1 2. Focusing Microscopy Object placed close to secondary source: => strong magnification The smaller the focus, the sharper the image! Spectroscopy, tomography.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bio-optics & Microscopy (MEDS 6450) 11/16/2010 Presented by: Mathilde Bonnemasison Leia Shuhaibar Steve Pirnie Ronghua (Ronnie) Yang Neil MAA, Juskaitis.
Advertisements

NSLS-II Soft X-ray Undulator Beamlines
Soft X-ray Self-Seeding
BACKGROUND THEORY AND TERMINOLOGY FOR ELECTRON MICROSCOPY FOR CyberSTEM PRESENTATIONS.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Can the optics get to 1-nm? Hanfei Yan NSLS-II, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Microscopy Outline 1.Resolution and Simple Optical Microscope 2.Contrast enhancement: Dark field, Fluorescence (Chelsea & Peter), Phase Contrast, DIC 3.Newer.
User requirements Session chair K.Evans-Lutterodt Speakers: Jorg Maser N. Simos D.Arena P.Northrup C. Sanchez-Hanke.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
Fire Protection Laboratory Methods Day
Groups: WA 2,4,5,7. History  The electron microscope was first invented by a team of German engineers headed by Max Knoll and physicist Ernst Ruska in.
Ultrafast XUV Coherent Diffractive Imaging Xunyou GE, CEA Saclay Director : Hamed Merdji.
Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA
How to explore a system? Photons Electrons Atoms Electrons Photons Atoms.
Optical Coherence Tomography Zhongping Chen, Ph.D. Optical imaging in turbid media Coherence and interferometry Optical coherence.
Electron Microscope. Light Resolution  The resolution of a microscope is limited by the diffraction of light. Single diffractionSingle diffraction 
ERL & Coherent X-ray Applications
FLASH Experiments with Photons High intensity laser light in the VUV spectral region Harald Redlin; HASYLAB.
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. { Chapter 36 Diffraction (cont.)
1 REFRACTIVE X-RAY LENSES NEW DEVELOPMENTS BRUNO LENGELER PHYSICS DEPARTMENT RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY and RXOPTICS and (2013)
Trivia Question During the Strategic Defense Initiative (Star Wars Initiative) under President Ronald Reagan, which of the following futuristic weapons.
J. B. Hastings LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 X-ray Optics 1 X-ray Optics J. B. Hastings Beam definition Attenuators Slits Pulse picker.
Do it with electrons !. Microscopy Structure determines properties We have discussed crystal structure (x-ray diffraction) But consider now different.
Factors affecting the depth of field for SEM Afshin Jooshesh.
Introduction to Microscopy. Objectives Learn to use a compound microscope correctly. Diagram the path of light through a compound microscope. Name major.
Microscope.
Microscopy.
Effective lens aperture Deff
Fluorescence Techniques
Recent Progress in X-ray Emittance Diagnostics at SPring-8 S. Takano, M. Masaki, and H. Sumitomo * JASRI/SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan SES, Hyogo, Japan *
Ultra-thin Gas Jet for Non-Invasive Beam Halo Measurement Adam Jeff CERN & University of Liverpool Workshop on Beam Halo Monitoring 19th September 2014.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
1 Minimal focal length achievable with Be, R = 50µm at 17 keV => effective aperture : 295µm => best lateral resolution: 42nm (diffraction limit)
High Throughput Microscopy
16/1-13MENA3100 Probes used for analysis PhotonElectronNeutron Waves/particles UiOIFE Wave length Monochromatic Amplitude and phase Coherence.
Tutorial on Computational Optical Imaging University of Minnesota September David J. Brady Duke University
Eusoballoon optics test Baptiste Mot, Gilles Roudil, Camille Catalano, Peter von Ballmoos Test configuration Calibration of the light beam Exploration.
Microscopes The invention of the microscope in the 17 th century led to the discovery of the cell. Robert Hooke described cells using this light microscope.
NANO 225 Micro/NanoFabrication Electron Microscopes 1.
Miyasaka Lab. Ikegami Takahiro 100nm Ke Xu, H. P. Babcock, X. Zhuang, Nature Methods, 2012, 9, 185–188. Sub-diffraction limited point spread function achieved.
IFAE-ALBA Meeting, December 13 th 2012BL24 - CIRCE 1 of 13 BL 24 – CIRCE Photoelectron spectroscopy and microscopy.
NANO 230 Micro/Nano Characterization
SEM- Schematic Overview. Electron Detection Tungsten Filament Electron Source.
Due to the oscillating charge in the antenna Along this line one does not observe any acceleration Radiation from a dipole-antenna To get the dimension.
Commissioning of the CMCF 08ID-1 Beamline. Light in the Optical Hutch September 2005 Light at the entrance to the white beam slits (42 m). The rectangular.
Tutorial on Computational Optical Imaging University of Minnesota September David J. Brady Duke University
Chris Hall Monash Centre for Synchrotron Science Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
A users viewpoint: absorption spectroscopy at a synchrotron Frithjof Nolting.
Proposed NSLS X13B Microdiffraction Instrument Source & Optics James M. Ablett National Synchrotron Light Source.
ACTINIC MASK IMAGING: TAKING A SHARP LOOK AT NEXT GENERATION PHOTOMASKS Semiconductor High-NA actinic Reticle Review Project Markus Benk, Antoine Wojdyla,
Coherent X-ray Diffraction (CXD) X-ray imaging of non periodic objects.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Lonny Berman EFAC May 10 th 2007 ID Beamline Optics and Damping Wigglers.
IPBSM Operation 11th ATF2 Project Meeting Jan. 14, 2011 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California Y. Yamaguchi, M.Oroku, Jacqueline Yan.
For off-center points on screen, Fresnel zones on aperture are displaced …harder to “integrate” mentally. When white and black areas are equal, light at.
Date of download: 5/27/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Schematic of the light path. The galvo scanners are mounted above periscopes.
Designing a Microscopy Experiment Kurt Thorn, PhD Director, Image from Susanne Rafelski, Marshall lab.
Highlights of science of USR Yuhui Dong BSRF, IHEP, CAS 2012/10/29.
Do it with electrons !. Microscopy Structure determines properties We have discussed crystal structure (x-ray diffraction) But consider now different.
Microscopy.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Through-the-objective TIRF creates the evanescent field on the aqueous side of the.
Strictly confidential Introduction to Lenses 07/28/2015: 2014 Applied Core Technology Inc., All Rights Introduction to lenses.
Microscope.
SPARCLAB: PW-class Ti:Sa laser+SPARC
Laboratory equipment Lecture (3).
location of refraction beam Maximum value of magnetic flux density
NANO 230 Micro/NanoFabrication
TEM and SEM.
Do it with electrons !.
Scalar theory of diffraction
Iterative Phase Retrieval (Jianwei Miao & David Sayre)
Presentation transcript:

1 2. Focusing Microscopy Object placed close to secondary source: => strong magnification The smaller the focus, the sharper the image! Spectroscopy, tomography large depth of field scanning beam over sample (diffraction, SAXS, XAS, fluorescence…)

2 Small focus requires 1. small source 2. long distance L 1 source-lens 3. small focal length and large effective aperture of lens

3 a. FOCUSING with rotationally parabolic Be lenses ( R = 1500µm) Image of the ID18 source at ESRF eV 39 Be lenses R = 1500µm f = m geometric aperture: 2.5mm (A. Chumakov ESRF)

4 Intensity profile in the horizontal: ID18 well fitted by a Gaussian with 239 µm FWHM (very low background in the wings)

5 b. Focusing with Be lens at energies as low as 2keV ID12 at ESRF (A. Rogalev) gain in intensity on sample at 2 keV: factor 500 compared to situation without lens!

6 c. Prefocusing with linear lenses Be, Al and Ni R = 200 to 1000µm, length 2.5 mm * collecting more intensity * for making spot on sample more circular (on storage rings)

7 SEM image of linear Be lens (R=500µm)

8 Focusing with 2 independent linear lenses in cross-geometry Ratio of horizontal to vertical source size in storage rings: 20 and more =>elongated spot on sample Generation of more circular spot size by astigmatic imaging of source via 2 independent linear lenses in cross geometry Example: experiment at DIAMOND Light Source by A. Snigirev et al with 1D Be from RXOPTICS

9 B16 Si keV HR X-ray CCD 4 m 44 m from source 1D Be Vert 1D Be Hor 1.4 m 7.5  m Astigmatic focusing with 2 crossed, linear Be lenses Vertical Horizontal Crossed N=17 R=300µm N=17 R=200µm gain: 1200 L2 ~ 4m N=15 R=300µm L2 ~ 1.4m

Vertical focusing: Be CRL N = 17, R = 300  m L 2 = ~ 4 m Horizontal focusing: Be CRL N = 17R = 200  m N = 15R = 300  m L 2 = ~ 1.4 m Gain = 1200 Porous Si; 2.5  m pitch In front of horizontal CRL Astigmatic-Cross focusing with 2 linear Be CRLs 1D and 2D Fourier transform Profile: vertical horizontal 7.5 µm FWHM 7.5 µm FWHM Astigmatic focusing with 2 crossed, linear Be lenses I & A Snigirev, I. Dolbnya, K. Sawhney Collaboration with Optics Group at DIAMOND

11 3. Coherent flux * diffraction of individual large molecules, nanoparticles * speckle spectroscopy Illuminated area on sample must be smaller than the lateral coherence area at the sample position. Then all monochromatic photons are undistinguishable, i.e. they are in the same mode! * coherent photon flux is a property of the brillance B of the source and of the degree of monochromaticity * the coherent flux can at best be conserved, it cannot be increased by a focusing optic.

12 Example: ID13 at ESRF Be lens: R = 50µm, N = 162, f = 205.9mm, D eff = 295µm, d tr = 42nm L 1 = 100m, L 2 = 206.3mm geometric image of source FWHM S (µm) S‘ geom (nm) S‘ incl diffr (nm) horizontal vertical diffraction limited in the vertical !

13 Example: low-betha undulator at ESRF 1. Be lenses, 17 keV, N = 162, f = 205.9mm, d tr = 42nm L 1 = 100 m, L 2 = m 2. Source size FWHM Geometric image FWHM horizontal 120µm 248 nm vertical 20µm 41nm Image is diffraction limited in the vertical: => coherent illumination in the vertical Not so in the horizontal!

14 3. remedy for horizontal direction * insert a linear lens (prefocussing lens) which focuses only in the horizontal * the secondary source S‘ must have a lateral coherence length at the postion of lens 2 which is equal to the effective aperture of lens2. S S‘ Prefocusing lens Lens 2 50m

15 Prefocusing lens Be linear: R = 500µm, N = 55, f = 3.854m, D eff = 1048µm Image S‘ at b 1 = 4.168m behind horizontal lens lateral (horizontal) coherence length at position of lens 2: 295µm this is equal to D eff of lens 2: only the coherent flux passes through lens 2, the rest is peeled off. gain in flux (compared to no prefocusing): about factor 10.

16 Coherent Imaging (Ptychography) (see talk by F. Seiboth, C. Schroer) * illuminate sample coherently in a small spot by means of Be-lenses * Scan this microfocus over sample with overlaping neighboring scans * take a diffraction image on each position * overlap of images allows for reconstruction of the object when each spot is illuminated coherently  Our Be lenses preserve coherence well enough to give a resolution which is 10 times better than the spot size!

17 MANY THANKS To my former students, Anatoly and Irina Snigirev from ESRF Christian Schroer and collaborators from TU Dresden for many years of efficient and pleasant collaboration