TODAY Concept Formation Graphic Organizers Mind Maps Concept Maps Do one.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bloom's Taxonomy.
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
The Language of Math November 3, Second Check-In  My name is ___ & I am (role).  I am feeling _______ today because ____.  The biggest challenge.
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Graphic Intelligence: Integrating Graphic Organizers and Connecting that Integration to Assessment Playing with Possibilities: Beirut 2012.
Framing Questions The Missing Think. Rationale … Most teachers do not frame questions effectively.
Intellectual Challenge of Teaching
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
The 5 E Instructional Model
Cooperative Learning … … & Self Regulated Learning.
Classroom Instruction That Works
Concept Attainment Inquiry Lessons.  Is used to teach concepts, patterns and abstractions  Brings together the ideas of inquiry, discovery and problem-solving.
Connecting Thinking to Self Regulated Learning. And now … our expert on thinking.
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
Evaluation: A Challenging Component of Teaching Darshana Shah, PhD. PIES
ELA: Focus on Informational Text FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Lari Miller-Powell & Sara Parenzin March 22, 2012.
Graphic Intelligence: Playing with Possibilities.
Our First Steps! Sheltered Instruction Center for the Education and Study of Diverse Populations at New Mexico Highlands University.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
The Beginning Teacher’s Program Curriculum Alignment Prepared & Presented by Ngaire Tagney.
We learned about what powerful social studies instruction entails According to the NCSS social studies is most powerful when it is: Meaningful – Students.
CWSEI Workshop 2 Interventions. Goals of workshop 1. Articulate your own reasons for (or against) using clickers/in class exercises in YOUR class. 2.
MATH 90 CURRICULUM RENEWAL & MATH MAKES SENSE 9 WORKSHOP June 25th, 2010.
PRIJ 3030 Planning- Session 8
Session 2 Learning Outcomes: articulating our expectations Active Learning Initiative Patrick A. Frantom, Ph.D. Department of Chemistry Adapted from Driscoll,
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
“In years to come, your students may forget what you taught them
Enhancing SIOP ACT-ESL Post-seminar Thursday, April 22, 2010, 3:30-6:30 pm Meadowbrook High School 1.
1 Code User: Breaking the Code SESSION 3 Thinking about Thinking: Setting the Stage for Independent Reading.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
New teacher toolkit: Learning objectives (TCRP 1.1)
Reading Strategies To Improve Comprehension Empowering Gifted Children.
Blooms Taxonomy Margaret Gessler Werts Department of Language, Reading, and Exceptionalities.
Assessment & Self Regulated Learning
Shake it up, baby! Differentiation in middle and high school classrooms. Tanya B. O’Berry.
Adolescent Literacy Cadre February 2, 2010 Jane Awtry & Marnie Leiferman AEA 13 Reading Consultants.
Instruction and Technology November 24, First… Sign attendance sheet. 2. Place name tent on CPU 3. Open class wiki at
Chapter 4. Chapter 4 Determining Learning Outcomes 1. LEARNING OUTCOMES 2. ASSESSMENT 3. TEACHING 4. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOP MATERIALS Buy – Adapt - Develop.
INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES
IST_Seminar II CHAPTER 12 Instructional Methods. Objectives: Students will: Explain the role of all teachers in the development of critical thinking skills.
Dine and Dish Wednesday, October 30, 2013 According to the National Reading Panel, what are the most effective reading strategies ?
St. Louis Area Curriculum Coordinator’s Association.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Instructional Delivery Part II of III: A Framework Judy Johnston, LaVonne Kunkel, and Steve.
February 28.  Unit plans feedback (that I have completed)  Expectations for reflections  Pre-Internship Expectations  Questions you always wanted.
Karen Viskupic Department of Geosciences Boise State University Writing Learning Outcomes November 2014.
Classroom Strategies That Work. Questions, Cues, and Advance Organizers Helping Students Activate Prior Knowledge.
Karen Viskupic Department of Geosciences Boise State University (but you have to suffer through Stuart presenting) Writing Learning Outcomes June 2015.
Original Terms New Terms
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Inquiry is Magic AQUARIUS: Find a guide who will ask you questions you never expected. Take the road that winds with surprise. Travel with an inquiring.
 Teaching and learning are “VISIBLE”- that is, when it is clear what teachers are teaching and what students are learning, student achievement increases.
NETA Power Point Slides to accompany: Prepared by Luigi Iannacci Trent University Copyright © 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd.
Teachers Reflecting On Practices In Contexts–Instructional Intelligence Acknowledgements to WA Central Institute, Barrie Bennett and Peter Smilanich.
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
Teacher in Residence WELCOME BACK! Happy New Year! Please sign in and check your homework folders Find your seat with your table group.
Differentiation through 4MAT
 Processing New Information Learning Content in Digestible Bites.
Learning & Teaching.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity
Jared Mader Red Lion Area School District Thursday, March 25, 2010
Contemporary Issues November 8, 2010.
Differentiated Learning
Q uality uestioning Henrico County Public Schools
Writing Learning Outcomes
What you assess makes a statement about what you value
Presentation transcript:

TODAY Concept Formation Graphic Organizers Mind Maps Concept Maps Do one

Class Seven/Six in syllabus Questions Concept Formation Graphic Organizers Mind Maps Concept Maps Do one Find info on PWIM on internet; be prepared to share

Graphic Organizers… Focus on Mind Maps and Concept Maps

Agenda Questions Inductive and Deductive Thinking Graphic Organizers - organize them Mind Maps Concept Maps Do yours How this connects to Curriculum and Assessment

Overview of Instructional Intelligence Instructional intelligence involves: Knowledge of the learner Knowledge of the learner Knowledge of curriculum Knowledge of curriculum Knowledge of assessment Knowledge of assessment Knowledge of instruction Knowledge of instruction Knowledge of change Knowledge of change Knowledge of systemic change Knowledge of systemic change

Seamless

Coil-cogs

CBAM (Concerns Based Adoption Model) Levels of Use Non-User Orientation Preparation Mechanical Routine Refined Integrative Refocusing Levels of Concern No Concerns Awareness Information Personal Impact on Students Collaborative

You need to understand ‘types’ of thinking and ‘levels’ of thinking Types of Thinking Inductive Deductive Ranking Predicting Sequence Inquiry Prioritizing Identify Levels of Thinking Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge

So in terms of Curriculum the teacher must… Understand objectives Understand what level of thinking is explicit - the level the student will be assessed at Understand what level of thinking is implicit - the level you have to teach at Understand what type of thinking is required Match that knowledge to instructional methods Assess meaningfully

Overview of Instructional Intelligence Instructional intelligence involves: Knowledge of the learner Knowledge of curriculum Knowledge of assessment Knowledge of instruction Knowledge of change Knowledge of systemic change

One component of “Knowledge of Instruction” is … Graphic Organizers

Objective for this session… Extend our understanding of and ability to apply two complex graphic organizers: Mind Mapping and Concept Mapping. In addition, to sense how to integrate multiple graphic organizers BY using concept attainment and a Venn diagram, watching a video on Mind Mapping and creating a Concept Map

What do you already know? With a partner, take about two minutes and identify all the graphic organizers you have seen and hopefully experienced.

Compare your list with this list - and there is no doubt more. Fish Bone, Concept Map, Mind Map, Flow Chart, Time Line, Word Web, Venn Diagram, Ranking Ladder etc.

LET’S PLAY WITH ONE

Ranking Graphic Organizers According to their Complexity Please rank the graphic organizers below using a Ranking Ladder. Fish Bone, Concept Map, Mind Map, Flow Chart, Time Line, Word Web, Venn Diagram, Ranking Ladder

RANKING LADDER

One Perspective Concept Map Mind Map Fish Bone Venn Diagram Ranking Ladder Time Line Flow Chart Word Web

What type of thinking and level of thinking do Mind Maps and Concept Maps Invoke?

‘TYPES’ of thinking and ‘LEVELS’ of thinking Types of Thinking Inductive Deductive Ranking Predicting Sequence Inquiry Prioritizing Levels of Thinking Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge

GIVEN Concept Maps and Mind Maps (if done properly) ask students to first identify what they know and then classify that knowledge into categories -- therefore -- it must be analysis re levels of thinking and inductive thinking regarding types of thinking.

Critical Attributes of Mind Maps and Concept Maps DIRECTIONS: )Clear off tables )Analyze Mind Maps or Concept Maps )Identify the critical attributes of MM or CM )Switch tables and do the same )Create Venn Diagram )Compare with another table )Share with larger group )Listen to mini-lecture/group discussion

Venn Diagram Mind MapConcept Map

2 Dimensional and 3 Dimensional Shapes: What do they have in common? 2 Dimensional3 Dimensional

Venn Diagram Mind MapConcept Map Start in centre Radiate out Colour Pictures Start at top Linking words on line Hierarchical Cross Links

Mind Maps and Concept Maps )Mind Maps )Start in the centre )Radiate out hierarchically )Key words (concepts) )Images )Colour )Cross Links )Concept Maps )Usually start at the top )Radiates down/out hierarchically )Key words (concepts) )Linking words )Cross links with words

How are the linking words on the left different from those on the right? has contains includes such as for example may have found in are part ofare transforms enhances destroys digests activates needs controls magnifies increases transports reflects breaks down made up of TESTERS

Linking Words … how are the blue linking words different from the red? Trees need Roots Mirrorsreflect Light Forks and Spoons Protagonist however Did Not Muscles act like Levers Triangles have 3 angles Rocks in the Soil Bearsas well asRaccoons

Linking Word Testers Blue or Red? plantsrequirewater magnetsattract most metals planets including the moon cars have engines poetry such as haiku verbs can be conjugated explorers are courageous frictioncausesheat foodon thetable

Linking Word Testers Blue or Red? plantsrequirewater magnetsattract most metals planets including the moon cars have engines poetry such as haiku verbs can be conjugated explorers are courageous frictioncausesheat foodon thetable

Two Types of Linking Words Descriptive or Passive: they illustrate the students ability to recall and comprehend relationships between two concepts Cause and Effect or Dynamic: they illustrate the students ability to analyze, synthesize or evaluate relationships between two concepts

Knowledge of Instruction )Instructional concepts )Instructional skills )Instructional tactics )Instructional Strategies )Instructional Organizers

Knowledge of Instruction … Mind Maps and Concept Maps are… )Instructional Strategies

Assessment )For learning (formative) )Of learning (summative) )Matching our instruction with our assessment )Applying instruction in assessment )Where do graphic organizers fit?

a sample provincial outcome By the end of grade six students will demonstrate their understanding of the four types of motion: oscillating, linear, reciprocating, and rotational. This has explicit and implicit implications.

Explicit Level of Thinking re assessment This outcome tells kids they will be assessed at the comprehension level of Bloom’s Taxonomy -- they will have to explain each in their own words and be able to generate examples of each type of motion

Implicit level at which the teacher will have to teach This outcome also informs teachers that they will most likely have to teach it at the analysis level of thinking re Bloom’s Taxonomy as the students will have to understand the similarities and differences between the four types of motion. SO…

What type of thinking does this outcome encourage? Inductive thinking -- the students will have to classify the different types of motion -- so, give them some pictures, say 4 or 5 of each, put the pictures in an envelop, have the students work in pairs to classify them -- then do a Jigsaw on each of the four -- then do a Venn Diagram or Fish Bone or Mind Map on the 4 types of motion

What instructional methods do you have that push analysis? Venn Diagrams Fish Bone Diagrams Mind Maps (chapter 10) Concept Maps (chapter 10) Concept Attainment (chapter 8) Concept Formation (chapter 9)