Looking at our School—LAOS School Development Planning Initiative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Advertisements

Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Head of Learning: Job description
Head teacher Performance Management
David Taylor Formerly Director of Inspection, Ofsted
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Belfast Education and Library Board
Transforming lives through learning Profiling and Profiles Sheila Quigley.
Consistency of Assessment
Performance management guidance
Inter-Board Governor Support Programme
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
1 National Training Programme for New Governors 2005 Module 3 Ensuring accountability.
Professional Standards 2009 Suzanne Scott, Ph.D., IDEC, ASID, Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation,
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
Building Our Curriculum
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Teacher standards and links to curriculum and assessment.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 …continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director Caroline Lansdown – Senior.
Planning for Continuing Professional Development – A Whole School Approach A step by step guide to planning CPD including a framework for Teacher Induction.
The revised Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills Charlie Henry HMI Principal Officer Special Educational Needs and Disability Natspec.
Another New Framework Major Changes: No more satisfactory 2 strikes and you are out All criteria changed Very short notice No pre-inspection brief.
Nursery Teachers Day 1 Every school A Good School Implications for Nursery Practice October 2009.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
Primary Inspection Models 14 September Overview of today’s briefing Revisions to the overall effectiveness conclusion Revisions to the performance.
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.
School Self – Evaluation
Outline for the session
Self-Evaluation in Schools: Sharing the Experience NSPI Conference, March 2009 School Development Planning Initiative.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Understanding Teachers Standards. Objectives of the session To develop an understanding of the teachers standards To start thinking about the relevant.
Development Team Day 4c Disseminating Practice April/May 2009.
Middle Leadership Programme Day 1: The Effective Middle Leader.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Inspection 2012 The new inspection process.
DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Inspection 2012 The new inspection process.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
School Development Planning Initiative
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
External Advisers Conference Facilitators John Young Ken Mc Caughey.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
EMB/REO Making Use of Assessment Results in School Development Planning School Development Division, EMB February 2006.
WELCOME Challenge and Support. What is challenge and support Table discussion As a governor what do you think Challenge and Support looks like?
Irish Evaluation Network DCU September 2004 Embedding a Culture of Evaluation: The Whole School Evaluation Experience.
Principals’ Meeting September Agenda CASS model of support including: –Induction/EPD –Boards of Governors ESAGS Count, Read, Succeed Target-setting.
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Multi-grade Workshop Improving teaching and learning IPPN Conference 2008.
Clerks’ Annual Conference 2010 Clerking towards an “Outstanding” Governing Body Steve Telfer Leadership & Governance.
Developing classroom practice to raise standards Rosemarie Sadler, Primary Performance Adviser Val Phillips – Primary Performance Adviser.
Building Our Curriculum Louise Turnbull Head Teacher Livingston Village Primary School All for the children, for all of the children!
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Work Scrutiny Charlton Park Academy November 2016.
School Development Planning
School Self-Evaluation 
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Professional development
ETBI Annual Conference for Principals and Deputy Principals
Presentation transcript:

Looking at our School—LAOS School Development Planning Initiative

Outline of this Session Overview of Looking at our School 1. Structure 2. Use in SDP process Working with LAOS—example Workshop—exploring use of LAOS

Foreword – Chief Inspector  LAOS was prepared by ESRU of DES Inspectorate  To assist schools in process of internal review and self-evaluation To assist schools in fulfilling quality assurance obligations under Education Act 1998 To provide a clear framework for external evaluation by the Inspectorate  Education partners contributed to its development  School views on the guide are welcome in the interest of improving its usefulness

LAOS Towards school improvement through internal review and self-evaluation School context factors central School selects focus in the light of context factors Consistent with SDP approach….

School Improvement – SDP Process MISSION VISION AIMS REVIEWPrioritiseDESIGN Action Plans / Policies IMPLEMENTMonitor EVALUATE – self Adopt / adapt

Use of LAOS—SDP Stages Review – provides relevant pointers for broad / general review to select priorities specific / focused review of selected priority Design – guides Selection of relevant targets re selected priority development of success criteria for action plans / policy statements Evaluation – acts as prompt for questions to test “real against the ideal”

LAOS - Overview 5 AREAS ASPECTS of each area COMPONENTS of each aspect THEMES of each component for review / self-evaluation

LAOS Structure  5 broad AREAS of operation in a school 1.Quality of School Management 2.Quality of School Planning 3.Quality of Curriculum Provision 4.Quality of Learning and Teaching in subjects 5.Quality of Support for Students  Each Area subdivided into ASPECTS  Further broken down into COMPONENTS  For each Component, a number of THEMES are identified as a basis for evaluation

LAOS Structure THEMES relating to COMPONENTS of each ASPECT within each AREA of operation

LAOS Structure - Area 2 (Including selected theme headings) AreaAspectsComponentsThemes School Planning The School Plan Planning Progress Collaboration Prioritization Process Content of the School Plan Vision Policy Roles Implementation of the School Plan Implementation and Impact of the School Plan Action Plans Communication Targets Monitoring and Evaluation – Leading to Review Systems Consultation Development

SDPI Materials and LAOS SDPI Review Areas 1.Mission, Vision, Aims 2.Context Factors 3.Curriculum (including Learning & Teaching) 4.Care & Management of Pupils 5.Staff Organisation and Development 6.School-Home- Community Links 7.School Management & Administration LAOS Areas 1. School Management 2. School Planning 3. Curriculum Provision 4. Learning & Teaching 5. Support for Students Context factors to be taken into account

SDPI Materials and School Self-Evaluation (SSE) The Blue Book The Planning Cycle The Planning Cycle, pp Review: Purpose, Areas, Instruments, Outcome Design: Action Planning Implementation: Support, Monitoring Evaluation: Purpose, Instruments, Next Steps… Areas for Review Areas for Review, pp Seven areas, including Context Factors

SDPI Materials and SSE The Yellow Folder Approaches to Review Approaches to Review, Unit 3 Preliminary Guidelines Models Worksheets Approaches to Evaluation, Unit 5 Approaches to Evaluation, Unit 5 Preliminary Steps in Self-Evaluation Criteria and Evidence Self-Evaluation Tools

school management 1. school management school planning 2. school planning curriculum provision 3. curriculum provision learning and teaching in subjects 4. learning and teaching in subjects support for students 5. support for students Working with LAOS - Example Areas

Learning and Teaching in Subjects Aspects: A. Planning and preparation B. Teaching and learning C. Assessment and achievement Area 4

Assessment and Achievement Components: i. Assessment modes and outcomes ii. Record-keeping and reporting iii. Student engagement in subject iv. Overall student achievement in subject Area 4, Aspect C

Record-keeping and reporting Themes: (page 27) I. I.Recording & ease of use II. II.Monitoring student progress & sharing records III. III.Students with special educational needs IV. IV.Written reports to parents V. V.Parental response to reports Area 4, Aspect C, Component ii

Record-keeping and reporting: Themes I. Recording & ease of use How does the school record results? (What, when, where?) How accessible is information on results? How user friendly is this information? Other considerations…? Area 4, Aspect C, Component ii How well are we doing re this theme? Evidence??

Record-keeping and reporting: Themes II. Monitoring student progress & sharing records How is student progress monitored? What aspects of student progress are monitored? To what extent are progress reports shared with other professionals? With whom are progress reports shared? Other considerations…? Area 4, Aspect C, Component ii How well are we doing re this theme? Evidence??

Record-keeping and reporting: Themes III. III.Students with special educational needs How effective is liaison between members of the school staff in relation to the progress of students with special needs? How do we liaise with parents of special needs students? How do we liaise with other professionals? Other considerations? Area 4, Aspect C, Component ii How well are we doing re this theme? Evidence??

Record-keeping and reporting: Themes IV. IV.Written reports to parent What written reports do we provide to parents? Are the reports easily understood? Do these reports give a profile of student achievement in the subject? Is this profile of both a quantitative & qualitative nature? Other considerations? Area 4, Aspect C, Component ii How well are we doing re this theme? Evidence??

Record-keeping and reporting: Themes V. V.Parental response to reports Do we encourage parents to respond to school reports? How? How do we respond to parental responses to reports? Other considerations? Area 4, Aspect C, Component ii How well are we doing re this theme? Evidence??

School Development Planning (Using LAOS as a tool) Used selectively in SDP, LAOS may help guide: Focused review, by prompting a detailed survey within any area of school life Evidence based validation of existing practice Selection of targets for action planning in a systematic way, sensitive to the school context Relation of SDP evaluation within a planning cycle to general criteria for evaluation of the chosen area for development

Workshop In PAIRS: Select from the following shortlist of common priorities: 1. Pastoral Care 2. Extra-Curricular Opportunities 3. Disadvantage4. In-School Management Identify Components and Themes in the LAOS guide relevant to your assigned priority. Develop a set of questions that could be used for either a review or evaluation of your school policy / approach in relation to this priority. Consider how you could use the Components and Themes in Action Planning. In FOURS: Share your experiences of exploring the guide FEEDBACK: