HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.

Advertisements

Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.

Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.

Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.

0 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK LHC preparations for precise measurements of muonic very rare B-decays 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska,

RAL Summer School September, 2004 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis High Level Trigger Studies for the.

Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern SM Higgs Discovery Channels ATLAS High Level Trigger Trigger & Physics Selection Higgs Channels: Physics Performance.

A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.

A segmented principal component analysis applied to calorimetry information at ATLAS ACAT May 22-27, Zeuthen, Germany H. P. Lima Jr, J. M. de Seixas.

Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●

27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.

The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.

1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.

The ATLAS B physics trigger

Prospects for Studying Heavy Quarkonia with ATLAS at the LHC Prospects for Studying Heavy Quarkonia with ATLAS at the LHC Armin NAIRZ CERN on behalf of.

The LHCb DAQ and Trigger Systems: recent updates Ricardo Graciani XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics.

J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,

Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.

The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.

Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)

High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.

Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May th Real-Time.

General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.

The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd

BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.

IOP HEPP 6-8 April 2009Matthew Tamsett, RHUL 1 Determining the ATLAS electron trigger efficiency in BSM channels from Data Matthew Tamsett, RHUL Supervisor:

Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.

Algorithm / Data-flow Interface

Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.

The ATLAS B-physics Trigger Simon George Royal Holloway, University of London, UK On behalf of the ATLAS T/DAQ group 9th International Conference on B-Physics.

Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)

Sez. di Lecce Universita` degli Studi del Salento The Muon Trigger in ATLAS Giovanni Siragusa On behalf of the ATLAS Muon Trigger group.

Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.

Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.

The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger

ATLAS Forward Detector Trigger ATLAS is presently planning to install forward detectors (Roman Pot system) in the LHC tunnel with prime goal to measure.

Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.

1 “Steering the ATLAS High Level Trigger” COMUNE, G. (Michigan State University ) GEORGE, S. (Royal Holloway, University of London) HALLER, J. (CERN) MORETTINI,

Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.

Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May

The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.

IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –

T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.

Accessing PBeast and monitoring the L1 trigger Emily Thompson.

Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.

Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.

ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.

New Trigger Strategies Discussion Perimeter Institute HL-LHC Workshop June 8, 2015 Eva Halkiadakis, Matt Strassler, Gordon Watts.

1 Jet Triggers and Dijet Mass Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab TTU Weekly HEP Group Meeting Feb 16, 2006.

Hardeep Bansil (University of Birmingham) on behalf of L1Calo collaboration ATLAS UK Meeting, Royal Holloway January 2011 Argonne Birmingham Cambridge.

Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.

Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.

A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.

ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.

ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.

ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,

Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas

IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.

The University of Manchester

Michele Pioppi* on behalf of PRIN _005 group

Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo

The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ

High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis

The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS

Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey

Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won

Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST

Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Presentation transcript:

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High Level Trigger System of the ATLAS Detector Stefanidis E. University College London

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Outline  ATLAS Trigger System: The challenge. Overview.  Level-2 Trigger: The Region of Interest mechanism.  Reduced Region of Interest: Motivation. Methodology. Implementation.  Results.  Conclusions.

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis The ATLAS Trigger System: The challenge Proton bunch crossing rate of 40 MHz Design (high) luminosity of cm -2 s -1 s pp-inel = 80  s = 14 TeV ~25 p-p interactions per crossing ! ~10 9 interactions per second ! Signal events are very rare: H  gg rate is ~ of the LHC interaction rate. (m H =120 GeV) Limited storage capability + High Granularity of the sub-systems event size ~1.6 MB just before storage. storage rate of O (200) Hz. Trigger System must be: Fast. Efficient: reject background and keep signals. Flexible: Cooperate for different signal signatures. Robust: successful operation during runs.

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis The ATLAS Trigger System: Overview 1.LVL1: 40 MHz  75 kHz < 2.5 μs Hardware trigger Coarse granularity Calorimeter and Muon Trigger stations only 2.LVL2: 75 kHz  2 kHz 10 ms Full granularity information from both ID and Calorimeter RoI mechanism 3.Event Filter (EF): 2 kHz  100 Hz  2s Sophisticated algorithms Alignment data available High Level Trigger (HLT)

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Level-2 Trigger: The RoI mechanism Region of Interest defines the geometrical region where HLT will start from. It is based on the LVL1 information. Z r Z r Z r Zvertex Z r Middle of the 1 st EM sampling Middle of the 2 nd EM sampling Z r Zvertex Middle of the 1 st EM sampling Middle of the 2 nd EM sampling How the RoI is currently constructed… With the RoI mechanism we manage to minimise the: Processing time. Network traffic. Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Level-1: h, f Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Level-1: h, f Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Level-1: h, f Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Level-1: h, f ±0.1 Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Level-1: h, f ±0.1 Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Level-1: h, f ±0.1 Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Level-1: h, f ±0.1 Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Level-1: h, f ±0.1 Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Level-1: h, f ±0.1 ±168 mm

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Reduced Region of Interest: motivation The size of the RoI in (eta, phi) space has been determined almost arbitrarily. The RoI currently takes into account the full range of the beam spread. Better algorithm design can reduce the size. Faster decisions (and more efficient?), especially in a demanding environment. Never before has been a detailed study for optimising this size. Main tool: the 1st and 2nd samplings of the EM Calorimeter. High granularity information at Level-2.

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Reduced Region of Interest: methodology Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling 1. Determine the position of the middle of the 1st and 2nd sampling. 2. Extrapolate back to the beam. 3. Open 3sigma around the Z found by the Calorimeter Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Zcalo Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Zcalo Z r Zvertex 1 st sampling 2 nd sampling Zcalo The RoI is reduced by ~30%!

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Reduced Region of Interest: implementation 1. Parameterize the middle of the 1st and the 2nd EM samplings 2. Parameterize the width to open.

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Results Using our Tracking Algorithm we can test the method: 1.…in terms of efficiency: 2.…in terms of timing:

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Conclusions A new method has been applied in order to reduce the size of the Region of Interest. Important improvement in terms of efficiency and timing even at this preliminary stage. Further/high order corrections and studies are being carried out in order to optimize the size. Contacts have started to integrate the new method into the official ATLAS Trigger Software.