Exxon Valdez oil spill [EVOS] legacy: Synthesis of long-term ecosystem responses Riki Ott, Charles H. “Pete” Peterson & Stanley “Jeep” Rice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Advertisements

Environmental impacts of incidents SPEAKER NAME SPEAKER APPOINTMENT National Contingency Plan – Environment Group Training.
CEDA DREDGING DAYS 2008 ECOSYSTEM APPROACH AND DREDGING Frederik Mink Interel Cabinet Stewart.
Tide Pools By: Cianna Palomino & Alex Atkins Alex Atkins.
WORLDWIDE INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT First meta-analysis of systemic pesticides - neonics 800 peer reviewed publications 29 independent scientists Environmental.
Title Page. State of Alaska Site of Exxon Valdex oil spill State of Alaska Location of the Exxon Valdex oil spill in the state of Alaska.
Ecology of a Rocky Shore Community. Zones of Life along a Rocky Shore Why are some animals and plants located in special zones and not all over? Why are.
Rocky Shore1 Intertidal Communities Rocky Shore Communities.
Lecture 8 – INTERTIDAL - ZONATION PHYSICAL FACTORS.
Marine Habitats and Communities. Main Concepts – Marine Habitats  Physical environment where community of organisms live is called a habitat.  Combination.
Between the Tides %20jolla&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&oe=UTF- 8&startIndex=&startPage=1&um=1&hl=en&ie=UTF-
Lecture 20 Competition and Predation 1) Review: intertidal zonation 2) Causes of zonation -Physical and biological factors -Temperature and desiccation.
Survival and Diversity
Marine Ecology Shipley’s Marine Biology.   Ecology is the interaction between organisms and their environment.  These interactions affect the survival.
Factors affecting Rocky Intertidal Zonation Patterns Intertidal Zones – Immersion in seawater – Emmersion in Air – Tidal Patterns Biobands of intertidal.
Oil Spills Jen Gollehon and Lindsey Poage Lindsey Poage.
Basic Ecological Concepts and Terms Session 2: Rocky Shores Coastal Hazards Management Course Slide 2.1 Basic Ecological Concepts and Terms habitat ecosystem.
Chapter 8 Temperate Coastal Seas More than 90% of marine animals are benthic, living in close association with the seafloor, at the interface with the.
Oil Spill Effects on Environment and Wildlife
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint ® Lecture Presentations for Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell.
1 Introduction Ecologists usually define a population as… – Characterized by the number of individuals and their density. Additional characteristics of.
Ecosystem (Rocky Shore)
Part 3: Chronic effects of decade-long contamination of key shoreline habitats and indirect interactions are important.
Lingering Exxon Valdez Oil Remains the Dominant Cause of CYP1A Induction in Prince William Sound, Alaska J W Short, S D Rice 1 K R Springman 2 C A Sloan.
Aquatic Science—Lotic
Contaminants and Conservation. Contaminant Impacts Key difficulty for measuring contaminant impacts is that most if not all systems impacted by contaminants.
Intertidal Communities
Functional Diversity and Substrate Composition Shape Primary Productivity and Decomposition Patterns in an Aquatic Ecosystem Methods Background The impact.
The Impacts of Humans on the Marine Environment
Marine Ecology of the Arctic Connectivity, change, and resilience Arny Blanchard Institute of Marine Science University of Alaska Fairbanks Oceanography.
Seagrass and Salt Marsh: Critical Coastal Habitats
Intertidal Glory Christen Foehring 11/12/09.  Area of the shore between mean high water and mean low water  Also known as the littoral zone.
Chapter 11 Between the Tides.
Direct effects on shallow sedimentary communities Enhanced hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria Reduced shoot densities of eelgrass until 1993 Reduced clam density.
The Impacts of Human on the Marine Environment Shipley Marine Biology.
INTERTIDAL ADAPTATION: Vertical Zonation Highest zones:a) black lichen on myxophycean zone b) periwinkle zone (gastropods) c) barnacle-dominated zone d)
- Aquatics - Presented by: Rick Pattenden Mainstream Aquatics Ltd.
An Introduction to Zonation
1 Succession and Stability Chapter 20 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
WATER POLLUTION Chapter 11. What is Pollution? 1.Describe water pollution that you have seen 2.Why do you believe that it was pollution? 3.What sensory.
CURRENT TOPICS Ms. Burakiewicz Conservation. Vocabulary Aquatic Biodiversity Conservation Coral Reef Ecosystem Extinction Endangered Forest Genetic variation.
Tidal Environments. A. Turbulence - wave action B. Keeps inshore waters from stratifying (layering) C. Causes substrate particles (sand) to remain suspended.
Long term monitoring of nearshore habitats in the Gulf of Alaska: Why and How? James L. Bodkin USGS, Alaska Science Center USGS, Alaska Science Center.
Lucinda Jacobs, Ph.D. Marine Sciences in Alaska 2006 Symposium January 23, /6 Assessment of Resources and Services Injured by EVOS.
An Introduction to Zonation. Rocky Intertidal Ecology Rocky - hard substrate Intertidal - area between high tide and low tide marks Ecology - the study.
Adaptations of Animals in Rocky Shores. Adaptations to resist wave action The crashing wave action against the rocks is an important factor limiting the.
Confidence in Assessments Workshop in Anchorage, Alaska 26 and 27 March, 2008.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chapter 18 Lecture Slides.
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity. The 6 th Mass Extinction Extinction- when there are no longer any of the species in the world. We are currently.
Between the Tides Shipley’s Marine Biology. What is the intertidal zone?  The intertidal zone is the area between the mean low tide and mean high tide.
Hala Nader, Alyson Pickard, Sam Shaw, & Jenna Thebeau.
Marilyn Latta North Bay Watershed Association Novato, CA June 3, 2011 San Francisco Bay Subtidal Habitat Goals Project.
Hazardous Chemicals Affect Living Things Unit C Chapter 3 Section 3.
Objective: Clean a simulated oil spill and evaluate methods. Catalyst: What steps in the Jardine filtration process might be effective in preventing oil.
The Intertidal Zone Sources used in the creation of this PowerPoint include: Fish 351 class website Online PowerPoint.
EXXON VALDEZ OIL SPILL. When and What Happened? March 24, 1989 the oil tanker Exxon Valdez struck a reef in Prince William Sound, Alaska creating a hole.
Chapter 15 Animals of the Benthic Environment
Global Change and a Sustainable Future Chapter 18.
OPRC Level 3 Termination of Response. OPRC Level 3 2 Outline Reasons for clean-up Options for clean-up Factors affecting the decision to terminate operations.
Environmental Issues Quiz
Puget Sound Coastal Geomorphology
Where is the intertidal zone?
Essential Questions What are three types of biodiversity?
The Impacts of Human on the Marine Environment
Natural Sciences Grade 7
Wave Exposure and Species Diversity
Chapter 11 Lecture Slides
Marissa Hackman Clay Steell Hannah Kienzle Jessica Browne
Presentation transcript:

Exxon Valdez oil spill [EVOS] legacy: Synthesis of long-term ecosystem responses Riki Ott, Charles H. “Pete” Peterson & Stanley “Jeep” Rice

Theme: Chronic effects of decade-long contamination of key shoreline habitats and indirect interactions are important 1994 EVOS oil, Prince William Sound, AK

Delayed, chronic, and indirect effects of shoreline oiling/treatment Treat EVOS as an ecosystem perturbation Capitalize on vast research effort Synthesis focused on shoreline habitats Contrast of NRDA based on old ecotoxicity risk models vs. field-based sampling

Assumptions about oil toxicology in 1989 Alaska's Water Quality Standard for PAHs was 10 ppb and provided conservative protection of natural resources Oil toxicity declined very rapidly in a matter of days/weeks Acute toxicity tests of lab animals adequately predicted risk Contact with feathers and fur was the only significant route of injury to birds and mammals Oil spill impacts could be assessed on a species-by-species basis with no regard for dependencies within the ecosystem

Contrasting terms Acute vs. Chronic exposure (= short- vs. long-term) Lethal vs. Sublethal impacts (= mortality vs. growth, reproduction, body condition) Immediate vs. Delayed response (= rapid vs. postponed) Direct vs. Indirect effect (= A  B vs. A  C  B) Trophic cascade vs. Biogenic habitat loss (= change in predator affects its prey, which affects its prey, etc. vs. change in an organism that provides structural living space for other organisms)

Benefits of EVOS field sampling approach Employs statistical sampling design Integrates responses across all mechanisms Includes chronic effects on long time scales Includes interactions of oil and other stressors Includes indirect interactions from trophic cascades, habitat modifications, etc.

Synthesis of long- term ecosystem responses Shows old assumptions of oil ecotoxicity to be inadequate Weathered oil persists Weathered oil remains bioavailable in important environments Weathered oil (multi-ring PAHs) induces toxicity during chronic exposure

Water column PAH contamination after EVOS Low (1-8 ppb) even during weeks 1-5 in 1989 Essentially below detection by end of summer 1989 using traditional water sampling But filter-feeding mussels revealed exposure and bioavailability even into summer 1992 via filtration of contaminated particulates

Persistence of oil Asphalts high on shore - biologically inactive Biologically available pockets in protected sites for >10 yrs –Under armor of mussel beds with relatively unweathered oil contaminating mussels at least into summer 1994 at study’s end –In groundwater of deltas of anadromous streams yrs later –In sediments among boulders on oiled beaches for yrs Transported on particles to shallow subtidal where elevated PAHs persisted until 1995 at study’s end

Is the oil still there? 2001 Survey Results: 91 sites with 9,000 total pits - 53 sites with oil - 38 sites without oil N

Distribution of oil 12 years later Upper intertidal Biological zone (lower intertidal) Oil below sampling grid = Yes How far down = ? Tidal zone (m) < 1m Surface oil (# of pits) Subsurface oil (# of pits)

Shoreline treatments Intense in 1989, 1990 summers with some extending into 1991 Invasive including wiping surfaces, pressurized washes with hot and cold water, bioremediation, rock washing, tilling, and berm relocation Had major impacts on shoreline habitat, plants and animals

Direct effects on rocky intertidal species Fucus removal - high and mid shore Limpet Tectura persona decline high on shore Balanoid barnacle decline Blue mussel decline Periwinkle Littorina sitkana decline Drilling predator Nucella lamellosa decline Main cause - pressurized washing

Indirect effects on rocky intertidal community Modest bloom of ephemeral algae in absence of Fucus competition and with low grazing Absent nearby canopy, Fucus spore arrival is limited and recruits desiccate high on shore Opportunistic barnacle colonizes heavily Fucus colonizing barnacle tests is uprooted Fucus expansion into low shore inhibits red algae unoiled oiled & not cleaned oiled & cleaned % cover Fucus Red algae

Possible indirect effects on rocky intertidal Potential induction of unstable cycle in Fucus cover as single-aged colonist plants senesce in synchrony 5 yrs later Reduction of biogenic habitat normally provided by Fucus and blue mussels impacts gastropods and smaller invertebrates