Arizona Department of Education Superintendent John Huppenthal Mark Masterson, CIO Pamela Smith, IT Program Director September 14, 2011 ADE1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Susan K. Burr, Deputy Executive Director
Advertisements

Wisconsin Department of Revenue Integrated Property Assessment System (IPAS) March 3, 2006.
ERP Applications Selection in a Changing Marketplace Evaluation of Software Providers for Midsize Institutions Bill Reed Director, Special Projects Northern.
Overview and Principles for Implementing State PPP (P3) Legislation Presented at the NCPPP P3 Connect Denver, Colorado Conference By Jim Reed, Group Director.
October 7, 2014 A Presentation to the Caddo Parish School Board by: Evergreen Solutions, LLC.
New Transportation Guideline— Effective July 1, 2014 Don’t miss the bus! Arizona Department of Education, Audit Unit Brian Lockery, Audit Manager
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Florida Atlantic University Overview of Operating Budget Process Presentation to the Florida Atlantic University Foundation, Inc. Board of Directors February.
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-first Legislature First Regular Session IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO BY FINANCE COMMITTEE.
SDPI Competitive Grant Program Planning Meeting 1 IHS Diabetes Competitive Grant Program: Overview and Update Kelly Acton, MD, MPH, FACP Director, IHS.
Working Toward a Statewide Information System to Track the Effectiveness of Student Aid Financial Programs in Maryland Michael J. Keller Director of Policy.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
Improving Data Migration Across Wyoming Schools Across Wyoming Schools October 2004 Presented By Data System Design Team Sponsored by the Wyoming Dept.
1 Oregon’s Superintendent of Public Instruction Presented to the Public Officials Compensation Commission July 23, 2008 “Every Student, Every Day – A Success”
Learning with a Purpose: Learning Management Systems Patti Holub, Director District Initiatives and Special Projects Miguel Guhlin, Director Instructional.
Mark T. Masterson for Superintendent John Huppenthal Pamela Smith Program Director Arizona Department of Education – IT
Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal Fixing the ADE Computer System to Improve Student Achievement.
Transportation/Land-Use Connections Program Program Evaluation Proposal for FY 2009 Program September 5, 2008 Darren Smith, Sarah Crawford Transportation.
Arizona Department of Education Superintendent John Huppenthal Mark Masterson, CIO Pamela Smith, AELAS Program Director Mark Svorinic, AZ-SLDS Program.
Cindy Hunt, Government and Legal Affairs Manager Oregon Department of Education.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera Director, Data Quality Campaign National Center for Education Accountability April 23, 2007.
Race To The Top (RttT) MSDE Division of Accountability and Assessment Data Systems (DAADS) Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation Three Years in a Row.
Oregon Department of Education. Introductions Cindy L. Hunt Government and Legal Affairs Manager Margaret Bates Education Specialist Kate Pattison Program.
Establishing the Student – Teacher Connection How Hard Can It Be? ADE Information Technology Division 1 Enterprise Data Architect: Dr. Alex Jones Project.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program July 23, 2003 eAuthentication Initiative Agency Responsibilities and Funding Discussion eGovernment.
Roads to Recovery by Leslie Riggs Executive Director AusLink.
Toronto Catholic District School Board Budget Consultation Meeting Catholic Education Centre May 5, 2008.
State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Update to Arizona Association of School Business Officials July 22, 2009 Arizona Office of Economic Recovery Janice K.
State Longitudinal Data System (AZ-SLDS) Project DRAFT v7 ADE SFSF K-12 Project Manager: David Plouff AZ-SLDS Program Manager: Mark Svorinic IT Programs.
The University of North Carolina Office of the President State Higher Education Executive Officers The University of North Carolina Office of the President.
1 Prop 82: An Historic Opportunity for California’s Children.
Longitudinal Data Systems: What Can They Do for Me? Nancy J. Smith, Ph.D. Deputy Director Data Quality Campaign November 30, 2007.
IMPACT OF STATE BUDGET PROPOSAL ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
WELCOME TO CLARITY KATHERINE CONOLY Customer Success Leader for Texas.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
Enabling pK12 Data Identification, Movement and Usage Larry Fruth, Ph.D. Executive Director Schools Interoperability Framework Association April 23, 2007.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
Easton Public Schools Financial Overview Easton School Committee October 5, 2015.
Budget Workshop: Fiscal Policies, Process, and Budget Guidelines Board of Governors April 21, 2005.
1 Statewide Directions for Student Information Systems James A. Kadamus New York State Education Department March, 2004.
Copyright ©2010. All rights reserved. California’s Teaching Force 2010: Key Issues & Trends Key Themes Changing conditions, fewer prospects Increased.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
Oregon Department of Education Technology and School Finance Presenter:Doug Kosty, Director Presentation to the Joint Ways & Means Subcommittee on Education.
ESE Chart of Accounts and Use of Finance Data MASBO Classified Personnel Training Program October 7, 2015 Melissa King, State Aid Coordinator, ESE.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Medicaid Nursing Home Reimbursement Mark A. Leeds, Director Long Term Care and Community Support Services Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
FY2010 and FY2011 Update Policy and Fiscal Committee September 13, 2010.
QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE OF THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT (MIG) – 2005/06 AND 2006/07 FINANCIAL YEARS Presentation to the Select Committee On Finance.
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Why Now?  New Mathematics Content Standards were adopted for grades K-8 in 2007 and high school in Oregon Statewide.
1 Transportation FY 2014 Sources - $ million  General Fund - $4.496 million  Transit Funds - $9.739 million  Parking Funds - $ million.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” FY 2011 Data Collections Conference September 2010 Presenter: Debra Holdren.
Business & Finance FY 2017 Budget Planning Thomas Harper, CFO.
EMIS Update: State Board of Education January 11, 2016.
Valley View Local Schools SELF ASSESSMENT/STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE MARCH 2016.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Field Analyst Support Team (FAST) School Finance Division
Stacy L. Haney, Esq. (804) General Assembly Stacy L. Haney, Esq. (804)
Treasury of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Parent Council engagement: September 2015
California State University CSUconnect Federation
School Budget Proposal
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera
IT Transformation: Strategic Plan & Pilot Public Education Department
Presentation to Project Certification Committee, DoIT August 24, 2008
Minnesota Department of Public Safety FY20-21 Budget
NM Department of Transportation (NMDOT) MMS/PMS Phase 2
Special Education Maintenance of Effort Project
Presentation transcript:

Arizona Department of Education Superintendent John Huppenthal Mark Masterson, CIO Pamela Smith, IT Program Director September 14, 2011 ADE1

Improve student achievement and lower State infrastructure costs through a new ADE data system currently called Arizona Education Learning and Accountability System (AELAS) or Education Management Information System (EMIS) that will provide a 360 view for students, teachers, schools and districts September 14, 2011ADE Information Technology Division2

September 14, 2011ADE Information Technology Division3

 Since January 2011 SAIS availability near 100% enabling Districts and Schools to have dependable access to transfer data. SAIS has only been offline for scheduled maintenance during off hours. In 2010 and previous years, SAIS was a bottleneck as was only available 50% of year creating a need to have schools check periodically for system availability.  Since January 2011 over 500 needed changes to SAIS have been implemented fixing software bugs that were causing customer data issues resulting in delay of funding to them. In 2010 fewer than 100 changes to SAIS were made. September 14, 2011ADE Information Technology Division4

 July 11 – SAIS opened for FY12 marking the earliest time since the 2003 school year enabling kindergartners and new student enrollees to be issued a SAIS ID essential for important programs like AZELLA and AIMS student testing. This change alone has saved a significant amount of money in the cost of retesting students who were already tested.  August 1 - Upgrade to new SAIS hardware has resulted in faster integrity processing time by 50%. Future scheduled upgrades to SAIS hardware will further reduce integrity processing times providing faster service to our customers.  October 5 – 40 Day Aggregation ‘on target.’ In the history of ADE, ADE Day Aggregation processing has never occurred. For the first time, in 2011, 40 Day Aggregation will take place on time which will positively impact budget planning and execution and fast and accurate funding for our customers. September 14, 2011ADE Information Technology Division5

4/28/11ADE Information Technology Division6 SAIS Special Education Food Service Library Finance Transportation Assessment Human Resources SIS (Student Information System) The tool creates reports that everyone at the appropriate level can access These reports help inform instruction and reallocate resources effectively An interoperable system connects all information and technologies This program results in student improvement and enables the continuous collection of information for future success 6 Proposed Education Management Information System

 AZ-SLDS (Arizona Statewide Longitudinal Data System) is a system that provides student-level data to school districts and charter schools that will empower educators with the ability to make data-driven decisions to improve student achievement. End Result: Districts and Schools will bring higher success rates to their students.  Great Plains is a Microsoft Financial Systems Management product. ADE IT is in the beginning stages of implementing Great Plains in order to consolidate the agency’s use of 4 different financial systems into 1 system. End Result: Districts and Schools will receive funding faster  SAIS Business Rules Audit/Clean-Up ADE IT in process of matching current SAIS business rules to current legislation in order to identify and consolidate or remove changed or reversed bills in order to ensure optimize SAIS data processing. A “Clean-Up” bill will then be proposed to legislators to address needed changes to remove or cancel abandoned or cancelled legislation. End Result: Faster data processing and accurate data results September 14, 2011ADE Information Technology Division7

 Identity Access Management (IAM) encapsulates people, processes and products to identify and manage the data used in an information system to authenticate users and grant or deny access rights to data and system resources. ADE IT will be implementing Forefront Identity Management(FIM), a Microsoft product, current and future data security requirements. End Result: Districts, Schools, Teachers, Parents will be able to access data at appropriate access levels.  Data Governance Commission Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes A.R.S. § , the purpose of the commission is to (1) identify, examine and evaluate the needs of public institutions who provide instruction to pupils in preschool, kindergarten, grades one through twelve and postsecondary programs in Arizona; (2) provide recommendations on technology spending; and (3) provide analyses and recommendations First meeting held, August 19, 2011 Next meeting scheduled for September, 30, 2011 End Result: Oversight and audit of Data Standards, Security, Standards and Processes, ensured by neutral committee comprised of technical education community stakeholder team September 14, 2011ADE Information Technology Division8

Discussion and Next Steps September 14, 2011ADE Information Technology Division9