NCOA Leadership Immersive Training Workshop NCOES Interim Assessment Report John Sparks, Director, INCOPD 26 Jan 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using the problem-finding, problem-solving model to present this issue.
Advertisements

A Systems Approach To Training
South Carolina Education & Business Summit Greenville, South Carolina ~ June 27, 2007 South Carolina Education & Business Summit Greenville, South Carolina.
South Carolina ~ VTECS Workshop June 26, 2007 South Carolina ~ VTECS Workshop June 26, designed to manage Career Cluster & Occupational Analysis.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
LEARNER CENTERED LEARNER DESIGNED Learning & Preparation Objectives Learning Resources and Strategies Evidence of Accomplishment of Objectives Criteria.
Assisting Peers to Provide W orthwhile Feedback UC Merced SATAL Program.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Formative and Summative Evaluations
MSCoE QAO Orientation Brief
Literacy Textual: The ability to read and write Oral: The ability to listen and speak Visual: The ability to interpret visual messages accurately and.
Instructional Design Dr. Lam TECM 5180.
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
Instructional Design Eman Almasruhi.
Instructional Design Eyad Hakami. Instructional Design Instructional design is a systematic process by which educational materials are created, developed,
+ Instructional Design Models EDU 560 Fall 2012 Online Module November 13, 2012.
U.S. European Command EPOC-JTRE - 5 September UNCLASSIFIED Joint Individual & Staff Training (JIST) Program Update Mr. Tony Carpenter Dr. Ruth.
Purpose: Exploit science-based institutional blended learning methods and technologies to produce more effective and less resource-intensive Army training.
Learning and Teaching Technology Integration Dr. Brush Research Group
The Development Phase. 2 Lesson Objectives Describe the purpose of Development Explain Development Phase processes Exercise: Complete Development Phase.
1 School Counseling PowerPoint produced by Melinda Haley, M.S., New Mexico State University. “This multimedia product and its contents are protected under.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
ISMS Best Practices Workshop Initial Steps to Integrate HPI into ISMS Continuous Improvement CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. September 12-13, 2006.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Georgia Performance Standards Curriculum Directors Conference September 20, 2006.
Analyze Design Develop AssessmentImplement Evaluate.
Dick Clark, Rich DiNinni and Gary Rauchfuss November , 2006
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Teacher in Residence  Sign in and take any graded homework from your folders.  Turn in your TWS – Teaching Context and Unit Overview  Please.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Curriculum Development Process Dr. M
Purpose: To enhance IET and Drill Sergeant School training strategies and methods based on established science of learning principles and well defined.
+ Instructional Design Models EDU 560 Fall 2012 Online Module November 13, 2012.
By Mario Carrizo. Definition Instructional design is define basically as the person who teaches, designs or develops instructions. Instructional designers.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
COM 535, S08 Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations April 7, 2008.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
“If a doctor, lawyer, or dentist had 40 people in his office at one time,all of whom had different needs, and some of whom didn’t want to be there and.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Overview of Network Team Plan.  Deliverable Metrics are being finalized  Assessment of Network Team Deliverables ◦ Principals ◦ Teachers ◦ District.
Training & Instructional Design Assessment This material (Comp20_Unit6) was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and Human.
A community of learners improving our world
Individual and Staff Joint Training Working Group
MATERIALS ASSESSMENT AND TEACHING
Instructional Design Models
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Kansas Educator Evaluation
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
The National Diploma in Teaching Adults
Mathematics/Science/Health Methods for ECE/Elem/MS Teachers
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Process Evaluation the implementation phase
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Colorado Department of Education
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Batavia 5th Grade Band Program Evaluation
Quality Enhancement Plan
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

NCOA Leadership Immersive Training Workshop NCOES Interim Assessment Report John Sparks, Director, INCOPD 26 Jan 2010

Agenda Purpose Data Collection Strategy Elements Evaluated – Training Analysis – Learning & Instructional Design – Instructor Strategies – Learning-to-Learn (L2L) Strategies The Way Ahead

Needs Assessment Purpose Examine ways to improve NCOES instructor effectiveness – Are evidence-based learning practices used in NCO course analysis, design, development and implementation? – What root causes prevent us from using evidence- based learning practices?

Training Analysis Instructional Design Instructor Strategies Learning to Learn On-Line Survey Lesson Evaluations On-site Interviews On-site Observations Needs Assessment Data Collection

Element Evaluated Criteria: Job-Performance based Multiple expert SMES with recent (3-6 mos) field experience Results: Approximately 30% of instruction is designed without accurate task analysis data Root Causes: Access to SMEs is very limited Task content changes are too frequent to conduct analysis Workforce is not highly skilled at analysis and does not perform it often Military developers receive little or no training on task analysis Training Analysis

Element Evaluated Criteria: NCOES Course/Lesson Design Checklist (evidence-based principles) Results: Fundamental principles of instruction are not applied in most lessons – Lessons primarily deliver information to students, lack demonstration and opportunities to practice new information in job relevant situations Root Causes: Most courseware revisions are based on existing courseware design rather than on learning principles Military and civilian personnel are not aware of current learning research Training developers have limited experience with complex scenario development, technology and multimedia design Training is not available for training developers Learning & Instructional Design

Element Evaluated Criteria: Observations/NCOES Needs Assessment Instructor Checklist Results: Military personnel perform exceptionally well despite limited instructor training, short rotations, and limited knowledge of concepts, principles, and theories of teaching and learning, but…….. Root Causes: Military instructors are primarily SMEs ABIC and SGI are not enough; need additional training Instructors are not trained well enough for administrative functions (e.g. counseling, academic reports, etc.) Instructor selection process is not always successful Instructor Strategies

Element Evaluated Criteria: NCOES Course/Lesson Design Checklist (evidence-based principles) Results: Little or no awareness of L2L strategies Root Causes: Not enough training time to consider the bigger picture --development of lifelong learning skills Until recently, little emphasis was placed on strategies to become better learners L-2-L training is not available for instructors and designers Perception that it is the instructor’s responsibility and L-2-L strategies do not need to be included in the lesson design Students don’t think they are accountable to become better learners – Poor grades are blamed on the instructor or the courseware Learning-to-Learn (L2L) Strategies

Way Ahead Training Tomorrow’s NCO Corps IndustryAcademia

Contact Information Mr. John Sparks (757) DSN: Dr. Millie Abell (757) DSN: Ms. Roberta Sparkman (757) DSN: Mr. Gary Rauchfuss (757) DSN:

Backup Slides

Phase II Site Visits Include: USASMA Combat Arms: Fort Sill, Fort Benning Combat Service Support: Fort Lee, Fort Eustis Combat Support: Fort Leonard-Wood, Fort Huachuca, Fort Rucker Site Visits

Phase I Develop instruments Course/lesson checklist Survey Instructor observation checklist Phase II interview questions Pilot instruments Phase I Data collection/coding Evaluate sample lessons Conduct survey Phase I data analysis Revise interview questions Phase II data collection Observe instructors Conduct interviews Phase II data analysis Produce report Develop action plan Phase II NCOES Front End Analysis Timeline 9 Oct Oct 15 FEB 25 Nov 20 Nov 10 NOV 8 MAR 26 MAR Revise instruments 20 Oct Course/lesson data call 9 Oct 09 Pilot interview questions 20 Nov Produce interim report 25 Nov