RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS RVS Calibration RVS Calibration & First Look Workshop, Paris Mark Cropper.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GENIUS kick-off - November 2013 GENIUS kick-off meeting The Gaia context: DPAC & CU9 X. Luri.
Advertisements

Workshop: First look, Calibrations & RV standard IAP
Discussion of CalWebb contents M. Robberto (facilitator)
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 3/16/2012OVSA Preliminary Design Review.
FMOS Observations and Data 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
Near & Long Term Planet Searches (not a review) S. R. Kulkarni California Institute of Technology.
RVS First Look ( WP6200) J.-M. Désert, G. Hébrard, A. Lecavelier, R. Ferlet, A. Vidal-Madjar Institut d’astrophysique de Paris (IAP) Workshop RVS Calibration.
VISTA pipelines summit pipeline: real time DQC verified raw product to Garching standard pipeline: instrumental signature removal, catalogue production,
30 March 2006Birmingham workshop1 The Gaia Mission A stereoscopic census of our Galaxy.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Advanced Technology Center 1 HMI Rasmus Larsen / Processing Modules Stanford University HMI Team Meeting – May 2003 Processing Module Development Rasmus.
Introduction to Spitzer and some applications Data products Pipelines Preliminary work K. Nilsson, J.M. Castro Cerón, J.P.U. Fynbo, D.J. Watson, J. Hjorth.
Classification of Instruments :
A Preliminary Cycle 1 Calibration Plan for the JWST Science Instruments James Muzerolle.
TRENDS IN MARINE WINDS ADJUSTED FOR CHANGES IN OBSERVATION METHOD, Bridget R. Thomas 1, Elizabeth C. Kent 2, Val R. Swail 3 and David I. Berry.
Data Processing and User Software Ken Ebisawa (Astro-E2 GOF) presentation and demonstration.
This chapter is extracted from Sommerville’s slides. Text book chapter
Commissioning the NOAO Data Management System Howard H. Lanning, Rob Seaman, Chris Smith (National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Data Products Program)
Database System Development Lifecycle © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005.
Memorandam of the discussion on FMOS observations and data kicked off by Ian Lewis Masayuki Akiyama 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
The Gaia mission Data reduction activities in the UK Floor van Leeuwen, IoA.
The NASA/NExScI/IPAC Star and Exoplanet Database 14 May 2009 David R. Ciardi on behalf of the NStED Team.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
1 Validation & Verification Chapter VALIDATION & VERIFICATION Very Difficult Very Important Conceptually distinct, but performed simultaneously.
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
Ground based observations for Gaia 2001 : need to have reference stars to calibrate AP algorithms for Gaia i.e. stars with well-known APs that will observed.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
1 Workshop First look, calibrations, reference sources IAP – 24 November CU6 structure 2.Aims of the workshop / open questions.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
Swift HUG April Swift data archive Lorella Angelini HEASARC.
Data Management at Gaia Data Processing Centers GREAT Workshop on Astrostatistics and Data Mining in Astrnomical Databases La Palma, Spain May 30 - June.
© Crown copyright Met Office The EN4 dataset of quality controlled ocean temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses Simon Good.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Science instruments data pipeline G. Martucci.
Early science on exoplanets with Gaia A. Mora 1, L.M. Sarro 2, S. Els 3, R. Kohley 1 1 ESA-ESAC Gaia SOC. Madrid. Spain 2 UNED. Artificial Intelligence.
PVPhotFlux PACS Photometer photometric calibration MPIA PACS Commissioning and PV Phase Plan Review 21 st – 22 nd January 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock.
Multiobject Spectroscopy: Preparing and performing Michael Balogh University of Durham.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
GLAST LAT Project LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering Pat Hascall SLAC System Engineering Manager
1 Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Daryl Swade Archive Team Meeting June 16, 2014.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
Mountaintop Software for the Dark Energy Camera Jon Thaler 1, T. Abbott 2, I. Karliner 1, T. Qian 1, K. Honscheid 3, W. Merritt 4, L. Buckley-Geer 4 1.
RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics,
Distance Indicators and Peculiar Velocities Status of the 6dFGS V-survey Lachlan Campbell, RSAA/AAO 6dFGS Workshop April 2005.
Observations with AMBER  General overview  P2VM  OB preparation with P2PP P2PP / OB / templates Available templates for observation procedure Typical.
ACS WFC Flat-Field Changes Temperature change from -77 C to -81 C on July 4, 2006 leads to expected changes for flat fields. Are L-flat measures stable.
STIS Status TIPS, September 17, 2009 Charles Proffitt for the STIS team.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
Application of a Charge Transfer Model to Space Telescope Data Paul Bristow Dec’03
Cluster Active Archive Status of DWP Data Activities Simon Walker, Keith Yearby, Michael Balikhin Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Establishing by the laboratory of the functional requirements for uncertainty of measurements of each examination procedure Ioannis Sitaras.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
SINFONI data reduction using the ESO pipeline. Instrument design and its impact on the data (I) integral field spectrometer using mirrors brickwall pattern.
Markus Nielbock (MPIA) – Herschel Pointing PACS ICC Meeting #38 Herschel Pointing Summary and Recent Developments Markus Nielbock (MPIA Heidelberg) with.
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker
Institute of Cosmos Sciences - University of Barcelona
Database Requirements for CCP4 17th October 2005
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Jesper Schou Instrument Scientist
Laura Bright David Maier Portland State University
Presentation transcript:

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS RVS Calibration RVS Calibration & First Look Workshop, Paris Mark Cropper

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS Contents 1.Which parameters will be calibrated? 2.How will they be calibrated? 3.Type/volume of calibration data? 4.Auxiliary data required for the calibrations?

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 1. Which Parameters? Guidelines The aim of calibration is to transform measurements from the internal instrument system to a universal system (cgs/SI). Simply: all those parameters that are necessary to do this transformation should be included. Obvious ones easily come to mind – examples: –wavelength reference point –throughput as a function of wavelength –… etc. However, a complete list is more difficult to compile and depends on a number of other parameters, such as temperature, and others we may not realise yet  some flexibility needs to be retained.

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 1. Which Parameters? Guidelines (ctd) Also, calibration has to be practical and driven by scientific needs (no point in measuring something for the sake of it)  implications for the policy on sub-system level testing, eg. –information per optical surface –information per CCD etc. In-orbit calibration uses as a basis the ground calibration/performance verification, together with –calibration file structures –infrastructure (conceptual, harware/software systems etc.) –simulation and analysis software which it is sensible to re-use to some extent if this is helpful (but issues of information and knowledge transfer).

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 1. Which Parameters? Guidelines (ctd) Calibration has to take note of the particular circumstances for Gaia: –no dedicated observations will be made –all data will be taken in TDI mode –fixed instrumental configuration (very helpful) –the dataset will be very large  automation is required Calibration data must be sufficient to: –provide scientific data products –allow data to be combined on board prior to telemetry –provide long-term monitoring of instrument health …All of these considerations need to be combined in making decisions on which parameters to include.

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 1. Which Parameters? Suggestions Calibration items required – all of these are f(t long-term ) –photometric throughput as f(CCD#,y,) –AC line spread function as f(CCD#,y,,scan_law) –AL line spread function as f(CCD#,y,) –distortion map as f(CCD#,y,) –wavelength scale and zero reference as f(y,, t short-term ) –CCD bias as f(CCD#) –CCD readout and dark noise as f(CCD#,y) –CCD TDI flat field as f(CCD#,y,) –CCD blemishes as f(CCD#,y) –signal linearity as f(CCD#) –saturation level as f(CCD#) –scattered light/ghosts as f(CCD#,y) we come back to these later

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS Which Parameters? Suggestions (ctd) Many of these need to be known for each individual CCD (CCD#): this is particularly true for the on-board processing software. ? – is this also true for the ground processing? Data at individual CCD level is available only via diagnostic mode Could adopt the policy for ground processing that the science calibrations operate only on the co-added data. In this case have two calibration streams: 1.diagnostic mode data  calibration for on-board software 2.science data  science calibration (mostly via SGIS) Else - use individual diagnostic mode calibrations to construct end-to-end calibration ? end-to-end  detailed calibration ?

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 1. Which Parameters? Suggestions (ctd) On consideration, probably best to separate requirements and use two-stream approach: –ensures best compatibility between measurements for where they are required –may be difficult to combine the detailed information via the diagnostic stream to use in the science calibration NOTE however, –ground calibration will be responsible for both streams (on-board and science processing) –long term trends and monitoring will need to be done on both streams –cross checks will need to be made to ensure compatibility between the two calibration streams

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 1. Which Parameters? Suggestions (ctd) Splitting the two streams, then, on-board processing requires the following parameters: –photometric throughput as f(CCD#,y,) –AC line spread function as f(CCD#,y,,scan_law) –AL line spread function as f(CCD#,y,) –distortion map as f(CCD#,y,) –wavelength scale and zero reference as f(y,, tshort-term) –CCD bias as f(CCD#) –CCD readout and dark noise as f(CCD#,y) –CCD TDI flat field as f(CCD#,y,) –CCD blemishes as f(CCD#,y) –signal linearity as f(CCD#) –saturation level as f(CCD#) –scattered light/ghosts as f(CCD#,y)

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 1. Which Parameters? Suggestions (ctd) Science processing requires the following parameters: –photometric throughput as f(CCD#,y,) –AC line spread function as f(CCD#,y,,scan_law) –AL line spread function as f(CCD#,y,) –distortion map as f(CCD#,y,) –wavelength scale and zero reference as f(y,, t short-term ) –CCD bias as f(CCD#) –CCD readout and dark noise as f(CCD#,y) –CCD TDI flat field as f(CCD#,y,) –CCD blemishes as f(CCD#,y) –signal linearity as f(CCD#) –saturation level as f(CCD#) –scattered light/ghosts as f(CCD#,y) note CCD#

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 2. How will they be calibrated? overview In-orbit calibration needs to proceed in as automated manner as possible, especially as mission proceeds Calibration objects will be observed as part of the routine observations Ground processing needs a database (or database partition) identifying the calibration objects and what they are used for Standard ground processing pipelines will process calibration objects, after which they will be extracted and piped to the calibration pipeline for further processing Calibration pipeline will derive instrument calibration parameters Calibration files will then be updated automatically Instrument monitoring and alerts will be produced automatically

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 2. How will they be calibrated? science data stream Calibration objects will be: 1.objects identified a priori by humans as suitable calibrators 2.objects identified by the Gaia-RVS processing itself (SGIS) A mixture of both is required, using the SGIS approach for the major (self) calibration, and the external calibrators used to provide zero points/references to the SGIS calibrations In any case, suitable calibrators will need to be identified before launch, and this may require specific observations from other telescopes In the SGIS approach, suitable robust techniques will also need to be identified – this will take place when the data centres are established post the ESA-AO.

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 2. How will they be calibrated? Standards will be required for –spectrophotometric throughput and out-of-band rejection –linearity of photometric response –radial velocity zero points –rotational velocity determinations –astrophysical parameter determinations (T eff, log(g) etc.) Suitable stable stars selected by SGIS will be sufficient to monitor –LSF in AL and AC directions –distortion map –dispersion law –radial velocity stability –spectrophotometric throughput stability

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 2. How will they be calibrated? science data stream SGIS works by monitoring the output spectra from the single-transit pipelines –bright stars, but not too bright to induce non-linearity/saturation –range of appropriate types (F, G, K) - may be useful to have input from photometry to select SGIS then selects a subset of those which produce a consistent wavelength, throughput, position etc. parameters Note these are not constant parameters, as there will be drifts at some level, particularly on the wavelength scale. SGIS will need to allow for and track parameter changes in order for consistent sample to be selected  some learning/iterative process?

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 2. How will they be calibrated? science data stream

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 2. How will they be calibrated? science data stream (ctd)

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 2. How will they be calibrated? science data stream (ctd)

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 2. How will they be calibrated? diagnostic mode data stream Diagnostic mode data has to be compared with co-added data from all 10 CCDs to –update the on-board software parameters/look-up tables –determine the additional calibration to operate on the co-added data telemetered from the RVS Sequence: –determine the calibration parameters –update the calibration files automatically (calibration database version control and management) –visualise the calibration parameters and provide tracking as a function of time –provide automated alerts for deviations All of this requires specific software tools (both manual and automatic) to be developed, and for the process to be overseen in some way by humans

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 2. How will they be calibrated? diagnostic mode data stream

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 3. Type/volume of calibration data Calibration data for the science stream will not add any particular telemetry overheads - these are normal observations Calibration data for on-board processing will incur overhead telemetry with the diagnostic mode data stream –data rate can be adjusted according to timescale that variations occur in the calibration –limited by overall telemetry allocation –priority when data is to be lost before telemetry? Additional volume will be required to host the calibration database and the calibration pipelines –SGIS –external standards –calibration for on-board processing –tools –status monitoring etc. TOTAL volume TBD

RVS Calibration Workshop, Paris RVS 4. Auxiliary data Auxiliary data is required for the processing of the calibration (and other) pipelines. This includes –instrument/spacecraft parameters (temperatures, solar angles, time, attitude, operating voltages) – these provide the correction for long-term and short-term calibration drifts –MBP/BBP photometry –astrometry from Astro –catalogue information (especially early in mission – astrometric positions etc.) –external standards (radial velocity, spectrophotometric etc.) Auxilliary data should include time history of the processing applied on the (calibration source) data up to that point. List is non-exhaustive – further thought required