Agenda Project Overview Project Background What is the GCPR Framework Project Schedule and Phases Phases Schedule Functionality/Scope Physical View Key.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise
Advertisements

GCPR Framework Project Orientation April Todays Presentation zG-CPR Organization and Framework Project zQuestions and Comments.
Supporting National e-Health Roadmaps WHO-ITU-WB joint effort WSIS C7 e-Health Facilitation Meeting 13 th May 2010 Hani Eskandar ICT Applications, ITU.
Christopher Carr Director of Informatics, RSNA
HelsIT 2010 Alberto Sáez Torres Sacyl Interoperability Office Junta de Castilla y León Experience of ePrescription in Spain using HL7 V3 September 21 th,
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Central Data Exchange EPA E-Authentication Pilot NOLA Network Node Workshop February 28, 2005.
DICOM and Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise: Five years of cooperation and mutual influence Charles Parisot Chair, NEMA Committee for advancement of.
1 Consolidated Health Informatics “CHI” HIPAA Summit March 9, 2004.
NHIN Specifications Richard Kernan, NHIN Specification Lead (Contractor), Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Karen Witting, Contractor to.
Notes to the presenter. I would like to thank Jim Waldo, Jon Bostrom, and Dennis Govoni. They helped me put this presentation together for the field.
1 THE HEALTH iNNOVATOR An Integrated Care Record Service The Durham & Darlington Approach The Simulator.
AHCCCS/ASU Clinical Data Project March 17 th, 2009 Arizona Health Care Cost Containment Health System Medicaid Transformation Grant Program.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Business Intelligence Dr. Mahdi Esmaeili 1. Technical Infrastructure Evaluation Hardware Network Middleware Database Management Systems Tools and Standards.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise IHE Technical Committee Status IHE ITI Plan Committee - February 2004.
Load Test Planning Especially with HP LoadRunner >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
Clinic Security and Policy Enforcement in Windows Server 2008.
HIE Implementation in Michigan for Improved Health As approved by the Michigan Health Information Technology Commission on March 4, 2009.
Overview Master Person Index/Identity Management VHA Beth Franchi, RHIA Data Quality Program Director, OI Sara Temlitz Business Product Manager, Data Quality,
Collaborative Direct-- Status Update December 6, 2013 Don Jorgenson Inpriva, Inc.
Initial slides for Layered Service Architecture
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
S New Security Developments in DICOM Lawrence Tarbox, Ph.D Chair, DICOM WG 14 (Security) Siemens Corporate Research.
Dao Dinh Kha National Centre of Digital Signature Authentication - Agency of Information Technology Application A vision on a national Electronic Authentication.
VistA Imaging: An Update on IHS Activity and Directions Mark Carroll, MD; Janis Sollenbarger.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Audit Trail and Node Authentication Robert Horn Agfa Healthcare.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Overview of IHE IT Infrastructure Patient Synchronized Applications.
UNCLASSIFIED Joint and Coalition Warfighting Mr. John Vinett March 2012 Technical Baseline Capability.
HL7 HL7  Health Level Seven (HL7) is a non-profit organization involved in the development of international healthcare.
Integration Profiles - Overview Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise G. Claeys Agfa Healthcare R&D, Technology Manager Vendor co-chair IHE Europe Courtesy.
Interoperability Updates -National Interoperability Roadmap 8/20/2014 Erica Galvez, ONC Interoperability Portfolio Manager.
GCPR Near-Term Solution System Design Review John Leslie PRC Health Informatics Systems & Services Chief Architect GCPR Project.
Module 7: Fundamentals of Administering Windows Server 2008.
1 Collaboration and Concept Exploration Nationwide Health Information Organization (NHIO) Gateway March 28, 2007.
ITS Program Update Moving Towards Implementation of Wireless Connectivity in Surface Transportation Talking Freight Webinar January 19, 2011.
Connecting for Health: Common Framework. 2 What is Connecting for Health? Broad-based, public-private coalition More than 100 collaborators –Providers.
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Overview of IHE IT Infrastructure Patient Synchronized Applications.
OOI CI LCA REVIEW August 2010 Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Architecture Overview Michael Meisinger Life Cycle Architecture Review.
DICOM and ISO/TC215 Hidenori Shinoda Charles Parisot.
0 Connectathon 2009 Registration Bob Yencha Webinar | August 28, 2008 enabling healthcare interoperability.
Government Computerized Patient Record Framework Project January 8,
Capital Beltway Operational Test August Capital Beltway Operational Test 2 Op Test Overview I-95 portion of the Capital Beltway Multi-jurisdiction.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 3b National and International Standards Developing.
NMI End-to-End Diagnostic Advisory Group BoF Fall 2003 Internet2 Member Meeting.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Patient Identifier Cross-referencing Charles PARISOT GE Healthcare.
HIT Standards Committee Overview and Progress Report March 17, 2010.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD)
25 April Unified Cryptologic Architecture: A Framework for a Service Based Architecture Unified Cryptologic Architecture: A Framework for a Service.
VA-DoD Health IT Sharing: Collaboration Among Agencies Mr. Fred McLain (VA) April 18, 2006.
Information Resource Stewardship A suggested approach for managing the critical information assets of the organization.
SAGE Nick Beard Vice President, IDX Systems Corp..
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology ONC Update for HITSP Board U.S. Department of Health and Human Services John W. Loonsk,
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise The IHE Process: Developing Standards-based Solutions Kevin O’Donnell Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Committee.
CCS Information for Mental Health John Turp Clinical Systems Project Manager.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Retrieve Information for Display (RID) Integration Profile Ellie Avraham Kodak Health Imaging IHE IT Infrastructure.
What IHE Delivers Healthcare Provider Directories IHE IT Infrastructure Planning Committee Eric Heflin - Medicity.
Secure Access and Mobility Jason Kunst, Technical Marketing Engineer March 2016 Location Based Services with Mobility Services Engine ISE Location Services.
Pennsylvania Health Information Exchange NJHIMSS - DVHIMSS Enabling Healthcare Transformation Through Information Technology September, 2010.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise
Unit 5 Systems Integration and Interoperability
Managing Clinical Information: EHR Terms and Architecture
HIMSS National Conference New Orleans Convention Center
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
ONC Update for HITSP Board
Presentation transcript:

Agenda Project Overview Project Background What is the GCPR Framework Project Schedule and Phases Phases Schedule Functionality/Scope Physical View Key Components

GCPR Program Vision Improve public and individual health status by sharing clinical information

Framework Goals & Objectives The GCPR Framework Project was conceived to establish the standards and technical infrastructure required to provide secure access to electronic clinical information on a shared patient population. The framework will consist of a suite of software and hardware tool sets and services designed to –Create a secure technical environment for sharing sensitive information –Develop a patient-focused information technology architecture –Create common information and terminology models to ensure interoperability between disparate systems –Adopt and adhere to standards where they exist and to advance the development and establishment of standards where they are absent –Leverage existing agency and inter-agency systems and workgroup investments

Why a joint effort? Presidential Executive Directive Congressional interest/legislation Parallel agency activities Economic pressures “It Makes sense”

What are the problems? Medical Treatment Facilities are heritage stovepipes Medical information gathered during deployment is lost Government patients receive healthcare from a variety of sources that don’t interchange information Patient information is not transferred when a patient’s status changes –Active Duty, Reserves, Retirement

What is GCPR Framework? The “CPR” in GCPR is misleading It is not a CPRS, CDR, EIS or Clinical Application Although it can enable exchange between such systems It is a component-based infrastructure for the secure information interchange between disparate systems Information Interchange Infrastructure What’s that mean?

What is GCPR Framework? (Cont.) Information Currently clinical information and patient demographics Architecture is information independent Interchange Not a data repository (temporary cache) Virtual record assembler Infrastructure Middleware and the platforms to run the middleware Common Services for the enterprise Non-application specific

Framework Project Phasing GCPR Framework Program Initiated in 1998 SOO (RFP) Release to D/SIDDOMS Primes May 1998 Litton/PRC Award August 1998 Phase I development work began April 1999 Prototype Completed March 2000 Phase II (stage 1 and 2) - Pilot development and test began April 1, 2000 Phase II (stage 3 and 4) alpha & beta testing (FY 2001) Phase III Multi year deployment

Current Program Schedule PHASES NODES MILESTONES SCHEDULE STAGE SITES ACTIVITIES PHASES / EVENTS / DEVELOPMENT & DEPLOYMENT IIIIII PrototypePilotProof of Concept Alaska Alpha Sites BetaAlphaPhased Deployment Stage 4 (Jun-Sep 01) Stage 3 (Jan-Jun 01) Stage 2 (Apr - Oct 00) Stage 1 (Mar 00) January 00 Stage 1 (Oct 01- Sep 02) Stage 2 (Oct 02 - Sep 03) Pilot Test Albuquerque Bay Pines Chantilly Development Node (0)Field Node (1) Protoype Acceptance Testing Selected Beta Sites

Phase I Results Prototype Acceptance Test Validated Architecture and Core Technology Current level of Functionality - Prototype –MPI Interoperability & Dynamic Updates –Demographic Data Retrieval –Lab Results Exchange –Terminology Mediation - Multiple output contexts –Security –Wide-area secure communications Stood up and refined processes

Pilot Planning Pilot is a functional release Pilot Testing Scheduled for January 2001 Test Environment (Bay Pines, Albuquerque, Chantilly) Pilot software baseline will be used to start Alpha Test –Demographics –Outpatient Pharmacy –Labs

Draft Scope Statement for Pilot The scope of Pilot will be to conduct a rigorous, robust test of a deployable information interchange infrastructure that supports identified common reference models, framework infrastructure middleware, data management, security and internal/external interfaces. At the same time it is essential to demonstrate the accurate secure movement of clinical data to the user, through more complete clinical area functionality, i.e. the completion of specific laboratory functions and simple outpatient medications.

Alpha Test ‘Current’ target May 2001 Agency Requirements –Site selection –Technical support –Functional support –CHCS II, VISTA, RPMS interface schemes (live system/test partition/mirror) CHCS II installed at Alaska Sites –Test scenario agreed to, security issues resolved –LAN/WAN interface –MPI and database population –Code sets current

Key Components Common Information Models Common Terminology Models Federated Master Patient Index (MPI) Security Services Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Cache Services Virtual Database Mediation Services Interface Engines Telecommunications Trigger Events Query Capabilities Open System & COTS Based Web-based Technologies & Internet Backbone Object Oriented Solutions

Security Protects patient and provider rights Provider access controlled by “Role” Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) compliant Meets legislative, regulatory, policy standards Encrypted transactions Adaptable to individual agency business rules

Security: Role Based Access Role Determines What is Displayed –Primary Care Manager has full access –Other providers have support access as required to perform their clinical role –Administrative personnel have limited access when required Data not permanently stored in GCPR Framework –Retrieved if authorized (from heritage system) –Data kept for limited period in cache (business rule defined)

Overall Privacy Architecture Two regions in the Framework –User Region: Only data displayable to the requesting user will exist here. –Trusted Region: All data sent to the Framework will be here Domain Access controls passage of data from Trusted Region to the user Region RAD is the basis of the consent checking

EMPI Enterprise Master Patient Index Framework PIDS ID Person, Demographics Mediation Clinical Terminology Observation Collector (ODBC, COAS) Heritage System Servers Framework LQS Agency System as Clients CHCS II, Vista, RPMS SQLCOAS JNDI VistA CHCS II RPMS Framework COAS Patient Records Framework Access Session,User,Security, etc Privacy Consent, Access Policies Cache Patient Records HL7 MPI Master Patient Index PIDS CORBACOAS LDAP

Lessons Learned Meetings multiply at a rate twice that of rabbits Pizza is more enjoyable when eaten less than 4 times a week Software developers and bananas ripen after 48 hours in a warm room Time exists so everything doesn’t happen at once Everything seems to happen at once anyway Getting two OO Guru’s to agree is only slightly harder than communicating with the dead The difference between theory and practice is much smaller in theory than it is in practice

Questions/Discussion