Trademarks Presented by: Jeanne M. Hamburg Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A. 875 Third Avenue New York, New York (212)
Webinar: Request for Comments on AIA Trial Proceedings Before the PTAB July 29, Scott Boalick, Vice Chief Judge (Acting) Patent Trial and Appeal.
RESIDENTIAL EVICTION QUICK GUIDE Due Process and Summary Procedure.
Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.
Paradise Point Resort & Spa San Diego, CA October 19-21, 2011 Patenting Protein Therapeutics: In the Shadow of Uncertainty 4th Protein Discovery and Therapeutics.
Asserting your rights and living to fight another day James M. Barclay Healthcare attorney.
Welcome U.S. Trademark Registration: The Attorney's Role from Clearance to Renewals Presented by Attorney Courtney Dunn Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor.
Geographical Indications (GIs) Global Intellectual Property Academy
TC1600 Appeals Practice Jean Witz, Appeals Specialist.
Indiana Election Division: Trent Deckard, Co-Director The Open Door Law, Public Records Law, and Records Retention.
Trademark Protection Process Selection and US Registration 2006.
Patent & Trademark Law LOYOLA PRESENTATION Copyright © 2014, Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP and Neal & McDevitt, LLC. All rights reserved.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 12, rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School August 31, 2004 Introduction.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 28, rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses.
Trademarks: Administrative Issues Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 25, rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School February 6, 2008 Intent to Use.
Appeal Practice Refresher Office of Patent Training.
A Comparative Analysis of Patent Post-Grant Review Procedures in the U
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association MADRID SYSTEM VS. DIRECT INTERNATIONAL FILINGS BY U.S. PARTIES JPO/AIPLA Joint Meeting.
CJP – THE TRIAL. Right to Trial by Jury When are juries used?  6 th Amendment  Juries are not required for offenses punishable by less than 6 months.
Brand Protection In China Eligio Pimentel
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
1 LAW DIVISION PATENT DIVISION TRADEMARK & DESIGN DIVISION ACCOUNTING & AUDITING DIVISION YUASA AND HARA LAW, PATENT, TRADEMARK & DESIGN and ACCOUNTING.
MANAGING ELECTION CHALLENGES. Election Challenges  Any registered voter of the county may challenge the right of any person to register, remain registered.
2011 Japanese Patent Law Revision AIPLA Annual Meeting October 21, 2011 Yoshi Inaba TMI Associates.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association EMERGING TRENDS IN INTER PARTES REVIEW PRACTICE TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update on AIA Implementation Especially post grant processes Alan J. Kasper AIPLA/JPO.
+ COLOMBIA´S IP RIGHTS RAUL BURITICA Bogotá- Colombia.
Prosecution Lunch September Trademark Public Advisory Mtg. Concerns about unauthorized practice of law by document mgmt services and others eFiling-
WORKING WITH TRADEMARK EXAMINING ATTORNEYS: TWO INSIDERS TELL ALL Danielle I. Mattessich Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould.
New Ex Parte Appeal Rules Patent and Trademark Practice Group Meeting January 26, 2012.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
Category 1 Category 5 Category 4 Category 3 Category
Law and Justice Chapter 14 - Trials. Due Process of Law Due Process of Law Due Process of Law Means little to people unless they are arrested Means little.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association TTAB REVIEW CASES FROM 2014 George W. Lewis, Esq. Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks August, 2011.
Trademarks II Establishment of Trademark Rights Class 20 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Report to the AIPLA’s IP Practice in Japan Committee January 22, 2012 USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules Presented by: Stephen S. Wentsler.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
Trademark Opposition & Cancellation Proceedings Salumeh Loesch January 12, 2016.
Name Reservation F MASHAU. Name Reservations Considerations Name reservation is no longer an initial mandatory process for company registration. A company.
Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.
Category Name $100100$100100$100100$ $200200$200200$200200$ $300300$300300$300300$ $400400$400400$400400$ $ Category Name.
Lin & Partners LAW FI R M U nit 301, Toyama Group Center, No. 22 Timog Avenue, Quezon City, Philippines Telefax (+632)
TTAB Gerard F. Rogers Chief Administrative Trademark Judge
What State Court Practitioners Need to Know About Federal Civil Procedures.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 1 – PTAB Basics and Procedure
TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD OVERVIEW
No-answer and Post-answer
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
PTAB Bootcamp: Nuts and Bolts of IPRs, PGRs, and CBMs
Noteworthy Developments at the TTAB
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN REPRESENTATION
Factoring Differences of Squares
Factoring Differences of Squares
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN REPRESENTATION
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics
Factoring Differences of Squares
Trademark Information Required for the Filing of a Statement of use
Presentation transcript:

Trademark Opposition & Cancellation Process U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) US Oppositions and Cancellations 2006

Trademark Oppositions Opposition –Timing –Grounds –Process Cancellation –Timing –Grounds –Process Timing –The window for filing an opposition, or extension, is 30 days from Publication –Opposition Deadlines can be extended up to 90 days (totaling 120 days from Publication) –Extensions must be requested before expiration of Opposition Deadline.

Trademark Oppositions Opposition –Timing –Grounds –Process Cancellation –Timing –Grounds –Process Grounds –Likelihood of Confusion Prior use or registration –Distinctiveness Descriptive or Generic or Functional –No Ownership –Fraud in Filing No Use or Specimens of Use

Trademark Oppositions Opposition –Timing –Grounds –Process Cancellation –Timing –Grounds –Process Process –Notice of Opposition Short Statement of Grounds –Answer Due 30 Days After Notice or Default Includes Defenses –Trial Deadlines Set Discovery (6 Months) Testimony (30 Days) Briefs Most TTAB Cases Settle Before Testimony

Trademark Cancellations Opposition –Timing –Grounds –Process Cancellation –Timing –Grounds –Process Timing –Any Time After Registration Issues –If Registration is 5+ Years Old, Check for “Incontestability.” Incontestable Registrations Can No Longer be Challenged on Some Grounds Presumed Distinctive

Trademark Cancellations Opposition –Timing –Grounds –Process Cancellation –Timing –Grounds –Process Grounds –Likelihood of Confusion* –Distinctiveness Descriptive* or Generic or Functional –Abandonment –No Ownership* –Fraud in Filing No Use or Specimens of Use * Not Available For Use Against Incontestable Registrations.

Trademark Cancellations Opposition –Timing –Grounds –Process Cancellation –Timing –Grounds –Process Process –Petition for Cancellation Short Statement of Grounds –Answer Due 30 Days After Notice or Default Includes Defenses –Trial Deadlines Set Discovery (6 Months) Testimony (30 Days) Briefs Most TTAB Cases Settle Before Testimony