LOGIC A Very Short Introduction Words We need to define words!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (1/2).
Advertisements

-- in other words, logic is
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
{ Introduction to Logic The two types of logos. Induction  Definition: compiling of evidence/reasons/ examples that support an argument  Example: “Wow!
Logic and Logical Fallacies A.P. English Language.
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Ch. 10 Eulogies AP World History. Definition: 1 : a commendatory oration or writing especially in honor of one deceased 2 : high praise.
FRIENDSHIP!!.
Logos Formal Logic.
MOMMY LEARNS TO WRITE BY LAURA HARRIS Once upon a time, not long ago, there was a working mother who decided that she was tired of her job. Becoming.
Me Talk Good One Day When Language and Logic Fail to Coincide.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Logical and Rule-Based Reasoning Part I. Logical Models and Reasoning Big Question: Do people think logically?
RESEARCH IN EDUCATION Chapter I. Explanations about the Universe Power of the gods Religious authority Challenge to religious dogma Metacognition: Thinking.
Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.
Deduction, Validity, Soundness Lecture II – 01/25/11.
Chapter 1 Logic Section 1-1 Statements Open your book to page 1 and read the section titled “To the Student” Now turn to page 3 where we will read the.
Syllogism Sarah Snell Frances Thorpe. Definition  Syllogism refers to a three-step deductive argument that moves logically from a major and a minor premise.
Formal Operations and Rationality. Formal Operations Using the real vs. the possible Inductive vs. deductive reasoning –Inductive: Specific to general,
The Science of Good Reasons
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
Who Defined the Study of Philosophy and Logic? ________,___________,__________ These three philosophers form the basis of what is known as__________________.
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
Logic in Everyday Life.
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
Making Generalizations. What is a generalization? A generalization is a broad statement about a group of people or things. It states something they have.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.
Ways of Knowing: Reason Reason. Cogito ergo sum Reasoning Deductive Inductive.
April 07, 2009 Humanities Core Course Today's Plan 1)Last Week? 2)Discussion Focus (Papers or Exams?) 3)Office Hours 4)Thoughts on Logic 5)Summarizing,
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
1 Introduction to Abstract Mathematics Chapter 2: The Logic of Quantified Statements. Predicate Calculus Instructor: Hayk Melikya 2.3.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
The construction of a formal argument
Logic and Reasoning.
Giving good reasons. When listening to others, we cannot concentrate only on our own feelings and reactions We must listen to what they are saying.
Arguments Arguments: premises provide grounds for the truth of the conclusion Two different ways a conclusion may be supported by premises. Deductive Arguments.
1 errare humanum est (to err is human). FALLACIES.
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.
Do you have any problems with your friends?
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
SYLLOGISM - FORM & LOGICAL REASONING. WHAT IS A SYLLOGISM? Syllogism – the formal structure of logical argument. Three statements - Major Premise, Minor.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive reasoning.
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
New Rhetoric Journal PDN: read the sentence below and identify what techniques the authors used to support their claim. Come up with as many techniques.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Distinguish valid from invalid arguments and sound from unsound
Philia Sophia The Love of Wisdom
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
WELCOME Chapter 2: Introduction to Proof 2.1: Foundations for Proof
Constructing a Logical Argument
Philosophical Methods
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
Introduction to Logos Logos as Reasoning.
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Logical and Rule-Based Reasoning Part I
Syllogisms and Enthymemes.
Syllogisms.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Presentation transcript:

LOGIC A Very Short Introduction

Words We need to define words!

Example: Jack: “I love you.” Mary: “Wow!” Mary thinks: Love means staying forever and getting married! Jack thinks: Love means I’m really attracted to you at this particular moment. Awkward.

DEFINE LOVE Some say there are four different kinds… 1.Storge – liking 2.Philia –friendship (shared interests) 3.Eros – romantic desire 4.Agape / Caritas – self-sacrificing love (desires the good of the other) All are forms of wanting.

Step 1: Induction Induction starts with experience. Over the years, I meet a couple dozen people from Omaha and they are in every case extremely nice and kind. I call my friend and she doesn’t answer three times. I didn’t think I would like books by Charles Dickens, but it turns out that I really enjoyed David Copperfield and Great Expectations. I thought everybody from the South was polite, but then somebody with a Southern accent rammed me with her grocery cart. Exercise 1: What is something you learned or concluded from repeated experiences?

Repeated experiences lead to INDUCTIVE LEAPS

Step 2: Forming Premises ALL people from Omaha are nice. NO phone-calls to my friend get answered. SOME of Dickens’ books are enjoyable. SOME people are NOT polite. Exercise 2: Express what you learned from repeated experiences as a simple statement.

A note about universals (all-statements): If it’s not inherent to the thing, it could be otherwise: For example: All squirrels are brown. There’s nothing about a squirrel that it means it HAS to be brown. When it is inherent, that’s different. For example: All material things have a gravitational pull. Gravitational pull is an intrinsic property of matter.

DEDUCTION Which now leads us to Step 3 in the reasoning process, namely…

Deductive Reasoning Based on propositions derived from our experiences, we come to conclusions. For example: All humans are mortal. I am a human. Therefore, I am mortal.

The Pieces of Syllogisms 3 TERMS Minor term, Middle Term, Major Term (Each appears twice.) 2 PREMISES (i.e., syllogistic propositions) Major premise contains the major term and the middle term. Minor premise contains the minor term and the middle term. 1 CONCLUSION Which joins the major and the minor terms.

Example Syllogism 1 Major Premise: All humans are risible. Minor Premise: X is a human. Conclusion: Therefore, X is risible. Middle Term = “human” Major Term = “risible” (able to laugh) Minor Term = “X”

Truth & Validity Is the conclusion of that syllogism VALID? Beings that laugh Humans X

Is it TRUE? Do we need a syllogism? Logic can be somewhat like grammar: 1. It reveals what we are already doing. 2.As knowing about language can make us better at using language, knowing about logic can make us better thinkers. Thus: Onward!

Truth vs. Validity Truth the correspondence of thought to reality. Validity whether or not the syllogism holds. Let’s look at some more examples.

Analyze these syllogisms: Some men are dishonest. Joe is a man. Therefore, Joe is dishonest All girls are kind. Mary is a girl. Therefore, Mary is kind

Enthymeme An enthymeme is a rhetorical syllogism. It’s abbreviated, and premises are left out. Example: “She’s coming from SCA, so she’ll be really nice.” What is the implicit syllogism?

The implicit syllogism: All SCA girlsare nice. Sheis an SCA girl Thus, sheis nice.

Questions? End of PPT.