Life of a Stanford Invention. Functional Antibodies FM Sound Synthesis Recombinant DNA Google Notable Stanford Inventions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management Strategies Hopes Creek Consulting. Management Strategies Management StrategyProtect Wait to Protect Market Actively Market PassivelyOther 1XX.
Advertisements

1 WIPO/INV/BEI/02/3.a The Role of Universities in the Innovation Cycle Document prepared by Ms. Kirsten Leute, Licensing Associate Office of Technology.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
LICENSING “One Way of Putting Your I.P. to Work for Your Organization” Inventing and Patenting Seminar May 16, 2001.
North Carolina State University © 2014 Technology Transfer Outcomes February 27, 2014 Research Retreat Kelly B. Sexton, Ph.D. Director Office of Technology.
Technology Transfer from A-Z! Office of Technology Licensing
LOWER SHORE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM Bringing the Benefits of Discovery to the World MAY 23, 2012 Wesley D. Blakeslee Executive Director Johns Hopkins.
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
EXPRESS LICENSE AGREEMENTS Ted Hagelin Crandall Melvin Professor of Law Kauffman Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Director, NY Science & Technology.
Welcome and Introduction: Market Timing and Licensing Options
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
1 Technology Transfer Seminar Series Patent Licensing : A Pathway to Commercialization Karen Hersey Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property, MIT. Ret.
Starting a Company from Research at the UW James A. Severson, Ph.D. Vice Provost, Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer January 30, 2007.
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
Welcome P&P Topics for GFY 2002 Patent Awards Tech Transfer Cycle: Part III FOOD!!!! PATENTS & PIZZA June 4, 2001.
Commercialization of University Technology Innovation, Technology Transfer and Licensing Jack Turner, Associate Director M.I.T. Technology Licensing Office.
Introduction to NUS Enterprise © National University of Singapore.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Introduction to University Tech Transfer Fall Columbia Technology Ventures
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.
Iowa State University Technology Protection and Licensing.
1 Wildcat Venture Management Technology Transfer Tactics Audio Panel September 30, 2008 Chicago, IL Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
Technology Transfer at Rice
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
History, Status, and Trends for Technology Transfer in U.S. Universities & The Stanford Model Presentation by Jon Sandelin Stanford University Office of.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
A Basic Primer on Intellectual Property Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Intellectual Property and Industry Relations Associate Vice Chancellor.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Technology Transfer and Assessment of Intellectual Assets Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. ( Vice President.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing Katharine Ku October 1, 2012.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
What should you know about Intellectual Property? Katharine Ku Office of Technology Licensing.
Navigating the University Technology Transfer August 23, 2012 Christopher Moulding Sr. Manager, Technology Advancement and Licensing I’ve got an idea…now.
University Technology Transfer: Issues and Opportunities Mark Crowell Research Administration for Scientists (T. Quigg) 7 December 2001.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
03/10/2008 Terese Rakow, PhD. Postdoctoral Career Development Course March 10, 2008.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy ITS America May 2010 Technology Transfer Follows Many Pathways: “It’s a Contact Sport” Work for.
Technology Licensing at Stanford University
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
Technology Transfer in The United States Paul Zielinski Director, Technology Partnerships Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology Chair,
Nanotechnology Transfer: Imagine the Possibilities! IEEE Symposium 13 November 2007 Luis Mejia Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing Stanford.
Understanding Technology Transfer Katharine Ku March 2, 2006.
Research Administration Forum May 2005 Tom Hagerty Office of Technology Management.
University of Iowa Research Foundation We help you identify, protect and commercialize your discoveries. We can help you start a company. We will help.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Best Practices for University Technology Transfer Katharine Ku June 1, 2011.
Taking Discoveries from Lab to the Market
Katharine Ku, Executive Director, Technology Licensing April 23, 2017
Universities and the Commercial World
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing (OTL)
Life of a Stanford Invention
Effects of Patenting and Technology Transfer on Commercialization
NASA Kennedy Space Center
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System
Presentation transcript:

Life of a Stanford Invention

Functional Antibodies FM Sound Synthesis Recombinant DNA Google Notable Stanford Inventions

Timeline of Stanford Inventions 1970 – OTL Established 1970 – OTL Established 1971 – FM Sound Synthesis ($22.9M) 1971 – FM Sound Synthesis ($22.9M) 1974 – Recombinant DNA ($255M) 1974 – Recombinant DNA ($255M) 1981 – Phycobiliproteins ($46.4M), Fiber Optic Amplifier ($48.4M), MINOS ($4.2M) 1981 – Phycobiliproteins ($46.4M), Fiber Optic Amplifier ($48.4M), MINOS ($4.2M) 1984 – Functional Antibodies ($425.7M) 1984 – Functional Antibodies ($425.7M) 1987 – Selective Amplification of Polynucleotides ($28.1M) 1987 – Selective Amplification of Polynucleotides ($28.1M) – Discrete Multi-tone technologies for DSL ($29.7M) – Discrete Multi-tone technologies for DSL ($29.7M) 1993 – Microarrays ($2.1M), MIMO for Wireless Broadcast ($1.6M) 1993 – Microarrays ($2.1M), MIMO for Wireless Broadcast ($1.6M) 1994 – In vivo Bioluminescent Imaging ($9.4M) 1994 – In vivo Bioluminescent Imaging ($9.4M) 1996 – Improved Hypertext Searching - Google TM ($339.2M) 1996 – Improved Hypertext Searching - Google TM ($339.2M) – Data Visualization Software – Data Visualization Software 2004 – Refocus Photography ($324.6K) 2004 – Refocus Photography ($324.6K) 2014 – the next big thing ??? 2014 – the next big thing ???

Stanford inventions begin as nascent ideas supported by over $1 billion per year of funding for research across 7 schools and SLAC.

Big Picture Stanford Budget FY13-14: $4.8B Total $1.35B for research $931.6M of gifts (FY13) $18.7B Endowment OTL $87.0M income in FY13

Stanford has over 15,000 students and over 2,000 faculty members that teach and conduct research.

How are Stanford innovations transferred to others to develop into new products and companies?

Background: Stanford Intellectual Property Policies SU18SU18 – Stanford University Patent and Copyright Agreement SU18 Patent policyPatent policy- University takes title to all inventions created with more than incidental use of university resources Patent policy Copyright policyCopyright policy - University takes title to copyrightable works created with significant university resources Copyright policy

The Office of Technology Licensing (OTL) is responsible for… the formal transfer of patents, copyrights and other technology through license agreements.

OTL’s Mission: To promote the transfer of Stanford technology for society’s use and benefit while generating unrestricted income to support research and education.

Most Inventions are Never Licensed 9-10 invention disclosures/week 50% have patent applications filed 20-25% are licensed* *some inventions such as software and biological materials are licensed without patent protection 9-10 invention disclosures/week 50% have patent applications filed 20-25% are licensed* *some inventions such as software and biological materials are licensed without patent protection

Disclosures Then in 1970 Now in ,897 cumulative

How Does OTL Decide? Licensing teams try to decide which inventions can make an impact.

Questions Is the invention evolutionary or revolutionary? What is the stage of development? Is it patentable and could a patent be enforced? What is the potential market size? What is the inventor’s track record?

Licensing Teams* Decide Patent and Licensing Strategy * Licensing Associate and Liaison teams have technical degrees and are market focused.

“Cradle to Grave” Evaluate overall potential Develop intellectual property strategy and manage patent prosecution Determine when and how to market and license the invention Negotiate contracts Maintain and amend agreements Monitor development and commercialization and track royalty payments

OTL Markets Broadly to Find the Best Fit for the Technology

Recombinant DNA: Many Companies of All Sizes

FM Sound: One Big Company

Functional Antibodies: One Mid-Sized Company

Google: One Start-Up Company

103 New License Agreements in FY13 66 non-exclusive 20 exclusive 17 option agreements 66 non-exclusive 20 exclusive 17 option agreements

Licenses Then... 3 in 1970 Now in FY13 ~1200 active licenses from ~3500 active inventions ~3300 cumulative licenses some inventions have many licensees

What is in a License?* Financial terms can include: License issue fee License issue fee Annual minimum payments Annual minimum payments Earned royalties Earned royalties Equity (if appropriate) Equity (if appropriate) Reimbursement of patent costs Reimbursement of patent costs Non-financial terms can include: Field of Use Field of Use Non-exclusive or exclusive rights Non-exclusive or exclusive rights Development milestones and diligence provisions Development milestones and diligence provisions *Sample Agreement:

Equity Can be One Component of the Financial Package About 10-15% of OTL’s licenses have an equity term.

License Agreements with Equity OTL first took equity in licenses with equity in FY13 Stanford holds equity in 161 companies as a result of license agreements (as of Aug. 31, 2013) Managed by Stanford Management Company Liquidated soon after IPO or at merger/acquisition Stanford may divest equity if a licensee conducts a clinical trial at the university

Equity Cash-Out at Stanford $1.0M in FY13 $370M cumulative from equity vs. $1.6B in total income $34M cumulative from non-Google equity vs. $1.2B in cumulative cash royalties

Licensed Inventions Can Develop into Products that generate income for the company and royalty returns to Stanford.

Income Then… $50K in 1970 Now… $87.0M in FY13 ~$1.6B cumulative Big Winners… Cohen-Boyer Recombinant DNA ($255M) Google ($339M) Functional Antibodies ($426M)

Since 1970, Stanford inventions have generated ~$1.6 Billion in licensing income, BUT only 3 out of 10,000 inventions was a big winner and only 75 have generated over $1 million.

Most Income Comes from a Few Dockets 622 inventions generated income in FY13 42 of those generated over $100K 6 of those generated over $1M 1 invention generated over $55M

Licensing Takes Time 10 to 15 years can elapse between initial invention disclosure and significant royalties

OTL Shares the Royalties After deductions for overhead (15%) and expenses, the net cash royalties are divided: 1/3 to inventors 1/3 to inventors’ departments 1/3 to inventors’ school After deductions for overhead (15%) and expenses, the net cash royalties are divided: 1/3 to inventors 1/3 to inventors’ departments 1/3 to inventors’ school

Royalty Sharing for Equity* In license agreements with equity, OTL typically negotiates 5% or less of the company, depending on the other financial terms. That equity is then distributed: 15% earmarked for OTL, with the rest divided 1/3 to the inventors (issued directly to them) 2/3 to Stanford (designated for the OTL Research Fund and the VPGE/OTL Graduate Education Fund) *In order to mitigate potential institutional conflicts of interest, equity is distributed differently than cash and Stanford Management Company handles equity designated for the university (including OTL’s share).

OTL Supports Operations, Patent Costs and Research OTL’s $6.7 million/year operating budget is self-funded through the 15% overhead deduction from royalties. In FY13 patent expenses were $9.3 million, this was partly offset by licensing income. OTL has contributed $65.9 million collectively to the OTL Research Incentive Fund, the OTL Research Fund, and the Vice Provost of Graduate Education/OTL Graduate Fellowship Fund.

Shared Royalties Support the Next Generation of Innovation

OTL Helps Find a Home for Stanford Inventions… to grow, develop and provide opportunities for the future.

Background: OTL and the Bayh-Dole Act ~83% of research at Stanford is funded by the U.S. government Bayh-Dole Act: Federal law that created uniform patent policy regarding inventions made under federally-funded research program. (Council on Governmental Relations publications on intellectual property) publications

More Information on OTL Website “The path from discovery to invention to marketplace is rarely a straight line, but more like a puzzle, with dozens of pieces that must come together in just the right configuration for success,” OTL Annual Report Search for new technologies on Techfinder Techfinder