LIGO-G010282-00-M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

FY 2013 Request: Total R&D by Agency Budget Authority in Billions of Dollars.

Advertisements

Open Campus Meetings November 7 & 13, 2014 RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM (RAS) Submission of Grants.gov vs. Non-Grants.gov Proposals.

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Construction Proposal Submission Gary Sanders LIGO Laboratory PAC 12 June 2002, Cambridge.

DOE/NSF U.S. CMS Operations Program Review Closeout Report Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory March 10, 2015 Anadi Canepa, TRIUMF Anna Goussiou, University.

Conversation with ACCORD on GSMT 21 January 2005 Michael S. Turner, Assistant Director Directorate for Mathematical & Physics Sciences National Science.

The Vision, Process, and Requirements for Creating EarthCube Presentation at Second EarthCube WebEx Aug 22, 2011.

LIGO-G W LIGO Laboratory1 Educational Outreach Across LIGO Funding source: »LIGO operations »IPSE proposal submitted in 2003 (pending) »Advanced.

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.

LIGO-G M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish LSC Meeting 19-Aug-02.

LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.

LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.

LIGO-G M GWIC16-Dec-02 LIGO Status Barry Barish GWIC 16-Dec-02.

NuMI Offaxis Costs and Whither Next Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.

LIGO-G M Status of LIGO Barry Barish PAC Meeting Caltech 3-June-04 Upper limits on known pulsar ellipticities.

October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.

AAAC Meeting: October 12, 2005 ALMA Update: October 2004-October 2005 Bob Dickman ALMA Staff Associate Division of Astronomical Sciences.

HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.

Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) DOE Headquarters Perspective Michael Worley Director, Office of Innovative Nuclear Research Office of Nuclear Energy.

MREFC Process Mark Coles Deputy Director, Large Facility Projects Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management NSF June 12, 2006.

NCAR Annual Budget Review October 8, 2007 Tim Killeen NCAR Director.

LSC General Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 UWM Data Analysis Facility LSC General Meeting, August.

AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting P. Pile 27 Jan 2005 AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting 27 Jan 2005 Useful Links: RSVP Project : C-AD.

LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.

G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.

Kelly Miller, DODD Service and Support Administration rule OAC 5123: OACB - SSA Forum August 28, 2013.

LSC – Hanford 16 th - 19 th August 2004 The View from NSF Changes in NSF leadership Funding Interagency Working Group response to Q2C Outreach - New $5M.

August 13, 2014 Information Technologies & Resources.

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO MREFC (Construction) Proposal Submission Gary Sanders Caltech/LIGO November 2001.

John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.

“From the Ground Up: Balancing the NSF Astronomy Program” Senior Review Major Recommendations November 2006 Implications for GSMT.

 Population: 45,578  Median Household Income: $54,871  Persons below poverty level: 8.3%  Housing Units: 27,925  Homeownership rate: 78.8%  Persons.

LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.

LIGO-G M Management and Operation Plans/Budget Stan Whitcomb NSF Annual Review 8 November 2004 Caltech.

SPORT CLUB COUNCIL MEETING 3/26/2014. SHENK SCHEDULE.

LIGO-G M Summary Remarks: Management of LIGO Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology NRC Committee on Organization and Management of Research.

CARRUTHERS LSC 3/20/06 1 LIGO-G M The View from NSF Tom Carruthers LIGO Program Officer National Science Foundation (703)

U.S. Muon Accelerator Program: MICE Milestones & Resource-Loaded Schedule M. A. Palmer, Director October 31, 2012.

LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.

LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.

BUDGET MESSAGE 2009 Salem-Keizer Public Schools. Our Values  Minimize the impact on students.  Provide security for our employees by saving jobs as.

1 Douglas Hudgins Exoplanet Exploration Program Scientist Presentation to ExoPAG#8, Denver Colorado October 5, 2013.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CF FY09 Work Plan & Schedule Martin Fallier, Conventional Facilities Division Director CFAC Review March 10-11, 2009.

LSC - Hanford, WA 19–22 August 2002 The View from NSF GP Funding FY 2002 NSF Funding Prospects FY 2003 Funding Opportunities for GWP Some Areas of Special.

9/2/2004 TB Strategy J. Yu 1 LC Test Beam Funding and Strategy Large number of detector R&D groups made great progress Technology decision provides great.

February 26, 2001LIGO-G B-P1 LIGO Future Operations (FY ) Budgets, Schedules, and Milestones NSF Review February 26, 2000 Hanford, Washington.

Presentation to Board June 17, 2008 Presented by: J. A. Sabo, Associate Director – Leading Services & Treasurer of the Board BUDGET York Catholic.

LIGO-G M Collaboration With Virgo Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Baton Rouge March, 2001.

Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.

LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.

Plan to go forward Peter Wilson SBN Program Coordinator 27 September 2014.

LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.

The Implementation Process1 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 Revising the Implementation Process Looking Forward, setting the stage for the panel discussion Hendrik.

LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC1 The View from DOE Moving ForwardMoving Forward HEPAPHEPAP FY08 “in review”FY08 “in review”

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Construction Proposal Submission Gary Sanders LIGO Laboratory LSC Meeting August 2002, Hanford.

LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.

DOE Review of LARP – Feb 17-18, 2014 DOE Critical Decision Process Ruben Carcagno February 17,

LIGO-G M Managing LIGO: Lessons for a Collaboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech NEES Awardees Meeting NSF, December 19, 2001.

G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.

West Contra Costa USD General Obligation Bond Program Status Presentation to the Facilities Subcommittee June 11, 2013.

Status of the MICE Construction Project

Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005

Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Hanford 15 August 2005

The Next Generation: Advanced LIGO

Preliminary Project Execution Plan

Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001

LIGO-G M Ancient History 1997 – 1998 Lab and LSC R&D Proposals »Advanced R&D funding initiated by NSF November 1998 LSC White Paper November 1999 LSC White Paper and LIGO II Conceptual Project Book »Peoples’ Panel review favorable »NSF decision to support R&D from program funds prior to construction funding  R&D program organized with a recognized reference design and schedule »International partnership

LIGO-G M LIGO Renewal Proposal Background Submitted by Lab in December 2000 but closely coordinated with LSC Included » operation of LIGO I detectors and observational science » and absorbed advanced R&D activity into the same proposal R&D program took most subsystems of Advanced LIGO through prototypes and to Final Design –Some long lead time purchases were included –Major equipment funding for collaborative LSC work was included Assumed R&D would take us to readiness for construction funding in FY2004 and installation in 2006

LIGO-G M LIGO Renewal Proposal Review Funding requested was an increase over prior level Separate reviews held of LIGO operations and R&D Combined review extremely positive and also positive on balance between R&D and operations Bush administration requests poor NSF budget and stops new NSF construction starts (MRE projects) LIGO renewal funding increase put under pressure due to proposed budget levels Submission of Advanced LIGO MRE construction proposal for 2004 start put under pressure from Bush logjam

LIGO-G M Working Plan for Advanced LIGO MRE Submission Assumed 2004 funding start Conservative assumption has been submission this fall »NSF review in winter »NSF MRE panel review in early 2002 »NSF Director’s Review Board in spring 2002 »NSB review by fall 2002 for 2004 budget inclusion Work required by us »Update proposal »Detail the cost estimate »Adjust scope to account for costs and scientific reach

LIGO-G M What Have We Been Doing Lately? Emphasis placed on LIGO renewal proposal »Clean separation maintained between this proposal and advocacy of MRE project R&D program has been proceeding »Lot’s of good progress, some delays »Desire to minimize LIGO I impacts Cost estimate development has moved forward »SEI, SUS, PSL, COC, IO, AOS detailing and/or reviews have been held »Cost estimates are coming in quite high We are not ready to confront scope decisions »Number of interferometers »Trimming features to control costs

LIGO-G M Today’s Perspective Last week’s positive NSB action on renewal puts uncertainty behind us Lab definition of initiating Science Run helps focus efforts Congress appears to be more supportive of NSF »Funding likely to be higher »MRE logjam reduced but not eliminated »NSF facing definition of MRE program and facility management

LIGO-G M Forward Strategy Use new definition of funding level to take a new look at R&D schedule Complete cost estimate and scrub by year end »Adjust scope and schedule together with LSC Coordinate NSF review plan with NSF Decision on submission later in the year Produce science with LIGO I It is most important that we now move beyond the positive decision on the renewal proposal to educate the NSF leadership, the NSB and Congress on the long term perspective for the LIGO program