Consumer Workgroup February 23, 2014 Michelle Consolazio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Advertisements

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.
HIT Policy Committee Federal Health IT Strategic Plan April 13, 2011 Jodi Daniel, ONC Seth Pazinski, ONC.
Strategy and Innovation Workgroup October 21, 2014 David Lansky, chair Jennifer Covich, co-chair.
Interoperability Roadmap Comments Package Implementation, Certification, and Testing (ICT) Workgroup February 13, 2015 Liz Johnson, co-chair Cris Ross,
ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup: Roadmap Charge Overview Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Transforming Clinical Practices Grant Opportunity Sponsored by CMS.
Interoperability Roadmap Comments Package Transport & Security Standards Workgroup Dixie Baker, chair Lisa Gallagher, co-chair February 24, 2015.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup March 10, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Draft – discussion only Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup: Update Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair March 10, 2015.
Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.
July 3, 2015 New HIE Capabilities Enable Breakthroughs In Connected And Coordinated Care Delivery. January 8, 2015 Charissa Fotinos.
Better, Smarter, Healthier Delivery System Reform Presentation to the Health IT Policy Committee March 10, 2015 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Connecting Health and Care for the Nation: A Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap – DRAFT Version 1.0 Joint FACA Meeting Chartese February 10, 2015.
Consumer Work Group Presentation Federal Health IT Strategic Plan January 9, 2015 Gretchen Wyatt Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Analysis.
Consumer Workgroup Interoperability Roadmap Comments Workgroup Discussion March 11, 2015 Christine Bechtel, chair.
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.
Strategy and Innovation Workgroup: Recommendations on the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan March 4, 2015 David Lansky, Chair Jennifer Covich,
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
August 10, 2011 A Leading Provider of Consulting and Systems Engineering Services to Public Health Organizations.
Exchange: The Central Feature of Meaningful Use Stage Meaningful Use and Health Care Innovation Conference Craig Brammer Office of the National.
Interoperability Updates -National Interoperability Roadmap 8/20/2014 Erica Galvez, ONC Interoperability Portfolio Manager.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 2, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair 1.
1 Manatt Health Solutions NYS Office of Health Information Technology Transformation Academy Health State Health Research and Policy Interest Group 2008.
State Alliance for e-Health Conference Meeting January 26, 2007.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
Draft – discussion only Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup June 23, 2015 Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup March 5, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Consumer Workgroup Interoperability Roadmap Comments Workgroup Discussion March 24, 2015 Christine Bechtel, chair.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.
Why FIDO Matters? Healthcare Tom Groom CEO October 5th, 2015 Confidential.
National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care June 15, 2011 Kana Enomoto Director Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.
Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair December 1, 2015 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force.
U.S. Department of Education Safeguarding Student Privacy Melanie Muenzer U.S. Department of Education Chief of Staff Office of Planning, Evaluation, and.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative (TCPI) An Overview Connie K
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Statewide Radio Feasibility Study (SIRN) Presented by Tom Harris SIEC Chair Mike Ressler.
Nevada State Innovation Model (SIM) Delivery System and Payment Alignment May 6,
Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process
Moving the National Health Information Technology Agenda Forward The Fourth Health Information Technology Summit March 28, 2007 Robert M. Kolodner, MD.
Discussion - HITSC / HITPC Joint Meeting Transport & Security Standards Workgroup October 22, 2014.
Creating an Interoperable Learning Health System for a Healthy Nation Jon White, M.D. Acting Deputy National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator.
Electronic Clinical Quality Measures – Session #1 ONC Resource Center.
Draft – discussion only Consumer Workgroup Christine Bechtel, chair Neil Calman, co-chair December 8, 2014.
S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.
Interoperability Roadmap Implementation, Certification, and Testing Workgroup Liz Johnson, Co-Chair Christopher Ross, Co-Chair February 13, 2015.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology ONC Update for HITSP Board U.S. Department of Health and Human Services John W. Loonsk,
EHealth Initiative Business and Clinical Motivator Work Group January 21, :00 p.m. EDT.
Patient Engagement Today’s presenter:
© 2014 By Katherine Downing, MA, RHIA, CHPS, PMP.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Draft – discussion only Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup February 17, 2015 Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair.
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
What is the Best Way to Select an EHR
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Patient Centered Medical Home
VERMONT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LEADERS
11/7/ :59 PM Pharmacy e-Health Information Technology Collaborative
Health IT Policy Committee Workgroup Evolution
Johns Hopkins Medicine Innovation 2023 Strategic Plan
ONC Update for HITSP Board
Presentation transcript:

Consumer Workgroup February 23, 2014 Michelle Consolazio

Agenda I. Call to Order/Roll Call Michelle Consolazio, Office of the National Coordinator Meeting Objective: Review Interoperability Roadmap II. Review of Agenda Christine Bechtel, Chair III. Interoperability Roadmap Overview including Sections C & D Michelle Consolazio, Office of the National Coordinator IV. Group Discussion V. Next Steps

Upcoming Milestones 3 Kick-off Federal Milestone Joint HITPC/HITSC Meeting Federal HIT Strategic Plan Posted for Comment Interoperability Roadmap Recs prior to posting for comment FACA HIT Strategic Plan Comments Interoperability Roadmap Posted for Comment and charge WG’s with responding HITPC comments on MU3 NPRM HITSC comments on Certification NPRM All workgroups kicked off FACA Milestone FACA Interoperability Roadmap Comments (estimate)

Consumer Draft Workplan MeetingsTask February 10th– HITPC Meeting Draft Federal Health IT Strategic Plan comments to HITPC/ Charged by HITPC with commenting on the Interoperability Roadmap V.1 February 23, :00am Overview and prepare to comment on Interoperability Roadmap V.1 March 10 th – HITPC Meeting Final Federal Health IT Strategic Plan comments to HITPC (tentative) Anticipated date to be charged by the HITPC with commenting on the MU3 NPRM March 11, :30-2:00pm Comment on the Interoperability Roadmap V.1 March 24, :30am Comment on the Interoperability Roadmap V.1 March 30, :30am Finalize comments on Interoperability Roadmap V.1 April 7 th - HITPC Meeting Interoperability Roadmap Comments to the HITPC April 20, :00am Transition to comment on consumer aspect of the MU3 NPRM (anticipated date for planning purposes) April 30, :30am Finalize comments on the MU3 NPRM (anticipated date for planning purposes) May 12 th – HITPC Meeting MU3 NPRM Comments to the HITPC (anticipated date for planning purposes)

HITPC - Consumer WorkgroupConsumer ONC FACA WG Lead(s)Chitra Mohla ONC SMEsAndy Gettinger, Lana Moriarty Chair / Co-Chairs Christine Bechtel, Chair, Bechtel Health Advisory Group General Questions (as they apply to the assigned Roadmap sections) Are the actions proposed in the draft interoperability Roadmap the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Roadmap Sections C. Individuals are empowered to be active managers of their health D. Care providers partner with individuals to deliver high value care Charge / Question(s) Specific questions to follow 5

Process for Responding Review Interoperability Roadmap Comment Develop Consensus Submit Comments to HITPC 6 Roadmap Overview Discuss assigned section and questions Members draft comments offline & submit comments to ONC staff ONC staff aggregates comments Workgroup meets to refine and finalize comments Brief HITPC on final comments Today’s Discussion Feb 23, 2015March 10, 2015 (due to ONC) Mar 24, 2015 Mar 30, 2015 Apr 7, 2015

Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap Overview of the Process and Timeline Initial roadmap development FACA review and recommendations Roadmap released for public comment Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap Version 1.0 Q2/Q

Why Interoperability? Significant progress in digitizing the care experience Consumers increasingly expect and demand real-time access to their electronic health information Evolving delivery and payment models are not only driving appropriate data sharing, but depend on it Successes and promising practices exist and can be built on Technology is rapidly evolving Opportunities to improve care and advance science in a learning health system environment demand rapid action 8

9 DRAFT Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap - Version 0.5 The Vision Broad-scale learning health system Expand interoperable data, users, sophistication, scale Nationwide ability to send, receive, find, use a common clinical data set

Principle-based Interoperability 10 ONC is working to establish a floor, not a ceiling (allow room for innovation) Working to create a system that allows data to move around a person (not just at the encounter) Tried to be as parsimonious as possible for a learning health system that allow the kinds of research that we want This is Version 1.0, we will continue to iterate – just the beginning of the journey Hoping to identify opportunities to allow the private sector be at the forefront (e.g. Argonaut project). How can the federal government work in partnership?

Functional and Business Requirements for a Learning Health System 11 Core technical standards and functions 1.Consistent data formats and semantics 2.Consistent, secure transport technique(s) 3.Standard, secure services 4.Accurate identity matching 5.Reliable resource location Certification to support adoption and optimization of health IT products and services 6. Stakeholder assurance that health IT is interoperable Privacy and security protections for health information 7. Ubiquitous, secure network infrastructure 8. Verifiable identity and authentication of all participants 9. Consistent representation of permission to collect, share, and use identifiable health information 10. Consistent representation of authorization to access health information Supportive business, clinical, cultural, and regulatory environments 11. A supportive business and regulatory environment that encourages interoperability 12. Individuals are empowered to be active managers of their health 13. Care providers partner with individuals to deliver high value care Rules of engagement and governance 14. Shared governance of policy and standards that enable interoperability

12 Supportive business, clinical, cultural, and regulatory environments

A cultural shift at both the individual and provider levels is necessary to empower individuals to participate in their health and care. Topics addressed in this section of the roadmap:  A supportive business and regulatory environment that encourages interoperability  Individuals are empowered to be active managers of their health  Care providers partner with individuals to deliver high value care Supportive business, clinical, cultural, and regulatory environments 13 Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap Draft v1.0 Assigned Sections

Today’s Workgroup Discussion Interoperability Roadmap Building Block: Supportive business, clinical, cultural, and regulatory environments C. Individuals are empowered to be active managers of their health D. Care providers partner with individuals to deliver high value care 14

Interoperability Roadmap Section C Individuals are empowered to be active managers of their health Learning Health System Requirement Individuals are empowered to be active managers of their health: A learning health system is person- centered, enabling individuals to become active partners in their health by not only accessing their electronic health information, but also providing and managing electronic health information through mobile health, wearable devices and online services. Federal Health IT Strategic Plan Objectives Supported Improve health care quality, access and experience through safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable and patient- centered care Improve clinical and community services and population health Empower individual, family and caregiver health management and engagement 15

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve nationwide LHS C1. Cultural change for individuals including demanding and using their electronic health information 1. Call to action: A majority of individuals and their caregivers should demand access to their electronic health information in a format they can use to manage their health or that of others. 2. Call to action: An increasing proportion of individuals and caregivers should demand and ask for access to their electronic health information in a format they can use to manage their health or that of others. 3. Call to action: Individuals should contribute clinically relevant patient- generated health data and request corrections to their electronic health information to effectively manage their interactions with the care delivery system and to manage their health and wellness where they live, work and play 4. Call to action: Individuals and their extended care teams (including family and caregivers) should utilize care planning to capture individual goals and preferences as part of longitudinal health information used across care settings. 5. Call to action: Individuals should regularly access and contribute to their health information in health IT, send and receive electronic health information through a variety of emerging technologies and use the information to manage and participate in shared decision making with their care team.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set C2. Providers and technology developers supporting individual empowerment 1. ONC, government and the industry will identify best practices for the incorporation of patient- generated health data in health care delivery. 2. Call to action: Providers should encourage their patients to access their health information online and will enable patients to view, download and transmit that information to a destination of the patient’s choice. 3. Call to action: Providers and technology developers should provide a majority of individuals with the ability to send and receive their health information and make decisions with the providers of their choice, including but not limited to their existing care team based on their preferences. 4. ONC will work with the technology community to increase the use of Blue Button through implementation of a portfolio of standards to support consistency in the way that individuals receive information. 5. ONC and government ensure that patients understand their ability to access, send and receive health information.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve a nationwide LHS C2. Providers and technology developers supporting individual empowerment 6. Call to action: Providers and technology developers should support the incorporation of patient-generated health data in health care delivery, which may include advance directives, remote monitoring, glucose levels and other data individuals are tracking 7. Call to action: Technology developers should deploy innovative aggregation platforms and tools that allow individuals and caregivers to receive and compile health information from multiple sources in one place, send their data to a destination of their choice and find and use the information they need (as determined by the individual), to support for example, the individual participating in shared decision-making with their care team. 8. Call to action: Providers should welcome and use information from other providers to avoid duplication of tests and ensure coordinated care. 9. Call to action: Providers and health IT developers should provide a majority of individuals/caregivers the ability to contribute as needed to their electronic health information and support the incorporation of patient-generated health data.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve nationwide LHS C3. Privacy and Security for Individuals 1. Call to action: Public and private sector stakeholders should assess whether people understand how to safeguard their health information and the need for resources related to this topic. 2. Call to action: Providers should provide individuals with secure access to their own behavioral health information in a manner that is easy to use and enables them to make choices about disclosure of specific information that is sensitive to the individual and/or legally protected. 3. Call to action: Individuals should be able to trust that their health information (such as that generated/collected via home monitoring devices or other emerging technologies) is protected and secure. 4. ONC and the industry will continue to provide individuals with relevant and updated resources based on current technology to assist with increasing their digital health literacy.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve nationwide LHS C4. Education and digital health literacy for individuals 1. Call to action: Consumer advocacy groups in collaboration with government agencies, associations and payers should develop and disseminate resources (toolkits and best practices) based on consumer needs to assist individuals with increasing their digital health literacy. This supports consumer participation in shared decision making with their care team based on more complete and accurate information 2. ONC, government and the industry should work with individuals to help the majority understand the value of health IT for managing their health by providing individuals with easy resources to assist with increasing their digital health literacy. 3. ONC and the industry should continue to provide individuals with relevant and updated resources based on current technology to assist with increasing their digital health literacy 4. ONC and the industry should work with individuals to ensure that a majority understand the value of sustained engagement in managing their health, supported by health IT. 5. ONC and the industry should continue to provide individuals with relevant and updated resources based on current technology to assist with increasing their digital health literacy.

Interoperability Roadmap Section D Care providers partner with individuals to deliver high value care Learning Health System Requirement Care providers partner with individuals to deliver high value care: Providers share and use information from multiple sources as they transform the way they provide care and engage with patients to routinely assess and incorporate patient preferences and goals into care plans that achieve measurable value for individuals and the population. Federal Health IT Strategic Plan Objectives Supported Protect and promote public health and healthy, resilient communities Empower individual, family and caregiver health management and engagement Improve clinical and community services and population health Support the delivery of high- value health care Improve health care quality, access and experience through safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable and person-centered care 21

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve nationwide LHS D1. Organization/ Governance 1. Call to action: Providers should participate in governance of interoperability at all levels, from regional efforts to nationwide coordinated governance 2. Call to action: Providers should continue to provide input on the evolution of coordinated governance to support a learning health system. 3. Call to action: Providers should remain active in coordinated governance.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set D2. Providers embrace a Culture of Interoperability and work with vendors and other supporting entities to improve interoperability 1. Call to action: Providers should routinely expect electronic access to outside information in the provision of care and engage with other providers to send, receive, find and use health information for their patients. 2. Call to action: Providers should recognize that valuable clinical information about their patients may reside with patients or caregivers themselves and that they may need to incorporate that information into their decision making. 3. Call to action: Providers and their organizations should embrace the use of enabling technologies such as publish/subscribe and query-based exchange with single sign-on to minimize workflow barriers to interoperability. 4. Call to action: Providers and their organizations should ensure contracts and agreements that they sign and re-sign with technology developers include necessary requirements for interoperability, to ensure they can share and incorporate patient information.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Expand interoperable health IT and users D2. Providers embrace a Culture of Interoperability and work with vendors and other supporting entities to improve interoperability 5. Call to action: Providers should routinely access and use health information from other sources, including individuals, when making clinical decisions 6. Call to action: Providers should routinely populate key data when E-prescribing in support of unambiguous prescription for verification, counseling, monitoring and activities of comprehensive medication management. 7. Call to action: Providers and their organizations should work with necessary parties to configure systems to alert providers to the presence of relevant information from other sources and make it conveniently available to the provider. 8. Call to action: Providers and their organizations should work with necessary parties to configure systems so that the presentation of information to providers is configurable based on use case, provider specialty and other characteristics, to facilitate usability and patient safety.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Achieve nationwide LHS D2. Providers embrace a Culture of Interoperabili ty and work with vendors and other supporting entities to improve interoperabili ty 9. Call to action: Providers should practice in a new way, with a new culture of electronic health information sharing, access and use for both clinicians and institutions is firmly established. 10. Call to action: Providers should routinely use and have access to robust and clinically relevant decision support (e.g. for medication management). 11. Call to action: Providers should regularly use and have access to the most relevant, integrated information, appropriate notifications. 12. Call to action: Providers should receive and provide continuous feedback to support the improvement of decision-making, care processes and outcomes. 13. Call to action: Providers should use new evidence-based guidelines and tools for care that are disseminated rapidly to providers through decision support and other timely and context-sensitive pathways.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve nationwide LHS D3. Accurate Measurement 1. Call to action: Providers should leverage data beyond their internal systems for population health analytics and quality measurement (eCQMs) including supporting value- based payment models. 2. Call to action: Providers and other stakeholders should use standard metrics of interoperability to monitor and track improvement. 3. Call to action: Providers and other stakeholders should use standard metrics for interoperability and health outcomes to improve clinical care and processes. 4. Call to action: Providers should be able to report on measures based on the most representative data available about each patient. 5. Call to action: Public and private stakeholders should objectively measure and value interoperability and information sharing as an indicator of care coordination, quality and efficiency. 6. Call to action: Providers should be able to report on measures based on more complete and consistent representative data about each patient.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve nationwide LHS D4. Interoperability of processes and workflows 1. Call to action: Providers should routinely leverage standards-based health IT to support prioritized workflows including: o Closed loop transitions of care o Secure clinical communications o Prior authorizations, medication co-pays and imaging appropriateness o CPOE for services and diagnostic testing o e-prescribing of controlled substances with concurrent availability of PDMP data 2. Call to action: Providers should engage with an expanded set of interoperable workflows, including: o Plug-and-play clinical decision support services o Electronic consultations o Reporting to specialty society registries o Reporting to value-based payment programs o e-prescribing supported by complete medication fill history o Discovery and incorporation of information from patient- owned devices with tools for reconciliation and validation o Recommendation of patients to relevant studies and trials o Exchange of information to support comprehensive medication management and MTM services 3. Call to action: Providers should leverage a robust library of interoperable workflows to support care processes across the continuum of care, including tools for integration, reconciliation and validation of external information.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve nationwide LHS D5. Training and maintenance of certification for providers 1. Call to action: Public and private stakeholders should incorporate interoperability into the training of new providers and continuing professional education. 2. Call to action: Professional specialty boards and other certifying bodies should agree on standards for interoperable registries and maintenance of certification. 3. Call to action: Public and private stakeholders should agree on a way in which to measure progress and competency of trainees is evaluated and scored using interoperable, standards based clinical information. 4. Call to action: Professional specialty boards and other certifying bodies should receive most of the information required from their diplomats through information exchanged in a standard format. 5. Call to action: Professional specialty boards should utilize standardized electronic data and formats to populate registries.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve nationwide LHS D6. Innovation and Generation of New Knowledge and Evidence 1. Call to action: Providers currently engaged in clinical research and quality improvement should work together with research institutions and other public and private stakeholders to establish a strategic plan for research and the generation of new knowledge. 2. Call to action: Providers should further engage with the research community and should routinely offer patients and families participation in research and quality improvement programs. 3. Call to action: Community or region-wide Institutional Review Boards should ensure that the appropriate patient protections are in place to conduct multi- sourced clinical research. 4. Call to action: Researchers, providers and other stakeholders should accelerate and measure the pace of innovation and research, as well as the dissemination of new knowledge to improve health and care. 5. Call to action: Technology developers should enable patient- centered and future clinical research methods for accelerated deployment of research findings into clinical care.

Questions for Workgroup Discussion Are the actions the right actions to improve interoperability nationwide in the near term while working toward a learning health system in the long term? What, if any, gaps need to be addressed? Is the timing of specific actions appropriate? Are the right actors/stakeholders associated with critical actions? Category Send, receive, find and use a common clinical data set Expand interoperable health IT and users Achieve nationwide LHS D7. Transparency of Value and engagement of patients, families, and caregivers 1. Call to action: Providers should work together with purchasers of care to have access to patient out-of-pocket costs and those of payers and purchasers. Providers are engaged in regional efforts to measure quality and maximize value. 2. Call to action: Providers should offer and encourage access to medical records and secure communications with all patients and any family and caregivers who are authorized to engage in such communications. 3. Call to action: Providers should support consumers in downloading or transmitting their health information to a destination of their choice. 4. Call to action: Providers should routinely utilize cost and quality data to make shared diagnostic and treatment planning decisions. 5. Call to action: Providers should work together with purchasers of care to develop, test and implement appropriate and credible indicators of value. 6. Call to action: Providers should support consumer-facing services such as: o Online scheduling o Medication refill requests o Electronic/Telehealth Visits o Patient provided device data, screenings and assessments o Informed consent and education modules o Integration of patient- generated health data in the medical record o Patient-defined goals of care o Shared care planning 7. Call to action: Providers should demonstrate the value of their care to those who receive and pay for it using objective, trusted metrics. 8. Call to action: Providers and individuals should work together to substantially reduce the burden of care coordination through patient-centered tools and sharing and use of electronic health information. 9. Call to action: Individuals should interact easily and seamlessly with their care team as they transition into and out of the health care system, communicating remotely with their care team as needed over time, rather than only in face-to- face care situations.

Next Steps Workgroup members to draft comments on sections C & D using ONC comments template Deliver comments to ONC by March 4, 2015 ONC staff synthesize comments Discuss comments on upcoming workgroup calls to reach consensus Deliver final comments to HITPC April 7,