Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Private Use Networks SIG Paper Review 08-04-08 TPTF Meeting (version 08-04-08 9:15)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Advertisements

Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Raine Cotton  Registered DG settlement is in accordance with Protocol Section as Real-Time Energy Imbalance at a Load.
TPTF Presentation Registration of PUN Facilities December 19, 2007.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Split Generation Resources (SGRs) (Also known as Jointly Owned.
1 Market Trials Open Market Participant Call Weekly Kick Off Aug 16, 2010.
October 22, 2007 TPTF Meeting Early Delivery Systems Status Update and Forecast Daryl Cote/John Webb/John Hall.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
Sai Moorty ERCOT Integration Options into ERCOT systems.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Requirement Documents November 7, 2006 Sai Moorty MMS Project.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy Management System Requirement Documents December 5, 2006 Jay Dondeti EMS Project.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
ROS Meeting – 12/06/071Texas Nodal Program - TPTF Update Texas Nodal Transition Plan Task Force ROS Meeting Stacy Bridges, ERCOT Thursday, 12/06/2007.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Resource Node Locations WMS Meeting.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
Nodal MIS Portal Project MIS Functions to Support EDS 3, Release 5 September 11, 2007.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations May 8, 2012 – COPS Meeting May 9, 2012 – WMS.
Market Participant Data Access 1 Market Participant Data Access Jan Stephen Kerr.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
July 10, 2008 ROS Early Delivery Systems Status – R6.3 2 Hour Test John Dumas and Jeff Gilbertson.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
GTBD Forecasting Using SCED to Produce Projections of Future LMPs Floyd J. Trefny February 17, 2011.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal NMMS/RARF Data Discussion By John Moseley, ERCOT, Network Modeling Group.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS 3 Early Delivery System Plan TPTF April 02, 2007.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 TPTF Update Trip Doggett.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Resource Node Locations WMS Subgroup Meeting.
Resource Registration Update Dana Showalter Patrick Coon March 4, 2008.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting NATF Sep 29, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS 4 Early Delivery System Plan TPTF May 22 nd, 2007.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
1Texas Nodal Update on Disclosure Issues, including NMMS/RARF Data Discussion ERCOT Staff October 27, 2009.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Text reason for Deviation from Defined High Sustained Limit/Low Sustained Limit John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
Reliability Must Run Resources for Summer Slide 2 RMR for Summer 2011 RMR Contracts for Mothballed Units ERCOT has signed RMR Agreements with two.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
1 Readiness Scorecard – Market Readiness Series Brandon McElfresh Nodal Readiness and Transition January 28, 2010.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
“Look Ahead SCED” Sai Moorty ERCOT November 28, 2011.
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
John Dumas Director, Wholesale Market Operations
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Presentation transcript:

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Private Use Networks SIG Paper Review TPTF Meeting (version :15)

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 2 Agenda Review key features of the approach Review previous comments and disposition Edit as necessary

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 3 Registration a)Resources registered at the PUCT as a self generator must be a “Non Modeled Generator”. b)Full capabilities of Generators should be provided in the RARF. c)LRL should be set to zero and HRL should be set to physical generator high reasonable limit. d)Ramp Rate curves shall be provided as a function of gross MW output. e)Load Schedules for each physical load shall be provided for each typical day type. f)Network data needed for NMMS should be provided by Resource Entity (RE). g)ERCOT shall submit NOMCR on behalf of the RE.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 4 NMMS a)Flag for PUN loads and PUN generators. The transmission elements, loads and generators of the same PUN shall be linked. b)PUN loads shall be modeled as non-conforming load based on the Load Schedules provided in the RARF. c)PUN Resource Nodes and Resource Nodes for PUN Resources shall be identified following the procedure to be reviewed by WMS in August. (First Fork Rule for PUN’s with only one interconnection.) d)Some “Non-Modeled Generators may actually be placed in the model. (For those “placed” in the model --- there shall be no Resource Node and the Resource will not participate in markets.) [Greater than 10MW and registered at PUCT.]

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 5 Mid Term/Long Term Forecast Module a)PUN loads served by PUN Resources shall not be included in the ERCOT Weather Zone load nor are these loads considered ERCOT load from any respect. b)However, if there is a net export from ERCOT to the PUN ---- that net export will be considered ERCOT Load.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 6 EMS Real Time a)SE shall use the telemetries at the interface points and within PUN (Gross MW, MVAR, kV) as regular measurements. b)SE shall use the estimated values of PUN loads to fine tune the PUN load schedules using a load adaptation algorithm similar to that used for the rest of the loads. c)In the cases where PUN generator and PUN load telemetries are not available, but the interchange telemetries are available, the PUN load is set as per the PUN load schedule as a pseudo measurement and adjust the PUN generation pseudo measurement to match the PUN load and telemetered interface flow. In the cases where the interchange telemetries and PUN generator and PUN load telemetries are not available, then the last good values are used. d)For the purposes of Bus Load Adaptation algorithm, PUN Loads shall be initialized with typical day schedules (provided by the PUN) prior to bus load adaptation. The Bus Load Forecast function should provide typical day schedules for both ERCOT Loads and PUN Loads. e)In the event that the PUN is a net load, the ERCOT load to be used in the SE (for obtaining pseudo load measurements) shall be adjusted by subtracting the amount that is exported from ERCOT to the PUN. f)RLC shall compute the LDL and HDL relative to net resource MW telemetry for each PUN Resource based on ramp rates determined by the ramp rate curves (ramp rates as a function of gross output) and gross resource MW telemetry.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 7 EMS Study Mode (Outage Evaluation, Power Flow Studies, Stability Studies. Etc.) a)Each forecasted ERCOT Weather Zone load is first adjusted for the net PUN load by subtracting from it the adapted PUN generation schedule minus the PUN load schedule. This adjusted load forecast shall be distributed among the load buses within the Weather Zone based on a set of defined Load Distribution Factors. This distribution process shall skip the PUN Load buses. b)The Bus Load Forecasting function shall use the typical day PUN load schedules as the projected PUN loads during both near term and long term study time periods. c)For near term study (less than 7 days), the status of PUN Resources shall be obtained from the QSE’s COP. In the cases where generators statuses data are not available from COP, it is assumed that those generators are OUT by default. The generation dispatch pattern shall be computed as designed by EMS so as to fully serve PUN Load by PUN generation (both modeled and Non-Modeled PUN Generators). If PUN generation cannot meet its own PUN Load, then ERCOT generation shall serve the balance. d)For longer term study (greater than 7 days), the process in a), b) and c) above shall be followed except that equipment status shall be determined by normal status and outage schedules instead of using COP data.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 8 CRR a)PUN Resource Nodes can be used as a CRR sink or source. b)Resource Nodes within a PUN can be used as a CRR sink or source. c)CCU Resource Nodes within a PUN can be used as a CRR sink or source. d)Logical CCP Resource Nodes within a PUN can not be used as a CRR sink or source.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 9 Outage Scheduler a)PUN shall report generation outages for PUN Resources in OS and COP. b)For “Non Modeled Generators” that are placed in the model, the PUN shall report the generation outages in OS. c)The RE/QSE must designate a TSP to report/schedule transmission outages in OS.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 10 COP a)Only the surplus that is available after covering the PUN loads should be represented in the COP. PUN Resources that are fully used for self-serving PUN load will have and LSL and HSL of zero. b)AS and other PUN Resource parameters should be submitted into COP as for any other Resource. c)“Non Modeled Generators” do not have to submit a COP.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 11 DAM a)QSE’s could submit Resource specific energy offers only for the portion of the unit capacity that is not used to self-serve PUN load. b)QSE’s could submit a PUN Resource specific AS offer in DAM and SASM. c)QSE’s could also submit DAM Energy Only offers at the PUN Resource Nodes and such offers are not Resource specific.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 12 SCED a)SCED receives current net generation and net LASL/HASL and net LDL/HDL. Generation-To-Be-Dispatched (GTBD) incorporates PUN net generation into ERCOT. The PUN Generation Resources are dispatched using real-time energy offers for net capacities of PUN generators. Resulting Base Points are sent to PUN units. b)Instead of real-time energy offers, QSE’s could submit net output schedules for PUN Generation Resources. If the QSE does not submit either an offer curve or an output schedule, then ERCOT shall notify the QSE and set the Output Schedule equal to the telemetered output of the Resource until a revised Output Schedule is validated (i.e. the provisions of apply). c)Transmission constraints for the ERCOT system will be enforced and will include PUN Resources as control resources. Constraints within PUN network will not be enforced by any MMS process. d)The DAM and SCED LMPs will be calculated in standard way for Settlement Points at both PUN Resource Nodes and Resource Nodes within PUN. The Real-Time Settlement Point Prices (SPPs) at PUN Resource Nodes are calculated as time weighted average of SCED LMPs because there are no physical Resources mapped to PUN Resource Nodes.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 13 RUC 1 of 2 a)All PUN Generation Resources should be represented in COP. RUC shall consider all Resources shown as offline and available as potential Resources to commit to resolve reliability issues. b)Only net capacity of PUN Generation Resources remaining after self-serving PUN loads is considered by RUC (as provided in COP). Therefore, PUN loads will not be considered by the RUC process. c)If QSE does not submit a DAM offer for a PUN Resource and the Resource is shown as offline and available, then ERCOT shall create a proxy three part offer for RUC purposes. For such a PUN Resource, ERCOT shall use 150% of any approved verifiable startup cost and minimum energy cost (or 150% of generic if verifiable have not been approved) in the selection process. Settlements would not use the 150% values but instead use the verifiable or the generic costs.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 14 RUC 2 of 2 (implications) –In the event that PUN generation is less than PUN load; this export from ERCOT to the PUN is included in the ERCOT load forecast but the load is entirely distributed to the ERCOT load. (Distribution of load not perfect.) –RUC Contingency analysis will not capture scenarios where a contingency causes ERCOT to serve PUN load since PUN Load MW value is zero.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 15 Settlements a)DAM settlements for CRRs, energy and ancillary services are performed in the standard way, i.e. DAM awarded quantities are settled at DAM clearing prices. There are no differences between the settlement PUN Resources and other Resources in ERCOT. b)The same rules and calculations apply for PUN Resources for make whole payments for DAM/RUC commitments. c)Real time energy settlement for QSEs representing PUNs is based on methodology developed for net-metering schemes. The EPS meters are located at all tie-lines between ERCOT system and PUN. The fifteen- minute settlement prices for PUN EPS meters are calculated in the standard way using the SCED LMPs and SCED Base Points. More details on net-metering scheme settlements can be found in Section 6 of the Nodal Protocols. d)The DAM Settlement Prices for the PUN Resource Nodes shall be essentially the DAM LMPs for their electrical buses. The 15 minute Settlement Prices for the PUN Resource Nodes shall be calculated following the approach specified in section Prices for the settlement EPS meters shall be calculated as described in Section paragraph 3.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 16 PUN’s a)PUNs shall telemeter flows at the ERCOT interconnection point (s), voltage at the interconnection point (s), and power output (gross generation output and net generation output with respect to serving PUN Load) of individual PUN Resources. Gross telemetry for Non-Modeled Generators >10MW is required. b)The status of each PUN Generation Resource shall be submitted to ERCOT through the COP for the next 7 operating days. c)PUN and Non-Modeled Generation Resource outages shall be reported to ERCOT in the Outage Scheduler. d)Transmission Equipment outages shall be reported to ERCOT in the Outage Scheduler by a TSP designated by the RE/QSE. e)Full capacities of the Generation Resources and the Non Modeled Generators shall be provided during the registration process.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 17 Typical Complex SCED & 3PO Mw Telm HSL LSL AS etc Resource Status SCED & 3PO Mw Telm HSL LSL AS etc. Resource Status DAM EOO CRR Bids

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 18 Combined Cycle Plant Slide 1 SCED & 3PO Mw Telm HSL LSL AS etc. Resource Status DAM EOO CRR Bids SCADA Gross

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 19 Combined Cycle Plant Slide 2 SCED & 3PO Mw Telm HSL LSL AS etc. Resource Status DAM EOO CRR Bids SCADA Gross

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 20 PUN (with one interconnection point)

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 21 PUN Complicated

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 22 PUN Very Complicated Interconnection with ERCOT E P S E P S Line2 1 load Logical Resource Node Logical Resource Node PUN RN G1G2G3G4G5G6 G7

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 23 Picture #1 To ERCOT PUN Load Station Aux Load

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 24 Questions Questions ?