Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to the World of Compliance
Advertisements

Principle 13 Community Engagement/ Game Environment.
Principle 12 Institutional Self-Study Guide. January, 2009 Each Division II institution shall conduct a comprehensive self-study and evaluation of its.
1. NCAA Division III Financial Aid Reporting Program and Self-Assessment 2012.
Springfield Public Schools  Provide an awareness regarding NCAA qualification  Ensure student-athletes understand the importance of the ACT.
Developing a Gender Equity Action Plan Judith M. Sweet Former Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services and Senior Woman Administrator.
Lincoln University NCAA Rules Education.  Sources of financial aid.  Exempted aid.  Financial aid from outside sources.  Reduction and cancellation.
Using Your Faculty Manual …Talking Manual With Your Chair - Dr. Rasoul Saneifard.
Review of 2015 NCAA Convention Proposals Southeast Region Compliance Seminar November 2014.
Principle 2 Chancellor/President Oversight. January, 2009 A model Division II member institution’s Chancellor/ President sets forth a vision for the institution’s.
Origins, Development, and Current Structure. Origins President Swain’s weekly faculty meetings l Student absences and misbehavior discussed l Trial of.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Natasha Oakes and Leslie Schuemann. 1. Session Outcomes. 2. Learning Objectives. 3. Compliance Concepts. 4. Resources.
DIVISION I GOVERNANCE UPDATE Brandy Hataway Kris Richardson 1.
February 15, 2011 PRESENTED BY THE VIRGINIA TECH OFFICE OF ATHLETICS COMPLIANCE.
Coaches Meeting March Agenda Around the NCAA Legislation Update – Awards – New Proposals Grant-in-Aid Agreements Technology.
National Association of Division III Athletic Administrators Round Table Topics and Discussion Questions 2006 NCAA Convention.
Oversight of Intercollegiate Athletics At Western Michigan University.
DIVISION II AND III INSTITUTIONS WITH DIVISION I SPORTS – FOUNDATIONAL Kristen Matha & Alex Smith 2015 Regional Rules.
Principle 14 Finances and Sports Sponsorship. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be administered with prudent management and fiscal.
Principle 10 Diversity and Inclusion. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the principle of diversity and inclusion.
Principle 16 Life Skills. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the total development of a student-athlete’s life.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit January, 2009.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Principle 15 Continuing Education and Professional Development.
Principle 8 Athletic Trainers. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an adequate number of certified athletic trainers (per.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Auburn University Athletics Compliance Program Susan Bazemore Krissy Ellis Bernard Hill Jamie Funk Diana Martin Rich McGlynn David Mines.
NCAA Division III Bylaw 15 – Financial Aid Brandy Hataway Jeff Myers.
Clearing Hurdles: Maintaining an Ongoing Relationship between Academic and Athletic Advisors NACADA Conference Denver, CO October 5, 2011 Kevin Jerrolds.
Conference USA Head Coaches Responsibility. What’s On Our Agenda Today? Rationale for rule change NCAA Bylaw Triggers of the Rule Promoting an.
Admissions/Registrars & Athletics: How To Make It Work! Anthony Gallina, Coordinator, Undergraduate Admissions – Oakland University Christopher Goeth,
Monthly Rules Education Session November 2011 Best Practices 1.
Division II Features-12 Reasons to Believe 1. Graduation Rates. Division II’s student-athlete graduation rate is consistently 10 to 15 percentage points.
Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Report to the University Senate March 6, 2007.
BOSTON COLLEGE ATHLETICS DEPT. COMPLIANCE OFFICE Beginning of the Year Coaches Meeting August, 28, 2007.
Carol Bonner Athletic Certification Specialist Robert Morris University.
Michigan State University Athletic Council Report January 27, 2015.
Principle 9 Academic Success. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the academic success of its student-athletes,
Principle 1 Integration and Institutional Control.
Athletics Certification Orientation. Orientation Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits Committee Philosophy Second Cycle Issues Technology Athletics Certification.
Athletics Certification Orientation Presentation.
Principle 17 Assessment. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a tool that is used as a written assessment each year to measure.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility in establishing a culture of compliance.
Principle 6 Coach’s Role. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
Principle 7 SAAC Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns.
BOSTON COLLEGE ATHLETICS DEPT. COMPLIANCE OFFICE Beginning of the Year Coaches Meeting August 26, 2008.
NCAA INFORMATION Athletic scholarships can be offered by Division I and Division II colleges Division III schools do not award athletic scholarships –DIII.
Principle 5 SWA Involvement or Fifth Representative to the Governance Structure.
Kellianne Milliner, Assistant Athletics Director for Compliance, Academic and Student Services Terry Beattie, Associate Athletics Director for Facilities.
Student-Athlete Advising Round Table – Fall 2010.
Steve Chen & William Salazar. Morehead State University 2009 AAHPERD Convention Tampa, Florida NCAA 101: Institutional Control and Academic Integrity for.
Faculty Governance Origins, Development, and Current Structure.
Principle 11 Compliance. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full- time compliance coordinator whose primary responsibility.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns and ideas of the institution’s student-athletes.
The Faculty Athletics Committee Update Friday, December 7, 2012.
N A T I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N O F I N T E R C O L L E G I A T E A T H L E T I C S Recruiting Prospective Students.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Purpose and Benefits.
NCAA Division III Institutional Performance Program Eric Hartung Nicole Hollomon Erin Irick.
Principle 19 Communication/ Campus Relationships.
Trust, Accountability and Integrity: Board Responsibility for
Eric Brey Kelly Brummett Katy Yurk
Athletics Information for Recruited Varsity Student-Athletes
Playing Sports in College
Principle 2: CEO Oversight
NCAA Compliance & Financial Aid
Playing Sports in College
Principle 4: FAR Involvement
What Presidents Need to Know About Intercollegiate Athletics
Presentation transcript:

Principle 4 FAR Involvement

January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative as the key institutional liaison to the athletics department, and should be supported and funded by the institution to perform these functions. The involvement of the FAR should include eligibility or academic related duties, maintaining an atmosphere of compliance and institutional control, and assisting in investigations of rules compliance. The FAR should also serve as a key contact for student-athletes. (Learning, Service, Resourcefulness) 4

January, 2009 FAR Involvement FAR reports directly to CEO and serves advisory role with athletics committee and AD Certifies athletics eligibility, administers coaches’ certification test, monitors countable hours Active role in institutional rules compliance program and self- reporting process Involved in Institutional Self-Study Guide Process 4

January, 2009 FAR Involvement Oversight of academic and personal welfare of student-athletics, and attends SAAC Meetings Represents the institution at conference and NCAA meetings Submits nominations for NCAA Post- Graduate scholarships and academic awards Serves on Financial Aid Hearing Committee in any case involving athletics-related financial aid 4

January, 2009 FAR Involvement Serves on any athletics department search committees Supports “conflict of avoidance” scheduling DII FAR Best Practices Web site Others: visible to student-athletes, serves on AD administration team, oversight of institutional waivers and appeals, involved in all investigations and violations, report regularly to faculty senate 4