TKAM Philosophical Debate Task 1: Quote Analysis Task 2: Philosophical Debate Task 3: Reflection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deeper-Level Discussion with Reading Street ALEX KINNEY CARIE TOMLINSON.
Advertisements

Reflection: TOPIC: Are people naturally “good” or are they forced to be “good” by social rules and legal institutions? INTRODUCE EVIDENCE: Why do you believe.
Socratic Seminar By participating in Scholars will practice academic behavior and language that will be expected in a 21 st century classroom & worksplace.
Socratic Seminars. We will end the year with an in-class discussion project called Socratic Seminars. We will use our class novel to get ideas for discussion.
Philosophical Chairs Speak Your Mind.
Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Facilitating Student-Led Discussions, K-12 Part 2: Developing an Age-Appropriate Teaching Rubric Cynde Snider.
EngageNY.org Highlighting a Module 2 Lesson: Secondary.
Socratic Seminar By participating in
PLANNING for High Student Engagement
Socratic Seminar #1 WHY ETHNIC STUDIES?
Standards  Writing  1.0 Writing Strategies: Students write coherent and focused texts that convey a well-defined perspective and tightly reasoned argument.
Writing a Persuasive Essay
Socratic Seminar #1 UNIVERSAL CONCEPT: ETHNIC STUDIES
Communication Skills Anyone can hear. It is virtually automatic. Listening is another matter. It takes skill, patience, practice and conscious effort.
Unit 2: Socratic Seminar
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
SOCRATIC SEMINARS HELP US ENGAGE A TEXT IN CLASS. THE THOUGHT PROCESS IS WHEN WE WORK TOGETHER TO UNDERSTAND A TEXT IT WILL HELP EVERYONE’S UNDERSTANDING.
Writing a Persuasive Essay
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
Academic Discourse Hand out Foldable Discourse Books and teach folds if not done ahead of time.
ACADEMIC CONVERSATIONS
Reflection: TOPIC: Are people naturally “good” or are they forced to be “good” by social rules and legal institutions? INTRODUCE EVIDENCE: Why do you believe.
Introduction, Guidelines, and Rules of Engagement.
ERIKA LUSKY JULIE RAINS Collaborative Dialogue in the Classroom
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
Prepared by: A. T. M. Monawer Success in EPT Listening & Speaking Reading Writing Listening &Speaking Reading Writing.
Setting Goals and Living Dreams
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Purposeful Speaking and Listening.. My goal for today  Engage you in a few different purposeful speaking and listening strategies that you can take and.
Socratic Seminar By participating in Scholars will practice academic behavior and language that will be expected in a 21 st century classroom & worksplace.
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
Philosophical Chairs. Welcome Sign In Introductions Parking Lot Logistics Materials.
1 AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. Philosophical Chairs.
Writing 1 and Writing 2—January 13, 2016 Journal #7: What do you think about ghosts or aliens or other supernatural occurrences? Do you believe in them?
Socratic Seminar By participating in Scholars will practice academic behavior and language that will be expected in a 21 st century classroom & worksplace.
Sept. 7, 2012 AGENDA: 1 – Bell Ringer 2 – Philosophical Chairs Discussion 3 – Envi. Sci. Pre- Assessment! 4 – Start HW: Discussion Reflection Today’s.
GLLATT. Get rid of distractions Look at the speaker Listen for key words and phrases Ask questions Think about what you hear Take notes in your own words.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Planning for and Attending an Important Meeting Advanced Social Communication High School: Lesson Seven.
Philosophical Chairs. Preparing for the Discussion Read the two articles provided by your teacher about a given issue. One article with be FOR the issue.
Do Now: Write the answers to the following question in complete sentence. What is the major difference between the high order and low order questions?
Argument Writing Evette Striblen ELA curriculum specialist Central Region
Philosophical Chairs Take out a piece of paper Set paper up in Cornell Note form Title page “Cell Phones in School” Take notes on important things in the.
Socratic Seminar Waiver Day Purdy and Snellgrove January 11, 2016.
California Common Core Standards Session 2 of 5: English Language Arts SOAR WITH THE COMMON CORE.
MEDIATION. What is your conflict style? How do you resolve conflicts? Are you aggressive (my way of the highway) Compromising (let’s work it out) Appeasing.
AVID Professional Learning
Journal Prompt Jonas says, “I thought there was only us. I thought there was only now.” Do you think that’s a good way to live?
Writing the Persuasive/Argumentative Essay
Philosophical Chairs.
Socratic Seminar By participating in
Expectations for a successful discussion
Lesson 13 I can participate in collaborative discussion and support my analysis of a text with evidence.
GLLATT.
Human Continuum.
Expectations for a successful discussion
Philosophical Chairs.
Philosophical Chairs.
Warm-Up: Take a ¼ sheet from the tan bin.
Warm-Up: Take a ¼ sheet from the tan bin.
Copy the following list of words and write their definitions: Obstruct
Fishbowl Discussion Directions:
D Self-Perception The way a person sees him/herself.
Copy the following list of words and write their definitions: Obstruct
D Impartial Neutral, fair, on neither side.
AVID Standard 2.8 Refine oral language skills
Academic Conversations
-Take out a sheet of paper -Fold it in half -On the top of the left hand side write POSITIVE -On the top of the right hand side write NEGATIVE.
In this PowerPoint… TVFS Shared Inquiry and Reflection.
Presentation transcript:

TKAM Philosophical Debate Task 1: Quote Analysis Task 2: Philosophical Debate Task 3: Reflection

College & Career Readiness Anchor Standards Read closely to determine what the text says and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from text. Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.

Other people’s words can help us understand the world better. 1.Read the quotation below 3 times to yourself and then once to someone sitting next to you. “ …[Y]ou must try to behave like the little lady and gentlemen that you are. She wants to talk to you about the family and what it’s meant to Maycomb County through the years, so you’ll have some idea of who you are, so you might be moved to behave accordingly… ” (Lee 136). 2.Explain the quote to your partner using the sentence frame: Atticus is saying that… TKAM Quote Analysis

TKAM Quote Analysis continued… 3.“ …[Y]ou must try to behave like the little lady and gentlemen that you are. She wants to talk to you about the family and what it’s meant to Maycomb County through the years, so you’ll have some idea of who you are, so you might be moved to behave accordingly… ” (Lee 136). 4.Using the sentence frames below, write an analysis of Atticus’s quote. In his quote about________________, Atticus’ perspective is that _____________________. This means that _____________, which is relevant to me because ___________________________________________________. 5. Get up, read your analysis to two people, and sit back down.

What common topics can we identify? List ideas on the board Here are some other ideas: – Expectations – Obligations – Social roles – identity – Social norms – Conformity

Vocabulary Awareness Vocabulary Know It Well Have Seen/ Heard It No Clue Identity Social norms Conformity Thumbs Up/Middle/Down

Vocabulary Awareness For discussion purposes, we will use the following definitions for reference… Identity is the distinguishing character or personality of an individual. Societal norms are the rules a group uses for appropriate and inappropriate values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviors. These rules may be explicit or implicit. Conformity is compliance with standards, rules or laws.

Task # 2: Philosophical Debate

Philosophical Chairs/ Debate The goal of Philosophical Chairs is to frequently engage students in a meaningful and structured debate on an engaging and controversial topic while teaching the skills of academic discussion and how to effectively support an opinion. Before we begin, let’s review some norms for the discussion…

Philosophical Chairs Rules of Engagement 1.Understand the central statement or topic and take a stand. 2.Listen carefully even if you don’t agree. 3.Only one person speaks at a time. 4.Summarize the previous speaker’s argument before responding. 5.Remember, “Three before me.” 6.Address the ideas, not the person stating them. 7.Move if your opinion is swayed. 8.Maintain order and keep an open mind.

Formal Register Students will: Chooses precise, academic language Respond in complete sentences Uses appropriate body language and posture for a formal, academic setting

Non-Verbal Cues The teacher and/or students can use these cues to redirect the speaker to adhere to the norms without interrupting. Complete sentence – Stretch fingers Elaborate – Keep going, moving hand Academic Language – Finger to mouth

Academic Language Scripts Students may use this handout during the discussion Expressing an Opinion I think/believe/predict/imagine that… In my opinion… It seems to me that… Not everyone will agree with me, but… Building on What Others Say I agree with what (name) said because… You bring up an interesting point, and I also think… (Name) said… I agree and I also think… Based on the ideas from _____ and _____, it seems that… That is an excellent point, and I would add… DISAGREEING I don’t really agree with (summarize point) because… I see it another way. I think… My idea is slightly different from yours. I believe/think that… I have a different conclusion/answer. I believe/think…

Agree or disagree People must conform to social norms in order to be successful in society. WRITE DOWN your position statement on a half sheet of paper using this sentence frame: I agree/ disagree that people must conform to social norms in order to be successful in society because…

When you choose a side… Bring the following items with you: 1.your ½ sheet with your position statment 2. your academic language scripts handout!

But first a few quick reminders… Before we begin, let’s briefly review the rules of engagement, the formal register, and the non-verbal cues. Now that you understand the expectations of the philosophical debate, you will now literally take a stand on a controversial statement. There is no neutral position so you must choose and defend the side on which you feel the strongest. The teacher is ONLY a facilitator. Students must drive the debate! And finally, let’s begin…

Philosophical Chairs AgreeDisagree People must conform to social norms in order to be successful in society.

Task 3: Questions for Reflection Directions: COPY and answer the following questions in complete sentences on a separate sheet of paper. Be sure to elaborate on your answers! 1.Did your opinion on the statement change during the debate? Why or why not? 2.Did your ideas on conformity change? Why or why not? 3.How did this activity add to your understanding of the novel as a whole?